Nike Cal Poly unis
Posted: Sat Aug 01, 2009 9:32 pm
FCS Football | Message Board | News
https://championshipsubdivision.com/forums/
https://championshipsubdivision.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=7919
Tbird stop being a dumb ass. If you want to go ahead and take a look at the number of option teams we've beat compared to the ones we've lost to. How'd that option work out for them last year at home? The lack of logic is astounding.SUUTbird wrote:Which is more then alot of teams have, and im reffering to recently like past few years since you always have had a good game with poly and that heartbreaker to wofford, all option teams.
No doubt and that's kind of the thinking when you send 5 wides into a pattern as well. Funny though that some say some dumb shit without looking at it as if Wofford really ran wild on us. We held them to less points and less avg. yds. than almost every team in the Socon did but we had trouble stopping it? A team we've never seen before and had no experience like the SoCon opponents that still had trouble stopping it after seeing it year in and year out.bobbythekidd wrote:Option teams are always hard to stop. That's kinda the whole point of it.
Which could be easily viewed by clicking the link in the 1st post and watching the featured video on the subject at hand.pantherrob82 wrote:Would be nice to see the whole uniform.
Point out yer facts then. How many times have we beat the offense you refer to as giving us trouble vx. how many times we've lost to it? The Griz have something like a 4-1 record or better against Cal Poly with that offense and in fact the year they beat us in the playoff we had defeated them earlier in the season with the same offense. We missed a FG at the end of the Wofford game to lose that one and we held their offense down to lows that even their conference mates didn't hold them to. They held our scoring down as well so if you weren't being a dumbass you might look at it and say that Wofford's defense was the real factor in that game. You don't though, you just have a perception that you want to hold on to in spite of facts so on this issue you are being a dumbass. If you have facts to point out then by all means do so.SUUTbird wrote:Not being a "dumbass" at all, im just pointing out facts, sorry if you dont like it
I read what you said just fine. You edited your post to make yourself look better and if you feel good about that then so be it. You said we seem to have trouble (i.e. losing) to trip-op teams and I refuted that statement. Please try to write what you mean and then stick by it and when you are wrong just go ahead and admit it and move on to something else to see if you can get it right the next time. You're welcome for the advice in advance.SUUTbird wrote:I never said you lost i was reffering to lately and how they were all close games...please read what im writing next time.
nah. Would've preferred full photos.Ursus A. Horribilis wrote:Which could be easily viewed by clicking the link in the 1st post and watching the featured video on the subject at hand.pantherrob82 wrote:Would be nice to see the whole uniform.
Good, we agree finally.SUUTbird wrote:Edited it? even though it says the exact same in your quotes?yeah that makes alot of sense and im the dumbass?
Anyways back to topic SUU does the same thing sometimes going all black for games which looks okay, but the red on red looks way better or even the red tops and black pants like we had against south dakota look good, makes us look less like texas tech.