Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

• 1. Montana _____________7-1_____9-2_____ Montana's defense = good; other Big Sky defenses = Stitt
  2. Eastern Washington__7-1_____8-3_____ The QB(s) aren't as good, but the Eags should still be in the playoffs
  3. Idaho State __________6-2_____8-3_____ Beating UNLV could be very important for the Bengals' postseason hopes
  4. Montana State _______6-2_____8-3_____ Not a bad record for the worst defense in the league
  5. Cal Poly _____________6-2_____7-4_____ A late playoff surge is possible if the 'Stangs can survive their first-half gauntlet
  6. Northern Arizona ____5-3_____6-5_____ Will the 'Jacks still stick with Kyren Poe even if the (new) other guy is better?
  7. Portland State_______ 3-5_____4-7_____ Can Kieran McDonagh return to his 2013 form?
  8. North Dakota ________3-5_____4-7_____ UND has excellent run D, but that's not the biggest factor in the pass-happy Big Sky
  9. Weber State__________3-5_____3-8_____ Seven straight years without a desperately needed non-DI opponent…
  10.UC Davis ___________ 2-6_____3-8_____ Ben Scott emerged as a good QB last year, but he doesn't have a ton of help
  11.Sacramento State ___ 2-6_____4-7 _____ Jody Sears was smart to sign a 3-year contract…
  12.Southern Utah _______1-7_____2-9_____ The T-Birds wasted a lot of defensive talent last year
  13.Northern Colorado___1-7_____3-8_____ The Bears were dumb to give Earnest Collins a 3-year extension…

• Best Rushing Offense - Cal Poly
  Worst Rushing Offense - Northern Colorado
  
  Best Passing Offense - Eastern Washington
  Worst Passing Offense - North Dakota
  
  Best Overall Offense - Montana St.
  Worst Overall Offense - North Dakota
  
  Best Run Defense - North Dakota
  Worst Run Defense - Sacramento St.
  
  Best Pass Defense - Northern Arizona
  Worst Pass Defense - Montana St.
  
  Best Overall Defense - Montana
  Worst Overall Defense - Montana St.
  
  Best Special Teams - Montana St.
  Worst Special Teams - Cal Poly
  
  
  
  Best Quarterback - Dakota Prukop (MSU)
  Best Running Back - Xavier Finney (ISU)
  Best Wide Receiver - Cooper Kupp (EWU)
  Best Tight End - Josh Cook (ISU)
  Best WR/TE Corps - Eastern Washington
  Best Offensive Lineman - Clay DeBord (EWU)
  Best Offensive Line - Portland St.
  
  Best Defensive Lineman - James Cowser (SUU)
  Best Defensive Line - Montana
  Best Linebacker - Mario Jenkins (ISU)
  Best LB Corps - Montana
  Best Defensive Back - Marcus Alford (NAU)
  Best Secondary - Northern Arizona
  
  Best Kicker - Brad Cornish (SAC)
  Best Punter - Trevor Bolton (MSU)
  Best Ret. Specialist - Ellis Henderson (UMT)
  Best Return Teams - Montana

AZGrizFan wrote:Bold prediction about Montana's D-Line...so who's Montana's league loss to, IYHO?

Mvemjsunpx wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote:Bold prediction about Montana's D-Line...so who's Montana's league loss to, IYHO?

I'm not sure who else would get best D-Line. Only 3 Big Sky teams figure to be even decent on defense.

I have the Griz losing to ISU & Liberty.

AZGrizFan wrote: If they lose to ISU and Liberty, there's no WAY they're going 9-2. On the spectrum of potential losses, I'd say it goes something like this:

NDSU
EWU
Cal Poly
ISU
NAU
Liberty
MSU
UND
PSU
Weber
UC Davis

Mvemjsunpx wrote:

AZGrizFan wrote: If they lose to ISU and Liberty, there's no WAY they're going 9-2. On the spectrum of potential losses, I'd say it goes something like this:

NDSU
EWU
Cal Poly
ISU
NAU
Liberty
MSU
UND
PSU
Weber
UC Davis

Except EWU, Cal Poly, and NAU are all home games. ISU & Liberty are not. I'm also not drinking the Kool-Aid on Cal Poly this year—they should be UM's "easiest" non-conference game.

kalm wrote:

Mvemjsunpx wrote:
Except EWU, Cal Poly, and NAU are all home games. ISU & Liberty are not. I'm also not drinking the Kool-Aid on Cal Poly this year—they should be UM's "easiest" non-conference game.

The Kool-Aid for a first year coach with a new system and losses at QB and all three levels of D must taste sweet!

Mvemjsunpx wrote:I'm also not totally drinking the Kool-Aid on Cal Poly this year—they should be UM's "easiest" non-conference game.

kalm wrote:The Kool-Aid for a first year coach

Brock Landers wrote:

kalm wrote:The Kool-Aid for a first year coach

Addition by subtraction

GoAgs72 wrote:SDHornet is a lot more realistic than SuperHornet. UC Davis Aggies will vary from maybe a low of three wins to at most six wins. I'm predicting a 5-6 record optimistically but I've been disappointed by the Aggies multiple times in the recent past.

Mvemjsunpx wrote:

kalm wrote:
The Kool-Aid for a first year coach with a new system and losses at QB and all three levels of D must taste sweet!

All 3 levels of D?

kalm wrote:

Mvemjsunpx wrote:
All 3 levels of D?

My bad. Thought you lost a lb but that was Tripp and Coyle last year.

Still...

SDHornet wrote:I think our range is 3-7 wins. Your 4 win prediction falls in that so I'm not going to argue that. I will argue the worst rushing defense though. We return size, experience and depth on the interior of the DL and have stud Sankey backing them up. We will be unknown/unproven on the ends so that could be the weakness. I think that should be enough to keep us out of the worst rushing defense conversation.

If our OL gels and Kniffin can find a grove I think we get 5-6 wins and finish in the middle of the BSC as usual.

Also I think Hennie will have a shot at best return specialist and Sankey as best LB (if he stays healthy).

SloStang wrote:

Mvemjsunpx wrote:I'm also not totally drinking the Kool-Aid on Cal Poly this year—they should be UM's "easiest" non-conference game.

Cal Poly's offense will be a top 5 FCS offense if they stay healthy. Cal Poly did not have a great D in 2014 and they lose two great LBs in Dzubnar and Ontko. That said they will be better and deeper on the D-line and secondary in 2014 and overall I think a better D. Cal Poly's biggest challenge in 2015 will be their schedule which is brutal. If the get through the first 6 games at 4-2 the Sky is the limit. Cal Poly won't be an easy out for any team on their schedule with the exception of Arizona State.

Mvemjsunpx wrote:

kalm wrote:
My bad. Thought you lost a lb but that was Tripp and Coyle last year.

Still...

Right. Also, keep in mind the Griz return several key players they didn't have last year.

Mvemjsunpx wrote:

SDHornet wrote:I think our range is 3-7 wins. Your 4 win prediction falls in that so I'm not going to argue that. I will argue the worst rushing defense though. We return size, experience and depth on the interior of the DL and have stud Sankey backing them up. We will be unknown/unproven on the ends so that could be the weakness. I think that should be enough to keep us out of the worst rushing defense conversation.

If our OL gels and Kniffin can find a grove I think we get 5-6 wins and finish in the middle of the BSC as usual.

Also I think Hennie will have a shot at best return specialist and Sankey as best LB (if he stays healthy).

Sac's run defense was pretty bad last year (allowed 5.3 ypc) and they lost a bit of production in the front 7 (http://home.comcast.net/~keepersfootball/fcsstats.htm). Most of the Big Sky figures to have lousy run D, though. I thought "Worst Run Defense" was really a pick'em between Sac, Cal Poly, & MSU with a few other teams close "behind."

Mvemjsunpx wrote:

• 7. Portland State_______ 3-5_____4-7_____ Can Kieran McDonagh return to his 2013 form?

SloStang wrote:

Mvemjsunpx wrote:I'm also not totally drinking the Kool-Aid on Cal Poly this year—they should be UM's "easiest" non-conference game.

Cal Poly's offense will be a top 5 FCS offense if they stay healthy. Cal Poly did not have a great D in 2014 and they lose two great LBs in Dzubnar and Ontko. That said they will be better and deeper on the D-line and secondary in 2014 and overall I think a better D. Cal Poly's biggest challenge in 2015 will be their schedule which is brutal. If the get through the first 6 games at 4-2 the Sky is the limit. Cal Poly won't be an easy out for any team on their schedule with the exception of Arizona State.

Mvemjsunpx wrote:

SloStang wrote:Cal Poly's offense will be a top 5 FCS offense if they stay healthy. Cal Poly did not have a great D in 2014 and they lose two great LBs in Dzubnar and Ontko. That said they will be better and deeper on the D-line and secondary in 2014 and overall I think a better D. Cal Poly's biggest challenge in 2015 will be their schedule which is brutal. If the get through the first 6 games at 4-2 the Sky is the limit. Cal Poly won't be an easy out for any team on their schedule with the exception of Arizona State.

I have Cal Poly's offense pretty much tied with MSU for best, but their D looks like it'll be quite weak (worse than last year) and the Mustang special teams look to be easily the worst in the conference.

They're pretty good, but not great.

JALMOND wrote:

Mvemjsunpx wrote:

• 7. Portland State_______ 3-5_____4-7_____ Can Kieran McDonagh return to his 2013 form?

You got some inside information that McDonough is going to be the QB? Word is that it is a 4 player race after spring ball between McDonough, Penn, Kraght, and Kuresa. From insider Scott Hood...

http://psuvikingtales.com/spring-cleaning-quarterbacks/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Three conference wins is a stretch, I'm thinking we will be lucky to get two (North Dakota and Southern Utah) if that. Western Oregon will be a tough one this year as well. But, having an interim coach with delusions of grandeur will no doubt make for an interesting season, for sure. May not win a single game, but it will be interesting.