MT in the top 25...you are nuts

Football Championship Subdivision discussions
grizzaholic
One Man Wolfpack
One Man Wolfpack
Posts: 34860
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:13 am
I am a fan of: Hodgdon
A.K.A.: Random Mailer
Location: Backwoods of Montana

MT in the top 25...you are nuts

Post by grizzaholic »

If anyone votes for them to be in the Top 25 they should have their voting pass revoked and then taken out back and shot after today's debacle.
"What I'm saying is: You might have taken care of your wolf problem, but everyone around town is going to think of you as the crazy son of a bitch who bought land mines to get rid of wolves."

Justin Halpern
User avatar
SuperHornet
SuperHornet
SuperHornet
Posts: 20548
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:24 pm
I am a fan of: Sac State
Location: Twentynine Palms, CA

Re: MT in the top 25...you are nuts

Post by SuperHornet »

FWIW, I left Montana out on accident. On reflection, though, it seems unfortunately appropriate. I also almost dumped UNI. I hope I don't have to pull the trigger on them next week....
Image

SuperHornet's Athletics Hall of Fame includes Jacksonville State kicker Ashley Martin, the first girl to score in a Division I football game. She kicked 3 PATs in a 2001 game for J-State.
clenz
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 21202
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 4:30 pm

Re: MT in the top 25...you are nuts

Post by clenz »

SuperHornet wrote:FWIW, I left Montana out on accident. On reflection, though, it seems unfortunately appropriate. I also almost dumped UNI. I hope I don't have to pull the trigger on them next week....
UNI doesn't play next week....finally.
User avatar
EWURanger
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 4712
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 1:06 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern Washington

Re: MT in the top 25...you are nuts

Post by EWURanger »

Montana is a top 25 team, no doubt about it. Seriously. does anyone think some of the other teams in the top 25 could beat them?

But, they need to find more of a passing game to compliment the running game.

Defense is pretty legit, minus the secondary.
Last edited by EWURanger on Sat Sep 29, 2012 9:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Image
grizzaholic
One Man Wolfpack
One Man Wolfpack
Posts: 34860
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:13 am
I am a fan of: Hodgdon
A.K.A.: Random Mailer
Location: Backwoods of Montana

Re: MT in the top 25...you are nuts

Post by grizzaholic »

EWURanger wrote:Montana is a top 25 team, no doubt about it. But, they need to find more of a passing game to compliment the running game and good defensive unit to make a playoff run this season.
:ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno: :ohno:
"What I'm saying is: You might have taken care of your wolf problem, but everyone around town is going to think of you as the crazy son of a bitch who bought land mines to get rid of wolves."

Justin Halpern
User avatar
uofmman1122
Level2
Level2
Posts: 1845
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 6:22 am
I am a fan of: Japanese girls
A.K.A.: Randy Butternubs
Location: Missoula, MT

Re: MT in the top 25...you are nuts

Post by uofmman1122 »

EWURanger wrote:Montana is a top 25 team, no doubt about it. Seriously. does anyone think some of the other teams in the top 25 could beat them?

But, they need to find more of a passing game to compliment the running game.

Defense is pretty legit, minus the secondary.
That's a pretty huge minus.

Also, we can't score.

We have a great offense for getting a shit ton of yards, but we're terrible at actually scoring. I think we're in the top 10 of FCS in yards per game, and top 5 in rushing per game, but I'd bet we aren't even in the top half of scoring per game.

And yes. I think every team in the top 25 could beat us. We can't finish games, even when we have a two score lead with 4 minutes left. :ohno:
JALMOND
Level4
Level4
Posts: 5306
Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 11:04 pm
I am a fan of: Portland State
A.K.A.: JALMOND

Re: MT in the top 25...you are nuts

Post by JALMOND »

grizzaholic wrote:If anyone votes for them to be in the Top 25 they should have their voting pass revoked and then taken out back and shot after today's debacle.
I actually left them out last week. I was not very high on them to being with.
User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 59959
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Re: MT in the top 25...you are nuts

Post by AZGrizFan »

uofmman1122 wrote:
EWURanger wrote:Montana is a top 25 team, no doubt about it. Seriously. does anyone think some of the other teams in the top 25 could beat them?

But, they need to find more of a passing game to compliment the running game.

Defense is pretty legit, minus the secondary.
That's a pretty huge minus.

Also, we can't score.

We have a great offense for getting a shit ton of yards, but we're terrible at actually scoring. I think we're in the top 10 of FCS in yards per game, and top 5 in rushing per game, but I'd bet we aren't even in the top half of scoring per game.

And yes. I think every team in the top 25 could beat us. We can't finish games, even when we have a two score lead with 4 minutes left. :ohno:
Jesus. That's a VERY negative opinion of what happened today. Two fumbles inside the 10 yard line are going to put a damper on scoring....but do you really think that's going to happen every game? Is every team in the BSC as good as EWU?

We lost our best offensive weapon in the 1st quarter and still had a 9 point lead with 3 minutes to go. Last week we played 21 minutes of great football. Today they played 57 minutes of great football. A bounce or two here or there and that game isn't close....I'd hardly say that's the definition of a team that would get beat by every other team in the top 25.

I predict an 8-3 season. That was our last loss. Mark it down.
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Image
User avatar
BlackFalkin
Level3
Level3
Posts: 3865
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 4:49 pm
I am a fan of: EASTERN WASHINGTON
Location: Southern California

Re: MT in the top 25...you are nuts

Post by BlackFalkin »

AZGrizFan wrote:
uofmman1122 wrote:That's a pretty huge minus.

Also, we can't score.

We have a great offense for getting a shit ton of yards, but we're terrible at actually scoring. I think we're in the top 10 of FCS in yards per game, and top 5 in rushing per game, but I'd bet we aren't even in the top half of scoring per game.

And yes. I think every team in the top 25 could beat us. We can't finish games, even when we have a two score lead with 4 minutes left. :ohno:
Jesus. That's a VERY negative opinion of what happened today. Two fumbles inside the 10 yard line are going to put a damper on scoring....but do you really think that's going to happen every game? Is every team in the BSC as good as EWU?

We lost our best offensive weapon in the 1st quarter and still had a 9 point lead with 3 minutes to go. Last week we played 21 minutes of great football. Today they played 57 minutes of great football. A bounce or two here or there and that game isn't close....I'd hardly say that's the definition of a team that would get beat by every other team in the top 25.

I predict an 8-3 season. That was our last loss. Mark it down.
You're a bettin man right?
:coffee:
EWU FOOTBALL 2004|2005|2010|2012|2013|2014|2016|2018|BigSky Champions
EASTERN WASHINGTON|2010 NATIONAL CHAMPIONS
User avatar
uofmman1122
Level2
Level2
Posts: 1845
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 6:22 am
I am a fan of: Japanese girls
A.K.A.: Randy Butternubs
Location: Missoula, MT

Re: MT in the top 25...you are nuts

Post by uofmman1122 »

AZGrizFan wrote:
uofmman1122 wrote:That's a pretty huge minus.

Also, we can't score.

We have a great offense for getting a shit ton of yards, but we're terrible at actually scoring. I think we're in the top 10 of FCS in yards per game, and top 5 in rushing per game, but I'd bet we aren't even in the top half of scoring per game.

And yes. I think every team in the top 25 could beat us. We can't finish games, even when we have a two score lead with 4 minutes left. :ohno:
Jesus. That's a VERY negative opinion of what happened today. Two fumbles inside the 10 yard line are going to put a damper on scoring....but do you really think that's going to happen every game? Is every team in the BSC as good as EWU?

We lost our best offensive weapon in the 1st quarter and still had a 9 point lead with 3 minutes to go. Last week we played 21 minutes of great football. Today they played 57 minutes of great football. A bounce or two here or there and that game isn't close....I'd hardly say that's the definition of a team that would get beat by every other team in the top 25.

I predict an 8-3 season. That was our last loss. Mark it down.
As much as I want to agree with you, I just can't. For as many yards as we've put up, we have yet to crack even 40 points. It wasn't just this game.

We had 533 yards today and only scored 26 points.
We had 483 yards against ASU and only scored 27 points.
We had 568 yards against USD and only scored 35 points.

That's the thing. This team CAN get it done, but after five weeks, especially after today's game that we god damn should have won, I don't have the confidence in this staff that you have.

As for the defense, It makes no sense to make adjustments in the second half if you completely abandon your adjustments later.

Why the hell do you blitz all 3rd quarter, hold them to negative yardage and force a fumble and INT, and then when crunch time comes up, say "Holy shit! He might throw the ball!" and drop back 8 guys?
That's the saddest thing. We gave up the pressure to cover better, and he burned us with long pass plays worse than when we were blitzing...

I want us to go 8-3. I think we can.

But I honestly don't think we will.

As for the Top25 comment, I didn't say we would lose to every team in the top 25, but we definitely could. So far this team and staff haven't really proven otherwise. We're 0-3 vs. top 25 teams so far.
Mvemjsunpx
Level5
Level5
Posts: 14138
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 2:44 pm
I am a fan of: Montana

Re: MT in the top 25...you are nuts

Post by Mvemjsunpx »

uofmman1122 wrote:We have a great offense for getting a shit ton of yards, but we're terrible at actually scoring. I think we're in the top 10 of FCS in yards per game, and top 5 in rushing per game, but I'd bet we aren't even in the top half of scoring per game.
The Griz are easily in the top half in scoring. Less than a third of FCS teams are averaging 30+ ppg.
Mvemjsunpx
Level5
Level5
Posts: 14138
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 2:44 pm
I am a fan of: Montana

Re: MT in the top 25...you are nuts

Post by Mvemjsunpx »

uofmman1122 wrote:As much as I want to agree with you, I just can't. For as many yards as we've put up, we have yet to crack even 40 points. It wasn't just this game.

We had 533 yards today and only scored 26 points.
We had 483 yards against ASU and only scored 27 points.
We had 568 yards against USD and only scored 35 points.
The Griz also had just 296 yards against Liberty and scored 34 points.
That's the thing. This team CAN get it done, but after five weeks, especially after today's game that we god damn should have won, I don't have the confidence in this staff that you have.

As for the defense, It makes no sense to make adjustments in the second half if you completely abandon your adjustments later.

Why the hell do you blitz all 3rd quarter, hold them to negative yardage and force a fumble and INT, and then when crunch time comes up, say "Holy shit! He might throw the ball!" and drop back 8 guys?
That's the saddest thing. We gave up the pressure to cover better, and he burned us with long pass plays worse than when we were blitzing...

I want us to go 8-3. I think we can.

But I honestly don't think we will.

As for the Top25 comment, I didn't say we would lose to every team in the top 25, but we definitely could. So far this team and staff haven't really proven otherwise. We're 0-3 vs. top 25 teams so far.
Fortunately, the next five games are against weaker teams than the two they just played. If the Griz win all of those, they'll head into the Bobcat game with at worst a 50/50 shot at the playoffs (8-3 will get in, 7-4 is probably a coin flip).
User avatar
BlackFalkin
Level3
Level3
Posts: 3865
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 4:49 pm
I am a fan of: EASTERN WASHINGTON
Location: Southern California

Re: MT in the top 25...you are nuts

Post by BlackFalkin »

If u guys win 5 of the next 6, youve gotta be in. Win 4 of the next 6, then it might be a coin flip. HOWEVER, the Big Sky is LEGIT so that will def play in your favor. Montana's schedule is tough and NAU is the only "bad" loss. (bc u had the lead @home) It wont be easy to win out but its def possible for UM to win 5 of the next 6 bc you get Montana State at home. IMHO UM still deserves to be in the top 25. I dont see how 5 Big Sky teams dont get in this year.
:coffee:
EWU FOOTBALL 2004|2005|2010|2012|2013|2014|2016|2018|BigSky Champions
EASTERN WASHINGTON|2010 NATIONAL CHAMPIONS
User avatar
uofmman1122
Level2
Level2
Posts: 1845
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 6:22 am
I am a fan of: Japanese girls
A.K.A.: Randy Butternubs
Location: Missoula, MT

Re: MT in the top 25...you are nuts

Post by uofmman1122 »

BlackFalkin wrote:If u guys win 5 of the next 6, youve gotta be in. Win 4 of the next 6, then it might be a coin flip. HOWEVER, the Big Sky is LEGIT so that will def play in your favor. Montana's schedule is tough and NAU is the only "bad" loss. (bc u had the lead @home) It wont be easy to win out but its def possible for UM to win 5 of the next 6 bc you get Montana State at home. IMHO UM still deserves to be in the top 25. I dont see how 5 Big Sky teams dont get in this year.
:coffee:
We'll get five in in this scenario:

MSU - 10-1 (7-1) Loss to Montana - Can afford to lose 3
EWU - 9-2 (7-1) Loss to Montana State - Can afford to lose 2
Cal Poly - 9-2 (7-1) Loss to NAU (EWU is non-conference) - Can afford to lose 3
NAU - 9-2 (7-1) I think they'll lose at least one conference game - Can afford to lose 2
UM - 8-3 (6-2) Have to win out - Can maybe afford another loss, but it has to be to MSU.

If this happens, it's 100% that the Big Sky gets 5 teams in. None of these teams would be left out. In this situation, who the fuck wins the autobid?!?! :shock:

Also, wow....if this happens, the NAU - Cal Poly game could decide the outright winner. Neither team plays MSU or EWU in conference.

Also also, in this situation UND loses its next four games in a row. :lol:
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 62341
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: MT in the top 25...you are nuts

Post by kalm »

uofmman1122 wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote:
Jesus. That's a VERY negative opinion of what happened today. Two fumbles inside the 10 yard line are going to put a damper on scoring....but do you really think that's going to happen every game? Is every team in the BSC as good as EWU?

We lost our best offensive weapon in the 1st quarter and still had a 9 point lead with 3 minutes to go. Last week we played 21 minutes of great football. Today they played 57 minutes of great football. A bounce or two here or there and that game isn't close....I'd hardly say that's the definition of a team that would get beat by every other team in the top 25.

I predict an 8-3 season. That was our last loss. Mark it down.
As much as I want to agree with you, I just can't. For as many yards as we've put up, we have yet to crack even 40 points. It wasn't just this game.
FWIW, in 2010 we didn't crack 40 points till the 9th game of the season and only did it once more after that. But I do get your point.

Montana may not deserve to be in the top 25 right now but they are definitely a top 25 caliber team. That's a hell of a rushing attack and the passing game should improve as things go forward.

I agree on the comments of playing soft at the end of the game. You guys have always been aggressive with blitzing and should have kept it up.

No reason you guys don't win out until the brawl, which is in Missoula, and really anyone's game.
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
SeattleGriz
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 17369
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:41 am
I am a fan of: Montana
A.K.A.: PhxGriz

Re: MT in the top 25...you are nuts

Post by SeattleGriz »

AZGrizFan wrote:
uofmman1122 wrote:That's a pretty huge minus.

Also, we can't score.

We have a great offense for getting a shit ton of yards, but we're terrible at actually scoring. I think we're in the top 10 of FCS in yards per game, and top 5 in rushing per game, but I'd bet we aren't even in the top half of scoring per game.

And yes. I think every team in the top 25 could beat us. We can't finish games, even when we have a two score lead with 4 minutes left. :ohno:
Jesus. That's a VERY negative opinion of what happened today. Two fumbles inside the 10 yard line are going to put a damper on scoring....but do you really think that's going to happen every game? Is every team in the BSC as good as EWU?

We lost our best offensive weapon in the 1st quarter and still had a 9 point lead with 3 minutes to go. Last week we played 21 minutes of great football. Today they played 57 minutes of great football. A bounce or two here or there and that game isn't close....I'd hardly say that's the definition of a team that would get beat by every other team in the top 25.

I predict an 8-3 season. That was our last loss. Mark it down.
:nod:
Everything is better with SeattleGriz
User avatar
weberwildcat
Level2
Level2
Posts: 1649
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 9:17 pm
I am a fan of: WEEber State
A.K.A.: WeberHoops.com
Location: San Jose, CA

Re: MT in the top 25...you are nuts

Post by weberwildcat »

Of course griz will be ranked.didn't they have a situation like this in 2010 and stay ranked?
Image
User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 59959
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Re: MT in the top 25...you are nuts

Post by AZGrizFan »

BlackFalkin wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote:
Jesus. That's a VERY negative opinion of what happened today. Two fumbles inside the 10 yard line are going to put a damper on scoring....but do you really think that's going to happen every game? Is every team in the BSC as good as EWU?

We lost our best offensive weapon in the 1st quarter and still had a 9 point lead with 3 minutes to go. Last week we played 21 minutes of great football. Today they played 57 minutes of great football. A bounce or two here or there and that game isn't close....I'd hardly say that's the definition of a team that would get beat by every other team in the top 25.

I predict an 8-3 season. That was our last loss. Mark it down.
You're a bettin man right?
:coffee:
We'll we're even right now, correct?
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Image
User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 59959
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Re: MT in the top 25...you are nuts

Post by AZGrizFan »

BlackFalkin wrote:If u guys win 5 of the next 6, youve gotta be in. Win 4 of the next 6, then it might be a coin flip. HOWEVER, the Big Sky is LEGIT so that will def play in your favor. Montana's schedule is tough and NAU is the only "bad" loss. (bc u had the lead @home) It wont be easy to win out but its def possible for UM to win 5 of the next 6 bc you get Montana State at home. IMHO UM still deserves to be in the top 25. I dont see how 5 Big Sky teams dont get in this year.
:coffee:
Agreed 100%.
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Image
clawman
Posts: 81
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 6:52 am
I am a fan of: Eastern Eagles

Re: MT in the top 25...you are nuts

Post by clawman »

grizzaholic wrote:
EWURanger wrote:Montana is a top 25 team, no doubt about it. But, they need to find more of a passing game to compliment the running game and good defensive unit to make a playoff run this season.
:ohno: :ohno: ... :ohno:
You obviously were not at the game. They are a VERY good team. I agree they are definitely a top 25 team and like the logic that all teams in the top 25 could not beat them. I find it interesting how quickly many so called Griz fans throw their team under the bus. I think the Griz just played the 2 best teams in the Big Sky and will get much better as the season progress's. I certainly hope my Eagles do not have to face them again.
"Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country"
John F Kennedy
http://www.bigskyfans.com/eagles/index.php" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
User avatar
Grizalltheway
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 35688
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
Location: BSC

Re: MT in the top 25...you are nuts

Post by Grizalltheway »

clawman wrote:
grizzaholic wrote: :ohno: :ohno: ... :ohno:
You obviously were not at the game. They are a VERY good team. I agree they are definitely a top 25 team and like the logic that all teams in the top 25 could not beat them. I find it interesting how quickly many so called Griz fans throw their team under the bus. I think the Griz just played the 2 best teams in the Big Sky and will get much better as the season progress's. I certainly hope my Eagles do not have to face them again.
Great post, claw. :clap:

Also want to give a shout out to all the Eagles fans in Cheney. I was smack dab in the middle of the home side, and I had a great time going back and forth (no homo) with the fans around me. Very much the opposite of how a few MSU fans portrayed the experience there. :notworthy:
clawman
Posts: 81
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 6:52 am
I am a fan of: Eastern Eagles

Re: MT in the top 25...you are nuts

Post by clawman »

BlackFalkin wrote:If u guys win 5 of the next 6, youve gotta be in. Win 4 of the next 6, then it might be a coin flip. HOWEVER, the Big Sky is LEGIT so that will def play in your favor. Montana's schedule is tough and NAU is the only "bad" loss. (bc u had the lead @home) It wont be easy to win out but its def possible for UM to win 5 of the next 6 bc you get Montana State at home. IMHO UM still deserves to be in the top 25. I dont see how 5 Big Sky teams dont get in this year.
:coffee:
25% of the field from one conference? thats a little suspect
"Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country"
John F Kennedy
http://www.bigskyfans.com/eagles/index.php" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
User avatar
EWURanger
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 4712
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 1:06 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern Washington

Re: MT in the top 25...you are nuts

Post by EWURanger »

clawman wrote:
grizzaholic wrote: :ohno: :ohno: ... :ohno:
You obviously were not at the game. They are a VERY good team. I agree they are definitely a top 25 team and like the logic that all teams in the top 25 could not beat them. I find it interesting how quickly many so called Griz fans throw their team under the bus. I think the Griz just played the 2 best teams in the Big Sky and will get much better as the season progress's. I certainly hope my Eagles do not have to face them again.
+1

If the Griz had a better passing game and even marginally better safeties they'd be unstoppable. Young team that will get a lot better.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Image
User avatar
eaglesfootball
Level1
Level1
Posts: 148
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 12:09 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern Washington
A.K.A.: eaglesfootball

Re: MT in the top 25...you are nuts

Post by eaglesfootball »

with a 2-3 record they probably shouldnt sniff the top 25 but i agree that they would probably beat a third of the teams in that field.
User avatar
OptimusPrime
Level1
Level1
Posts: 169
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2011 5:05 pm
I am a fan of: The Fightin' Bobcats
A.K.A.: educated

Re: MT in the top 25...you are nuts

Post by OptimusPrime »

Grizalltheway wrote:
clawman wrote: You obviously were not at the game. They are a VERY good team. I agree they are definitely a top 25 team and like the logic that all teams in the top 25 could not beat them. I find it interesting how quickly many so called Griz fans throw their team under the bus. I think the Griz just played the 2 best teams in the Big Sky and will get much better as the season progress's. I certainly hope my Eagles do not have to face them again.
Great post, claw. :clap:

Also want to give a shout out to all the Eagles fans in Cheney. I was smack dab in the middle of the home side, and I had a great time going back and forth (no homo) with the fans around me. Very much the opposite of how a few MSU fans portrayed the experience there. :notworthy:
I may have missed the other posts, but I had a good experience last year, minus the random dude who wanted to fight us. I was quite pleased. The parking was terrible though and getting back to the highway was a pain, but a good experience nonetheless. :thumb:
Image
Image
Post Reply