QUESTION???
Posted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 12:14 pm
Do SFA control their on destiny for a 1st Round Bye??? Or do you guys think they could get jumped?
Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums
FCS Football | Message Board | News
https://championshipsubdivision.com/forums/
QUESTION???
https://championshipsubdivision.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=19487
Page 1 of 2
Re: QUESTION???
Posted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 12:16 pm
Why the fuck are you so excited???????????????
Re: QUESTION???
Posted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 12:17 pm
First round bye means being in the top 12.
Yes, SFA controls their own destiny for that.
To get a seed means being top 5, and it's my opinion that SFA also controls their own destiny for that.
So yes, on all accounts.
Yes, SFA controls their own destiny for that.
To get a seed means being top 5, and it's my opinion that SFA also controls their own destiny for that.
So yes, on all accounts.
Re: QUESTION???
Posted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 12:23 pm
For a bye? 100% yes
For a seed? They might need some help
For a seed? They might need some help
Re: QUESTION???
Posted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 12:25 pm
How would they need some help? I think they are in a good position.
Silenoz wrote:For a bye? 100% yes
For a seed? They might need some help
Re: QUESTION???
Posted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 12:29 pm
Seriously, you are one excited guy SFA Fan!!!!
I'd love to tailgate with you someday!!!! I've never done that many uppers before!!!
I'd love to tailgate with you someday!!!! I've never done that many uppers before!!!
Re: QUESTION???
Posted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 12:46 pm
Weakness of the Southland. The winner of the CAA and App State are pretty much locks for seeds right now. Then you've got Jacksonville State who will probably get one if they run the table thanks to the Ole Miss win. So then it comes down to Stephen F Austin, a 9-2 EWU/MSU/UM team, and a 2nd CAA team.SFA Fan!!! wrote:How would they need some help? I think they are in a good position.Silenoz wrote:For a bye? 100% yes
For a seed? They might need some help
So we're potentially gonna see something like this:
1) Delaware 10-1 (at-large)
2) App State 10-1 (AQ)
3) Jacksonville State 11-0 (AQ)
4) William and Mary 9-2 (AQ)
5) Eastern Washington 9-2 (AQ)
Or
1) Wofford 10-1 (AQ)
2) Jacksonville State 11-0 (AQ)
3) Nova 9-2 (AQ)
4) William and Mary 9-2 (at-large)
5) App State 9-2 (at-large)
Re: QUESTION???
Posted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 12:51 pm
I THINK HE COULD BE MORE EXCITED!!!!!!bandl wrote:Seriously, you are one excited guy SFA Fan!!!!
I'd love to tailgate with you someday!!!! I've never done that many uppers before!!!
WAY MORE!!!!!!
Re: QUESTION???
Posted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 12:52 pm
LIKE THIS?!?!andy7171 wrote:I THINK HE COULD BE MORE EXCITED!!!!!!bandl wrote:Seriously, you are one excited guy SFA Fan!!!!
I'd love to tailgate with you someday!!!! I've never done that many uppers before!!!
WAY MORE!!!!!!
We are such assholes sometimes.
Re: QUESTION???
Posted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 12:56 pm
Sometimes?
Re: QUESTION???
Posted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 12:58 pm
I respect you.Grizalltheway wrote:Sometimes?
See?!?!?
Re: QUESTION???
Posted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 12:58 pm
YES!!!!bandl wrote:LIKE THIS?!?!andy7171 wrote: I THINK HE COULD BE MORE EXCITED!!!!!!
WAY MORE!!!!!!
We are such assholes sometimes.
Re: QUESTION???
Posted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 12:59 pm
Too bad you can't change the to a larger number, like 4,000,000,000,000,000 or something like that. That would be a hoot.andy7171 wrote:YES!!!!bandl wrote:
LIKE THIS?!?!
We are such assholes sometimes.
Re: QUESTION???
Posted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 1:00 pm
bandl wrote:Too bad you can't change the to a larger number, like 4,000,000,000,000,000 or something like that. That would be a hoot.andy7171 wrote: YES!!!!
I tried.
This is the longest SFA thread not to include a Towson, JMU or female poster.
Re: QUESTION???
Posted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 1:52 pm
bandl wrote:Too bad you can't change the to a larger number, like 4,000,000,000,000,000 or something like that. That would be a hoot.andy7171 wrote: YES!!!!
A better question would have been, " is SFA excited to come to Missoula again?"
Re: QUESTION???
Posted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 2:26 pm
SO WOULD EWU BE A LOCK OR CLOSE TO IT TO GET A SEED IF WE WON OUT!!!?????
Seriously though, what does every one think our odds are if we win out to get a seed?
Seriously though, what does every one think our odds are if we win out to get a seed?
Re: QUESTION???
Posted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 3:15 pm
I think the committee would rather give it to a team that would get more than 10k for home playoff games. Seriously.Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:SO WOULD EWU BE A LOCK OR CLOSE TO IT TO GET A SEED IF WE WON OUT!!!?????
Seriously though, what does every one think our odds are if we win out to get a seed?
Re: QUESTION???
Posted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 3:37 pm
Hey, I agree. Then again, if we earn it... just look at Villanova last year.Grizalltheway wrote:I think the committee would rather give it to a team that would get more than 10k for home playoff games. Seriously.Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:SO WOULD EWU BE A LOCK OR CLOSE TO IT TO GET A SEED IF WE WON OUT!!!?????
Seriously though, what does every one think our odds are if we win out to get a seed?
Re: QUESTION???
Posted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 6:42 pm
ANSWER!
The SLC will be in and out of the playoffs before you can finish a good bottle of Jack Daniels. SFA may be ranked high but I'm afraid they, again, will be exposed when they go up against a good, all-around team.
The SLC will be in and out of the playoffs before you can finish a good bottle of Jack Daniels. SFA may be ranked high but I'm afraid they, again, will be exposed when they go up against a good, all-around team.
Re: QUESTION???
Posted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 9:21 pm
HAHA, I figured CatMom had something negative to say... Its all good i understand. All do respect, that wasnt the question i asked... I asked about our playoff seedings, not how well we will do in the playoffs. Hope to see you in Nac this weekend!
CatMom wrote:ANSWER!
The SLC will be in and out of the playoffs before you can finish a good bottle of Jack Daniels. SFA may be ranked high but I'm afraid they, again, will be exposed when they go up against a good, all-around team.
Re: QUESTION???
Posted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 9:36 pm
Not going to make the game. It's a long drive and I couldn't get a hotel room and I checked 6 weeks ago. Everything was booked. It's not a trip I want to do in a day. I'd have to stay overnight, as I would be doing all the driving. Just didn't happen.SFA Fan!!! wrote:HAHA, I figured CatMom had something negative to say... Its all good i understand. All do respect, that wasnt the question i asked... I asked about our playoff seedings, not how well we will do in the playoffs. Hope to see you in Nac this weekend!CatMom wrote:ANSWER!
The SLC will be in and out of the playoffs before you can finish a good bottle of Jack Daniels. SFA may be ranked high but I'm afraid they, again, will be exposed when they go up against a good, all-around team.
As for the seeding. It's a toss up. TXST was ranked 4th in 2005 and was seeded 4th. Sometimes the committee actually follows that pattern. SFA wins out...only has 1 loss and having been ranked in the top 10 all year....it would be biased (IMHO) if they seeded a 9-2 higher than a 10-1 (FBS loss) SFA. However, my playoff prediction still stands.
Re: QUESTION???
Posted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 10:37 pm
Attendance has nothing to do with seed assignments.Grizalltheway wrote:I think the committee would rather give it to a team that would get more than 10k for home playoff games. Seriously.
That being said, I don't think any Big Sky team has much shot at a seed. I'm guessing several teams would have to lose and/or a couple would have to lose twice.
Re: QUESTION???
Posted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 10:40 pm
If they have a choice to make between Montana or SFA for a seed I can promise you Montana gets the seed.Mvemjsunpx wrote:Attendance has nothing to do with seed assignments.Grizalltheway wrote:I think the committee would rather give it to a team that would get more than 10k for home playoff games. Seriously.
That being said, I don't think any Big Sky team has much shot at a seed. I'm guessing several teams would have to lose and/or a couple would have to lose twice.
SFA is only averaging about 9K per home game. IF push comes to shove the team with the higher attendance gets the seed
Re: QUESTION???
Posted: Tue Oct 26, 2010 6:15 am
Now I know you're lying.CatMom wrote:Not going to make the game. It's a long drive and I couldn't get a hotel room and I checked 6 weeks ago. Everything was booked. It's not a trip I want to do in a day. I'd have to stay overnight, as I would be doing all the driving. Just didn't happen.SFA Fan!!! wrote:HAHA, I figured CatMom had something negative to say... Its all good i understand. All do respect, that wasnt the question i asked... I asked about our playoff seedings, not how well we will do in the playoffs. Hope to see you in Nac this weekend!
As for the seeding. It's a toss up. TXST was ranked 4th in 2005 and was seeded 4th. Sometimes the committee actually follows that pattern. SFA wins out...only has 1 loss and having been ranked in the top 10 all year....it would be biased (IMHO) if they seeded a 9-2 higher than a 10-1 (FBS loss) SFA. However, my playoff prediction still stands.
Also, I don't understand all the hate from the other SLC schools is coming from. You're having a down year? Sad, but don't rain on our parade. Its my prediction that SFA will get a seed and win its first round. National champs? I don't see that with this team but they are very good and I believe they'll still be very competitive once Moses is gone.
Re: QUESTION???
Posted: Tue Oct 26, 2010 6:32 am
Well, in fairness, it is homecoming weekend. I didn't try to get a hotel this year, but last year I had hell trying to find one and the wife and I ended up at a little bed & breakfast place that turned out to be real nice. But hotels go real quick.AxeEmJacks wrote:Now I know you're lying.CatMom wrote: Not going to make the game. It's a long drive and I couldn't get a hotel room and I checked 6 weeks ago. Everything was booked. It's not a trip I want to do in a day. I'd have to stay overnight, as I would be doing all the driving. Just didn't happen.
As for the seeding. It's a toss up. TXST was ranked 4th in 2005 and was seeded 4th. Sometimes the committee actually follows that pattern. SFA wins out...only has 1 loss and having been ranked in the top 10 all year....it would be biased (IMHO) if they seeded a 9-2 higher than a 10-1 (FBS loss) SFA. However, my playoff prediction still stands.
Also, I don't understand all the hate from the other SLC schools is coming from. You're having a down year? Sad, but don't rain on our parade. Its my prediction that SFA will get a seed and win its first round. National champs? I don't see that with this team but they are very good and I believe they'll still be very competitive once Moses is gone.
As far as the seeding goes. If SFA wins out. I think they get a seed. Keep in mind, in these attendance numbers, SFA hasn't had there homecoming yet and that will provide a significant boost to avg. attendance. Also, I'm pretty sure that I read in another post in this forum, that SFA has an avg of over 10K so far this year.