2013 NFC B/West Thread

All other sports including pro, high school and more!
User avatar
Screamin_Eagle174
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 16619
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 12:33 pm
I am a fan of: Peaches
A.K.A.: SE174
Location: Spokanistan

Re: 2013 NFC B/West Thread

Post by Screamin_Eagle174 »

Rkdimwitten? Bueller?

Oh yeah, you're probably too busy watching your favorite team go 0-3. :lol:
Seahawks08
Level2
Level2
Posts: 1918
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2011 9:28 pm
I am a fan of: Villanova

Re: 2013 NFC B/West Thread

Post by Seahawks08 »

Rkdimwitten, let's hear more about how SF's WR corp is better than Seattle's.
No no...I want an explanation on why Carolina's secondary is the worst in the NFC, and yet, just shut out Eli Manning... :kisswink:
Image
User avatar
rkwittem
Level2
Level2
Posts: 889
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 9:08 am
I am a fan of: North Dakota State
Location: Fargo, ND

Re: 2013 NFC B/West Thread

Post by rkwittem »

Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:Rkdimwitten, let's hear more about how SF's WR corp is better than Seattle's. :lol: :popcorn:
Not their fault when the QB lays an egg. When you lay an egg for 16 games as a wr corps and your QB is great.....well that's Seattle. There's a difference. Plus, no Crabtree.

Get over yourself you arrogant dbag. :roll: :coffee:
Image
User avatar
Screamin_Eagle174
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 16619
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 12:33 pm
I am a fan of: Peaches
A.K.A.: SE174
Location: Spokanistan

Re: 2013 NFC B/West Thread

Post by Screamin_Eagle174 »

rkwittem wrote:
Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:Rkdimwitten, let's hear more about how SF's WR corp is better than Seattle's. :lol: :popcorn:
Not their fault when the QB lays an egg. When you lay an egg for 16 games as a wr corps and your QB is great.....well that's Seattle. There's a difference. Plus, no Crabtree.

Get over yourself you arrogant dbag. :roll: :coffee:
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

You may be a clown, but I'll give you props for being a consistent clown. :thumb:
User avatar
rkwittem
Level2
Level2
Posts: 889
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 9:08 am
I am a fan of: North Dakota State
Location: Fargo, ND

Re: 2013 NFC B/West Thread

Post by rkwittem »

Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:
rkwittem wrote: Not their fault when the QB lays an egg. When you lay an egg for 16 games as a wr corps and your QB is great.....well that's Seattle. There's a difference. Plus, no Crabtree.

Get over yourself you arrogant dbag. :roll: :coffee:
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

You may be a clown, but I'll give you props for being a consistent clown. :thumb:
What are you going to whine about when Seattle gets Harvin back and I stop ripping your WR coros? How Jim Harbaugh was too much of a hardass to his current-Seachicken/former-Stanford players? I'm sure it will be amusing.
Image
User avatar
uofmman1122
Level2
Level2
Posts: 1847
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 6:22 am
I am a fan of: Japanese girls
A.K.A.: Randy Butternubs
Location: Missoula, MT

Re: 2013 NFC B/West Thread

Post by uofmman1122 »

Holy shit.

The 49ers running the ball was a good idea.

Who fucking knew??

:roll: :roll: :roll:
User avatar
rkwittem
Level2
Level2
Posts: 889
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 9:08 am
I am a fan of: North Dakota State
Location: Fargo, ND

Re: 2013 NFC B/West Thread

Post by rkwittem »

uofmman1122 wrote:Holy shit.

The 49ers running the ball was a good idea.

Who fucking knew??

:roll: :roll: :roll:
I'm still wondering when they'll bring out the Read Option again. Maybe it was just a playoff thing....
Image
Seahawks08
Level2
Level2
Posts: 1918
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2011 9:28 pm
I am a fan of: Villanova

Re: 2013 NFC B/West Thread

Post by Seahawks08 »

Holy ****.

The 49ers running the ball was a good idea.

Who **** knew??
I did!!! (Frank Gore on my ff team) :thumb:
Image
User avatar
Screamin_Eagle174
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 16619
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 12:33 pm
I am a fan of: Peaches
A.K.A.: SE174
Location: Spokanistan

Re: 2013 NFC B/West Thread

Post by Screamin_Eagle174 »

Time for rk's weekly installment of hate and hyperbole. Let's hear how Seattle's OL woes were the WRs fault. And how Baldwin's 3rd or 4th Sports Center top-10 catch of the season was just lucky. :lol:
User avatar
uofmman1122
Level2
Level2
Posts: 1847
Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 6:22 am
I am a fan of: Japanese girls
A.K.A.: Randy Butternubs
Location: Missoula, MT

Re: 2013 NFC B/West Thread

Post by uofmman1122 »

I was sooooooooo ready to come on here and crow about how the Buzzards are once again a terrible road team...















And then Schaub threw that Pick-six. :wall:
User avatar
Screamin_Eagle174
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 16619
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 12:33 pm
I am a fan of: Peaches
A.K.A.: SE174
Location: Spokanistan

Re: 2013 NFC B/West Thread

Post by Screamin_Eagle174 »

uofmman1122 wrote:I was sooooooooo ready to come on here and crow about how the Buzzards are once again a terrible road team...


And then Schaub threw that Pick-six. :wall:
Any team would struggle on the road minus their 3 best OL-men, against the #2 defense.

Fact of the matter is we've won 5 of our last 6 road games (including playoffs). :coffee:
Vidav
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 10804
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 2:42 pm
I am a fan of: Montana
A.K.A.: The Russian
Location: Missoula, MT

Re: 2013 NFC B/West Thread

Post by Vidav »

Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:
uofmman1122 wrote:I was sooooooooo ready to come on here and crow about how the Buzzards are once again a terrible road team...


And then Schaub threw that Pick-six. :wall:
Any team would struggle on the road minus their 3 best OL-men, against the #2 defense.

Fact of the matter is we've won 5 of our last 6 road games (including playoffs). :coffee:
Just love that if it were any other team in this exact spot you wouldn't be so forgiving. :coffee:
Seahawks08
Level2
Level2
Posts: 1918
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2011 9:28 pm
I am a fan of: Villanova

Re: 2013 NFC B/West Thread

Post by Seahawks08 »

I was sooooooooo ready to come on here and crow about how the Buzzards are once again a terrible road team...
I don't get how people can keep saying that after last year's playoffs. Go into Washington and win. Go into Atlanta and almost win.

And then go to Carolina and win there.

So how are they a terrible road team? :?
Image
User avatar
rkwittem
Level2
Level2
Posts: 889
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 9:08 am
I am a fan of: North Dakota State
Location: Fargo, ND

Re: 2013 NFC B/West Thread

Post by rkwittem »

Seahawks08 wrote:
I was sooooooooo ready to come on here and crow about how the Buzzards are once again a terrible road team...
I don't get how people can keep saying that after last year's playoffs. Go into Washington and win. Go into Atlanta and almost win.

And then go to Carolina and win there.

So how are they a terrible road team? :?
3-5 in regular season...beat WAS with an injured RG3 and didn't show up for 3 quarters in the ATL perhaps?????
:coffee:
Image
Seahawks08
Level2
Level2
Posts: 1918
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2011 9:28 pm
I am a fan of: Villanova

Re: 2013 NFC B/West Thread

Post by Seahawks08 »

3-5 in regular season...beat WAS with an injured RG3 and didn't show up for 3 quarters in the ATL perhaps?????
And that makes them a terrible road team how? Maybe you should do some research before you spout crap. Of all those road games they lost last year, the most they lost by was 7 and that was to the 49ers. Try again. :roll:
Image
User avatar
rkwittem
Level2
Level2
Posts: 889
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 9:08 am
I am a fan of: North Dakota State
Location: Fargo, ND

Re: 2013 NFC B/West Thread

Post by rkwittem »

Seahawks08 wrote:
3-5 in regular season...beat WAS with an injured RG3 and didn't show up for 3 quarters in the ATL perhaps?????
And that makes them a terrible road team how? Maybe you should do some research before you spout crap. Of all those road games they lost last year, the most they lost by was 7 and that was to the 49ers. Try again. :roll:
You're an idiot. They had a losing record away from home and yet you wonder why people think they're a bad road team. :dunce:

I wasn't talking shit either, those were all facts. Just because I don't like your team doesn't mean I'm wrong. You and SE are too biased to see otherwise....
People don't care about point differential. If you lose away from home, you are, by definition, a bad road team. Barely beating Washington, Carolina, and Houston doesn't impress, nationally. IDK wh
Image
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 68917
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: 2013 NFC B/West Thread

Post by kalm »

rkwittem wrote:
Seahawks08 wrote:
And that makes them a terrible road team how? Maybe you should do some research before you spout crap. Of all those road games they lost last year, the most they lost by was 7 and that was to the 49ers. Try again. :roll:
You're an idiot. They had a losing record away from home and yet you wonder why people think they're a bad road team. :dunce:

I wasn't talking shit either, those were all facts. Just because I don't like your team doesn't mean I'm wrong. You and SE are too biased to see otherwise....
People don't care about point differential. If you lose away from home, you are, by definition, a bad road team. Barely beating Washington, Carolina, and Houston doesn't impress, nationally. IDK wh
Without looking, I'm guessing 3-5 makes you an average, if not above average road team in the NFL.
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Screamin_Eagle174
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 16619
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 12:33 pm
I am a fan of: Peaches
A.K.A.: SE174
Location: Spokanistan

Re: 2013 NFC B/West Thread

Post by Screamin_Eagle174 »

rkwittem wrote:
Seahawks08 wrote:
And that makes them a terrible road team how? Maybe you should do some research before you spout crap. Of all those road games they lost last year, the most they lost by was 7 and that was to the 49ers. Try again. :roll:
You're an idiot. They had a losing record away from home and yet you wonder why people think they're a bad road team. :dunce:

I wasn't talking shit either, those were all facts. Just because I don't like your team doesn't mean I'm wrong. You and SE are too biased to see otherwise....
People don't care about point differential. If you lose away from home, you are, by definition, a bad road team. Barely beating Washington, Carolina, and Houston doesn't impress, nationally. IDK wh
Posts like this are why everyone thinks you're a clown. You say point differential doesn't mean anything, a loss on the road means we're a bad road team. But then a few sentences later you essentially argue that close wins on the road mean we're still a bad road team. :lol: :dunce:

You want facts? Seattle has won five of their last six on the road. I guess a .830 record sucks in your assbackwards world of hate-fueled bias.
Seahawks08
Level2
Level2
Posts: 1918
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2011 9:28 pm
I am a fan of: Villanova

Re: 2013 NFC B/West Thread

Post by Seahawks08 »

Without looking, I'm guessing 3-5 makes you an average, if not above average road team in the NFL.
Good call sir. :clap:

17 of 32 (0.53) teams were 3-5 or worse last year.

16 of 32 in 2011

and 18 of 32 (0.56) in 2010
Image
User avatar
rkwittem
Level2
Level2
Posts: 889
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 9:08 am
I am a fan of: North Dakota State
Location: Fargo, ND

Re: 2013 NFC B/West Thread

Post by rkwittem »

Screamin_Eagle174 wrote: Posts like this are why everyone thinks you're a clown. You say point differential doesn't mean anything, a loss on the road means we're a bad road team. But then a few sentences later you essentially argue that close wins on the road mean we're still a bad road team. :lol: :dunce:

You want facts? Seattle has won five of their last six on the road. I guess a .830 record sucks in your assbackwards world of hate-fueled bias.
I said people don't care about it. A loss is a loss. I don't care how or by how many. It's a L either way. Winning close games against average competition when you're supposedly the best team in the league is not impressive. Winning like Denver is impressive. Why, then, don't the Seahawks win at margins that Denver puts up? Are they not good or not as good on the road, i.e. a bad road team. Face it, if you don't have home field advantage, there is no Super Bowl coming for you. Whether that theory gets tested is another matter entirely....

"Hate-fueled bias"eh? The only thing I hate about Seattle is Sherman, your stupid 12th Man nickname you STOLE from A&M and arrogant pricks like you who make it easy to enjoy any misfortune that could happen to them.
Last edited by rkwittem on Tue Oct 01, 2013 9:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image
User avatar
rkwittem
Level2
Level2
Posts: 889
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 9:08 am
I am a fan of: North Dakota State
Location: Fargo, ND

Re: 2013 NFC B/West Thread

Post by rkwittem »

Seahawks08 wrote:
Without looking, I'm guessing 3-5 makes you an average, if not above average road team in the NFL.
Good call sir. :clap:

17 of 32 (0.53) teams were 3-5 or worse last year.

16 of 32 in 2011

and 18 of 32 (0.56) in 2010
So there are a lot of bad road teams. You can rest easy knowing that Seattle isn't the only shitty road team around.
Image
User avatar
rkwittem
Level2
Level2
Posts: 889
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 9:08 am
I am a fan of: North Dakota State
Location: Fargo, ND

Re: 2013 NFC B/West Thread

Post by rkwittem »

Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:
uofmman1122 wrote:I was sooooooooo ready to come on here and crow about how the Buzzards are once again a terrible road team...


And then Schaub threw that Pick-six. :wall:
Any team would struggle on the road minus their 3 best OL-men, against the #2 defense.

Fact of the matter is we've won 5 of our last 6 road games (including playoffs). :coffee:
Yeah, against the immortal (playoffless) Bears, Bills, Redskins with an injured RG3, the Panthers and Houston. That on the heels of an impressive 6-5 loss in Miami and a no-show in Atlanta for 3 quarters. I would expect any competent playoff team to run the table against that road onslaught.
Image
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 68917
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: 2013 NFC B/West Thread

Post by kalm »

rkwittem wrote:
Seahawks08 wrote:
Good call sir. :clap:

17 of 32 (0.53) teams were 3-5 or worse last year.

16 of 32 in 2011

and 18 of 32 (0.56) in 2010
So there are a lot of bad road teams. You can rest easy knowing that Seattle isn't the only shitty road team around.
Re-define bad/shitty to avoid admitting you're wrong. :roll:
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
rkwittem
Level2
Level2
Posts: 889
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 9:08 am
I am a fan of: North Dakota State
Location: Fargo, ND

Re: 2013 NFC B/West Thread

Post by rkwittem »

kalm wrote:
rkwittem wrote: So there are a lot of bad road teams. You can rest easy knowing that Seattle isn't the only shitty road team around.
Re-define bad/shitty to avoid admitting you're wrong. :roll:
Winning less than 50% of your road games is not impressive. Getting a "C" when everyone except a few are getting D's and F's is still bad.
Image
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 68917
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: 2013 NFC B/West Thread

Post by kalm »

rkwittem wrote:
kalm wrote:
Re-define bad/shitty to avoid admitting you're wrong. :roll:
Winning less than 50% of your road games is not impressive. Getting a "C" when everyone except a few are getting D's and F's is still bad.
No...it's tough for most teams to win on the road in the NFL. D's and F's would be bad. C would be average. I would grade your skills at debate a D+
Image
Image
Image
Post Reply