Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

Discuss

Villinova by double digits. Villanova had a strong case for a seed.

pantherrob82 wrote:Villinova by double digits. Villanova had a strong case for a seed.

Blame Montana, not UNI.

Nova by 21...........or more

If anyone was "woofed" it was Villanova not getting a seed. They should still handle Colgate, though.

Mvemjsunpx wrote:If anyone was "woofed" it was Villanova not getting a seed. They should still handle Colgate, though.

SOMEBODY explain to me how the #1 team in the LAND gets stuck with #8 Wofford, while Villanova walks into the second round with a fuckin' gimme. I just will NEVER understand the logic of the committee.

AZGrizFan wrote: SOMEBODY explain to me how the #1 team in the LAND gets stuck with #8 Wofford, while Villanova walks into the second round with a f**k[*]' gimme. I just will NEVER understand the logic of the committee.

Well, the Colgate/Nova matchup seemed pretty obvious looking at the vicinity of the schools, I just thought Nova would be seeded. I am surprised at JMU playing Wofford, though. I thought they'd draw EKU (or Liberty or Jacksonville St. had either of them made it). I also thought for sure we'd see an in-state SCSU/Wofford pairing.

AZGrizFan wrote:

Mvemjsunpx wrote:If anyone was "woofed" it was Villanova not getting a seed. They should still handle Colgate, though.

SOMEBODY explain to me how the #1 team in the LAND gets stuck with #8 Wofford, while Villanova walks into the second round with a f**k[*]' gimme. I just will NEVER understand the logic of the committee.

If they walk into the second round they will presumably be walking straight into JMU. And if not, they'll face Wofford. Either way, it will be a tough game for a 2nd round match-up. The bracket seems a bit top heavy with JMU, Nova, Montana, Cal Poly and Wofford - 5 of the top 8 teams.

Cap'n Cat wrote:Hey, guys - all this bitching about getting woofed and whining about your seed is complete and utter childish bullsh*t.

The real champion fan will shut up and play with the cards his or her team is dealt.

I'll never look a gift horse in the mouth, but, I'm thinking back to UNI's sh*t path in 2005. High scorin'-ass Eastern Washington with two pro players, then high scorin'-ass New Hampshire ON THE ROAD at that half-assed cold f**king pile of sh*t they call a stadium, then high scorin'-ass Texas State ON THE ROAD.

And other teams have had worse than that.

Quit bitchin' and sit your ass down. NOW!!!!

There's an easy answer: Don't read it.

I shall bitch to my heart's content. Period.

Typical Conk bullsh*t. Bitch, don't do nothin' about it.

Cap'n Cat wrote:Typical Conk bullsh*t. Bitch, don't do nothin' about it.

OK, bitch. That's twice in two threads you've gone political. Take that crapola to the poly lounge.

Cap'n Cat wrote:Typical Conk bullsh*t. Bitch, don't do nothin' about it.

I'd gladly volunteer for committee duty next year.

Sorry colgate. Im going to say Villanova wins this one in dominating fashion:
Nova-45
Colgate-13

SUUTbird wrote:Sorry colgate. Im going to say Villanova wins this one in dominating fashion:
Nova-45
Colgate-13

I'm going to have to agree with that...I just hope Nova doesn't sustain any injuries that will hurt them for the second round...anyone know if any team looks particularly more healthy than the rest coming into the playoffs?

Here's my assessment of the matchups & my pick for the game:

• • • Quarterbacks -- (push)
      
      Running Backs - Colgate
      
      Receivers/TEs - Villanova
      
      Offensive Line - Colgate
      
      
      Defensive Line - Villanova
      
      Linebackers --- Villanova
      
      Secondary ---- Villanova
      
      
      Kicking ------ Villanova
      
      Punting ------ Colgate
      
      Return Teams - Villanova
      
      Kickoffs ------ Villanova
      
      
      
      
      
      • • Colgate 10-34 Villanova

Mvemjsunpx wrote:Here's my assessment of the matchups & my pick for the game:

• • • Quarterbacks -- (push)
      
      Running Backs - Colgate
      
      Receivers/TEs - Villanova
      
      Offensive Line - Colgate
      
      
      Defensive Line - Villanova
      
      Linebackers --- Villanova
      
      Secondary ---- Villanova
      
      
      Kicking ------ Villanova
      
      Punting ------ Colgate
      
      Return Teams - Villanova
      
      Kickoffs ------ Villanova
      
      
      
      
      
      • • Colgate 10-34 Villanova

Nova 6-0 with 14:47 left in the first quarter. They scored on the opening kickoff. Good scoring start but they lost a huge asset at a defensive linebacker on that opening play - taken away in an ambulence.

Colgate is getting killed.