Page 1 of 2
Loss of institutional control at Montana
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 8:19 am
by CitadelGrad
It's time for the death penalty.
http://www.foxnews.com/sports/2012/09/1 ... of-montana" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: Loss of institutional control at Montana
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 8:36 am
by polsongrizz
You are absolutely right, death to fox news, what a joke...
Re: Loss of institutional control at Montana
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 8:38 am
by Skjellyfetti
I agree with Van Valkenberg and this is something I disagree strongly with Obama on. The federal guidelines take away the rights of the accused in sexual assault cases. Using a lower standard of evidence and denying the accused the right to confront their accuser is absolutely wrong. I'm not speaking of the guilt or innocence of the Montana players, but the system generally.
Re: Loss of institutional control at Montana
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 8:55 am
by AZGrizFan
Skjellyfetti wrote:I agree with Van Valkenberg and this is something I disagree strongly with Obama on. The federal guidelines take away the rights of the accused in sexual assault cases. Using a lower standard of evidence and denying the accused the right to confront their accuser is absolutely wrong. I'm not speaking of the guilt or innocence of the Montana players, but the system generally.
Agreed completely. And given the number of these that DON'T end up in convictions, the accuser gets off virtually scott free while the accused is basically branded for life regardless. It's a fucked up double standard.
Re: Loss of institutional control at Montana
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 11:27 am
by Libertine
I don't see any new news in this article and I definitely don't see the NCAA's dreaded Lack Of Institutional Control phraseology.
Moving on.... Hey, Lindsay Lohan "in a tailspin"
http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/20 ... =obnetwork" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: Loss of institutional control at Montana
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 11:31 am
by 93henfan
Libertine wrote:I don't see any new news in this article and I definitely don't see the NCAA's dreaded Lack Of Institutional Control phraseology.
Moving on.... Hey, Lindsay Lohan "in a tailspin"
http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/20 ... =obnetwork" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I love train wrecks.
Re: Loss of institutional control at Montana
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 11:33 am
by Grizalltheway
Libertine wrote:I don't see any new news in this article and I definitely don't see the NCAA's dreaded Lack Of Institutional Control phraseology.
Misery loves company, and our resident Pedo State fanboy and apologist is one miserable feather plucker.
Re: Loss of institutional control at Montana
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 12:15 pm
by rkwittem
Bit rich of you to say that, Mr. State Penn, er, I mean Penn State fan. I guess I see where you're coming from. You must be having an awful 12 months.
Color me an idiot, but I didn't see anything in there where the NCAA had served Montana a notice of allegations or anything pertaining to the NCAA determining a "lack of institutional control." I don't know Montana's history of law-breaking (I'm sure someone will inform me), but I don't think one instance of sexual assault makes a school open to L.I.C. charges.
Re: Loss of institutional control at Montana
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 1:48 pm
by kemajic
rkwittem wrote:
Bit rich of you to say that, Mr. State Penn, er, I mean Penn State fan. I guess I see where you're coming from. You must be having an awful 12 months.
Color me an idiot, but I didn't see anything in there where the NCAA had served Montana a notice of allegations or anything pertaining to the NCAA determining a "lack of institutional control." I don't know Montana's history of law-breaking (I'm sure someone will inform me), but I don't think one instance of sexual assault makes a school open to L.I.C. charges.
The only sactions I can remember on Montana were about 40 years ago.
Re: Loss of institutional control at Montana
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 2:04 pm
by kemajic
Without completion of a single investigation or any evidence of any non-compliance yet made public, you are the judge and jury based on an old repasted media article. A feminazi Missulian reporter, out of newsworthy material to further her relentless biased agenda, continues to recirculate old type to whomever will run with it. There have been no charges against the University; the primary investigations involve the Missoula County Attorney's office. Of course that doesn't help your cause to raise your program a notch. In your dreams, typical of a grad from a wannabe.
Re: Loss of institutional control at Montana
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 3:36 pm
by CitadelGrad
This report has as much validity as the vast majority of reports about Sandusky and Penn State. All of you Montana fuckers (and others) were quick to take those reports as the gospel. It is my prerogative to take this report as gospel. In short, Fuck You!
Re: Loss of institutional control at Montana
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 3:42 pm
by uofmman1122
CitadelGrad wrote:This report has as much validity as the vast majority of reports about Sandusky and Penn State. All of you Montana fuckers (and others) were quick to take those reports as the gospel. It is my prerogative to take this report as gospel. In short, Fuck You!
Come back to us when Montana covered up for a child molester for 14 years.
We might get hit by sanctions, but so far word is they haven't found anything. If it weren't for articles like this, there wouldn't be anything to talk about. I know you all want us to go down so it will make you feel better, though.
Re: Loss of institutional control at Montana
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 4:02 pm
by Grizpsych
Why not just go to Egriz if you want to post this shit?
Re: Loss of institutional control at Montana
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 4:52 pm
by AZGrizFan
Re: Loss of institutional control at Montana
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 4:53 pm
by grizzaholic
CitadelGrad wrote:This report has as much validity as the vast majority of reports about Sandusky and Penn State. All of you Montana fuckers (and others) were quick to take those reports as the gospel. It is my prerogative to take this report as gospel. In short, Fuck You!
Are you just full of piss and vigor because of the...sorry THE CITADEL's win last weekend?
Re: Loss of institutional control at Montana
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 5:55 pm
by Seahawks08
I understand what CitGrad is saying, but you have to at least admit that if Montana was in the PAC 12, this story would be on ESPN nightly.
Re: Loss of institutional control at Montana
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 6:05 pm
by Mvemjsunpx
Seahawks08 wrote:I understand what CitGrad is saying, but you have to at least admit that if Montana was in the PAC 12, this story would be on ESPN nightly.
If it wasn't Oregon State or Wazzu, then perhaps…
On the other hand, if this happened at, say, Tennessee Tech, it would have barely made the news at all.
Re: Loss of institutional control at Montana
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 9:00 pm
by rkwittem
CitadelGrad wrote:This report has as much validity as the vast majority of reports about Sandusky and Penn State. All of you Montana fuckers (and others) were quick to take those reports as the gospel. It is my prerogative to take this report as gospel. In short, Fuck You!
Oh, your words wound me. The obvious counter is that charges were actually filed and Sandusky has been found guilty...Montana, not so much.
It disgusts me that you continue to stick up for that pedophile and his sidekicks who turned a blind eye to his misdeeds. Keep living in your fantasy land, you bitter old cretin.
Re: Loss of institutional control at Montana
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 9:33 pm
by Willie
CitadelGrad wrote:This report has as much validity as the vast majority of reports about Sandusky and Penn State. All of you Montana fuckers (and others) were quick to take those reports as the gospel. It is my prerogative to take this report as gospel. In short, Fuck You!
Re: Loss of institutional control at Montana
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 9:57 pm
by grizzaholic
Willie wrote:CitadelGrad wrote:This report has as much validity as the vast majority of reports about Sandusky and Penn State. All of you Montana fuckers (and others) were quick to take those reports as the gospel. It is my prerogative to take this report as gospel. In short, Fuck You!
Re: Loss of institutional control at Montana
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 11:55 pm
by mtjack
It's getting all e-grizzy here @ C.S.
Re: Loss of institutional control at Montana
Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 4:03 am
by D1B
Death Penalty would be therapeutic for Montana. It the only FCS school that neglects all its other sports for football. It's the Penn State of FCS - Too big and too powerful.
Re: Loss of institutional control at Montana
Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 4:17 am
by Aho Old Guy
Let's not kid ourselves. **institutional control** is an oxymoron -- for the most part, everywhere, in each division.
Re: Loss of institutional control at Montana
Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 4:34 am
by CAA Flagship
Re: Loss of institutional control at Montana
Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 5:28 am
by kalm
Aho Old Guy wrote:Let's not kid ourselves. **institutional control** is an oxymoron -- for the most part, everywhere, in each division.
This.
I think we were accused of institutional control on our violations, which might be true considering our one and only compliance officer at the time was a part time professor.
There's a lack of control everywhere. Partly because you're dealing 100's of 18-23 year olds and partly because there are shit ton of rules and they're very complicated. It's like the tax codes, begging to be manipulated and/or broken.