US SOCCER

EPJr · Post by **EPJr** » Thu Sep 12, 2013 8:18 am

New FIFA world rankings:
USA 13
Mexico 21
Canada 106

http://www.fifa.com/worldranking/rankin ... index.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Post by **clenz** » Thu Sep 12, 2013 8:32 am

Ibanez wrote:
Grizalltheway wrote:
Boredom is a reflection of oneself.
No, Harvey Danger. Boredom is a reflection of one interest in something. A person is not required to be neither excited nor interested about every event they attend, book they read, place they go, experience, etc...

So....a reflection of oneself then....

Post by **Ibanez** » Thu Sep 12, 2013 8:34 am

clenz wrote:
Ibanez wrote: No, Harvey Danger. Boredom is a reflection of one interest in something. A person is not required to be neither excited nor interested about every event they attend, book they read, place they go, experience, etc...
So....a reflection of oneself then....

No. Not in the sense that you are boring person as WTAG implied.. In the sense that nobody derives entertainment from every thing in life. Some things are boring.

Post by **Grizalltheway** » Thu Sep 12, 2013 8:50 am

Ibanez wrote:
clenz wrote: So....a reflection of oneself then....
No. Not in the sense that you are boring person as WTAG implied.. In the sense that nobody derives entertainment from every thing in life. Some things are boring.

Some things are boring to you. Stop making blanket statements.

89Hen · Post by **89Hen** » Thu Sep 12, 2013 8:53 am

New FIFA world rankings:
USA 13
England 17
Mexico 21
France 25

Post by **Grizalltheway** » Thu Sep 12, 2013 9:00 am

89Hen wrote:New FIFA world rankings:
USA 13
England 17
Mexico 21
France 25

Those rankings are garbage. I think we were like 5th or 6th heading into the 2006 WC.

Post by **clenz** » Thu Sep 12, 2013 9:01 am

Grizalltheway wrote:
Ibanez wrote:
No. Not in the sense that you are boring person as WTAG implied.. In the sense that nobody derives entertainment from every thing in life. Some things are boring.
Some things are boring to you. Stop making blanket statements.

So....a reflection of oneself

Post by **Ibanez** » Thu Sep 12, 2013 9:03 am

Grizalltheway wrote:
Ibanez wrote:
No. Not in the sense that you are boring person as WTAG implied.. In the sense that nobody derives entertainment from every thing in life. Some things are boring.
Some things are boring to you. Stop making blanket statements.

It's the interwebs.

ASUMountaineer · Post by **ASUMountaineer** » Thu Sep 12, 2013 9:06 am

Ibanez wrote:
clenz wrote: So....a reflection of oneself then....
No. Not in the sense that you are boring person as WTAG implied.. In the sense that nobody derives entertainment from every thing in life. Some things are boring.

You watch your mouth! There's nothing more exciting on this planet than watching a game with 22 guys running around for 90+ minutes, flopping all over the place like fish out of water, not using their hands, and wearing shin guards that ends in a 0-0 tie. That shit is legit!

Post by **bandl** » Thu Sep 12, 2013 9:08 am

ASUMountaineer wrote:
Ibanez wrote:
No. Not in the sense that you are boring person as WTAG implied.. In the sense that nobody derives entertainment from every thing in life. Some things are boring.
You watch your mouth! There's nothing more exciting on this planet than watching 22 guys run around for 90+ minutes, flopping all over the place like fish out of water, not using their hands, and wearing shin guards ending in a 0-0 tie. That shit is legit!

You talking about SWAC football?

Post by **Ibanez** » Thu Sep 12, 2013 9:13 am

bandl wrote:
ASUMountaineer wrote:
You watch your mouth! There's nothing more exciting on this planet than watching 22 guys run around for 90+ minutes, flopping all over the place like fish out of water, not using their hands, and wearing shin guards ending in a 0-0 tie. That shit is legit!
You talking about SWAC football?

Post by **Ibanez** » Thu Sep 12, 2013 9:14 am

ASUMountaineer wrote:
Ibanez wrote:
No. Not in the sense that you are boring person as WTAG implied.. In the sense that nobody derives entertainment from every thing in life. Some things are boring.
You watch your mouth! There's nothing more exciting on this planet than watching a game with 22 guys running around for 90+ minutes, flopping all over the place like fish out of water, not using their hands, and wearing shin guards that ends in a 0-0 tie. That shit is legit!

I understand the hooligans. I'd riot if I sat in the cold for 90+minutes to watch a game end in a 0-0 tie.

Post by **Grizalltheway** » Thu Sep 12, 2013 9:18 am

ASUMountaineer wrote:
Ibanez wrote:
No. Not in the sense that you are boring person as WTAG implied.. In the sense that nobody derives entertainment from every thing in life. Some things are boring.
You watch your mouth! There's nothing more exciting on this planet than watching a game with 22 guys running around for 90+ minutes, flopping all over the place like fish out of water, not using their hands, and wearing shin guards that ends in a 0-0 tie. That shit is legit!

Or you could watch a game that manages to pack 11 minutes of action into a 3+ hour event!

Post by **AZGrizFan** » Thu Sep 12, 2013 9:20 am

Grizalltheway wrote:
ASUMountaineer wrote:
You watch your mouth! There's nothing more exciting on this planet than watching a game with 22 guys running around for 90+ minutes, flopping all over the place like fish out of water, not using their hands, and wearing shin guards that ends in a 0-0 tie. That shit is legit!
Or you could watch a game that manages to pack 11 minutes of action into a 3+ hour event!

The fact the ball is continually moving <> "action"

Post by **Ibanez** » Thu Sep 12, 2013 9:25 am

Grizalltheway wrote:
ASUMountaineer wrote:
You watch your mouth! There's nothing more exciting on this planet than watching a game with 22 guys running around for 90+ minutes, flopping all over the place like fish out of water, not using their hands, and wearing shin guards that ends in a 0-0 tie. That shit is legit!
Or you could watch a game that manages to pack 11 minutes of action into a 3+ hour event!

Someone sure does love their soccer. Relax dude.

tribe_pride · Post by **tribe_pride** » Thu Sep 12, 2013 10:31 am

Grizalltheway wrote:
89Hen wrote:New FIFA world rankings:
USA 13
England 17
Mexico 21
France 25

Those rankings are garbage. I think we were like 5th or 6th heading into the 2006 WC.

Not sure the change but they changed the way that rankings were done shortly after the 2006 world cup.

Also, while we lost at Costa Rica (33 ranked) recently, we did win at Bosnia (ranked 18) and home versus Germany (who is currently ranked number 3 and has not lost otherwise in over a year).

We probably should be somewhere in the top 20 so around 15 is not bad guestimate based on our year.

ASUMountaineer · Post by **ASUMountaineer** » Thu Sep 12, 2013 10:38 am

bandl wrote:
ASUMountaineer wrote:
You watch your mouth! There's nothing more exciting on this planet than watching 22 guys run around for 90+ minutes, flopping all over the place like fish out of water, not using their hands, and wearing shin guards ending in a 0-0 tie. That **** is legit!
You talking about SWAC football?

That post is why you need to limit your hiatuses.

ASUMountaineer · Post by **ASUMountaineer** » Thu Sep 12, 2013 10:39 am

Grizalltheway wrote:
ASUMountaineer wrote:
You watch your mouth! There's nothing more exciting on this planet than watching a game with 22 guys running around for 90+ minutes, flopping all over the place like fish out of water, not using their hands, and wearing shin guards that ends in a 0-0 tie. That **** is legit!
Or you could watch a game that manages to pack 11 minutes of action into a 3+ hour event!

dal4018 · Post by **dal4018** » Sun Sep 22, 2013 8:01 am

My guys from Ghana beat Zambia 2-1 next on the list to be taken out Egypt Oct.11th!!!!

EPJr · Post by **EPJr** » Thu Oct 10, 2013 9:58 am

Canada continues to plan on bid for 2026 World Cup

TORONTO — By the time 2026 rolls around, it will have been 32 years since the CONCACAF region hosted the FIFA World Cup, and according to reports published on Wednesday, the president of the Liga MX believes a joint US-Mexico bid might be just the thing to bring the World Cup back to this part of the globe.

http://www.mlssoccer.com/news/article/2 ... -world-cup" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Mexico would team up with the USA to host 2026 World Cup tournament

Mexico is interested in joining forces with the USA to co-host a bid for the 2026 World Cup.

Liga MX president Decio de María, a former high-ranking executive of the Mexican soccer federation, made the statement at Wednesday's Leaders in Football Conference in London during a discussion about the future of the World Cup and the FIFA bidding process.

“Do it with some Mexican cities there,” de María reportedly told U.S. Soccer Federation president Sunil Gulati when the topic of a US bid for the 2026 World Cup came up.

http://www.mlssoccer.com/sideline/news/ ... t-sideline" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

89Hen · Post by **89Hen** » Thu Oct 10, 2013 10:07 am

EPJr wrote:By the time 2026 rolls around, it will have been 32 years since the CONCACAF region hosted the FIFA World Cup

That's a joke.

Post by **clenz** » Thu Oct 10, 2013 11:00 am

89Hen wrote:
EPJr wrote:By the time 2026 rolls around, it will have been 32 years since the CONCACAF region hosted the FIFA World Cup
That's a joke.

agreed

Sent from my SCH-R530U using Tapatalk now Free

tribe_pride · Post by **tribe_pride** » Thu Oct 10, 2013 11:28 am

I know we've already qualified but we host Jamaica tomorrow and go to Panama on Tuesday

Games Remaining
Tomorrow:
Jamaica @ US - US has qualified and Jamaica is eliminated so it is meaningless

Costa Rica @Honduras - CR has already qualified and Honduras would clinch a minimum of 4th with a win (likely qualifies with it since it goes to Jamaica for its last game) - a tie would not be horrible for Honduras

Panama @ Mexico - Winner should get 4th (playoff spot with NZ) and loser likely staying home. A tie will make things very interesting for Tuesday

Tuesday:
US @ Panama - US has qualified and will likely use this to try out younger players. Panama could need this for a 4th spot or maybe 3rd if things go the right way.

Honduras @ Jamaica - Jamaica has been eliminated and Honduras will likely either need 1 or 3 points to guarantee a WC spot so watch for blood here

Mexico @ Costa Rica - Costa Rica has qualified and will likely use this to try out younger players. Like Panama, Mexico could need this for a 4th spot or maybe 3rd if things go the right way

Predicted final standings (tough to predict with US and CR not necessarily fielding their best teams):
US with 20 points WC qualifier
Costa Rica with 17 points WC qualifier
Honduras with 15 points WC qualifier
Panama with 10 points (Panama getting 4th on more goals scored during all matches) - plays NZ in a playoff
Mexico with 10 points
Jamaica with 4 points

89Hen · Post by **89Hen** » Thu Oct 10, 2013 11:30 am

tribe_pride wrote:Predicted final standings (tough to predict with US and CR not necessarily fielding their best teams):
US with 20 points WC qualifier
Costa Rica with 17 points WC qualifier
Honduras with 15 points WC qualifier
Panama with 10 points (Panama getting 4th on more goals scored during all matches) - plays NZ in a playoff
Mexico with 10 points
Jamaica with 4 points

Beaners!

dal4018 · Post by **dal4018** » Thu Oct 10, 2013 12:27 pm

As stated before Ghana meets up with Egypt tomorrow.Mexico and USA co-host the 2026 World Cup nice idea!!!

Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

US SOCCER

Re: US SOCCER

Re: US SOCCER

Re: US SOCCER

Re: US SOCCER

Re: US SOCCER

Re: US SOCCER

Re: US SOCCER

Re: US SOCCER

Re: US SOCCER

Re: US SOCCER

Re: US SOCCER

Re: US SOCCER

Re: US SOCCER

Re: US SOCCER

Re: US SOCCER

Re: US SOCCER

Re: US SOCCER

Re: US SOCCER

Re: US SOCCER

Re: US SOCCER

Re: US SOCCER

Re: US SOCCER

Re: US SOCCER

Re: US SOCCER

Re: US SOCCER