Nothing in my post said anything about it being important or not. That's a deflection that you added. Either you don't understand the argument, or you are intentionally obfuscating. Either way it's lame.
How about reading anything past the first sentence...
I said throw it out if it's a bad metric. Use BPI and kenpom then. If not those, then give me another metric using statistics.
Nothing in my post said anything about it being important or not. That's a deflection that you added. Either you don't understand the argument, or you are intentionally obfuscating. Either way it's lame.
How about reading anything past the first sentence...
I said throw it out if it's a bad metric. Use BPI and kenpom then. If not those, then give me another metric using statistics.
How about if you just stay on point. It's on you to state your argument clearly, I shouldn't have to pick and choose which statements to ignore.
Why you ignoring me? Why are you no longer fighting the actual battle on this? Although that's a typical tactic of someone who's suffering from beaten dog syndrome
Why you ignoring me? Why are you no longer fighting the actual battle on this? Although that's a typical tactic of someone who's suffering from beaten dog syndrome
I'm not ignoring you. You haven't said anything as inflammatory as the others so I'd rather waste my time with them.
Why you ignoring me? Why are you no longer fighting the actual battle on this? Although that's a typical tactic of someone who's suffering from beaten dog syndrome
I'm not ignoring you. You haven't said anything as inflammatory as the others so I'd rather waste my time with them.
Are you saying his inflammatory comments are mid-major?
Seahawks08 wrote:I'm not ignoring you. You haven't said anything as inflammatory as the others so I'd rather waste my time with them.
What I heard
Seahawks08 wrote:I'm not ignoring you. You have completely and utterly destroyed the living shit out of everything in this thread. I now realize that engaging with you on this topic is just suicide so I'm not going to reply to you anymore
Seahawks08 wrote:I'm not ignoring you. You haven't said anything as inflammatory as the others so I'd rather waste my time with them.
What I heard
Seahawks08 wrote:I'm not ignoring you. You have completely and utterly destroyed the living **** out of everything in this thread. I now realize that engaging with you on this topic is just suicide so I'm not going to reply to you anymore
If one of your coachers jumps ship, to take a job for less money, you might be a mid-major.
Seriously, why are you even in this thread? Do you have a team in this fight? B/c it definitely seems like you are a troll.
I see quoting is still giving your troubles.
"What I'm saying is: You might have taken care of your wolf problem, but everyone around town is going to think of you as the crazy son of a bitch who bought land mines to get rid of wolves."
Leave the people's names in your fucking quotes. It helps distinguish who you are talking to...it is not hard. The quote button does it for you
"What I'm saying is: You might have taken care of your wolf problem, but everyone around town is going to think of you as the crazy son of a bitch who bought land mines to get rid of wolves."
Seahawks08 wrote:I'm sorry if I use both methods of quotations. From now on, I will use the button just for you.
You are an idiot.
"What I'm saying is: You might have taken care of your wolf problem, but everyone around town is going to think of you as the crazy son of a bitch who bought land mines to get rid of wolves."
I didn't know that there was another way to quote. Better to include the name of the person you are quoting.
No shit.
Here I will quote you.
I didn't know that there was another way to quote. Better to include the name of the person you are quoting.
"What I'm saying is: You might have taken care of your wolf problem, but everyone around town is going to think of you as the crazy son of a bitch who bought land mines to get rid of wolves."