![Oh No :ohno:](./images/smilies/sSig_ohno.gif)
Seriously, that will kill them if they miss those later.
Turns out to be a great play by Suarez, since Uruguay likely loses if Ghana scores there. Ghana really choked on the penalty kicks.DukeJack wrote:Crazy sequence with two Uruguayan goal-line clearances in the last minute of stoppage time ends with a red card to Saurez and a PK for Ghana which Gyan hits over the crossbar
PKs to decide who goes through to the semis - Uruguay wins 4-2 on PKs
+193henfan wrote:Suck on that, Maradona, you greasy piece of shit.
Jesus, was I drunk, high, or both when I wrote these?Grizalltheway wrote:Group A: France, Mexico
Group B: Argentina, Nigeria
Group C: England, US
Group D: Germany, Australia
Group E: Nederland, Dänemark
Group F: Italy, Slovakia
Group G: Brasil, Ivory Coast
Group H: Spain, Switzerland
Round of 16:
France over Nigeria
Australia over England
Germany over US
Argentina over Mexico
Netherlands over Slovakia
Brasil over Switzerland
Denmark over Italy
Spain over Ivory Coast
Quarters:
Brasil beats Netherlands
Australia beats France
Germany beats Argentina
Spain beats Denmark
Semis:
Brasil beats Australia
Germany beats Spain
Final:
Germany beats Brasil on penalties.
http://soccernet.espn.go.com/world-cup/ ... 901&ver=us" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;Saturday's results sent three of four European teams to the semifinals, which not only puts to bed the myth of South American dominance but also suggests it was only a convenient mirage that allowed commentators to herald a shift in the global game. For at least the 10th tournament running, the semifinals are dominated by European teams. In fact, to look at the final four teams going all the way back to 1970 is to see an established pattern of John Wooden-like supremacy. Only twice in 40 years has Europe had only two teams in the semis; the rest of the time, it was three alpha dogs or more, including an all-Euro final four in 1982 and 2006.
Well, if you remember my prior post, I said I was pulling and rooting for the Dutch and Germany to get here, so it's not like I'm all of a sudden broken up about that scenario coming true.Grizalltheway wrote:Germany v Spain should be a great semifinal, but I personally think Germany can only stop themselves at this point.![]()
Oh, and how about those 3 European teams in the semis, Gannonfan?![]()
Eh, still doesn't change my opinion that Europe gets too many teams into the tournament. And what a difference a round makes here. Only having 3 European teams make the quarterfinals was one of the worst showing by Europe in decades, but now all of a sudden because those 3 European teams make the semis this is supposed to herald some era of European dominance? Please, that is bunk. Spain, Germany, and the Dutch looking good (especially the last two, who are actually two favorites of mine) doesn't erase the debacle that was France, that was Italy, that was England, that was Greece, and so on and so on. When Brazil was the only South American team dominating past tournaments it didn't mean the whole continent was good. And if Europe gets someone the title this time (and I'm rooting for that Dutch/German final) that doesn't hide the fact that many of the giants of Europe looked particularly average in this tournament, like they do whenever they need to leave the home continent.Grizalltheway wrote:Gannonfan, your theory of European teams never performing well outside of Europe is officially bunk.
http://soccernet.espn.go.com/world-cup/ ... 901&ver=us" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;Saturday's results sent three of four European teams to the semifinals, which not only puts to bed the myth of South American dominance but also suggests it was only a convenient mirage that allowed commentators to herald a shift in the global game. For at least the 10th tournament running, the semifinals are dominated by European teams. In fact, to look at the final four teams going all the way back to 1970 is to see an established pattern of John Wooden-like supremacy. Only twice in 40 years has Europe had only two teams in the semis; the rest of the time, it was three alpha dogs or more, including an all-Euro final four in 1982 and 2006.
![]()
GF on the opposite side of the CAA arguement.GannonFan wrote:Eh, still doesn't change my opinion that Europe gets too many teams into the tournament. And what a difference a round makes here. Only having 3 European teams make the quarterfinals was one of the worst showing by Europe in decades, but now all of a sudden because those 3 European teams make the semis this is supposed to herald some era of European dominance? Please, that is bunk. Spain, Germany, and the Dutch looking good (especially the last two, who are actually two favorites of mine) doesn't erase the debacle that was France, that was Italy, that was England, that was Greece, and so on and so on. When Brazil was the only South American team dominating past tournaments it didn't mean the whole continent was good. And if Europe gets someone the title this time (and I'm rooting for that Dutch/German final) that doesn't hide the fact that many of the giants of Europe looked particularly average in this tournament, like they do whenever they need to leave the home continent.
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6651FI20100706" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;Sorry Germany, the mystic mollusk has spoken
(Reuters) - Soccer fans across Germany will be hoping a "psychic" cephalopod's fabled skills of prophecy have failed him after Paul the octopus predicted a German loss in their World Cup semi-final with Spain.
With a 100 percent record so far, the British-born aquarium dweller at Sea Life in Oberhausen, western Germany has become a celebrity having correctly predicted a series of German wins and even Germany's surprise group stage loss to Serbia.
On Tuesday, Paul once again was given the choice of picking food from two different plastic containers lowered into his tank -- one decorated with a Spanish flag and one with a German flag.
The container which Paul opens first is seen as his pick.
He settled on both containers at first in a sign of hesitation before opening the box with the Spanish flag.
Not at all - the CAA's never had a debacle like what was seen with France, England, Italy, etc. When the CAA isn't good enough, they don't get extra teams in (i.e. 2006 with only getting two teams in). And when the CAA gets teams in, they can and have won on the road as well. Europe's been historically heavy on the homefield advantage (England in '66, France in '98, never winning outside of the continent until likely this year). No correlation between the two at all - if the CAA got Rhode Island into the tournament then we could start talking similarities.89Hen wrote:GF on the opposite side of the CAA arguement.GannonFan wrote:Eh, still doesn't change my opinion that Europe gets too many teams into the tournament. And what a difference a round makes here. Only having 3 European teams make the quarterfinals was one of the worst showing by Europe in decades, but now all of a sudden because those 3 European teams make the semis this is supposed to herald some era of European dominance? Please, that is bunk. Spain, Germany, and the Dutch looking good (especially the last two, who are actually two favorites of mine) doesn't erase the debacle that was France, that was Italy, that was England, that was Greece, and so on and so on. When Brazil was the only South American team dominating past tournaments it didn't mean the whole continent was good. And if Europe gets someone the title this time (and I'm rooting for that Dutch/German final) that doesn't hide the fact that many of the giants of Europe looked particularly average in this tournament, like they do whenever they need to leave the home continent.
You did, however, say that an all-European final "wasn't gonna happen", and now it's almost certain to .GannonFan wrote:Well, if you remember my prior post, I said I was pulling and rooting for the Dutch and Germany to get here, so it's not like I'm all of a sudden broken up about that scenario coming true.Grizalltheway wrote:Germany v Spain should be a great semifinal, but I personally think Germany can only stop themselves at this point.![]()
Oh, and how about those 3 European teams in the semis, Gannonfan?![]()
Since when are France and England the giants of Europe? They historically underachieve, regardless of which continent the tournament is held on.GannonFan wrote:Eh, still doesn't change my opinion that Europe gets too many teams into the tournament. And what a difference a round makes here. Only having 3 European teams make the quarterfinals was one of the worst showing by Europe in decades, but now all of a sudden because those 3 European teams make the semis this is supposed to herald some era of European dominance? Please, that is bunk. Spain, Germany, and the Dutch looking good (especially the last two, who are actually two favorites of mine) doesn't erase the debacle that was France, that was Italy, that was England, that was Greece, and so on and so on. When Brazil was the only South American team dominating past tournaments it didn't mean the whole continent was good. And if Europe gets someone the title this time (and I'm rooting for that Dutch/German final) that doesn't hide the fact that many of the giants of Europe looked particularly average in this tournament, like they do whenever they need to leave the home continent.Grizalltheway wrote:Gannonfan, your theory of European teams never performing well outside of Europe is officially bunk.
http://soccernet.espn.go.com/world-cup/ ... 901&ver=us" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
![]()
Germany is looking great...but I don't think the dutch are looking all that good. Sure, they beat Brazil, but I'd take Brazil to win 8 out of 10 matches with the Dutch. Brazil imploded.GannonFan wrote: Spain, Germany, and the Dutch looking good (especially the last two, who are actually two favorites of mine)
That fucker doesn't know his ink hole from a hole in the ground.JMU DJ wrote:You're German boys are done GATW....
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6651FI20100706" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;Sorry Germany, the mystic mollusk has spoken
(Reuters) - Soccer fans across Germany will be hoping a "psychic" cephalopod's fabled skills of prophecy have failed him after Paul the octopus predicted a German loss in their World Cup semi-final with Spain.
With a 100 percent record so far, the British-born aquarium dweller at Sea Life in Oberhausen, western Germany has become a celebrity having correctly predicted a series of German wins and even Germany's surprise group stage loss to Serbia.
On Tuesday, Paul once again was given the choice of picking food from two different plastic containers lowered into his tank -- one decorated with a Spanish flag and one with a German flag.
The container which Paul opens first is seen as his pick.
He settled on both containers at first in a sign of hesitation before opening the box with the Spanish flag.
Well, outside of Germany and Italy, isn't every European side underacheivers? I mean, I love the Dutch, but they've got quite a history of great teams and classic flameouts. You've got England and France being historical underacheivers so no effort needed to convince you of that. And Spain is practically synonymous with underacheiving, maybe even more than the Dutch are. So that's two great teams out of a continent ofGrizalltheway wrote:Since when are France and England the giants of Europe? They historically underachieve, regardless of which continent the tournament is held on.GannonFan wrote:
Eh, still doesn't change my opinion that Europe gets too many teams into the tournament. And what a difference a round makes here. Only having 3 European teams make the quarterfinals was one of the worst showing by Europe in decades, but now all of a sudden because those 3 European teams make the semis this is supposed to herald some era of European dominance? Please, that is bunk. Spain, Germany, and the Dutch looking good (especially the last two, who are actually two favorites of mine) doesn't erase the debacle that was France, that was Italy, that was England, that was Greece, and so on and so on. When Brazil was the only South American team dominating past tournaments it didn't mean the whole continent was good. And if Europe gets someone the title this time (and I'm rooting for that Dutch/German final) that doesn't hide the fact that many of the giants of Europe looked particularly average in this tournament, like they do whenever they need to leave the home continent.
Did you just not read the paragraph I quoted at all?GannonFan wrote:Eh, still doesn't change my opinion that Europe gets too many teams into the tournament. And what a difference a round makes here. Only having 3 European teams make the quarterfinals was one of the worst showing by Europe in decades, but now all of a sudden because those 3 European teams make the semis this is supposed to herald some era of European dominance? Please, that is bunk. Spain, Germany, and the Dutch looking good (especially the last two, who are actually two favorites of mine) doesn't erase the debacle that was France, that was Italy, that was England, that was Greece, and so on and so on. When Brazil was the only South American team dominating past tournaments it didn't mean the whole continent was good. And if Europe gets someone the title this time (and I'm rooting for that Dutch/German final) that doesn't hide the fact that many of the giants of Europe looked particularly average in this tournament, like they do whenever they need to leave the home continent.Grizalltheway wrote:Gannonfan, your theory of European teams never performing well outside of Europe is officially bunk.
http://soccernet.espn.go.com/world-cup/ ... 901&ver=us" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
![]()