Maine at App State Game Thread
Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2011 3:46 pm
CAA vs Southern tilt.
Can App keep the quarterfinal streak alive?
Can App keep the quarterfinal streak alive?
FCS Football | Message Board | News
https://championshipsubdivision.com/forums/
https://championshipsubdivision.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=27670
Not as well on a consistent basis. We're young, we've lost a lot of our experienced coaching staff due to the success of those years, and it shows in the playcalling IMO. If we put together a string of games like we did against GSU I like our chances - unfortunately, we've seen quite a rollercoaster effort this season. One positive is that goasu.com reports we're as healthy right now as we've been in a while, but I expect Maine will benefit from the bye as well. Should be a good one this week.pantherclaw wrote:Appy-28 Maine-25 Go APPY STATE(can't believe I jsut said that) Question for the appstaters how does this team stack up against your championship teams?
This team has not shown the "video game" scoring ability of many of the past teams and hasn't been able to run the ball consistantly because of a young offensive line. The coaching staff appears to have finally stopped trying to force the running game and just get the ball to the playmakers of which App has many. The defense has gotten better and better as the year has progressed and could be a big factor in the playoffs. Team has not performed well on the road and that is a concern as with no seed this year there may be only one home game assuming App advances.pantherclaw wrote:Appy-28 Maine-25 Go APPY STATE(can't believe I jsut said that) Question for the appstaters how does this team stack up against your championship teams?
Deep down you know it felt good to say that. Go ahead and let your inner Yosef out. Your significant other will thank you!pantherclaw wrote:Appy-28 Maine-25 Go APPY STATE(can't believe I jsut said that) Question for the appstaters how does this team stack up against your championship teams?
Allright, letting my inner Yosef out, yeah, OK, grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr. My inner Yosef has a lot of respect for Maine. Predict we decimate, crush, kill, victimize, terrorise, annihilate them by up to 8 points. Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrproasu89 wrote:Deep down you know it felt good to say that. Go ahead and let your inner Yosef out. Your significant other will thank you!pantherclaw wrote:Appy-28 Maine-25 Go APPY STATE(can't believe I jsut said that) Question for the appstaters how does this team stack up against your championship teams?
Sad thing is I can hardly get my significant other to get interested in Panther football, let alone what the rest of the FCS. At least her father is into FCS football. Ahhh life.proasu89 wrote:Deep down you know it felt good to say that. Go ahead and let your inner Yosef out. Your significant other will thank you!pantherclaw wrote:Appy-28 Maine-25 Go APPY STATE(can't believe I jsut said that) Question for the appstaters how does this team stack up against your championship teams?
If you rate Appalachian's OL above the Bears, Maine must have a really bad OLMvemjsunpx wrote:Most everything about these teams screams "solid, but unremarkable." Neither one is really on a roll, either, so I'll just take the Mountaineers at home.
Here's my assessment of the matchups & my pick for the game:
- Quarterbacks -- Appalachian St.
Running Backs - (push)
Receivers/TEs - Appalachian St.
Offensive Line - Appalachian St.
Defensive Line - Maine
Linebackers --- Appalachian St.
Secondary ---- Maine
Kicking ------ Appalachian St.
Punting ------ Maine
Return Teams - Appalachian St.
Kickoffs ------ Appalachian St.
- Maine 27-35 Appalachian St.
Sure hope the good part of "Team Sybil" shows up on Saturday. Totally agree of your accessment of the OL and DL situation. The DL has been real solid the second half of the season. The OL has improved but won't knock anyone off the ball; that makes the play calling to take advantage of what they do well critical...and that's not the dive play on every first down.Aho Old Guy wrote:If you rate Appalachian's OL above the Bears, Maine must have a really bad OLMvemjsunpx wrote:Most everything about these teams screams "solid, but unremarkable." Neither one is really on a roll, either, so I'll just take the Mountaineers at home.
Here's my assessment of the matchups & my pick for the game:
- Quarterbacks -- Appalachian St.
Running Backs - (push)
Receivers/TEs - Appalachian St.
Offensive Line - Appalachian St.
Defensive Line - Maine
Linebackers --- Appalachian St.
Secondary ---- Maine
Kicking ------ Appalachian St.
Punting ------ Maine
Return Teams - Appalachian St.
Kickoffs ------ Appalachian St.
- Maine 27-35 Appalachian St.
![]()
It's not that ASU has a bad OL - there is a nice mix of youth, experience and skill. The issue is I don't believe we have started the same bunch this year for 2 successive weeks - the 'core' does not have tremendous experience together. The good news is Ruff should play.
It's the opposite for the DL - I believe Appalachian has a great rotation (now), and I think most App fans expect big things from the DL/front7 if we are going to make a run this year.
And you should probably add a section for 'Intangibles.' Appalachian has been a soap opera this year - 'Team Turmoil' is more like it. The ship has been 'righted' but I sometimes wonder if Jekyll or Hyde will show up from week-to-week.
That's some funny shit right there.SpeedkingATL wrote:Sure hope the good part of "Team Sybil" shows up on Saturday. Totally agree of your accessment of the OL and DL situation. The DL has been real solid the second half of the season. The OL has improved but won't knock anyone off the ball; that makes the play calling to take advantage of what they do well critical...and that's not the dive play on every first down.
App has better ypc and sack % allowed numbers than Maine. Also, Maine's running back averages 4.9 ypc while the team overall averages just 3.7.Aho Old Guy wrote:If you rate Appalachian's OL above the Bears, Maine must have a really bad OL![]()
It's not that ASU has a bad OL - there is a nice mix of youth, experience and skill. The issue is I don't believe we have started the same bunch this year for 2 successive weeks - the 'core' does not have tremendous experience together. The good news is Ruff should play.
It's the opposite for the DL - I believe Appalachian has a great rotation (now), and I think most App fans expect big things from the DL/front7 if we are going to make a run this year.
And you should probably add a section for 'Intangibles.' Appalachian has been a soap opera this year - 'Team Turmoil' is more like it. The ship has been 'righted' but I sometimes wonder if Jekyll or Hyde will show up from week-to-week.
It's tough to compare that stat since we run a multiple 3-4. John Rizor is listed as a LB, but I believe the majority of his sacks have come when he has lined as a DE.Mvemjsunpx wrote:
I thought the DLine comparison was close, but I gave it to Maine because they rely on their DLine to get sacks more than App does (App gets more sacks from their LBs than Maine).
Skjellyfetti wrote:Mvemjsunpx wrote:Also, our rush defense is just slightly better... but, we had to play the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd rushing offenses in FCS since we play in the ToCon.
theresehunter wrote:Yeah.. Those years of success really had affect us.. Some results to good but it can't be avoided that it will also bring some bad results like losing the staffs.. We still need to exert more effort if we want to have good chances.. If we are really as good as before we might get this one..ASUG8 wrote:
Not as well on a consistent basis. We're young, we've lost a lot of our experienced coaching staff due to the success of those years, and it shows in the playcalling IMO. If we put together a string of games like we did against GSU I like our chances - unfortunately, we've seen quite a rollercoaster effort this season. One positive is that goasu.com reports we're as healthy right now as we've been in a while, but I expect Maine will benefit from the bye as well. Should be a good one this week.
As long as TOCon doesn't stand for Turn-OverPwns wrote:Skjellyfetti wrote: