Big East expansion intent now official
Posted: Tue Nov 02, 2010 1:09 pm
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20101102/ap_ ... st_meeting" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Odds Nova leaves?
Odds Nova leaves?
FCS Football | Message Board | News
https://championshipsubdivision.com/forums/
https://championshipsubdivision.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=19735
TCU to the Big East, team x to the MWC (probably Utah State). Suddenly the WAC is back down to 7 teams in football and has to invite someone (anyone). Sac perhaps?Big McLargehuge wrote:TCU is definitely getting an invite, and the names of these conferences continues to have less and less meaning.
Nova...I don't know where the hell they'd be playing, but the Philadelphia area was an abject failure in the Big East before with Temple...I'd say I'd expect Nova to be just as much of a failure if it weren't for the atrocious quality of the Big East as a football conference...they may actually stand a chance.
I'm not sure if TCU would go. The travel costs would not provide much value, IMO, since the MWC is probably a better football conference in 2012 than the Big East. And would they play any other sports? That's where a lot of costs would get sunk.Big McLargehuge wrote:TCU is definitely getting an invite, and the names of these conferences continues to have less and less meaning.
Nova...I don't know where the hell they'd be playing, but the Philadelphia area was an abject failure in the Big East before with Temple...I'd say I'd expect Nova to be just as much of a failure if it weren't for the atrocious quality of the Big East as a football conference...they may actually stand a chance.
If TCU moved to the Big East it would be the better football conference, no question. Pit, WVU and USF as mediocre as they often are would still be better than the combo of BSU, Air Force and Nevada. Plus you've got the BCS auto-bid, and 7-8 bids annually in basketball (and that could increase)mcveyrl wrote:I'm not sure if TCU would go. The travel costs would not provide much value, IMO, since the MWC is probably a better football conference in 2012 than the Big East. And would they play any other sports? That's where a lot of costs would get sunk.Big McLargehuge wrote:TCU is definitely getting an invite, and the names of these conferences continues to have less and less meaning.
Nova...I don't know where the hell they'd be playing, but the Philadelphia area was an abject failure in the Big East before with Temple...I'd say I'd expect Nova to be just as much of a failure if it weren't for the atrocious quality of the Big East as a football conference...they may actually stand a chance.
I think we need to blame the Big South and SB for all this commotion with names. They started it.
Silenoz wrote:If TCU moved to the Big East it would be the better football conference, no question. Pit, WVU and USF as mediocre as they often are would still be better than the combo of BSU, Air Force and Nevada. Plus you've got the BCS auto-bid, and 7-8 bids annually in basketball (and that could increase)mcveyrl wrote:
I'm not sure if TCU would go. The travel costs would not provide much value, IMO, since the MWC is probably a better football conference in 2012 than the Big East. And would they play any other sports? That's where a lot of costs would get sunk.
I think we need to blame the Big South and SB for all this commotion with names. They started it.
I've been a proponent of adding ECU and Memphis to the Big East (my sister is a Pitt alum so I follow them somewhat)...but the Big East cares more about media markets than actual fan interest...why else would DePaul be in it?T-Dog wrote:They won't stop at 10.
I'm hearing a loud uproar from ECU fans about how they draw 20K more people than either TCU or Houston and passionate fan-bases are better than potential media markets, using the ACC as an example as VT is proving to be the best addition as Miami and BC don't do **** in either Boston or Miami.
I dunno, would make sense since basketball is already too big. Not sure how CUSA or the MWC would feel about someone trying to leave in football only thoughmcveyrl wrote:Silenoz wrote: If TCU moved to the Big East it would be the better football conference, no question. Pit, WVU and USF as mediocre as they often are would still be better than the combo of BSU, Air Force and Nevada. Plus you've got the BCS auto-bid, and 7-8 bids annually in basketball (and that could increase)
Would they play basketball? I thought the BE wanted to stay where they were on basketball and thus the 'Nova invite. You are probably right about BE v. MWC, I forgot about Utah going Pac-12.
I'd like that...but aren't they intent on being Independents? Army willingly kicked Conference USA to the curb to go back to Independent status after a 7 year stint.SUUTbird wrote:To be honest i think that besides Nova that the Big East should go after Army and Navy. Both teams would be good geographical fits and would bring not only one of if not the biggest rivalries in College football to the Big East (aka more media coverage) but both teams would be very competitive i feel in the conference (except basketball probably). Also Navy and Army deserve a shot to get into a BCS bowl, what with the history of their tradition and what they stand for alone being enough to get them in i think.
And MarquetteBig McLargehuge wrote:I've been a proponent of adding ECU and Memphis to the Big East (my sister is a Pitt alum so I follow them somewhat)...but the Big East cares more about media markets than actual fan interest...why else would DePaul be in it?T-Dog wrote:They won't stop at 10.
I'm hearing a loud uproar from ECU fans about how they draw 20K more people than either TCU or Houston and passionate fan-bases are better than potential media markets, using the ACC as an example as VT is proving to be the best addition as Miami and BC don't do **** in either Boston or Miami.
I find it hard to imagine the Big East inviting four new members because of the size of the conference in all sports. Even if Villanova is one of the teams moving up they still have DePaul, Georgetown, Rhode Island, Seton Hall, St. John's, and Notre Dame playing basically everything but football. The Big East seems the least likely to jump to 12 teams of the conferences expanding.
On the flip side...if TCU does go to the Big East (I can't imagine why they would but...who knows) then that drops the Mountain West back down to 9 schools come 2012...if they have to replace TCU then I imagine they'll invite two more on top of it to get to 12.
The last conference Liberty will end up in is one full of Catholic schools.ToTheLeft wrote:Liberty.
Um..........kay.T-Dog wrote:ECU would sell their soul to get into the Big East. No joke. They want the hell out of CUSA since the closest conference foe is over 400 miles away in Marshall. They draw 50K for football games, have a good basketball arena and have a really good baseball program.
Of course the Big East is all about media markets so it's an uphill battle for them, But they're shrewd enough to give it a go.


And if the Big East takes Houston, CUSA could look at Louisiana Tech. All of a sudden the WAC is down to 6 (and counting)...Silenoz wrote:TCU to the Big East, team x to the MWC (probably Utah State). Suddenly the WAC is back down to 7 teams in football and has to invite someone (anyone). Sac perhaps?Big McLargehuge wrote:TCU is definitely getting an invite, and the names of these conferences continues to have less and less meaning.
Nova...I don't know where the hell they'd be playing, but the Philadelphia area was an abject failure in the Big East before with Temple...I'd say I'd expect Nova to be just as much of a failure if it weren't for the atrocious quality of the Big East as a football conference...they may actually stand a chance.
Didn't even think of that.danefan wrote:The last conference Liberty will end up in is one full of Catholic schools.ToTheLeft wrote:Liberty.