Why is Montana Ranked at all?
- dbackjon
- Moderator Team
- Posts: 45613
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
- I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
- A.K.A.: He/Him
- Location: Scottsdale
Why is Montana Ranked at all?
They haven't beaten a team with a winning record yet. Combined record of teams they have beaten (not including DII game) is 13-26.
Lost all games against teams with winning records.
Lost all games against teams with winning records.
Re: Why is Montana Ranked at all?
Because they are Montana.
Re: Why is Montana Ranked at all?
WC(b)dbackjon wrote:They haven't beaten a team with a winning record yet. Combined record of teams they have beaten (not including DII game) is 13-26.
Lost all games against teams with winning records.
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
- dbackjon
- Moderator Team
- Posts: 45613
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
- I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
- A.K.A.: He/Him
- Location: Scottsdale
Re: Why is Montana Ranked at all?
Same could be said for Montana State, although they do have a win over 5-5 Central Arkansas.
- Gil Dobie
- Supporter
- Posts: 31113
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:45 pm
- I am a fan of: Norse Dakota State
- Location: Historic Leduc Estate
Re: Why is Montana Ranked at all?
Montana lost to a FBS, #1 NDSU and a ranked Cal Poly and beat South Dakota no bad losses
NAU lost to a FBS, South Dakota(2-7), and Northern Colorado(3-6), 2 bad losses, 2 good wins(EWU & Poly).
Both are 5-2 vs FCS
NAU does have an easier schedule and should win out, but Montana will have a tough time with EWU and Montana St left.
Remember Jon, the only poll that counts is the last poll of the season.
NAU lost to a FBS, South Dakota(2-7), and Northern Colorado(3-6), 2 bad losses, 2 good wins(EWU & Poly).
Both are 5-2 vs FCS
NAU does have an easier schedule and should win out, but Montana will have a tough time with EWU and Montana St left.
Remember Jon, the only poll that counts is the last poll of the season.
Re: Why is Montana Ranked at all?
Danbl gets it.bandl wrote:Because they are Montana.
Delaware Football: 1889-2012; 2022-
Re: Why is Montana Ranked at all?
On a more serious note, the combination of a vastly diminished FCS and an increase to a ridiculous 24 playoff slots ensures that some very poor teams will get in the field.
I mean, when you have people seriously considering 2014 JMU and Albany for playoff spots, well, that's a very sad indictment on FCS football.
I mean, when you have people seriously considering 2014 JMU and Albany for playoff spots, well, that's a very sad indictment on FCS football.
Delaware Football: 1889-2012; 2022-
- dbackjon
- Moderator Team
- Posts: 45613
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
- I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
- A.K.A.: He/Him
- Location: Scottsdale
Re: Why is Montana Ranked at all?
Gil Dobie wrote:Montana lost to a FBS, #1 NDSU and a ranked Cal Poly and beat South Dakota no bad losses
NAU lost to a FBS, South Dakota(2-7), and Northern Colorado(3-6), 2 bad losses, 2 good wins(EWU & Poly).
Both are 5-2 vs FCS
NAU does have an easier schedule and should win out, but Montana will have a tough time with EWU and Montana St left.
Remember Jon, the only poll that counts is the last poll of the season.
Oh I know - still a lot of football to be played. As an NAU fan, I still expect 6-6
Just looking at schedules and how some teams have managed to stay ranked/be ranked on a poor resume. Losing by 20 to a team NAU beat...
- dbackjon
- Moderator Team
- Posts: 45613
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
- I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
- A.K.A.: He/Him
- Location: Scottsdale
Re: Why is Montana Ranked at all?
93henfan wrote:On a more serious note, the combination of a vastly diminished FCS and an increase to a ridiculous 24 playoff slots ensures that some very poor teams will get in the field.
I mean, when you have people seriously considering 2014 JMU and Albany for playoff spots, well, that's a very sad indictment on FCS football.
FCS lost App and GSU (two traditional powers) and who else? Ga State - improves the FCS. ODU? meh.
Expanded playoffs - somewhat.
- 89Hen
- Supporter
- Posts: 39227
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
- I am a fan of: High Horses
- A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter
Re: Why is Montana Ranked at all?
Where were all you guys when I lobbied against playoff expansion?93henfan wrote:On a more serious note, the combination of a vastly diminished FCS and an increase to a ridiculous 24 playoff slots ensures that some very poor teams will get in the field.
I mean, when you have people seriously considering 2014 JMU and Albany for playoff spots, well, that's a very sad indictment on FCS football.
-
- 4th&29
- Posts: 38527
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:01 pm
- I am a fan of: Old Dominion
- A.K.A.: He/His/Him/Himself
- Location: Pizza Hell
Re: Why is Montana Ranked at all?
We were Half good.dbackjon wrote:93henfan wrote:On a more serious note, the combination of a vastly diminished FCS and an increase to a ridiculous 24 playoff slots ensures that some very poor teams will get in the field.
I mean, when you have people seriously considering 2014 JMU and Albany for playoff spots, well, that's a very sad indictment on FCS football.
FCS lost App and GSU (two traditional powers) and who else? Ga State - improves the FCS. ODU? meh.
Expanded playoffs - somewhat.
Re: Why is Montana Ranked at all?
I've always said 16 was the right number.89Hen wrote:Where were all you guys when I lobbied against playoff expansion?93henfan wrote:On a more serious note, the combination of a vastly diminished FCS and an increase to a ridiculous 24 playoff slots ensures that some very poor teams will get in the field.
I mean, when you have people seriously considering 2014 JMU and Albany for playoff spots, well, that's a very sad indictment on FCS football.
Delaware Football: 1889-2012; 2022-
- Grizalltheway
- Supporter
- Posts: 35688
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
- A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
- Location: BSC
Re: Why is Montana Ranked at all?
Losing to SoDak and UNC...dbackjon wrote:Gil Dobie wrote:Montana lost to a FBS, #1 NDSU and a ranked Cal Poly and beat South Dakota no bad losses
NAU lost to a FBS, South Dakota(2-7), and Northern Colorado(3-6), 2 bad losses, 2 good wins(EWU & Poly).
Both are 5-2 vs FCS
NAU does have an easier schedule and should win out, but Montana will have a tough time with EWU and Montana St left.
Remember Jon, the only poll that counts is the last poll of the season.
Oh I know - still a lot of football to be played. As an NAU fan, I still expect 6-6
Just looking at schedules and how some teams have managed to stay ranked/be ranked on a poor resume. Losing by 20 to a team NAU beat...
- dbackjon
- Moderator Team
- Posts: 45613
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
- I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
- A.K.A.: He/Him
- Location: Scottsdale
Re: Why is Montana Ranked at all?
Grizalltheway wrote:Losing to SoDak and UNC...dbackjon wrote:
Oh I know - still a lot of football to be played. As an NAU fan, I still expect 6-6
Just looking at schedules and how some teams have managed to stay ranked/be ranked on a poor resume. Losing by 20 to a team NAU beat...
Losing to Poly by 20
-
- Supporter
- Posts: 62329
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: Why is Montana Ranked at all?
I love the 24 field team. It gives more programs an incentive to improve their recruiting, facilities, etc and provides some interesting match ups.
- 89Hen
- Supporter
- Posts: 39227
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
- I am a fan of: High Horses
- A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter
Re: Why is Montana Ranked at all?
So you'd be OK with 32. How about 64?kalm wrote:I love the 24 field team. It gives more programs an incentive to improve their recruiting, facilities, etc and provides some interesting match ups.
Re: Why is Montana Ranked at all?
Montana is ranked b/c they are the only non-MVFC FCS team that has a win over an MVFC team. duh. ;op
- AZGrizFan
- Supporter
- Posts: 59959
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
- I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
- Location: Just to the right of center
Re: Why is Montana Ranked at all?
Fish ain't bitin' Jon?dbackjon wrote:Gil Dobie wrote:Montana lost to a FBS, #1 NDSU and a ranked Cal Poly and beat South Dakota no bad losses
NAU lost to a FBS, South Dakota(2-7), and Northern Colorado(3-6), 2 bad losses, 2 good wins(EWU & Poly).
Both are 5-2 vs FCS
NAU does have an easier schedule and should win out, but Montana will have a tough time with EWU and Montana St left.
Remember Jon, the only poll that counts is the last poll of the season.
Oh I know - still a lot of football to be played. As an NAU fan, I still expect 6-6
Just looking at schedules and how some teams have managed to stay ranked/be ranked on a poor resume. Losing by 20 to a team NAU beat...
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
- AZGrizFan
- Supporter
- Posts: 59959
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
- I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
- Location: Just to the right of center
Re: Why is Montana Ranked at all?
Losing to Poly by 20 is a better loss than losing at ALL to SoDak OR UNC, let alone BOTH.dbackjon wrote:Grizalltheway wrote:
Losing to SoDak and UNC...
Losing to Poly by 20
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
- Grizalltheway
- Supporter
- Posts: 35688
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
- A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
- Location: BSC
Re: Why is Montana Ranked at all?
Don't let logic get in the way of dback's butthurt.AZGrizFan wrote:Losing to Poly by 20 is a better loss than losing at ALL to SoDak OR UNC, let alone BOTH.dbackjon wrote:
Losing to Poly by 20
-
- Supporter
- Posts: 62329
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: Why is Montana Ranked at all?
So......yore going to quality loss your way into the playoffs?Grizalltheway wrote:Don't let logic get in the way of dback's butthurt.AZGrizFan wrote:
Losing to Poly by 20 is a better loss than losing at ALL to SoDak OR UNC, let alone BOTH.
- Grizalltheway
- Supporter
- Posts: 35688
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
- A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
- Location: BSC
Re: Why is Montana Ranked at all?
No, we're going to 4 game win streak our way into them.kalm wrote:So......yore going to quality loss your way into the playoffs?Grizalltheway wrote: Don't let logic get in the way of dback's butthurt.
- uofmman1122
- Level2
- Posts: 1845
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 6:22 am
- I am a fan of: Japanese girls
- A.K.A.: Randy Butternubs
- Location: Missoula, MT
Re: Why is Montana Ranked at all?
Dback complaining about Montana being ranked?
Yup, it's November.
Yup, it's November.
Re: Why is Montana Ranked at all?
This.89Hen wrote:So you'd be OK with 32. How about 64?kalm wrote:I love the 24 field team. It gives more programs an incentive to improve their recruiting, facilities, etc and provides some interesting match ups.
Moving to 24 is practically headed toward the joke that is the participation trophy mentality that is today's FBS
Re: Why is Montana Ranked at all?
Just for reference on that USD loss...
USD is winless in mvfc play and outscored by SC average of 35-12
USD is winless in mvfc play and outscored by SC average of 35-12