Who Replaces Boise State in the WAC?
Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2010 9:49 pm
Montana?
Cal Poly?
UC Davis?
Sac State?
Portland State?
Other?
Cal Poly?
UC Davis?
Sac State?
Portland State?
Other?
FCS Football | Message Board | News
https://championshipsubdivision.com/forums/
https://championshipsubdivision.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=16188
The travel partner thing is overlooked by a lot of folks, Mike. But ironically I think the WAC would love to add TWO teams and jettison LA Tech.Mike Johnson wrote:Given that the WAC extends all the way to Louisiana Tech, one possibility would be North Texas, joining the mass Texas wagon train to the west.
But, I think if Montana wants to join the WAC, they have to be the favorite. But, I do wonder if Montana wants it. How long would it take for them to climb to the top of the WAC and really replace Montana? Montana would be a good travel partner with Idaho.
Interesting that your posters think TXST is no where near ready. If we're not, UTSA is lightyears away. They have basically no facilities on campus. Oh sure they have some but they're comparable to Little League venues.MrTitleist wrote:Texas State, UTSA (at some point, not immediately), Montana, SacSt, Cal Poly. I did a quick: What happens to the WAC now on my site: http://www.wyonation.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=2869" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I agree with Putter. I can see the WAC going after the Texas athletes.putter wrote:If we are talking FCS..then I think it is Texas St. They are building the football stadium and have solid support in their other sports, plus, they want to go to the FBS which is something that other schools have not 100% came out for.
I think LaTech will wake up and go to CUSA for geographic purposes which opens up another spot......
I also agree with Putter...I think the WAC will highly encourage LaTech to go elsewhere, and that opens up a spot for Montana.BigSkyBears wrote:I agree with Putter. I can see the WAC going after the Texas athletes.putter wrote:If we are talking FCS..then I think it is Texas St. They are building the football stadium and have solid support in their other sports, plus, they want to go to the FBS which is something that other schools have not 100% came out for.
I think LaTech will wake up and go to CUSA for geographic purposes which opens up another spot......
If they replaced Boise State with Idaho State the BSC IMMEDIATELY becomes a stronger conference than the WAC.SouthDakotaGrizzly wrote:Let's give em Idaho State.
Exactly .AZGrizFan wrote:If they replaced Boise State with Idaho State the BSC IMMEDIATELY becomes a stronger conference than the WAC.SouthDakotaGrizzly wrote:Let's give em Idaho State.
I wondered this on AGS as well - I'm wondering if the WAC is waiting, maybe even helping, LA Tech to find a new home before they move on expansion.AZGrizFan wrote:The travel partner thing is overlooked by a lot of folks, Mike. But ironically I think the WAC would love to add TWO teams and jettison LA Tech.Mike Johnson wrote:Given that the WAC extends all the way to Louisiana Tech, one possibility would be North Texas, joining the mass Texas wagon train to the west.
But, I think if Montana wants to join the WAC, they have to be the favorite. But, I do wonder if Montana wants it. How long would it take for them to climb to the top of the WAC and really replace Montana? Montana would be a good travel partner with Idaho.
Agreed. The WAC footprint is friggin' HUGE right now, and jettisoning LaTech would shrink it considerably and allow them to focus on somebod(ies) more centrally located...GA St. MBB Fan wrote:I wondered this on AGS as well - I'm wondering if the WAC is waiting, maybe even helping, LA Tech to find a new home before they move on expansion.AZGrizFan wrote:
The travel partner thing is overlooked by a lot of folks, Mike. But ironically I think the WAC would love to add TWO teams and jettison LA Tech.
Because if LA Tech stays then the WAC will likely try to bridge the gap between the rest of the schools and LA Tech, with Texas schools. But if LA Tech goes the WAC can look at multiple options for expansion including Montana, California schools, and Texas schools.
While the WAC is NOT as bad as the Sun Belt, there is something to be said for this. That's exactly why the Big West dumped LA Tech and SW LA.AZGrizFan wrote:Agreed. The WAC footprint is friggin' HUGE right now, and jettisoning LaTech would shrink it considerably and allow them to focus on somebod(ies) more centrally located...GA St. MBB Fan wrote:
I wondered this on AGS as well - I'm wondering if the WAC is waiting, maybe even helping, LA Tech to find a new home before they move on expansion.
Because if LA Tech stays then the WAC will likely try to bridge the gap between the rest of the schools and LA Tech, with Texas schools. But if LA Tech goes the WAC can look at multiple options for expansion including Montana, California schools, and Texas schools.
I'm PRETTY sure that the WAC footprint is considerably larger than the Sun Belt, given that Hawaii is in the WAC.SuperHornet wrote:While the WAC is NOT as bad as the Sun Belt, there is something to be said for this. That's exactly why the Big West dumped LA Tech and SW LA.AZGrizFan wrote:
Agreed. The WAC footprint is friggin' HUGE right now, and jettisoning LaTech would shrink it considerably and allow them to focus on somebod(ies) more centrally located...
I don't count HI; they're like a joker. They would skew ANY conference. Compare the Sun Belt to the continental WAC, and one sees how crazy spread out the Belt is. The only conference I know of worse than the Sun Belt in this regard is the Great West with everyone from the Dakotas to Houston Baptist to the suckiest program known to man, NJIT.AZGrizFan wrote:I'm PRETTY sure that the WAC footprint is considerably larger than the Sun Belt, given that Hawaii is in the WAC.SuperHornet wrote:
While the WAC is NOT as bad as the Sun Belt, there is something to be said for this. That's exactly why the Big West dumped LA Tech and SW LA.
Where can I find those college tags?MrTitleist wrote:Texas State, UTSA (at some point, not immediately), Montana, SacSt, Cal Poly. I did a quick: What happens to the WAC now on my site: http://www.wyonation.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=2869" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
CUSA: El Paso TX to Greenville NC, pretty damn far too.SuperHornet wrote:I don't count HI; they're like a joker. They would skew ANY conference. Compare the Sun Belt to the continental WAC, and one sees how crazy spread out the Belt is. The only conference I know of worse than the Sun Belt in this regard is the Great West with everyone from the Dakotas to Houston Baptist to the suckiest program known to man, NJIT.AZGrizFan wrote:
I'm PRETTY sure that the WAC footprint is considerably larger than the Sun Belt, given that Hawaii is in the WAC.