SUGGESTION BOX - WHAT WOULD MAKE THE FCS BETTER?

Football Championship Subdivision discussions
User avatar
BlackFalkin
Level3
Level3
Posts: 3875
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 4:49 pm
I am a fan of: EASTERN WASHINGTON
Location: Southern California

SUGGESTION BOX - WHAT WOULD MAKE THE FCS BETTER?

Post by BlackFalkin »

BLACK FALKIN's suggestions:

1: I've said it before and Ill say it again. Conference mandated stadium capacity minimums/attendance minimums. I think the Big Sky shd set a minimum bar of 20k minimum Stadium capacity and 10k minimum avg attendance.. ppl inside the stadium gates. Or else you're out! 1st time warning w/1 season grace period.. not at quota by 2nd season after warning and YOU'RE OUT! btw before you wet your pants... 10k isn't that hard and if you don't want to invest in your program and put the best product out there, move outta D1!!

and that brings me to #2...

2: Remove at least 30-50 teams out of FCS into D2. Don't meet the attendance/ stadium requirements? find a D2 home. no harm no foul.. keep your team, keep your rival (via non-conf games whenever possible) but gtfoutta here. Don't Participate in playoffs? Gtfoutta here. keep your 'classics' and 200 year old annual rivalry games but don't call it FCS. Take your entire conference into Division 2 classification. This would cut the fat off of FCS ball, which holds it back imo.

3: Less cupcake(d2) games. More FCS v FCS non-conf games.


I love the FCS and that's my take. What do you think would make the FCS better?
EWU FOOTBALL 2004|2005|2010|2012|2013|2014|2016|2018|BigSky Champions
EASTERN WASHINGTON|2010 NATIONAL CHAMPIONS
User avatar
Gil Dobie
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 31480
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:45 pm
I am a fan of: Norse Dakota State
Location: Historic Leduc Estate

Re: SUGGESTION BOX - WHAT WOULD MAKE THE FCS BETTER?

Post by Gil Dobie »

Winner of the FCS playoffs gets a spot in the FBS playoffs. Of course this means finishing the FCS playoffs in December with possibly fewer teams, fewer rounds.
Image
User avatar
SACCAT
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 1437
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2009 1:27 pm
I am a fan of: Montana State

Re: SUGGESTION BOX - WHAT WOULD MAKE THE FCS BETTER?

Post by SACCAT »

EWU has only averaged 8,000 fans a game this year. Sure you have only had two games, but if it wasn't that hard, how come you haven't done it yet.

(and before you ask, the Cats average over 3 games is at 19,960)
JayJ79
Level3
Level3
Posts: 4253
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 7:52 pm
I am a fan of: myself

Re: SUGGESTION BOX - WHAT WOULD MAKE THE FCS BETTER?

Post by JayJ79 »

last season, only 29 schools averaged 10K in attendance. and some of those schools who did are in conferences that don't do the playoffs. (and some are transitioning to FBS).

and if such rules were instituted, most schools would probably drop football so as to keep their other sports (or at least MBB) in division I
JayJ79
Level3
Level3
Posts: 4253
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 7:52 pm
I am a fan of: myself

Re: SUGGESTION BOX - WHAT WOULD MAKE THE FCS BETTER?

Post by JayJ79 »

and looking at this year's attendance figures, there are only 34 averaging 10K, and taking out the Ivy and SWAC teams, you have 25
User avatar
GrizFanStuckInUtah
Level3
Level3
Posts: 3758
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 11:27 am
I am a fan of: Montana

Re: SUGGESTION BOX - WHAT WOULD MAKE THE FCS BETTER?

Post by GrizFanStuckInUtah »

BlackFalkin wrote:BLACK FALKIN's suggestions:

1: I've said it before and Ill say it again. Conference mandated stadium capacity minimums/attendance minimums. I think the Big Sky shd set a minimum bar of 20k minimum Stadium capacity and 10k minimum avg attendance.. ppl inside the stadium gates. Or else you're out! 1st time warning w/1 season grace period.. not at quota by 2nd season after warning and YOU'RE OUT! btw before you wet your pants... 10k isn't that hard and if you don't want to invest in your program and put the best product out there, move outta D1!!

and that brings me to #2...

2: Remove at least 30-50 teams out of FCS into D2. Don't meet the attendance/ stadium requirements? find a D2 home. no harm no foul.. keep your team, keep your rival (via non-conf games whenever possible) but gtfoutta here. Don't Participate in playoffs? Gtfoutta here. keep your 'classics' and 200 year old annual rivalry games but don't call it FCS. Take your entire conference into Division 2 classification. This would cut the fat off of FCS ball, which holds it back imo.

3: Less cupcake(d2) games. More FCS v FCS non-conf games.


I love the FCS and that's my take. What do you think would make the FCS better?

That would keep Idaho out of the big sky. :lol:

I personally don't think the capacity/attendance thing would do anything for the game, I really don't. There is no sense in making someone build a 20K seat stadium to have 4K attend. :twocents:
-Go Griz!
-Class of '97
-Thank you to all our Veterans. :bow:
User avatar
BlackFalkin
Level3
Level3
Posts: 3875
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 4:49 pm
I am a fan of: EASTERN WASHINGTON
Location: Southern California

Re: SUGGESTION BOX - WHAT WOULD MAKE THE FCS BETTER?

Post by BlackFalkin »

GrizFanStuckInUtah wrote:
BlackFalkin wrote:BLACK FALKIN's suggestions:

1: I've said it before and Ill say it again. Conference mandated stadium capacity minimums/attendance minimums. I think the Big Sky shd set a minimum bar of 20k minimum Stadium capacity and 10k minimum avg attendance.. ppl inside the stadium gates. Or else you're out! 1st time warning w/1 season grace period.. not at quota by 2nd season after warning and YOU'RE OUT! btw before you wet your pants... 10k isn't that hard and if you don't want to invest in your program and put the best product out there, move outta D1!!

and that brings me to #2...

2: Remove at least 30-50 teams out of FCS into D2. Don't meet the attendance/ stadium requirements? find a D2 home. no harm no foul.. keep your team, keep your rival (via non-conf games whenever possible) but gtfoutta here. Don't Participate in playoffs? Gtfoutta here. keep your 'classics' and 200 year old annual rivalry games but don't call it FCS. Take your entire conference into Division 2 classification. This would cut the fat off of FCS ball, which holds it back imo.

3: Less cupcake(d2) games. More FCS v FCS non-conf games.


I love the FCS and that's my take. What do you think would make the FCS better?

That would keep Idaho out of the big sky. :lol:

I personally don't think the capacity/attendance thing would do anything for the game, I really don't. There is no sense in making someone build a 20K seat stadium to have 4K attend. :twocents:

If the school puts someone on the job of building the brand of the schools GAMEDAY and building attendance numbers the attendance numbers will rise. Most schools get at least 50% of their stadium cap bro beans. EWU's gets 100% bro breans. All the sky schools get at least 50%+ of their stadium cap except psu bc that's not their stadium and therefor they can be added to this equation. I'm in the zone chief.
EWU FOOTBALL 2004|2005|2010|2012|2013|2014|2016|2018|BigSky Champions
EASTERN WASHINGTON|2010 NATIONAL CHAMPIONS
Mvemjsunpx
Level5
Level5
Posts: 14775
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 2:44 pm
I am a fan of: Montana

Re: SUGGESTION BOX - WHAT WOULD MAKE THE FCS BETTER?

Post by Mvemjsunpx »

If you made a 10k attendance requirement, FCS would fall to about 30 teams.

Falling to DII requires that the whole athletics program fall to DII, not just football. There's obviously no way the suggested idea above could possibly work in any vague way. There just aren't enough football fans around. All this would do is force a bunch of schools to drop football entirely.
User avatar
ASUG8
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 17570
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 12:57 pm
I am a fan of: ASU
Location: SC

Re: SUGGESTION BOX - WHAT WOULD MAKE THE FCS BETTER?

Post by ASUG8 »

Kick out the problematic SoCon schools. :coffee:
User avatar
BlackFalkin
Level3
Level3
Posts: 3875
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 4:49 pm
I am a fan of: EASTERN WASHINGTON
Location: Southern California

Re: SUGGESTION BOX - WHAT WOULD MAKE THE FCS BETTER?

Post by BlackFalkin »

Mvemjsunpx wrote:If you made a 10k attendance requirement, FCS would fall to about 30 teams.

Falling to DII requires that the whole athletics program fall to DII, not just football. There's obviously no way the suggested idea above could possibly work in any vague way. There just aren't enough football fans around. All this would do is force a bunch of schools to drop football entirely.
You're proving my point further. No fans = nobody is gonna miss the team. Do like cal state north ridge and long beach state and close up shop. U can't tell me there's not enough fans in SoCal. What's ur excuse there? Ur shxt doesn't hold water bro beans.
EWU FOOTBALL 2004|2005|2010|2012|2013|2014|2016|2018|BigSky Champions
EASTERN WASHINGTON|2010 NATIONAL CHAMPIONS
grizzaholic
One Man Wolfpack
One Man Wolfpack
Posts: 34860
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:13 am
I am a fan of: Hodgdon
A.K.A.: Random Mailer
Location: Backwoods of Montana

Re: SUGGESTION BOX - WHAT WOULD MAKE THE FCS BETTER?

Post by grizzaholic »

I can fix this shit of the FCS...


Go back to the top 16...with the top 4 seeded.


This 20 or 24 is idiotic.
"What I'm saying is: You might have taken care of your wolf problem, but everyone around town is going to think of you as the crazy son of a bitch who bought land mines to get rid of wolves."

Justin Halpern
User avatar
EWURanger
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 4712
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 1:06 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern Washington

SUGGESTION BOX - WHAT WOULD MAKE THE FCS BETTER?

Post by EWURanger »

SACCAT wrote:EWU has only averaged 8,000 fans a game this year. Sure you have only had two games, but if it wasn't that hard, how come you haven't done it yet.

(and before you ask, the Cats average over 3 games is at 19,960)
School wasn't in session yet for the first game of the season. We had almost 10k at the Weber game and should get around that same number until the weather gets really shitty when some folks start staying at home. Roos field technically only has 8700 permanent seats, so when we are drawing 9-11k fans we're actually well over capacity (temp seats).


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free
Image
Mvemjsunpx
Level5
Level5
Posts: 14775
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 2:44 pm
I am a fan of: Montana

Re: SUGGESTION BOX - WHAT WOULD MAKE THE FCS BETTER?

Post by Mvemjsunpx »

BlackFalkin wrote:
Mvemjsunpx wrote:If you made a 10k attendance requirement, FCS would fall to about 30 teams.

Falling to DII requires that the whole athletics program fall to DII, not just football. There's obviously no way the suggested idea above could possibly work in any vague way. There just aren't enough football fans around. All this would do is force a bunch of schools to drop football entirely.
You're proving my point further. No fans = nobody is gonna miss the team. Do like cal state north ridge and long beach state and close up shop. U can't tell me there's not enough fans in SoCal. What's ur excuse there? Ur shxt doesn't hold water bro beans.
Excuse? Huh?

The NCAA isn't going to institute a policy that would force 3/4 of FCS football teams to shut down. That's insane, not to mention something like that would have to be voted on. If that did happen, FCS would just be eliminated and all the remaining teams would be turned into Idahoes struggling in vain to play in shitty bowls in places like Boise. Everyone would lose in that scenario.

Northridge shut down because their stadium was damaged in the earthquake, they apparently couldn't/didn't want to spend the money to fix it, and the Big Sky kicked them out for it thus leaving them as the unwanted Idaho of I-AA.
CAA Flagship
4th&29
4th&29
Posts: 38528
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:01 pm
I am a fan of: Old Dominion
A.K.A.: He/His/Him/Himself
Location: Pizza Hell

Re: SUGGESTION BOX - WHAT WOULD MAKE THE FCS BETTER?

Post by CAA Flagship »

Answer:
Let the 70 or so major programs break away from the rest of the FBS programs. The remaining FBS and the full scholarship FCS programs then combine to form the "second level" of college football.
User avatar
mainejeff
Level4
Level4
Posts: 5395
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 10:43 am
I am a fan of: Maine
A.K.A.: mainejeff

Re: SUGGESTION BOX - WHAT WOULD MAKE THE FCS BETTER?

Post by mainejeff »

Maine averages 6K per game.......Delaware averages 18K per game........Maine beat Delaware 62-28.

Go figure.

:coffee:

Oh yeah.......with your minimums.........good-bye Maine, UNH, Richmond, Stony Brook, Albany........and yeah.......URI ( :lol: )
Go Black Bears!
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 67811
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: SUGGESTION BOX - WHAT WOULD MAKE THE FCS BETTER?

Post by kalm »

CAA Flagship wrote:Answer:
Let the 70 or so major programs break away from the rest of the FBS programs. The remaining FBS and the full scholarship FCS programs then combine to form the "second level" of college football.
This is my hope once the dust settles. :thumb:
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Gil Dobie
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 31480
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:45 pm
I am a fan of: Norse Dakota State
Location: Historic Leduc Estate

Re: SUGGESTION BOX - WHAT WOULD MAKE THE FCS BETTER?

Post by Gil Dobie »

mainejeff wrote:Maine averages 6K per game.......Delaware averages 18K per game........Maine beat Delaware 62-28.

Go figure.

:coffee:

Oh yeah.......with your minimums.........good-bye Maine, UNH, Richmond, Stony Brook, Albany........and yeah.......URI ( :lol: )
What kind of attendance does Maine hockey get?
Image
User avatar
TribeFanInNC
Level1
Level1
Posts: 435
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 12:32 pm
I am a fan of: William & Mary Tribe

Re: SUGGESTION BOX - WHAT WOULD MAKE THE FCS BETTER?

Post by TribeFanInNC »

Require every team to have an FCS inter-regional home-and-home, every 4 or 5 years. And once you've committed to it, you can't back out after you've played the home half without paying a massive penalty, such forfeiting playoff eligibility in the year in question.
YoUDeeMan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 12088
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:48 am
I am a fan of: Fleecing the Stupid
A.K.A.: Delaware Homie

Re: SUGGESTION BOX - WHAT WOULD MAKE THE FCS BETTER?

Post by YoUDeeMan »

FCS would be much better if they required their graduates and fans to be able to communicate their ideas clearly in writing. Those ideas would also not involve taxing other peoples pockets and/or intelligence.
These signatures have a 500 character limit?

What if I have more personalities than that?
User avatar
Grizalltheway
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 35688
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
Location: BSC

Re: SUGGESTION BOX - WHAT WOULD MAKE THE FCS BETTER?

Post by Grizalltheway »

mainejeff wrote:Maine averages 6K per game.......Delaware averages 18K per game........Maine beat Delaware 62-28.

Go figure.

:coffee:

Oh yeah.......with your minimums.........good-bye Maine, UNH, Richmond, Stony Brook, Albany........and yeah.......URI ( :lol: )
See ya! :coffee:
User avatar
Cap'n Cat
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 13614
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:38 am
I am a fan of: Mostly myself.
A.K.A.: LabiaInTheSunlight

Re: SUGGESTION BOX - WHAT WOULD MAKE THE FCS BETTER?

Post by Cap'n Cat »

State schools only. No privates.
HI54UNI
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 12394
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 9:39 pm
I am a fan of: Firing Mark Farley
A.K.A.: Bikinis for JSO
Location: The Panther State

Re: SUGGESTION BOX - WHAT WOULD MAKE THE FCS BETTER?

Post by HI54UNI »

No fields that look like bloody tampons.
If fascism ever comes to America, it will come in the name of liberalism. Ronald Reagan, 1975.

Progressivism is cancer

All my posts are satire
User avatar
Grizalltheway
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 35688
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
Location: BSC

Re: SUGGESTION BOX - WHAT WOULD MAKE THE FCS BETTER?

Post by Grizalltheway »

HI54UNI wrote:No fields that look like bloody tampons.
No domes, either. :thumb:
User avatar
andy7171
Firefly
Firefly
Posts: 27951
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 6:12 am
I am a fan of: Wiping.
A.K.A.: HE HATE ME
Location: Eastern Palouse

Re: SUGGESTION BOX - WHAT WOULD MAKE THE FCS BETTER?

Post by andy7171 »

Cap'n Cat wrote:State schools only. No privates.
Yeah! Fuck Notre Dame!
"Elaine, you're from Baltimore, right?"
"Yes, well, Towson actually."
User avatar
Gil Dobie
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 31480
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:45 pm
I am a fan of: Norse Dakota State
Location: Historic Leduc Estate

Re: SUGGESTION BOX - WHAT WOULD MAKE THE FCS BETTER?

Post by Gil Dobie »

Grizalltheway wrote:
HI54UNI wrote:No fields that look like bloody tampons.
No domes, either. :thumb:
That would actually reduce the attendance. There are a lot of 60+ year old fans that would not be using their season tickets when those Alberta Clippers come through.
Image
Post Reply