Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

http://www.championshipsubdivision.com/ ... -10182010/

2010 CS Top 25 Football Poll

Week 7 | 10/18/2010
1. Delaware Fightin’ Blue Hens
2. Appalachian State Mountaineers
3. Stephen F. Austin Lumberjacks
4. Jacksonville State Gamecocks
5. William & Mary Tribe
6. Villanova Wildcats
7. Eastern Washington Eagles
8. Wofford Terriers
9. Montana Grizzlies
10. Massachusetts Minutemen
11. James Madison Dukes
12. Northern Arizona Lumberjacks
13. Southeast Missouri State Redhawks
14. Montana State Bobcats
15. Western Illinois Leathernecks
16. Bethune-Cookman Wildcats
17. Chattanooga Mocs
18. Liberty Flames
19. Furman Paladins
20. New Hampshire Wildcats
21. South Carolina State Bulldogs
22. Robert Morris Colonials
23. Northern Iowa Panthers
24. Richmond Spiders
25. Georgia Southern Eagles

Next 10 receiving points
Cal Poly Mustangs, Grambling State Tigers, North Dakota State Bison, Sam Houston State Bearkats, Hampton Pirates, Texas State Bobcats, Pennsylvania Quakers, Elon Phoenix, Sacramento State Hornets, Jacksonville Dolphins

wasn't proud of that loss but did not expect to see Cal Poly drop from #13 to out?

How many voters in this poll?

Interesting, we beat a team 24-0 and drop a spot....

I think I would have actually flipped Delaware and App. State after this week.

JSU02 wrote:Interesting, we beat a team 24-0 and drop a spot....

I guess it really depends on who you think is better when it comes to it. That said I wouldn't have leapfrogged you just based on what happened at Texas A&M, even if I did think they'd beat you.

JSU02 wrote:Interesting, we beat a team 24-0 and drop a spot....

I believe I have had JSU #1 every week thus far.

TSN:

1. Appalachian State Mountaineers (111) 6-0 3,718 1
2. Delaware Blue Hens (28) 7-0 3,594 2
3. Jacksonville State Gamecocks (11) 7-0 3,419 3
4. William & Mary Tribe 5-1 3,293 4
5. Stephen F. Austin Lumberjacks (1) 5-1 3,164 5
6. Villanova Wildcats 4-2 2,988 6
7. Montana Grizzlies 5-2 2,594 11
8. Eastern Washington Eagles 5-2 2,520 12
9. Wofford Terriers 5-1 2,394 14
10. New Hampshire Wildcats 4-3 2,047 16
11. James Madison Dukes 4-2 2,001 7
12. Massachusetts Minutemen 4-2 1,854 8
13. Southeast Missouri State Redhawks 6-1 1,807 18
14. Bethune-Cookman Wildcats 6-0 1,592 23
15. Montana State Bobcats 5-2 1,551 9
16. Richmond Spiders 3-3 1,479 20
17. Liberty Flames 5-2 1,341 19
18. South Carolina State Bulldogs 4-2 1,283 10
19. Northern Iowa Panthers 3-3 759 22
20. Penn Quakers 4-1 625 25
21. Western Illinois Leathernecks 5-2 622 NR
22. Northern Arizona Lumberjacks 4-2 599 NR
23. Cal Poly Mustangs 4-3 584 13
24. Chattanooga Mocs 4-2 516 NR
25. Furman Paladins 4-2 462 NR
Others receiving votes: North Dakota State 353, Elon 329, Grambling State 319, Jacksonville 309, Jackson State 148, Hampton 144, Robert Morris 120, Southern Illinois 98, Georgia Southern 85, Colgate 63, Dayton 56, Sam Houston State 41, South Dakota State 32, Indiana State 24, Illinois State 24, McNeese State 24, Sacramento State 23, Lehigh 16, Yale 15, Southern Utah 13, Texas State 9, Weber State 8, UC Davis 7, South Dakota 4, Harvard 3, Tennessee State 2.

The two things I find fault with with the TSN is, NAU is too low IMO, and the fact that Robert Morris isn't ranked.

An obviously dominant montana team moves into the top 10.

DJH wrote:An obviously dominant montana team moves into the top 10.

An obviously envious uni fan cries.

mlbowl wrote:

DJH wrote:An obviously dominant montana team moves into the top 10.

An obviously envious uni fan cries.

The fixation is pretty silly, even if the sentiment has integrity.

Yeah, I forgot. I'm not allowed to comment.

Congrats on your dominant team. Clearly top 10 material.

DJH wrote:An obviously dominant montana team moves into the top 10.

Is this in reference to the CS poll, TSN poll, or GPI?

I don't think the FCS Now poll is out yet, but I don't think it will make you happy.

On the bright side, there are lots of polls, if you look hard enough, you can probably find one that will make you happy. If not, you can start your own.

mlbowl wrote:

DJH wrote:An obviously dominant montana team moves into the top 10.

An obviously envious uni fan cries.

Envious of a loss to an unranked Cal Poly, a win over a high school, the 2 worst teams in the Big Fluffy, and close wins over middle of the pack Big Fluffy teams.

Yup, UNI has a lot to be jealous about.

DJH wrote:Yeah, I forgot. I'm not allowed to comment.

Congrats on your dominant team. Clearly top 10 material.

It's not the comment DJH. It's the incessant commenting and bitching about one team. I don't know if you are familiar with TT and Catmom and the way they can hone in on one team but that is where you find yourself. As I said the sentiment is probably correct.

ToTheLeft wrote: Yup, UNI has a lot to be jealous about.

Yup, our ranking.

ToTheLeft wrote:

mlbowl wrote:

An obviously envious uni fan cries.

Envious of a loss to an unranked Cal Poly, a win over a high school, the 2 worst teams in the Big Fluffy, and close wins over middle of the pack Big Fluffy teams.

Yup, UNI has a lot to be jealous about.

They sure do.

Ursus A. Horribilis wrote:

DJH wrote:Yeah, I forgot. I'm not allowed to comment.

Congrats on your dominant team. Clearly top 10 material.

It's not the comment DJH. It's the incessant commenting and bitching about one team. I don't know if you are familiar with TT and Catmom and the way they can hone in on one team but that is where you find yourself. As I said the sentiment is probably correct.

I've honed in on the one team because it is the most obvious mistake in the polls, IMO. Montana is obviously getting votes on reputation this year, much more than any other team.

Just so happens that there are a million Griz posters here, so you all get pissy with me.

DJH wrote:Yeah, I forgot. I'm not allowed to comment.

Congrats on your dominant team. Clearly top 10 material.

Commenting is fine...but your backhanded whine deserved some cheese.

mlbowl wrote:

DJH wrote:Yeah, I forgot. I'm not allowed to comment.

Congrats on your dominant team. Clearly top 10 material.

Commenting is fine...but your backhanded whine deserved some cheese.

fair enough.

DJH wrote:

mlbowl wrote:
Commenting is fine...but your backhanded whine deserved some cheese.

fair enough.

Which is exactly what I was getting at. I don't care that you think the way you do about it. I just like to put some back on ya when you take a swipe and point out that you have had an envious obsession with Montana from your first posts on here. You have been making these same kinds of statements for the last couple of years about who we've played and the lack of a good teams and yet we were still one of the two playing at the end of the year. You also have it in your head that the MVFC is a traditionally stronger conference in spite of the fact that the BSC normally ends up above the MVFC in conference rankings. So you can see why normally you can't be taken seriously.

This year you are as close to correct as you've ever been but since you've poisoned that well long ago it is still seen as crying.

ToTheLeft wrote: Envious of a loss to an unranked Cal Poly, a win over a high school, the 2 worst teams in the Big Fluffy, and close wins over middle of the pack Big Fluffy teams.

Seriously, the Big Fluffy? Nice, Capt Original...you do know Liberty competes in the Big South Conference, right?

Ursus A. Horribilis wrote:

DJH wrote:
fair enough.

Which is exactly what I was getting at. I don't care that you think the way you do about it. I just like to put some back on ya when you take a swipe and point out that you have had an envious obsession with Montana from your first posts on here. You have been making these same kinds of statements for the last couple of years about who we've played and the lack of a good teams and yet we were still one of the two playing at the end of the year. You also have it in your head that the MVFC is a traditionally stronger conference in spite of the fact that the BSC normally ends up above the MVFC in conference rankings. So you can see why normally you can't be taken seriously.

This year you are as close to correct as you've ever been but since you've poisoned that well long ago it is still seen as crying.

I do believe the MVFC is traditionally stronger than the BSC. And IMO, that is evidenced, by the complete lack of success in the playoffs by BSC conf teams not named montana. Montana is almost always really really good. And they have almost always proven themselves in the playoffs. BUT, they have often benefited from a mediocre conf schedule IMO. Montana has won, what, 15 conference titles in a row? It hardly matters how good Montana is, and they will still win the conf. Not exactly the picture of parity for the BSC.

And as I said, my opinions on this are not popular here because there are a ton of griz posters.

But all that nothing to do with this year, as both conferences appear to suck.

DJH wrote:

Ursus A. Horribilis wrote: Which is exactly what I was getting at. I don't care that you think the way you do about it. I just like to put some back on ya when you take a swipe and point out that you have had an envious obsession with Montana from your first posts on here. You have been making these same kinds of statements for the last couple of years about who we've played and the lack of a good teams and yet we were still one of the two playing at the end of the year. You also have it in your head that the MVFC is a traditionally stronger conference in spite of the fact that the BSC normally ends up above the MVFC in conference rankings. So you can see why normally you can't be taken seriously.

This year you are as close to correct as you've ever been but since you've poisoned that well long ago it is still seen as crying.

I do believe the MVFC is traditionally stronger than the BSC. And IMO, that is evidenced, by the complete lack of success in the playoffs by BSC conf teams not named montana. Montana is almost always really really good. And they have almost always proven themselves in the playoffs. BUT, they have often benefited from a mediocre conf schedule IMO. Montana has won, what, 15 conference titles in a row? It hardly matters how good Montana is, and they will still win the conf. Not exactly the picture of parity for the BSC.

And as I said, my opinions on this are not popular here because there are a ton of griz posters.

But all that nothing to do with this year, as both conferences appear to suck.

Check the conference ratings at the end of the year in each of those years we've won it. I bet you'll be surprised to find that we won those BSC titles in years where the BSC was considered stronger than your conference. What say you to that? You can also look at how well our 2nd team in played the top team in your conference even when they do lose it was a nail biter. Then you can have our 2nd place team go to a highly seeded (#1) team and take them out at their own house. What say you to that?

If you want to stick with your line of thinking in spite of what has actually happened to prove it fairly unstable then I can't do much for ya.