SUGGESTION BOX - WHAT WOULD MAKE THE FCS BETTER?
- BlackFalkin
- Level3

- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 4:49 pm
- I am a fan of: EASTERN WASHINGTON
- Location: Southern California
SUGGESTION BOX - WHAT WOULD MAKE THE FCS BETTER?
BLACK FALKIN's suggestions:
1: I've said it before and Ill say it again. Conference mandated stadium capacity minimums/attendance minimums. I think the Big Sky shd set a minimum bar of 20k minimum Stadium capacity and 10k minimum avg attendance.. ppl inside the stadium gates. Or else you're out! 1st time warning w/1 season grace period.. not at quota by 2nd season after warning and YOU'RE OUT! btw before you wet your pants... 10k isn't that hard and if you don't want to invest in your program and put the best product out there, move outta D1!!
and that brings me to #2...
2: Remove at least 30-50 teams out of FCS into D2. Don't meet the attendance/ stadium requirements? find a D2 home. no harm no foul.. keep your team, keep your rival (via non-conf games whenever possible) but gtfoutta here. Don't Participate in playoffs? Gtfoutta here. keep your 'classics' and 200 year old annual rivalry games but don't call it FCS. Take your entire conference into Division 2 classification. This would cut the fat off of FCS ball, which holds it back imo.
3: Less cupcake(d2) games. More FCS v FCS non-conf games.
I love the FCS and that's my take. What do you think would make the FCS better?
1: I've said it before and Ill say it again. Conference mandated stadium capacity minimums/attendance minimums. I think the Big Sky shd set a minimum bar of 20k minimum Stadium capacity and 10k minimum avg attendance.. ppl inside the stadium gates. Or else you're out! 1st time warning w/1 season grace period.. not at quota by 2nd season after warning and YOU'RE OUT! btw before you wet your pants... 10k isn't that hard and if you don't want to invest in your program and put the best product out there, move outta D1!!
and that brings me to #2...
2: Remove at least 30-50 teams out of FCS into D2. Don't meet the attendance/ stadium requirements? find a D2 home. no harm no foul.. keep your team, keep your rival (via non-conf games whenever possible) but gtfoutta here. Don't Participate in playoffs? Gtfoutta here. keep your 'classics' and 200 year old annual rivalry games but don't call it FCS. Take your entire conference into Division 2 classification. This would cut the fat off of FCS ball, which holds it back imo.
3: Less cupcake(d2) games. More FCS v FCS non-conf games.
I love the FCS and that's my take. What do you think would make the FCS better?
EWU FOOTBALL 2004|2005|2010|2012|2013|2014|2016|2018|BigSky Champions
EASTERN WASHINGTON|2010 NATIONAL CHAMPIONS
EASTERN WASHINGTON|2010 NATIONAL CHAMPIONS
- Gil Dobie
- Supporter

- Posts: 31480
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:45 pm
- I am a fan of: Norse Dakota State
- Location: Historic Leduc Estate
Re: SUGGESTION BOX - WHAT WOULD MAKE THE FCS BETTER?
Winner of the FCS playoffs gets a spot in the FBS playoffs. Of course this means finishing the FCS playoffs in December with possibly fewer teams, fewer rounds.

Re: SUGGESTION BOX - WHAT WOULD MAKE THE FCS BETTER?
EWU has only averaged 8,000 fans a game this year. Sure you have only had two games, but if it wasn't that hard, how come you haven't done it yet.
(and before you ask, the Cats average over 3 games is at 19,960)
(and before you ask, the Cats average over 3 games is at 19,960)
Re: SUGGESTION BOX - WHAT WOULD MAKE THE FCS BETTER?
last season, only 29 schools averaged 10K in attendance. and some of those schools who did are in conferences that don't do the playoffs. (and some are transitioning to FBS).
and if such rules were instituted, most schools would probably drop football so as to keep their other sports (or at least MBB) in division I
and if such rules were instituted, most schools would probably drop football so as to keep their other sports (or at least MBB) in division I
Re: SUGGESTION BOX - WHAT WOULD MAKE THE FCS BETTER?
and looking at this year's attendance figures, there are only 34 averaging 10K, and taking out the Ivy and SWAC teams, you have 25
- GrizFanStuckInUtah
- Level3

- Posts: 3758
- Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2009 11:27 am
- I am a fan of: Montana
Re: SUGGESTION BOX - WHAT WOULD MAKE THE FCS BETTER?
BlackFalkin wrote:BLACK FALKIN's suggestions:
1: I've said it before and Ill say it again. Conference mandated stadium capacity minimums/attendance minimums. I think the Big Sky shd set a minimum bar of 20k minimum Stadium capacity and 10k minimum avg attendance.. ppl inside the stadium gates. Or else you're out! 1st time warning w/1 season grace period.. not at quota by 2nd season after warning and YOU'RE OUT! btw before you wet your pants... 10k isn't that hard and if you don't want to invest in your program and put the best product out there, move outta D1!!
and that brings me to #2...
2: Remove at least 30-50 teams out of FCS into D2. Don't meet the attendance/ stadium requirements? find a D2 home. no harm no foul.. keep your team, keep your rival (via non-conf games whenever possible) but gtfoutta here. Don't Participate in playoffs? Gtfoutta here. keep your 'classics' and 200 year old annual rivalry games but don't call it FCS. Take your entire conference into Division 2 classification. This would cut the fat off of FCS ball, which holds it back imo.
3: Less cupcake(d2) games. More FCS v FCS non-conf games.
I love the FCS and that's my take. What do you think would make the FCS better?
That would keep Idaho out of the big sky.
I personally don't think the capacity/attendance thing would do anything for the game, I really don't. There is no sense in making someone build a 20K seat stadium to have 4K attend.
-Go Griz!
-Class of '97
-Thank you to all our Veterans.
-Class of '97
-Thank you to all our Veterans.
- BlackFalkin
- Level3

- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 4:49 pm
- I am a fan of: EASTERN WASHINGTON
- Location: Southern California
Re: SUGGESTION BOX - WHAT WOULD MAKE THE FCS BETTER?
GrizFanStuckInUtah wrote:BlackFalkin wrote:BLACK FALKIN's suggestions:
1: I've said it before and Ill say it again. Conference mandated stadium capacity minimums/attendance minimums. I think the Big Sky shd set a minimum bar of 20k minimum Stadium capacity and 10k minimum avg attendance.. ppl inside the stadium gates. Or else you're out! 1st time warning w/1 season grace period.. not at quota by 2nd season after warning and YOU'RE OUT! btw before you wet your pants... 10k isn't that hard and if you don't want to invest in your program and put the best product out there, move outta D1!!
and that brings me to #2...
2: Remove at least 30-50 teams out of FCS into D2. Don't meet the attendance/ stadium requirements? find a D2 home. no harm no foul.. keep your team, keep your rival (via non-conf games whenever possible) but gtfoutta here. Don't Participate in playoffs? Gtfoutta here. keep your 'classics' and 200 year old annual rivalry games but don't call it FCS. Take your entire conference into Division 2 classification. This would cut the fat off of FCS ball, which holds it back imo.
3: Less cupcake(d2) games. More FCS v FCS non-conf games.
I love the FCS and that's my take. What do you think would make the FCS better?
That would keep Idaho out of the big sky.![]()
I personally don't think the capacity/attendance thing would do anything for the game, I really don't. There is no sense in making someone build a 20K seat stadium to have 4K attend.
If the school puts someone on the job of building the brand of the schools GAMEDAY and building attendance numbers the attendance numbers will rise. Most schools get at least 50% of their stadium cap bro beans. EWU's gets 100% bro breans. All the sky schools get at least 50%+ of their stadium cap except psu bc that's not their stadium and therefor they can be added to this equation. I'm in the zone chief.
EWU FOOTBALL 2004|2005|2010|2012|2013|2014|2016|2018|BigSky Champions
EASTERN WASHINGTON|2010 NATIONAL CHAMPIONS
EASTERN WASHINGTON|2010 NATIONAL CHAMPIONS
-
Mvemjsunpx
- Level5

- Posts: 14775
- Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 2:44 pm
- I am a fan of: Montana
Re: SUGGESTION BOX - WHAT WOULD MAKE THE FCS BETTER?
If you made a 10k attendance requirement, FCS would fall to about 30 teams.
Falling to DII requires that the whole athletics program fall to DII, not just football. There's obviously no way the suggested idea above could possibly work in any vague way. There just aren't enough football fans around. All this would do is force a bunch of schools to drop football entirely.
Falling to DII requires that the whole athletics program fall to DII, not just football. There's obviously no way the suggested idea above could possibly work in any vague way. There just aren't enough football fans around. All this would do is force a bunch of schools to drop football entirely.
Re: SUGGESTION BOX - WHAT WOULD MAKE THE FCS BETTER?
Kick out the problematic SoCon schools. 
- BlackFalkin
- Level3

- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 4:49 pm
- I am a fan of: EASTERN WASHINGTON
- Location: Southern California
Re: SUGGESTION BOX - WHAT WOULD MAKE THE FCS BETTER?
You're proving my point further. No fans = nobody is gonna miss the team. Do like cal state north ridge and long beach state and close up shop. U can't tell me there's not enough fans in SoCal. What's ur excuse there? Ur shxt doesn't hold water bro beans.Mvemjsunpx wrote:If you made a 10k attendance requirement, FCS would fall to about 30 teams.
Falling to DII requires that the whole athletics program fall to DII, not just football. There's obviously no way the suggested idea above could possibly work in any vague way. There just aren't enough football fans around. All this would do is force a bunch of schools to drop football entirely.
EWU FOOTBALL 2004|2005|2010|2012|2013|2014|2016|2018|BigSky Champions
EASTERN WASHINGTON|2010 NATIONAL CHAMPIONS
EASTERN WASHINGTON|2010 NATIONAL CHAMPIONS
-
grizzaholic
- One Man Wolfpack

- Posts: 34860
- Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 10:13 am
- I am a fan of: Hodgdon
- A.K.A.: Random Mailer
- Location: Backwoods of Montana
Re: SUGGESTION BOX - WHAT WOULD MAKE THE FCS BETTER?
I can fix this shit of the FCS...
Go back to the top 16...with the top 4 seeded.
This 20 or 24 is idiotic.
Go back to the top 16...with the top 4 seeded.
This 20 or 24 is idiotic.
"What I'm saying is: You might have taken care of your wolf problem, but everyone around town is going to think of you as the crazy son of a bitch who bought land mines to get rid of wolves."
Justin Halpern
Justin Halpern
SUGGESTION BOX - WHAT WOULD MAKE THE FCS BETTER?
School wasn't in session yet for the first game of the season. We had almost 10k at the Weber game and should get around that same number until the weather gets really shitty when some folks start staying at home. Roos field technically only has 8700 permanent seats, so when we are drawing 9-11k fans we're actually well over capacity (temp seats).SACCAT wrote:EWU has only averaged 8,000 fans a game this year. Sure you have only had two games, but if it wasn't that hard, how come you haven't done it yet.
(and before you ask, the Cats average over 3 games is at 19,960)
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free

-
Mvemjsunpx
- Level5

- Posts: 14775
- Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 2:44 pm
- I am a fan of: Montana
Re: SUGGESTION BOX - WHAT WOULD MAKE THE FCS BETTER?
Excuse? Huh?BlackFalkin wrote:You're proving my point further. No fans = nobody is gonna miss the team. Do like cal state north ridge and long beach state and close up shop. U can't tell me there's not enough fans in SoCal. What's ur excuse there? Ur shxt doesn't hold water bro beans.Mvemjsunpx wrote:If you made a 10k attendance requirement, FCS would fall to about 30 teams.
Falling to DII requires that the whole athletics program fall to DII, not just football. There's obviously no way the suggested idea above could possibly work in any vague way. There just aren't enough football fans around. All this would do is force a bunch of schools to drop football entirely.
The NCAA isn't going to institute a policy that would force 3/4 of FCS football teams to shut down. That's insane, not to mention something like that would have to be voted on. If that did happen, FCS would just be eliminated and all the remaining teams would be turned into Idahoes struggling in vain to play in shitty bowls in places like Boise. Everyone would lose in that scenario.
Northridge shut down because their stadium was damaged in the earthquake, they apparently couldn't/didn't want to spend the money to fix it, and the Big Sky kicked them out for it thus leaving them as the unwanted Idaho of I-AA.
-
CAA Flagship
- 4th&29

- Posts: 38528
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:01 pm
- I am a fan of: Old Dominion
- A.K.A.: He/His/Him/Himself
- Location: Pizza Hell
Re: SUGGESTION BOX - WHAT WOULD MAKE THE FCS BETTER?
Answer:
Let the 70 or so major programs break away from the rest of the FBS programs. The remaining FBS and the full scholarship FCS programs then combine to form the "second level" of college football.
Let the 70 or so major programs break away from the rest of the FBS programs. The remaining FBS and the full scholarship FCS programs then combine to form the "second level" of college football.
- mainejeff
- Level4

- Posts: 5395
- Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 10:43 am
- I am a fan of: Maine
- A.K.A.: mainejeff
Re: SUGGESTION BOX - WHAT WOULD MAKE THE FCS BETTER?
Maine averages 6K per game.......Delaware averages 18K per game........Maine beat Delaware 62-28.
Go figure.
Oh yeah.......with your minimums.........good-bye Maine, UNH, Richmond, Stony Brook, Albany........and yeah.......URI (
)
Go figure.
Oh yeah.......with your minimums.........good-bye Maine, UNH, Richmond, Stony Brook, Albany........and yeah.......URI (
Go Black Bears!
-
kalm
- Supporter

- Posts: 67811
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: SUGGESTION BOX - WHAT WOULD MAKE THE FCS BETTER?
This is my hope once the dust settles.CAA Flagship wrote:Answer:
Let the 70 or so major programs break away from the rest of the FBS programs. The remaining FBS and the full scholarship FCS programs then combine to form the "second level" of college football.
- Gil Dobie
- Supporter

- Posts: 31480
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:45 pm
- I am a fan of: Norse Dakota State
- Location: Historic Leduc Estate
Re: SUGGESTION BOX - WHAT WOULD MAKE THE FCS BETTER?
What kind of attendance does Maine hockey get?mainejeff wrote:Maine averages 6K per game.......Delaware averages 18K per game........Maine beat Delaware 62-28.
Go figure.
![]()
Oh yeah.......with your minimums.........good-bye Maine, UNH, Richmond, Stony Brook, Albany........and yeah.......URI ()

- TribeFanInNC
- Level1

- Posts: 435
- Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 12:32 pm
- I am a fan of: William & Mary Tribe
Re: SUGGESTION BOX - WHAT WOULD MAKE THE FCS BETTER?
Require every team to have an FCS inter-regional home-and-home, every 4 or 5 years. And once you've committed to it, you can't back out after you've played the home half without paying a massive penalty, such forfeiting playoff eligibility in the year in question.
-
YoUDeeMan
- Level5

- Posts: 12088
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:48 am
- I am a fan of: Fleecing the Stupid
- A.K.A.: Delaware Homie
Re: SUGGESTION BOX - WHAT WOULD MAKE THE FCS BETTER?
FCS would be much better if they required their graduates and fans to be able to communicate their ideas clearly in writing. Those ideas would also not involve taxing other peoples pockets and/or intelligence.
These signatures have a 500 character limit?
What if I have more personalities than that?
What if I have more personalities than that?
- Grizalltheway
- Supporter

- Posts: 35688
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
- A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
- Location: BSC
Re: SUGGESTION BOX - WHAT WOULD MAKE THE FCS BETTER?
See ya!mainejeff wrote:Maine averages 6K per game.......Delaware averages 18K per game........Maine beat Delaware 62-28.
Go figure.
![]()
Oh yeah.......with your minimums.........good-bye Maine, UNH, Richmond, Stony Brook, Albany........and yeah.......URI ()
- Cap'n Cat
- Supporter

- Posts: 13614
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:38 am
- I am a fan of: Mostly myself.
- A.K.A.: LabiaInTheSunlight
Re: SUGGESTION BOX - WHAT WOULD MAKE THE FCS BETTER?
State schools only. No privates.
-
HI54UNI
- Supporter

- Posts: 12394
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 9:39 pm
- I am a fan of: Firing Mark Farley
- A.K.A.: Bikinis for JSO
- Location: The Panther State
Re: SUGGESTION BOX - WHAT WOULD MAKE THE FCS BETTER?
No fields that look like bloody tampons.
If fascism ever comes to America, it will come in the name of liberalism. Ronald Reagan, 1975.
Progressivism is cancer
All my posts are satire
Progressivism is cancer
All my posts are satire
- Grizalltheway
- Supporter

- Posts: 35688
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
- A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
- Location: BSC
Re: SUGGESTION BOX - WHAT WOULD MAKE THE FCS BETTER?
No domes, either.HI54UNI wrote:No fields that look like bloody tampons.
- andy7171
- Firefly

- Posts: 27951
- Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 6:12 am
- I am a fan of: Wiping.
- A.K.A.: HE HATE ME
- Location: Eastern Palouse
Re: SUGGESTION BOX - WHAT WOULD MAKE THE FCS BETTER?
Yeah! Fuck Notre Dame!Cap'n Cat wrote:State schools only. No privates.
"Elaine, you're from Baltimore, right?"
"Yes, well, Towson actually."
"Yes, well, Towson actually."
- Gil Dobie
- Supporter

- Posts: 31480
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:45 pm
- I am a fan of: Norse Dakota State
- Location: Historic Leduc Estate
Re: SUGGESTION BOX - WHAT WOULD MAKE THE FCS BETTER?
That would actually reduce the attendance. There are a lot of 60+ year old fans that would not be using their season tickets when those Alberta Clippers come through.Grizalltheway wrote:No domes, either.HI54UNI wrote:No fields that look like bloody tampons.





