Big Sky Power Rankings 9-29

Football Championship Subdivision discussions
JALMOND
Level4
Level4
Posts: 5186
Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 11:04 pm
I am a fan of: Portland State
A.K.A.: JALMOND

Big Sky Power Rankings 9-29

Post by JALMOND »

So the waters may be becoming a bit clearer, but yet its only been one conference week. Still a lot of football left to be played. And just when you might think things are clear, they could possibly become muddled again. Here are this week's Bog Sky power rankings (last week's rank in parenthesis). Here you go...

1. Eastern Washington (1)---The Eagles may have had a bit of a scare from UC-Davis last week but they did wake up in time to get the win. This week they return to the red turf and bring in Idaho State.

2. Montana State (2)---So the Bobcats did get the win last weekend against North Dakota but it may not have been all that impressive. But a win is still a win. This may be true this weekend as they head out to Sacramento State.

3. Montana (3)---The Grizzlies had little trouble at home last weekend with Northern Colorado in getting an easy win. They hit the road this weekend with a trip out to North Dakota.

4. Northern Arizona (5)---The Lumberjacks held off upstart Cal Poly last weekend at home, getting a hard fought win. Things should get easier this weekend as they hit the road against Northern Colorado. Or will they get easier.

5. Southern Utah (6)---The Thunderbirds took care of their instate cohorts last weekend, Weber State, at their home. Now they hit the road for a much tougher test at Cal Poly.

6. Cal Poly (7)---The Mustangs gave Northern Arizona all they could handle on the road last weekend before falling in a close contest. They return home this weekend, bringing in another tough test, Southern Utah.

7. Idaho State (11)---The Bengals looked like world beaters in their conference opener, destroying Sacramento State in their barn. Their reward is now heading out on the road to Eastern Washington.

8. Sacramento State (4)---The Hornets had a dream season hit a major pothole last weekend at Idaho State, where they could not get anything going. Things don't get any easier this weekend as they bring in Montana State.

9. UC-Davis (9)---The Aggies took on the enormous task of playing Eastern Washington and went toe to toe with them, in the first half anyway. Then reality set in and they took their loss. This weekend they hit the road again at Portland State.

10. Weber State (8)---The Wildcats put up a good fight, yet still could not get their first win of the season at Southern Utah. Eager to break through, they will have to put those plans on hold as they take this weekend off.

11. North Dakota (10)---The No-Names headed on the road at Montana State where no one gave them much of a shot. But they did hang in there, making the score look respectable. It did give them confidence which they will need this weekend as Montana comes calling.

12. Portland State (12)---The Vikings were the only Big Sky team that didn't play last weekend and the hope is that they were able to refocus and prepare for the conference. It starts this weekend at home against UC-Davis.

13. Northern Colorado (13)---The Bears could not break through last weekend at Montana, a fairly tough place to play. They move back home and welcome Northern Arizona to their home turf. Still a tough matchup.

RECAP: 1-3 together, 4-13 still together.
User avatar
SuperHornet
SuperHornet
SuperHornet
Posts: 20290
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:24 pm
I am a fan of: Sac State
Location: Twentynine Palms, CA

Re: Big Sky Power Rankings 9-29

Post by SuperHornet »

1,

3, 2,





6, 7, 8,


4, 5, 10,



9, 12, 11,






















13.
Image

SuperHornet's Athletics Hall of Fame includes Jacksonville State kicker Ashley Martin, the first girl to score in a Division I football game. She kicked 3 PATs in a 2001 game for J-State.
Mvemjsunpx
Level5
Level5
Posts: 13707
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 2:44 pm
I am a fan of: Montana

Re: Big Sky Power Rankings 9-29

Post by Mvemjsunpx »

Interesting stats…

We all know about Montana's O-Line issues and we've seen some of them in games, but the Griz are presently the best team in the league in both yards-per-carry (5.6) and sacks allowed (2).
User avatar
uofmman1122
Level2
Level2
Posts: 1845
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 6:22 am
I am a fan of: Japanese girls
A.K.A.: Randy Butternubs
Location: Missoula, MT

Re: Big Sky Power Rankings 9-29

Post by uofmman1122 »

The Griz are absolutely devastated by injuries. More so than any year I can remember. :ohno:
User avatar
Grizalltheway
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 35688
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
Location: BSC

Re: Big Sky Power Rankings 9-29

Post by Grizalltheway »

Mvemjsunpx wrote:Interesting stats…

We all know about Montana's O-Line issues and we've seen some of them in games, but the Griz are presently the best team in the league in both yards-per-carry (5.6) and sacks allowed (2).
And yet, no one seems to care that the supposed #2 team is giving up 424 yds/game on defense and a whopping 5.6 yds/play. :coffee:
User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 59959
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Re: Big Sky Power Rankings 9-29

Post by AZGrizFan »

Mvemjsunpx wrote:Interesting stats…

We all know about Montana's O-Line issues and we've seen some of them in games, but the Griz are presently the best team in the league in both yards-per-carry (5.6) and sacks allowed (2).
:lol: :lol: :lol:

Amazing. Of course, we can't count any of the big plays. We can only count the ones that go for 3 yards or less. Big plays are just an anomaly. :coffee: :coffee:
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Image
User avatar
Grizalltheway
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 35688
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
Location: BSC

Re: Big Sky Power Rankings 9-29

Post by Grizalltheway »

AZGrizFan wrote:
Mvemjsunpx wrote:Interesting stats…

We all know about Montana's O-Line issues and we've seen some of them in games, but the Griz are presently the best team in the league in both yards-per-carry (5.6) and sacks allowed (2).
:lol: :lol: :lol:

Amazing. Of course, we can't count any of the big plays. We can only count the ones that go for 3 yards or less. Big plays are just an anomaly. :coffee: :coffee:
Weird, I see one happen every time I post. :?
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 59482
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Big Sky Power Rankings 9-29

Post by kalm »

Grizalltheway wrote:
Mvemjsunpx wrote:Interesting stats…

We all know about Montana's O-Line issues and we've seen some of them in games, but the Griz are presently the best team in the league in both yards-per-carry (5.6) and sacks allowed (2).
And yet, no one seems to care that the supposed #2 team is giving up 424 yds/game on defense and a whopping 5.6 yds/play. :coffee:
I care.

But let's see if those stats even out a bit as the season progresses.
Image
Image
Image
Robsnotes4u
Level1
Level1
Posts: 144
Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2013 2:16 pm
I am a fan of: Cats, Sioux, Griz
A.K.A.: Robsnotes4u
Location: Fargo, ND

Re: Big Sky Power Rankings 9-29

Post by Robsnotes4u »

Grizalltheway wrote:
Mvemjsunpx wrote:Interesting stats…

We all know about Montana's O-Line issues and we've seen some of them in games, but the Griz are presently the best team in the league in both yards-per-carry (5.6) and sacks allowed (2).
And yet, no one seems to care that the supposed #2 team is giving up 424 yds/game on defense and a whopping 5.6 yds/play. :coffee:
I thought yards didn't matter. I guess now they do.

UNC is the #96 rated offense in the FCS, and the Griz gave up 358 yards of offense. In addition UNC had 23 first downs in the game

To be fair MSU gave up 293 yards to the #97 ranked offense, UND, and only 17 first downs.

65 less yards, and 6 first downs and one place in the ranking.

What does this tell us, the defenses are closer than some will want to admit. First downs are huge. Every First down you surrender as a defense effects the field position game for your offense. Holding teams to field goals maybe a victory if you have an offense that can score against good teams, otherwise they are nothing but a moral victory (NDSU game).

We do know that Montana has not played an offense as powerful as EWU (#2 FCS total offense) so they may skew the stats a little.

With that we can see why I would put MSU over the Griz in a poll, which doesn't matter anyway, because they still need to play the game to see who is better on that day. There is a reason, Hockey, Baseball, and Basketball play series instead of one game.

I think it will be more clear after this weekend, as I look forward to watching the Griz/Sioux game live along with watching the EWU/ISU game
You will never know what a good is unless you have experienced a bad day
User avatar
grizcountry420
Level1
Level1
Posts: 370
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 2:01 pm
I am a fan of: The University of Montana

Re: Big Sky Power Rankings 9-29

Post by grizcountry420 »

JALMOND wrote:
3. Montana (3)---The Grizzlies had little trouble at home last weekend with Northern Colorado in getting an easy win. They hit the road this weekend with a trip out to North Dakota.


So the Griz score 28 points on them in the first quarter and ended up beating them by 4 scores and you think they had trouble putting away UNC?


:roll:
Grizzlies1982
Level1
Level1
Posts: 126
Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2013 12:45 pm

Re: Big Sky Power Rankings 9-29

Post by Grizzlies1982 »

Robsnotes4u wrote:
Grizalltheway wrote:
And yet, no one seems to care that the supposed #2 team is giving up 424 yds/game on defense and a whopping 5.6 yds/play. :coffee:
I thought yards didn't matter. I guess now they do.

UNC is the #96 rated offense in the FCS, and the Griz gave up 358 yards of offense. In addition UNC had 23 first downs in the game

To be fair MSU gave up 293 yards to the #97 ranked offense, UND, and only 17 first downs.

65 less yards, and 6 first downs and one place in the ranking.

What does this tell us, the defenses are closer than some will want to admit. First downs are huge. Every First down you surrender as a defense effects the field position game for your offense. Holding teams to field goals maybe a victory if you have an offense that can score against good teams, otherwise they are nothing but a moral victory (NDSU game).

We do know that Montana has not played an offense as powerful as EWU (#2 FCS total offense) so they may skew the stats a little.

With that we can see why I would put MSU over the Griz in a poll, which doesn't matter anyway, because they still need to play the game to see who is better on that day. There is a reason, Hockey, Baseball, and Basketball play series instead of one game.

I think it will be more clear after this weekend, as I look forward to watching the Griz/Sioux game live along with watching the EWU/ISU game
Rob,
The Grizzlies were carrying a 25 point lead. Do you suppose that might have something to do with allowing No. Colorado to pick up 23 first downs?
User avatar
dbackjon
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 45610
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
A.K.A.: He/Him
Location: Scottsdale

Re: Big Sky Power Rankings 9-29

Post by dbackjon »

grizcountry420 wrote:
JALMOND wrote:
3. Montana (3)---The Grizzlies had little trouble at home last weekend with Northern Colorado in getting an easy win. They hit the road this weekend with a trip out to North Dakota.


So the Griz score 28 points on them in the first quarter and ended up beating them by 4 scores and you think they had trouble putting away UNC?


:roll:

I guess reading comprehension is not required in Montana
:thumb:
User avatar
grizcountry420
Level1
Level1
Posts: 370
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 2:01 pm
I am a fan of: The University of Montana

Re: Big Sky Power Rankings 9-29

Post by grizcountry420 »

dbackjon wrote:
grizcountry420 wrote:


So the Griz score 28 points on them in the first quarter and ended up beating them by 4 scores and you think they had trouble putting away UNC?


:roll:

I guess reading comprehension is not required in Montana

:rofl:

My bad.. I'm dyslexic! Sorry about that..
User avatar
dbackjon
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 45610
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
A.K.A.: He/Him
Location: Scottsdale

Re: Big Sky Power Rankings 9-29

Post by dbackjon »

grizcountry420 wrote:
dbackjon wrote:

I guess reading comprehension is not required in Montana

:rofl:

My bad.. I'm dyslexic! Sorry about that..

Must be the 420 :kisswink:
:thumb:
User avatar
grizcountry420
Level1
Level1
Posts: 370
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 2:01 pm
I am a fan of: The University of Montana

Re: Big Sky Power Rankings 9-29

Post by grizcountry420 »

dbackjon wrote:
grizcountry420 wrote:

:rofl:

My bad.. I'm dyslexic! Sorry about that..

Must be the 420 :kisswink:

Nah.. My THC levels were just a little too low this morning

8-)
Robsnotes4u
Level1
Level1
Posts: 144
Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2013 2:16 pm
I am a fan of: Cats, Sioux, Griz
A.K.A.: Robsnotes4u
Location: Fargo, ND

Re: Big Sky Power Rankings 9-29

Post by Robsnotes4u »

Grizzlies1982 wrote:
Robsnotes4u wrote:
I thought yards didn't matter. I guess now they do.

UNC is the #96 rated offense in the FCS, and the Griz gave up 358 yards of offense. In addition UNC had 23 first downs in the game

To be fair MSU gave up 293 yards to the #97 ranked offense, UND, and only 17 first downs.

65 less yards, and 6 first downs and one place in the ranking.

What does this tell us, the defenses are closer than some will want to admit. First downs are huge. Every First down you surrender as a defense effects the field position game for your offense. Holding teams to field goals maybe a victory if you have an offense that can score against good teams, otherwise they are nothing but a moral victory (NDSU game).

We do know that Montana has not played an offense as powerful as EWU (#2 FCS total offense) so they may skew the stats a little.

With that we can see why I would put MSU over the Griz in a poll, which doesn't matter anyway, because they still need to play the game to see who is better on that day. There is a reason, Hockey, Baseball, and Basketball play series instead of one game.

I think it will be more clear after this weekend, as I look forward to watching the Griz/Sioux game live along with watching the EWU/ISU game
Rob,
The Grizzlies were carrying a 25 point lead. Do you suppose that might have something to do with allowing No. Colorado to pick up 23 first downs?
So you would agree they same could be said about the MSU/Sioux game? They were up by 19 at half against a team that had only 3 TD's going into that game and averages 11.4 pts per game.

Thank you
You will never know what a good is unless you have experienced a bad day
User avatar
Grizalltheway
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 35688
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
Location: BSC

Re: Big Sky Power Rankings 9-29

Post by Grizalltheway »

Robsnotes4u wrote:
Grizzlies1982 wrote:
Rob,
The Grizzlies were carrying a 25 point lead. Do you suppose that might have something to do with allowing No. Colorado to pick up 23 first downs?
So you would agree they same could be said about the MSU/Sioux game? They were up by 19 at half against a team that had only 3 TD's going into that game and averages 11.4 pts per game.

Thank you
How many 2nd and 3rd stringers did MSU rotate in? And were they playing without the 2nd best receiver in the conference?
User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 59959
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Re: Big Sky Power Rankings 9-29

Post by AZGrizFan »

Robsnotes4u wrote: I thought yards didn't matter. I guess now they do.

UNC is the #96 rated offense in the FCS, and the Griz gave up 358 yards of offense. In addition UNC had 23 first downs in the game

To be fair MSU gave up 293 yards to the #97 ranked offense, UND, and only 17 first downs.

65 less yards, and 6 first downs and one place in the ranking.

What does this tell us, the defenses are closer than some will want to admit.
This doesn't tell us squat. Both games were very similar...over by halftime, so stats don't mean much to me at that point. These games are perfect examples of where stat's don't even tell part of the story.
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Image
Robsnotes4u
Level1
Level1
Posts: 144
Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2013 2:16 pm
I am a fan of: Cats, Sioux, Griz
A.K.A.: Robsnotes4u
Location: Fargo, ND

Re: Big Sky Power Rankings 9-29

Post by Robsnotes4u »

AZGrizFan wrote:
Robsnotes4u wrote: I thought yards didn't matter. I guess now they do.

UNC is the #96 rated offense in the FCS, and the Griz gave up 358 yards of offense. In addition UNC had 23 first downs in the game

To be fair MSU gave up 293 yards to the #97 ranked offense, UND, and only 17 first downs.

65 less yards, and 6 first downs and one place in the ranking.

What does this tell us, the defenses are closer than some will want to admit.
This doesn't tell us squat. Both games were very similar...over by halftime, so stats don't mean much to me at that point. These games are perfect examples of where stat's don't even tell part of the story.
Thank you for admitting that.
Serious question. i couldn't get the Griz game. Was JJ in the whole game? If so, why. Just talking to DJ Coulter back and forth on the phone about injuries. The Griz have a ton, why with a 25 point lead would you risk him getting hurt?
You will never know what a good is unless you have experienced a bad day
User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 59959
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Re: Big Sky Power Rankings 9-29

Post by AZGrizFan »

Robsnotes4u wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote:
This doesn't tell us squat. Both games were very similar...over by halftime, so stats don't mean much to me at that point. These games are perfect examples of where stat's don't even tell part of the story.
Thank you for admitting that.
Serious question. i couldn't get the Griz game. Was JJ in the whole game? If so, why. Just talking to DJ Coulter back and forth on the phone about injuries. The Griz have a ton, why with a 25 point lead would you risk him getting hurt?
No, he wasn't in the game. I believe SSH played the last 2 series of the game. This offense needs TIME. Time to gel and get on the same page....at some point that need outweighs the chance of an injury happening. Case in point: John Nguyen's injury happened AFTER JJ had been removed from the game (in fact, it was the first play of the first drive after we got the ball back and SSH was QB).
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Image
Robsnotes4u
Level1
Level1
Posts: 144
Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2013 2:16 pm
I am a fan of: Cats, Sioux, Griz
A.K.A.: Robsnotes4u
Location: Fargo, ND

Re: Big Sky Power Rankings 9-29

Post by Robsnotes4u »

AZGrizFan wrote:
Robsnotes4u wrote:
Thank you for admitting that.
Serious question. i couldn't get the Griz game. Was JJ in the whole game? If so, why. Just talking to DJ Coulter back and forth on the phone about injuries. The Griz have a ton, why with a 25 point lead would you risk him getting hurt?
No, he wasn't in the game. I believe SSH played the last 2 series of the game. This offense needs TIME. Time to gel and get on the same page....at some point that need outweighs the chance of an injury happening. Case in point: John Nguyen's injury happened AFTER JJ had been removed from the game (in fact, it was the first play of the first drive after we got the ball back and SSH was QB).
Correct. Sounds Like Nugyen's injury isn't as bad as first thought. Which is good.
You will never know what a good is unless you have experienced a bad day
User avatar
SACCAT
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 1437
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2009 1:27 pm
I am a fan of: Montana State

Re: Big Sky Power Rankings 9-29

Post by SACCAT »

Grizalltheway wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Amazing. Of course, we can't count any of the big plays. We can only count the ones that go for 3 yards or less. Big plays are just an anomaly. :coffee: :coffee:
Weird, I see one happen every time I post. :?
I see AT LEAST 16 block in the backs, and about 12 holdingses on that play in your sig. But what a TD saving Block 98 had at about the 15 yard line... :ohno:
User avatar
Grizalltheway
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 35688
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
Location: BSC

Re: Big Sky Power Rankings 9-29

Post by Grizalltheway »

SACCAT wrote:
Grizalltheway wrote:
Weird, I see one happen every time I post. :?
I see AT LEAST 16 block in the backs, and about 12 holdingses on that play in your sig. But what a TD saving Block 98 had at about the 15 yard line... :ohno:
Go home, you're drunk.
User avatar
SACCAT
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 1437
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2009 1:27 pm
I am a fan of: Montana State

Re: Big Sky Power Rankings 9-29

Post by SACCAT »

Grizalltheway wrote:
SACCAT wrote:
I see AT LEAST 16 block in the backs, and about 12 holdingses on that play in your sig. But what a TD saving Block 98 had at about the 15 yard line... :ohno:
Go home, you're drunk.
You donn't gitt to telld me whatts too do. Youuree not my m...mother. Are youu?
User avatar
Grizalltheway
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 35688
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
Location: BSC

Re: Big Sky Power Rankings 9-29

Post by Grizalltheway »

No, but I am your huckleberry.
Post Reply