Question is, will you be here after SF gets smacked in the mouth again?rkwittem wrote:Laugh it up now...I'll be here after the She-hawks get beat.Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:
They aren't playing the Colts yet.Grizalltheway wrote:Niners by 10.
Aren't theyScreamin_Eagle174 wrote:They aren't playing the Colts yet.Grizalltheway wrote:Niners by 10.
Grizalltheway wrote:Aren't theyScreamin_Eagle174 wrote:
They aren't playing the Colts yet.
Considering I'm not a 49ers fan (for most of the season), yes I'll be here. I can always fall back on my real favorite team (who most would consider to be slightly less disappointing than Seattle has been throughout their history).Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:Question is, will you be here after SF gets smacked in the mouth again?rkwittem wrote: Laugh it up now...I'll be here after the She-hawks get beat.
The Hawks were already going to be amped for this one, but Dixon just brought on the hurt. Kam's gonna take Boldin or VD's head off.
I thought She-hawks was pretty funny. Any team that tries the "adderall" card as much as they have is fair game for any criticism they receive, no matter how lame.uofmman1122 wrote:I'm a 49ers fan, and that's the weakest smack ever.rkwittem wrote: Laugh it up now...I'll be here after the She-hawks get beat.
Come on, Dixon.
You gotta do it like this
VVVVVVVVVVVVVV
Well, the Seahawks responded with the tried and true SuperHornet, 12 year-old special "Forty Whiners", so I guess neither team is very adept at smack.rkwittem wrote:I thought She-hawks was pretty funny. Any team that tries the "adderall" card as much as they have is fair game for any criticism they receive, no matter how lame.uofmman1122 wrote: I'm a 49ers fan, and that's the weakest smack ever.
Come on, Dixon.
You gotta do it like this
VVVVVVVVVVVVVV
Wow just wow...it is quite clear you didn't watch the game. First, Carolina is not the worst secondary in the NFC (GB, DET, STL, NO, MIN are demonstrably worse). And then you need to take the upfront 7 into play since Wilson had no time to pass (which SE so eloquently said). Also, I can use the sample size argument against you too if you want to make wild accusations.They played against the worst secondary in the NFC you clueless homer. This is one game (sample size won't suggest that you're right) and your top 2 WRs didn't do squat, leaving your #3 and #4 WRs to duke it out with Carolina's vauntednickel and dime DBs.
Isn't there a Seahawks board you can spew your drivel on? GO 49ers (this week)
Of course I didn't watch the game. My favorite team was on another channel playing their game. I don't have time to watch this game when the Vikings are on FOX and my Sunday Ticket is set to another game. I don't have any Seahawks or Cardinals in fantasy so you bet I didn't watch a lick of this game. Go ahead and read what someone who actually watched the game said. http://espn.go.com/blog/carolina-panthe ... -efficient" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;Seahawks08 wrote:Wow just wow...it is quite clear you didn't watch the game. First, Carolina is not the worst secondary in the NFC (GB, DET, STL, NO, MIN are demonstrably worse). And then you need to take the upfront 7 into play since Wilson had no time to pass (which SE so eloquently said). Also, I can use the sample size argument against you too if you want to make wild accusations.They played against the worst secondary in the NFC you clueless homer. This is one game (sample size won't suggest that you're right) and your top 2 WRs didn't do squat, leaving your #3 and #4 WRs to duke it out with Carolina's vauntednickel and dime DBs.
Isn't there a Seahawks board you can spew your drivel on? GO 49ers (this week)
You're a Vikings fan? It all makes sense now.rkwittem wrote:Of course I didn't watch the game. My favorite team was on another channel playing their game. I don't have time to watch this game when the Vikings are on FOX and my Sunday Ticket is set to another game. I don't have any Seahawks or Cardinals in fantasy so you bet I didn't watch a lick of this game. Go ahead and read what someone who actually watched the game said. http://espn.go.com/blog/carolina-panthe ... -efficient" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;Seahawks08 wrote:
Wow just wow...it is quite clear you didn't watch the game. First, Carolina is not the worst secondary in the NFC (GB, DET, STL, NO, MIN are demonstrably worse). And then you need to take the upfront 7 into play since Wilson had no time to pass (which SE so eloquently said). Also, I can use the sample size argument against you too if you want to make wild accusations.
So it's clearly not a "wild accusation." The Panthers themselves AGREE WITH MY ASSESSMENT. You, being the knowledgeable, unbiased observer that you are, obviously must know better than someone who actually plays the damn game for a living and is in fact a current member of said awful unit.
Carolina knew that Seattle would pass and they still couldn't stop them. They had, like that article said, the worst completion % against them last year. Josh Thomas and Captain Munnerlyn are nickel backs on every other team in the league. Their secondary is a joke. They only look half-decent at times because their front 7 can bail them out.
GB is not worse, don't forget they had Casey Heyward out last week. St. Louis definitely isn't the worst with Jenkins and Finnegan, NO...maybe but they at least have a promising rookie (Vaccaro) and a Pro Bowl-caliber DB in Malcolm Jenkins. But if we use your logic- they had little trouble slowing down the mighty Falcons' WRs on Sunday. So they're actually a really tough secondary.
Minnesota has a lot of average guys with the exceptional Harrison Smith at S. But they're not atrocious by any means. You idiots continue to go by yards allowed when there is simply much more that goes into being a good secondary...like completion % against, ypa allowed, etc.
What sample size argument can you make? This is Wilson's 1st 300 yard regular season game ever which somehow proves in SE's mind that Seattle's WRs are all going to the HoF someday. (They'll be lucky to make the Seahawks' HOF if you ask me). Just man up and admit that your team is not elite at WR and this pointless argument goes away. Is it not enough to be elite everywhere else except WR for you? Are Seachickens fans so spoiled and provincial that they cannot tolerate being criticized for any little thing? Go pop some adderall and come back when you'v calmed down. Sheesh.
Dude, it's über soft and fragile Western Washington, and the NFL knows they literally abandon cars when even an inch of snow falls.Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:Even the gods are duking it out this is such a big game. Let's get the show on the road... what's a little lightning?
uofmman1122 wrote:Good fucking god, we look like shit against the best defense in the NFL.
At this point, I can't argue.Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:uofmman1122 wrote:Good fucking god, we look like shit against the best defense in the NFL.
Pretty bad. Keep in mind we're without Clemons, Irvin and Browner. Hell of a defensive battle going so far. Hope Reid is okay... looks to be made of glass.uofmman1122 wrote:At this point, I can't argue.Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:
How bad must Green Bay be?
uofmman1122 wrote:Yay.
Points.
Loved the SF front 7 getting beast moded by the one and only beast mode for 7.uofmman1122 wrote:Loved Sherman getting beast moded by Vance McDonald.
rkwittem wrote:Laugh it up now...I'll be here after the She-hawks get beat.Screamin_Eagle174 wrote: