No, it was three (3) teams from the SEC getting into the Sweet 16. That's compared with zero (0) Big East teams making it that far into the tournament. So you see, in math, the number 3 is considered to be a bigger number than the number 0. 3>0. Got it?Seahawks08 wrote:GannonFan wrote:
Citation? You actually need a citation for this? Man, I knew vutomcat was pretty much basketball illiterate but I thought you were more aware. Where have you been the last two years?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_NCAA ... Tournament
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2015_NCAA ... Tournament
So, just in case you can't navigate links any better than you can recall common knowledge of the past two years, the winning percentage in the NCAA tournament, by conference, for the last two years is as follows:
2014
Conference (number of total bids in parantheses), record, and winning percentage and then number of teams to make Sweet 16:
SEC(3): 12-3 .800 3 teams in Sweet 16
American (4): 9-3 .750 2 teams in Sweet 16
Big 10 (6): 10-6 .625 3 teams in Sweet 16
Pac-12 (6): 8-6 .571 3 teams in Sweet 16
ACC (6): 6-6 .500 1 team in Sweet 16
Mountain West (2): 2-2 .500 1 team in Sweet 16
Big 12 (7): 6-7 .462 2 teams in Sweet 16
Atlantic 10 (6): 4-6 .400 1 team in Sweet 16
Big East (4): 2-4 .333 0 teams in Sweet 16
2015
ACC (6): 17-5 .773 5 teams in Sweet 16 (which is funny because vutomcat had a quote early in the year that the Big East was maybe just only behind the ACC. Good stuff)
Big 10 (7): 12-7 .632 2 teams in Sweet 16
SEC (5): 6-5 .545 1 team in Sweet 16
Pac-12 (4): 8-4 .667 3 teams in Sweet 16
West Coast (2): 3-2 .600 1 team in Sweet 16
Big 12 (7): 5-7 .417 2 teams in Sweet 16
Big East (6): 5-6 .455 1 team in Sweet 16
MVC (2): 3-2 .600 1 team in Sweet 16
And man, why mocking the SEC? The new Big East would love to have done as well as they have. 2014 was just two years ago and the SEC had three (3) teams make the Sweet 16 - Tennessee, Florida, and Kentucky. Remember, that year the Big East had zero (0) teams in the Sweet 16. And then, to boot, Florida and Kentucky were both in the Final Four (for the math impaired *cough* vutomcat *cough* that's two, count them two SEC teams in the Final Four that year). But who really wants that kind of success when you can point to wins that happened before Thanksgiving?
That's lovely that you think 2 teams from the SEC going deep into a tournament makes them a better conference. Keep thinking that when you go to sleep at night.American was top heavy as well. The fact you think that the NCAA tournament is the end all be all for a conference strength shows you really are off your meds.
Ah yes I see you love taking things out of context. Like I said before, you spin with the best of them.posted in response on Jan 22nd this year

And yes, the NCAA tournament is the end all be all for conference strength - outside of conference challenges (ala the Big 10/ACC showdown and the Big 12/SEC one) conferences don't play enough games against each other to be statistically valid. Conferences just can't avoid each other in the NCAA tournament. Oh, I guess they can, though, as the Big East has shown - lose early, and you don't have to play the big guys from other conferences.
