#16 d. #1

SuperHornet · Post by **SuperHornet** » Fri Mar 20, 2015 1:24 pm

It's happened once. In 1998, #16 Harvard took out #1 Stanford.

I'm wondering if anyone thinks there's a chance of it happening today, particularly with #1 Notre Dame....

89Hen · Post by **89Hen** » Fri Mar 20, 2015 1:30 pm

Post by **Grizalltheway** » Fri Mar 20, 2015 1:42 pm

89Hen wrote:No

This

Post by **Ibanez** » Fri Mar 20, 2015 2:27 pm

Or CCU beating Wisconsin? It won't happen but I wouldn't be upset if it did.

dal4018 · Post by **dal4018** » Sun Mar 22, 2015 5:54 am

We're it not for Kelly Olnyk and his 21 pts Southern would have joined Harvard in '13 playing vs Gonzaga.

YoUDeeMan · Post by **YoUDeeMan** » Mon Mar 23, 2015 9:01 am

dal4018 wrote:We're it not for Kelly Olnyk and his 21 pts Southern would have joined Harvard in '13 playing vs Gonzaga.

So?

Southern failed. End of story.

89Hen · Post by **89Hen** » Mon Mar 23, 2015 1:05 pm

Last year I filled out a bracket on ESPN just for fun and I picked chalk the whole way through... I almost won the damn thing. Looks like there were only 6 "upsets" in the first round this year, none higher than an 11 seed.

Post by **bandl** » Mon Mar 23, 2015 1:24 pm

89Hen wrote:Last year I filled out a bracket on ESPN just for fun and I picked chalk the whole way through... I almost won the damn thing. Looks like there were only 6 "upsets" in the first round this year, none higher than an 11 seed.

Are the two 13s over 4s not considered 'upsets'?

89Hen · Post by **89Hen** » Mon Mar 23, 2015 1:27 pm

bandl wrote:
89Hen wrote:Last year I filled out a bracket on ESPN just for fun and I picked chalk the whole way through... I almost won the damn thing. Looks like there were only 6 "upsets" in the first round this year, none higher than an 11 seed.
Are the two 13s over 4s not considered 'upsets'?

Look who started this thread... you think this is about the mens' tourney?

Post by **Grizalltheway** » Mon Mar 23, 2015 1:28 pm

bandl wrote:
89Hen wrote:Last year I filled out a bracket on ESPN just for fun and I picked chalk the whole way through... I almost won the damn thing. Looks like there were only 6 "upsets" in the first round this year, none higher than an 11 seed.
Are the two 13s over 4s not considered 'upsets'?

He's talking about dykeball.

Post by **Ivytalk** » Mon Mar 23, 2015 1:28 pm

Is Princeton still alive?

Post by **bandl** » Mon Mar 23, 2015 1:29 pm

Grizalltheway wrote:
bandl wrote: Are the two 13s over 4s not considered 'upsets'?
He's talking about dykeball.

About what?

Post by **bandl** » Mon Mar 23, 2015 1:34 pm

89Hen wrote:
bandl wrote: Are the two 13s over 4s not considered 'upsets'?
Look who started this thread... you think this is about the mens' tourney?

Post by **Wedgebuster** » Mon Mar 23, 2015 3:30 pm

Grizalltheway wrote:
bandl wrote: Are the two 13s over 4s not considered 'upsets'?
He's talking about dykeball.

Boxketball.

BDKJMU · Post by **BDKJMU** » Mon Mar 23, 2015 4:48 pm

SuperHornet wrote:It's happened once. In 1998, #16 Harvard took out #1 Stanford.

I'm wondering if anyone thinks there's a chance of it happening today, particularly with #1 Notre Dame....

Notre Dame is a #3 seed.

And a #16 has never beaten a #1.

SuperHornet · Post by **SuperHornet** » Mon Mar 23, 2015 8:02 pm

BDKJMU wrote:
SuperHornet wrote:It's happened once. In 1998, #16 Harvard took out #1 Stanford.

I'm wondering if anyone thinks there's a chance of it happening today, particularly with #1 Notre Dame....
Notre Dame is a #3 seed.

And a #16 has never beaten a #1.

You obviously didn't bother to read any of the intervening posts.

Post by **clenz** » Tue Mar 24, 2015 5:53 am

SuperHornet wrote:
BDKJMU wrote:
Notre Dame is a #3 seed.

And a #16 has never beaten a #1.

You obviously didn't bother to read any of the intervening posts.

Just like 99.999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999996939999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999% of people don't give a flying fuck about womens basketball.

The only reason 99.999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999996939999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999% of womens programs exist is Title IX.

The 100% only reason the WNBA exists is the NBA allows it too. If they wanted they could shut the league down tomorrow

Post by **Ibanez** » Tue Mar 24, 2015 7:54 am

clenz wrote:
SuperHornet wrote:
You obviously didn't bother to read any of the intervening posts.

Just like 99.999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999996939999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999% of people don't give a flying fuck about womens basketball.

The only reason 99.999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999996939999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999% of womens programs exist is Title IX.

The 100% only reason the WNBA exists is the NBA allows it too. If they wanted they could shut the league down tomorrow

Who would want to play for the WNBA and make hundreds of dollars a year?

tribe_pride · Post by **tribe_pride** » Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:40 am

One of their top players just went to Russia to get $1.5 million when she was making about $100,000 (about league max) in the WNBA. Apparently, the coaches make $250,000 in the WNBA.

Post by **clenz** » Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:43 am

tribe_pride wrote:One of their top players just went to Russia to get $1.5 million when she was making about $100,000 (about league max) in the WNBA. Apparently, the coaches make $250,000 in the WNBA.

All 100% subsidized by NBA advertising $

tribe_pride · Post by **tribe_pride** » Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:53 am

Not disagreeing at all. Is the Russian league really that good though that they can pay these amounts or do they get nice subsidies too?

Post by **clenz** » Tue Mar 24, 2015 9:56 am

tribe_pride wrote:Not disagreeing at all. Is the Russian league really that good though that they can pay these amounts or do they get nice subsidies too?

Not sure what would be subsidizing them.

Look at professional salaries all over Europe. None of them match the NBA/NFL/MLB (outside of the pro soccer leagues) but they are all extremely high. Most pro basketball players in Europe make way more than they would in the NBADL or as a last man on the bench at the NBA minimum. Many teams pay the taxes on their salaries as well so they end up getting 100% of their quoted salar

dal4018 · Post by **dal4018** » Tue Mar 24, 2015 10:09 am

Ivytalk wrote:Is Princeton still alive?

If your talking about the women unfortunately they are out courtesy of Maryland 31-1!!!!

dal4018 · Post by **dal4018** » Tue Mar 24, 2015 10:10 am

Cluck U wrote:
dal4018 wrote:We're it not for Kelly Olnyk and his 21 pts Southern would have joined Harvard in '13 playing vs Gonzaga.
So?

Southern failed. End of story.

Yes they failed.

dal4018 · Post by **dal4018** » Tue Mar 24, 2015 10:13 am

SuperHornet wrote:It's happened once. In 1998, #16 Harvard took out #1 Stanford.

I'm wondering if anyone thinks there's a chance of it happening today, particularly with #1 Notre Dame....

Because of that Allison Feaster (Harvard)was taken 10th overall in the '98 WNBA draft.Probably the only player taken in the draft from a Ivy League school.

Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

#16 d. #1

#16 d. #1

Re: #16 d. #1

Re: #16 d. #1

Re: #16 d. #1

Re: #16 d. #1

Re: #16 d. #1

Re: #16 d. #1

Re: #16 d. #1

Re: #16 d. #1

Re: #16 d. #1

Re: #16 d. #1

Re: #16 d. #1

Re: #16 d. #1

Re: #16 d. #1

Re: #16 d. #1

Re: #16 d. #1

Re: #16 d. #1

Re: #16 d. #1

Re: #16 d. #1

Re: #16 d. #1

Re: #16 d. #1

Re: #16 d. #1

Re: #16 d. #1

Re: #16 d. #1

Re: #16 d. #1