Oh yeah, you're probably too busy watching your favorite team go 0-3.
2013 NFC B/West Thread
- Screamin_Eagle174
- Supporter

- Posts: 16619
- Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 12:33 pm
- I am a fan of: Peaches
- A.K.A.: SE174
- Location: Spokanistan
Re: 2013 NFC B/West Thread
Rkdimwitten? Bueller?
Oh yeah, you're probably too busy watching your favorite team go 0-3.
Oh yeah, you're probably too busy watching your favorite team go 0-3.
-
Seahawks08
- Level2

- Posts: 1918
- Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2011 9:28 pm
- I am a fan of: Villanova
Re: 2013 NFC B/West Thread
No no...I want an explanation on why Carolina's secondary is the worst in the NFC, and yet, just shut out Eli Manning...Rkdimwitten, let's hear more about how SF's WR corp is better than Seattle's.

- rkwittem
- Level2

- Posts: 889
- Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 9:08 am
- I am a fan of: North Dakota State
- Location: Fargo, ND
Re: 2013 NFC B/West Thread
Not their fault when the QB lays an egg. When you lay an egg for 16 games as a wr corps and your QB is great.....well that's Seattle. There's a difference. Plus, no Crabtree.Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:Rkdimwitten, let's hear more about how SF's WR corp is better than Seattle's.![]()
Get over yourself you arrogant dbag.

- Screamin_Eagle174
- Supporter

- Posts: 16619
- Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 12:33 pm
- I am a fan of: Peaches
- A.K.A.: SE174
- Location: Spokanistan
Re: 2013 NFC B/West Thread
rkwittem wrote:Not their fault when the QB lays an egg. When you lay an egg for 16 games as a wr corps and your QB is great.....well that's Seattle. There's a difference. Plus, no Crabtree.Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:Rkdimwitten, let's hear more about how SF's WR corp is better than Seattle's.![]()
Get over yourself you arrogant dbag.![]()
You may be a clown, but I'll give you props for being a consistent clown.
- rkwittem
- Level2

- Posts: 889
- Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 9:08 am
- I am a fan of: North Dakota State
- Location: Fargo, ND
Re: 2013 NFC B/West Thread
What are you going to whine about when Seattle gets Harvin back and I stop ripping your WR coros? How Jim Harbaugh was too much of a hardass to his current-Seachicken/former-Stanford players? I'm sure it will be amusing.Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:rkwittem wrote: Not their fault when the QB lays an egg. When you lay an egg for 16 games as a wr corps and your QB is great.....well that's Seattle. There's a difference. Plus, no Crabtree.
Get over yourself you arrogant dbag.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
You may be a clown, but I'll give you props for being a consistent clown.

- uofmman1122
- Level2

- Posts: 1847
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 6:22 am
- I am a fan of: Japanese girls
- A.K.A.: Randy Butternubs
- Location: Missoula, MT
Re: 2013 NFC B/West Thread
Holy shit.
The 49ers running the ball was a good idea.
Who fucking knew??

The 49ers running the ball was a good idea.
Who fucking knew??
- rkwittem
- Level2

- Posts: 889
- Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 9:08 am
- I am a fan of: North Dakota State
- Location: Fargo, ND
Re: 2013 NFC B/West Thread
I'm still wondering when they'll bring out the Read Option again. Maybe it was just a playoff thing....uofmman1122 wrote:Holy shit.
The 49ers running the ball was a good idea.
Who fucking knew??
![]()
![]()

-
Seahawks08
- Level2

- Posts: 1918
- Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2011 9:28 pm
- I am a fan of: Villanova
Re: 2013 NFC B/West Thread
I did!!! (Frank Gore on my ff team)Holy ****.
The 49ers running the ball was a good idea.
Who **** knew??

- Screamin_Eagle174
- Supporter

- Posts: 16619
- Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 12:33 pm
- I am a fan of: Peaches
- A.K.A.: SE174
- Location: Spokanistan
Re: 2013 NFC B/West Thread
Time for rk's weekly installment of hate and hyperbole. Let's hear how Seattle's OL woes were the WRs fault. And how Baldwin's 3rd or 4th Sports Center top-10 catch of the season was just lucky. 
- uofmman1122
- Level2

- Posts: 1847
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2008 6:22 am
- I am a fan of: Japanese girls
- A.K.A.: Randy Butternubs
- Location: Missoula, MT
Re: 2013 NFC B/West Thread
I was sooooooooo ready to come on here and crow about how the Buzzards are once again a terrible road team...
And then Schaub threw that Pick-six.
And then Schaub threw that Pick-six.
- Screamin_Eagle174
- Supporter

- Posts: 16619
- Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 12:33 pm
- I am a fan of: Peaches
- A.K.A.: SE174
- Location: Spokanistan
Re: 2013 NFC B/West Thread
Any team would struggle on the road minus their 3 best OL-men, against the #2 defense.uofmman1122 wrote:I was sooooooooo ready to come on here and crow about how the Buzzards are once again a terrible road team...
And then Schaub threw that Pick-six.
Fact of the matter is we've won 5 of our last 6 road games (including playoffs).
-
Vidav
- Moderator Team

- Posts: 10804
- Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 2:42 pm
- I am a fan of: Montana
- A.K.A.: The Russian
- Location: Missoula, MT
Re: 2013 NFC B/West Thread
Just love that if it were any other team in this exact spot you wouldn't be so forgiving.Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:Any team would struggle on the road minus their 3 best OL-men, against the #2 defense.uofmman1122 wrote:I was sooooooooo ready to come on here and crow about how the Buzzards are once again a terrible road team...
And then Schaub threw that Pick-six.
Fact of the matter is we've won 5 of our last 6 road games (including playoffs).
-
Seahawks08
- Level2

- Posts: 1918
- Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2011 9:28 pm
- I am a fan of: Villanova
Re: 2013 NFC B/West Thread
I don't get how people can keep saying that after last year's playoffs. Go into Washington and win. Go into Atlanta and almost win.I was sooooooooo ready to come on here and crow about how the Buzzards are once again a terrible road team...
And then go to Carolina and win there.
So how are they a terrible road team?

- rkwittem
- Level2

- Posts: 889
- Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 9:08 am
- I am a fan of: North Dakota State
- Location: Fargo, ND
Re: 2013 NFC B/West Thread
3-5 in regular season...beat WAS with an injured RG3 and didn't show up for 3 quarters in the ATL perhaps?????Seahawks08 wrote:I don't get how people can keep saying that after last year's playoffs. Go into Washington and win. Go into Atlanta and almost win.I was sooooooooo ready to come on here and crow about how the Buzzards are once again a terrible road team...
And then go to Carolina and win there.
So how are they a terrible road team?

-
Seahawks08
- Level2

- Posts: 1918
- Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2011 9:28 pm
- I am a fan of: Villanova
Re: 2013 NFC B/West Thread
And that makes them a terrible road team how? Maybe you should do some research before you spout crap. Of all those road games they lost last year, the most they lost by was 7 and that was to the 49ers. Try again.3-5 in regular season...beat WAS with an injured RG3 and didn't show up for 3 quarters in the ATL perhaps?????

- rkwittem
- Level2

- Posts: 889
- Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 9:08 am
- I am a fan of: North Dakota State
- Location: Fargo, ND
Re: 2013 NFC B/West Thread
You're an idiot. They had a losing record away from home and yet you wonder why people think they're a bad road team.Seahawks08 wrote:And that makes them a terrible road team how? Maybe you should do some research before you spout crap. Of all those road games they lost last year, the most they lost by was 7 and that was to the 49ers. Try again.3-5 in regular season...beat WAS with an injured RG3 and didn't show up for 3 quarters in the ATL perhaps?????
I wasn't talking shit either, those were all facts. Just because I don't like your team doesn't mean I'm wrong. You and SE are too biased to see otherwise....
People don't care about point differential. If you lose away from home, you are, by definition, a bad road team. Barely beating Washington, Carolina, and Houston doesn't impress, nationally. IDK wh

-
kalm
- Supporter

- Posts: 68917
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: 2013 NFC B/West Thread
Without looking, I'm guessing 3-5 makes you an average, if not above average road team in the NFL.rkwittem wrote:You're an idiot. They had a losing record away from home and yet you wonder why people think they're a bad road team.Seahawks08 wrote:
And that makes them a terrible road team how? Maybe you should do some research before you spout crap. Of all those road games they lost last year, the most they lost by was 7 and that was to the 49ers. Try again.![]()
I wasn't talking shit either, those were all facts. Just because I don't like your team doesn't mean I'm wrong. You and SE are too biased to see otherwise....
People don't care about point differential. If you lose away from home, you are, by definition, a bad road team. Barely beating Washington, Carolina, and Houston doesn't impress, nationally. IDK wh
- Screamin_Eagle174
- Supporter

- Posts: 16619
- Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 12:33 pm
- I am a fan of: Peaches
- A.K.A.: SE174
- Location: Spokanistan
Re: 2013 NFC B/West Thread
Posts like this are why everyone thinks you're a clown. You say point differential doesn't mean anything, a loss on the road means we're a bad road team. But then a few sentences later you essentially argue that close wins on the road mean we're still a bad road team.rkwittem wrote:You're an idiot. They had a losing record away from home and yet you wonder why people think they're a bad road team.Seahawks08 wrote:
And that makes them a terrible road team how? Maybe you should do some research before you spout crap. Of all those road games they lost last year, the most they lost by was 7 and that was to the 49ers. Try again.![]()
I wasn't talking shit either, those were all facts. Just because I don't like your team doesn't mean I'm wrong. You and SE are too biased to see otherwise....
People don't care about point differential. If you lose away from home, you are, by definition, a bad road team. Barely beating Washington, Carolina, and Houston doesn't impress, nationally. IDK wh
You want facts? Seattle has won five of their last six on the road. I guess a .830 record sucks in your assbackwards world of hate-fueled bias.
-
Seahawks08
- Level2

- Posts: 1918
- Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2011 9:28 pm
- I am a fan of: Villanova
Re: 2013 NFC B/West Thread
Good call sir.Without looking, I'm guessing 3-5 makes you an average, if not above average road team in the NFL.
17 of 32 (0.53) teams were 3-5 or worse last year.
16 of 32 in 2011
and 18 of 32 (0.56) in 2010

- rkwittem
- Level2

- Posts: 889
- Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 9:08 am
- I am a fan of: North Dakota State
- Location: Fargo, ND
Re: 2013 NFC B/West Thread
I said people don't care about it. A loss is a loss. I don't care how or by how many. It's a L either way. Winning close games against average competition when you're supposedly the best team in the league is not impressive. Winning like Denver is impressive. Why, then, don't the Seahawks win at margins that Denver puts up? Are they not good or not as good on the road, i.e. a bad road team. Face it, if you don't have home field advantage, there is no Super Bowl coming for you. Whether that theory gets tested is another matter entirely....Screamin_Eagle174 wrote: Posts like this are why everyone thinks you're a clown. You say point differential doesn't mean anything, a loss on the road means we're a bad road team. But then a few sentences later you essentially argue that close wins on the road mean we're still a bad road team.![]()
You want facts? Seattle has won five of their last six on the road. I guess a .830 record sucks in your assbackwards world of hate-fueled bias.
"Hate-fueled bias"eh? The only thing I hate about Seattle is Sherman, your stupid 12th Man nickname you STOLE from A&M and arrogant pricks like you who make it easy to enjoy any misfortune that could happen to them.
Last edited by rkwittem on Tue Oct 01, 2013 9:00 am, edited 1 time in total.

- rkwittem
- Level2

- Posts: 889
- Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 9:08 am
- I am a fan of: North Dakota State
- Location: Fargo, ND
Re: 2013 NFC B/West Thread
So there are a lot of bad road teams. You can rest easy knowing that Seattle isn't the only shitty road team around.Seahawks08 wrote:Good call sir.Without looking, I'm guessing 3-5 makes you an average, if not above average road team in the NFL.![]()
17 of 32 (0.53) teams were 3-5 or worse last year.
16 of 32 in 2011
and 18 of 32 (0.56) in 2010

- rkwittem
- Level2

- Posts: 889
- Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 9:08 am
- I am a fan of: North Dakota State
- Location: Fargo, ND
Re: 2013 NFC B/West Thread
Yeah, against the immortal (playoffless) Bears, Bills, Redskins with an injured RG3, the Panthers and Houston. That on the heels of an impressive 6-5 loss in Miami and a no-show in Atlanta for 3 quarters. I would expect any competent playoff team to run the table against that road onslaught.Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:Any team would struggle on the road minus their 3 best OL-men, against the #2 defense.uofmman1122 wrote:I was sooooooooo ready to come on here and crow about how the Buzzards are once again a terrible road team...
And then Schaub threw that Pick-six.
Fact of the matter is we've won 5 of our last 6 road games (including playoffs).

-
kalm
- Supporter

- Posts: 68917
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: 2013 NFC B/West Thread
Re-define bad/shitty to avoid admitting you're wrong.rkwittem wrote:So there are a lot of bad road teams. You can rest easy knowing that Seattle isn't the only shitty road team around.Seahawks08 wrote:
Good call sir.![]()
17 of 32 (0.53) teams were 3-5 or worse last year.
16 of 32 in 2011
and 18 of 32 (0.56) in 2010
- rkwittem
- Level2

- Posts: 889
- Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 9:08 am
- I am a fan of: North Dakota State
- Location: Fargo, ND
Re: 2013 NFC B/West Thread
Winning less than 50% of your road games is not impressive. Getting a "C" when everyone except a few are getting D's and F's is still bad.kalm wrote:Re-define bad/shitty to avoid admitting you're wrong.rkwittem wrote: So there are a lot of bad road teams. You can rest easy knowing that Seattle isn't the only shitty road team around.

-
kalm
- Supporter

- Posts: 68917
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: 2013 NFC B/West Thread
No...it's tough for most teams to win on the road in the NFL. D's and F's would be bad. C would be average. I would grade your skills at debate a D+rkwittem wrote:Winning less than 50% of your road games is not impressive. Getting a "C" when everyone except a few are getting D's and F's is still bad.kalm wrote:
Re-define bad/shitty to avoid admitting you're wrong.


