Bandwagon fan - n. - person who likes a sport team just because of their recent success.
Only an old turd like 89Hen would think 18 years is recent.
Number of posts by baldy about the Penguins prior to 2016..... ONE.
Baldy wrote:
89Hen wrote:Flyers Penguins were on.
That's what I watched. Some damn good fights too.
Bandwagon fann. - a person that only likes a team when they win, only posts when they win, and has no history of being a fan of said team prior to them winning. See baldy.
Bandwagon fan - n. - person who likes a sport team just because of their recent success.
Only an old turd like 89Hen would think 18 years is recent.
Number of posts by baldy about the Penguins prior to 2016..... ONE.
Baldy wrote:
That's what I watched. Some damn good fights too.
Bandwagon fann. - a person that only likes a team when they win, only posts when they win, and has no history of being a fan of said team prior to them winning. See baldy.
Stalking posts prior to 2016, and still didn't disprove anything I said.
Baldy wrote:Stalking posts prior to 2016, and still didn't disprove anything I said.
This site has a really cool button called "search". It takes all of 6.93 seconds to turn up all your posts on the Pens or Penguins. I wouldn't expect a Penguins fan to grasp that, let alone a bandwagon one from Georgia.
Yup, the Pens have the Cups. They also have ugly fans, a woman for a captain and at the end of the day, they still have to live in Pittsburgh.... except the internet bandwagoners.
Baldy wrote:Stalking posts prior to 2016, and still didn't disprove anything I said.
This site has a really cool button called "search". It takes all of 6.93 seconds to turn up all your posts on the Pens or Penguins. I wouldn't expect a Penguins fan to grasp that, let alone a bandwagon one from Georgia.
Yup, the Pens have the Cups. They also have ugly fans, a woman for a captain and at the end of the day, they still have to live in Pittsburgh.... except the internet bandwagoners.
Still, you actually went through the process of searching my posts to try to find something...anything to dispute what I said.
Someone needs to change their soiled tampon. You're kinda cranky when you have that not so fresh feeling.
89Hen wrote:
This site has a really cool button called "search". It takes all of 6.93 seconds to turn up all your posts on the Pens or Penguins. I wouldn't expect a Penguins fan to grasp that, let alone a bandwagon one from Georgia.
Yup, the Pens have the Cups. They also have ugly fans, a woman for a captain and at the end of the day, they still have to live in Pittsburgh.... except the internet bandwagoners.
Still, you actually went through the process of searching my posts to try to find something...anything to dispute what I said.
Someone needs to change their soiled tampon. You're kinda cranky when you have that not so fresh feeling.
Yup, in the time you took to respond you could have done the same. Your only posts on the Penguins are from the 2016 playoffs and later. You are the absolute definition of a bandwagon fan. I don't know why you're trying to deny that tag when it's clearly accurate.
Cranky? Absolutely. Until the Caps actually win something, I am rightfully cranky. That's what a real fan is when their team loses. You're never cranky about the Pens because you only pay attention when they're winning.
Thanks for making this the most easily proved thread in the history of the sports board here.
Baldy wrote:
Still, you actually went through the process of searching my posts to try to find something...anything to dispute what I said.
Someone needs to change their soiled tampon. You're kinda cranky when you have that not so fresh feeling.
Yup, in the time you took to respond you could have done the same. Your only posts on the Penguins are from the 2016 playoffs and later. You are the absolute definition of a bandwagon fan. I don't know why you're trying to deny that tag when it's clearly accurate.
Cranky? Absolutely. Until the Caps actually win something, I am rightfully cranky. That's what a real fan is when their team loses. You're never cranky about the Pens because you only pay attention when they're winning.
Thanks for making this the most easily proved thread in the history of the sports board here.
You won't see me post very little if anything about the Falcons in any NFL thread before their SB run in 16-17 either. Anecdotal evidence is anecdotal. Welcome to Hen fans global warming thread.
Shockingly baldy has been silent since the ass whipping of Game 3. NHL helping out the whining coach and woman captain of the Pens by suspending Tom Wilson for a hit that wasn't penalized even with all four on-ice refs discussing it at great length.
89Hen wrote:Shockingly baldy has been silent since the ass whipping of Game 3. NHL helping out the whining coach and woman captain of the Pens by suspending Tom Wilson for a hit that wasn't penalized even with all four on-ice refs discussing it at great length.
89Hen wrote:Shockingly baldy has been silent since the ass whipping of Game 3. NHL helping out the whining coach and woman captain of the Pens by suspending Tom Wilson for a hit that wasn't penalized even with all four on-ice refs discussing it at great length.
I’m still rooting for giant meteor.
To/Too/Two hit Baldy? That's a little harsh. Jk
I'm with you but if I have to pick someone in this series it's the Caps. I'd rather have the unlikeable underdog over the whiny, unlikeable favorite.
Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm
MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qult qonspiracy theories since 2015.
Well that was fun. Caps had no business being in that game through two periods and pulled out the win. That was the complete opposite of past years. Still feel they need to win Game 6 to win the series. Don't want this going 7.
Caps had to beat not only the Pens, not only the referees, but I'm not sure I've seen a more poorly officiated game from the linesmen. I have no idea if they track how many players get kicked out of the faceoff circle over the course of the game, but by my estimate it was Caps 37 - Pens 0. They also called three mystery offsides at very crucial times.
89Hen wrote:Well that was fun. Caps had no business being in that game through two periods and pulled out the win. That was the complete opposite of past years. Still feel they need to win Game 6 to win the series. Don't want this going 7.
Caps had to beat not only the Pens, not only the referees, but I'm not sure I've seen a more poorly officiated game from the linesmen. I have no idea if they track how many players get kicked out of the faceoff circle over the course of the game, but by my estimate it was Caps 37 - Pens 0. They also called three mystery offsides at very crucial times.
