So this means we can throw out their 2007* and 2004* titles, and now their 1918* title too?
So they don't have a clean title since 1916?



2004 has an asterisk to signify the greatest choke a team has ever had in a 7-game series??JoltinJoe wrote:http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/news?slug=a ... orldseries
So this means we can throw out their 2007* and 2004* titles, and now their 1918* title too?
So they don't have a clean title since 1916?![]()
Eh, just bad timing for a four-game losing streak. Doesn't compare to blowing a 6 1/2 game lead with 12 games to play by losing 10 in a row.bluehenbillk wrote:2004 has an asterisk to signify the greatest choke a team has ever had in a 7-game series??JoltinJoe wrote:http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/news?slug=a ... orldseries
So this means we can throw out their 2007* and 2004* titles, and now their 1918* title too?
So they don't have a clean title since 1916?![]()

JoltinJoe wrote:Eh, just bad timing for a four-game losing streak. Doesn't compare to blowing a 6 1/2 game lead with 12 games to play by losing 10 in a row.bluehenbillk wrote:
2004 has an asterisk to signify the greatest choke a team has ever had in a 7-game series??

See, glad you agree - the '04 Yanks are the biggest chokers of all time. See, wasn't that hard, was it?JoltinJoe wrote:Maybe you're right. Losing 10 games in a row isn't simply choking. That's sucking.


Glad you agree too. The Phillies suck.GannonFan wrote:See, glad you agree - the '04 Yanks are the biggest chokers of all time. See, wasn't that hard, was it?JoltinJoe wrote:Maybe you're right. Losing 10 games in a row isn't simply choking. That's sucking.

On that train of thought, why would the Red Sox title be tainted if the Cubs threw the series then?JoltinJoe wrote:Gil, what you just said makes no sense at all. Why would Ruth be tainted because the Cubs threw the 1918 World Series??

Hey, Gil, there is only person here that this thread was posted for. So butt out.Gil Dobie wrote:On that train of thought, why would the Red Sox title be tainted if the Cubs threw the series then?JoltinJoe wrote:Gil, what you just said makes no sense at all. Why would Ruth be tainted because the Cubs threw the 1918 World Series??
I just added more BS to your pile Joe

Memories must be contained only outside of the 5-borough area, as you conveniently left out the 2007 Mets.....JoltinJoe wrote:Eh, just bad timing for a four-game losing streak. Doesn't compare to blowing a 6 1/2 game lead with 12 games to play by losing 10 in a row.bluehenbillk wrote:
2004 has an asterisk to signify the greatest choke a team has ever had in a 7-game series??
When was the last time the Yankees were clean? Sure has been awhile...what the 1940's?JoltinJoe wrote:http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/news?slug=a ... orldseries
So this means we can throw out their 2007* and 2004* titles, and now their 1918* title too?
So they don't have a clean title since 1916?![]()
2009.NHwildEcat wrote:When was the last time the Yankees were clean? Sure has been awhile...what the 1940's?JoltinJoe wrote:http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/news?slug=a ... orldseries
So this means we can throw out their 2007* and 2004* titles, and now their 1918* title too?
So they don't have a clean title since 1916?![]()

Derek Jeter?JoltinJoe wrote:Hey, Gil, there is only person here that this thread was posted for. So butt out.Gil Dobie wrote:
On that train of thought, why would the Red Sox title be tainted if the Cubs threw the series then?
I just added more BS to your pile Joe


bluehenbillk wrote:Memories must be contained only outside of the 5-borough area, as you conveniently left out the 2007 and 2008 Mets.....JoltinJoe wrote:
Eh, just bad timing for a four-game losing streak. Doesn't compare to blowing a 6 1/2 game lead with 12 games to play by losing 10 in a row.