Page 1 of 1

Big Sky Conference Logo - Complete Gallery

Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 10:53 am
by chris

Re: Big Sky Conference Logo - Complete Gallery

Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 10:56 am
by dbackjon
Thanks for putting that together!

Re: Big Sky Conference Logo - Complete Gallery

Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 10:59 am
by CPAlum
That logo is really growing on me......I think they should put it on the left rather than right shoulder though

Re: Big Sky Conference Logo - Complete Gallery

Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 11:00 am
by chris
dbackjon wrote:Thanks for putting that together!
no prob!

Re: Big Sky Conference Logo - Complete Gallery

Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 11:31 am
by SloStang
CPAlum wrote:That logo is really growing on me......I think they should put it on the left rather than right shoulder though
I agree, but in Cal Poly's case they can not because of their Nike contract which has the Nike symbol on the left shoulder. I would put it on the sleave.

BTW, I like the new logo and the fact it looks good in all the different colors. I also liked the one Willie submitted.

Re: Big Sky Conference Logo - Complete Gallery

Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 12:11 pm
by CPAlum
Maybe the Big Sky should work on a conference wide Adidas contract so they can put it on the left shoulder....outside of that I like the sleeve better as well.

Re: Big Sky Conference Logo - Complete Gallery

Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 12:17 pm
by grizcountry420
CPAlum wrote:Maybe the Big Sky should work on a conference wide Adidas contract so they can put it on the left shoulder....outside of that I like the sleeve better as well.
Adidas... Really?

Re: Big Sky Conference Logo - Complete Gallery

Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 12:39 pm
by CPAlum
only cause their logo sits in the center

Re: Big Sky Conference Logo - Complete Gallery

Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 12:40 pm
by cats2506
CPAlum wrote:only cause their logo sits in the center
That sounds like a superhornet argument :lol:

Re: Big Sky Conference Logo - Complete Gallery

Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 2:13 pm
by Wildcat Ryan
I like the Logo, but Im not too sure I like Weber's new uniforms, I think if they had black pants instead of the solid white pants (I dont like the solid white pants look) they would look really good.

Re: Big Sky Conference Logo - Complete Gallery

Posted: Wed Jul 18, 2012 7:47 am
by SDHornet
I think I will grow to like "our" BSC logo. They look sharp with the team colors rather than the "neutral" BSC one. Thanks for getting the gallery up chris. :notworthy:

Re: Big Sky Conference Logo - Complete Gallery

Posted: Wed Jul 18, 2012 8:27 pm
by SuperHornet
Not that they had much choice in the matter, but the NAU version is a bit too "Cal-ish" for me. The ISU version would look a WHOLE lot better to me if it were intended for a football-associate member UOP. [I know that's not going to happen for AT LEAST ten years (and probably NEVER), but I can certainly dream.]

Re: Big Sky Conference Logo - Complete Gallery

Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 2:46 pm
by Darell1976
I can't wait to see the logo displayed on the new turf being installed at the Alerus Center. UND is also getting new uniforms to be revealed soon. I heard black is going be filtered in (pants, jersey, etc). I can't wait to see them.

Re: Big Sky Conference Logo - Complete Gallery

Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 2:51 pm
by dbackjon
SuperHornet wrote:Not that they had much choice in the matter, but the NAU version is a bit too "Cal-ish" for me. The ISU version would look a WHOLE lot better to me if it were intended for a football-associate member UOP. [I know that's not going to happen for AT LEAST ten years (and probably NEVER), but I can certainly dream.]

We are both Blue and Gold - what did you expect?

Re: Big Sky Conference Logo - Complete Gallery

Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 3:44 pm
by Herky
SuperHornet wrote:Not that they had much choice in the matter, but the NAU version is a bit too "Cal-ish" for me. The ISU version would look a WHOLE lot better to me if it were intended for a football-associate member UOP. [I know that's not going to happen for AT LEAST ten years (and probably NEVER), but I can certainly dream.]
UOP will never, ever have a football team again. The press box at Stagg is condemned and UOP is looking into tearing the whole thing down and adding some new campus buildings.

Stockton, CA is the worst city on the planet, Juarez Mexico is a safer place than Stockton, it is a pit, a miserable hell hole of a place. I work there, have for the past five years, and it is terrible. I wont even bring my family to Stockton or San Joaquin County, they're awful terrible places that need to just fall into the Pacific Ocean.

Re: Big Sky Conference Logo - Complete Gallery

Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 4:00 pm
by SJHornet
Herky wrote:
SuperHornet wrote:Not that they had much choice in the matter, but the NAU version is a bit too "Cal-ish" for me. The ISU version would look a WHOLE lot better to me if it were intended for a football-associate member UOP. [I know that's not going to happen for AT LEAST ten years (and probably NEVER), but I can certainly dream.]
UOP will never, ever have a football team again. The press box at Stagg is condemned and UOP is looking into tearing the whole thing down and adding some new campus buildings.

Stockton, CA is the worst city on the planet, Juarez Mexico is a safer place than Stockton, it is a pit, a miserable hell hole of a place. I work there, have for the past five years, and it is terrible. I wont even bring my family to Stockton or San Joaquin County, they're awful terrible places that need to just fall into the Pacific Ocean.
Totally agree. We'll see football at Long Beach, Fullerton and probably even Santa Clara before Pacific's program sees life again. And your dead on when it comes to Stockton. They're only 45 mins down he road and I won't go there or take my family to a game.

Re: Big Sky Conference Logo - Complete Gallery

Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 4:16 pm
by Grizalltheway
Honestly, how do you guys decide WHICH California shithole is the worst, when there's so many to choose from? Fresno, Oakland, Bakersfield, East LA, on and on...

Re: Big Sky Conference Logo - Complete Gallery

Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 4:48 pm
by Green Laser
Grizalltheway wrote:Honestly, how do you guys decide WHICH California shithole is the worst, when there's so many to choose from? Fresno, Oakland, Bakersfield, East LA, on and on...

Stockton is OFFICIALLY Bankrupt!

Re: Big Sky Conference Logo - Complete Gallery

Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2012 6:17 pm
by SuperHornet
Herky wrote:
SuperHornet wrote:Not that they had much choice in the matter, but the NAU version is a bit too "Cal-ish" for me. The ISU version would look a WHOLE lot better to me if it were intended for a football-associate member UOP. [I know that's not going to happen for AT LEAST ten years (and probably NEVER), but I can certainly dream.]
UOP will never, ever have a football team again. The press box at Stagg is condemned and UOP is looking into tearing the whole thing down and adding some new campus buildings.

Stockton, CA is the worst city on the planet, Juarez Mexico is a safer place than Stockton, it is a pit, a miserable hell hole of a place. I work there, have for the past five years, and it is terrible. I wont even bring my family to Stockton or San Joaquin County, they're awful terrible places that need to just fall into the Pacific Ocean.
Completely wrong....

1. Officially, UOP's football program is "suspended." That leaves a return a POSSIBILITY, though it's definitely NOT plausible under the current administration.

2. The PRESS BOX isn't condemned; the whole bloody thing is. And it's not "new campus buildings" that will replace it. It's a new athletic facility. Did you not see the AD's video put out a few months ago? He also guaranteed that the facility name will NOT change.

3. Stockton the worst city on the planet? That's pure hype. I have friends that live in North Stockton, and those are some of the safest areas around. North Stockton and South Stockton are NOT the same thing. It's like comparing Folsom to North Highlands. Plus, being on campus at UOP is fairly safe. The campus police is pretty competent.

4. You don't like ALL of SJC? Have you even bothered to try Lodi? We likely produce your wine and your cereal, at the very least, if not your milk, too.