Re: 2012 Early Poll
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 9:39 am
NDSU, SHSU, and Georgia Southern, UNI, Montana State...1-5....UND #20.
FCS Football | Message Board | News
https://championshipsubdivision.com/forums/
https://championshipsubdivision.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=29854
Your schedule is brutal....I hope you get a lot of upsets!!clenz wrote:UNI will not be preseason to 5.
Top 15 yes, top 5 no.
Given the fact the voters will look at the fact UNI lost 3 senior "starters" at skill positions (2 WR and QB) they will knock UNI pretty good....even though the to 3 WR on the team by the end of the season were a JR and 2 FR....
UNI returns the entire OL, plus the deepest backfield in the conference (yeah I said it....I'll argue that point with anyone) the offense should be fine. A more traditional QB will put our OC in more of a comfort zone for play calling (circa the Eric Sanders era). Rennie was a tremendous talent that our OC showed he didn't know how to use properly.
The defense *should* be a concern for non-UNI fans. They'll look at the loss of 3 LB's and Ben Boothby and go "Noway they can be good again"....yet the defense does nothing but reload and be at or near the top of the conference ever year.
I'd bet UNI ends up around 11-15 pre season.
Does the schedule have any play in determining the preseason poll? I guess what I'm trying to say is that recovering from a big preseason hiccup such as you're forecasting would be easier starting from a Top 5 preseason ranking as opposed to starting unranked, right? Such a drop would take one from say 5 to about 20-23, and then the recovery would start from there as the wins pile up later on. Starting the wins from an unranked oh-fer or two-fer would make gaining the playoffs pretty difficult, wouldn't it?clenz wrote:UNI will not be preseason to 5.
Top 15 yes, top 5 no.
Given the fact the voters will look at the fact UNI lost 3 senior "starters" at skill positions (2 WR and QB) they will knock UNI pretty good....even though the to 3 WR on the team by the end of the season were a JR and 2 FR....
UNI returns the entire OL, plus the deepest backfield in the conference (yeah I said it....I'll argue that point with anyone) the offense should be fine. A more traditional QB will put our OC in more of a comfort zone for play calling (circa the Eric Sanders era). Rennie was a tremendous talent that our OC showed he didn't know how to use properly.
The defense *should* be a concern for non-UNI fans. They'll look at the loss of 3 LB's and Ben Boothby and go "Noway they can be good again"....yet the defense does nothing but reload and be at or near the top of the conference ever year.
I'd bet UNI ends up around 11-15 pre season.
Always easier to recover from starting high than starting low....SuperHornet wrote:Does the schedule have any play in determining the preseason poll? I guess what I'm trying to say is that recovering from a big preseason hiccup such as you're forecasting would be easier starting from a Top 5 preseason ranking as opposed to starting unranked, right? Such a drop would take one from say 5 to about 20-23, and then the recovery would start from there as the wins pile up later on. Starting the wins from an unranked oh-fer or two-fer would make gaining the playoffs pretty difficult, wouldn't it?clenz wrote:UNI will not be preseason to 5.
Top 15 yes, top 5 no.
Given the fact the voters will look at the fact UNI lost 3 senior "starters" at skill positions (2 WR and QB) they will knock UNI pretty good....even though the to 3 WR on the team by the end of the season were a JR and 2 FR....
UNI returns the entire OL, plus the deepest backfield in the conference (yeah I said it....I'll argue that point with anyone) the offense should be fine. A more traditional QB will put our OC in more of a comfort zone for play calling (circa the Eric Sanders era). Rennie was a tremendous talent that our OC showed he didn't know how to use properly.
The defense *should* be a concern for non-UNI fans. They'll look at the loss of 3 LB's and Ben Boothby and go "Noway they can be good again"....yet the defense does nothing but reload and be at or near the top of the conference ever year.
I'd bet UNI ends up around 11-15 pre season.
Really, Top 30?guinzone wrote:Entering October, I don't think UNI will be in the top 30. Brutal schedule to start.
I will bet that 2 of those will be in the top 3 at the end of the season next year.lakesbison wrote:NDSU
SHSU
GSU
MONTANA ST
YOUNGSTOWN
JMU
MSU is not going to be better than UM.Cujo wrote:1. NDSU
2. SHSU
3. GSU
4. MSU
5. UM
How do you know how good Montana is going to be? They don't even have a head coach.Vidav wrote:MSU is not going to be better than UM.Cujo wrote:1. NDSU
2. SHSU
3. GSU
4. MSU
5. UM
Tell Mick Delaney that.DJH wrote:How do you know how good Montana is going to be? They don't even have a head coach.Vidav wrote:
MSU is not going to be better than UM.
AZGrizFan wrote:Tell Mick Delaney that.DJH wrote:
How do you know how good Montana is going to be? They don't even have a head coach.
SuperHornet wrote:1. UM
2. Sac
3. App
4. JMU
5. Liberty
Please before you bash me, tell me what's wrong with 3 and 4? Remember that SHSU has a barnstorming schedule this year that will be VERY tough.
THEN bash me.
He will be coaching the full season. Grizzlies will be fine.Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:AZGrizFan wrote:
Tell Mick Delaney that.
Interim.
Vidav wrote:MSU is not going to be better than UM.Cujo wrote:1. NDSU
2. SHSU
3. GSU
4. MSU
5. UM
CatBlitz22 wrote:Vidav wrote:
MSU is not going to be better than UM.