What Ever Idiot Vho Voted Miguel Cabrera Over Joe Mauer
-
UNHWildCats
- Level4
- Posts: 6984
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:47 pm
- I am a fan of: New Hampshire
- A.K.A.: UNHWildCats
What Ever Idiot Vho Voted Miguel Cabrera Over Joe Mauer
Should be punched in the face by a million people....
-
UNHWildCats
- Level4
- Posts: 6984
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:47 pm
- I am a fan of: New Hampshire
- A.K.A.: UNHWildCats
Re: What Ever Idiot Vho Voted Miguel Cabrera Over Joe Mauer
@SI_BenReiter Other votes cast by person who picked Cabrera 1st: Beverly Hills Chihuahua for `08 Best Picture; Marion Berry in `94.UNHWildCats wrote:Should be punched in the face by a million people....
-
TwinTownBisonFan
- Supporter
- Posts: 7704
- Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2009 1:56 pm
- I am a fan of: NDSU
- Location: St. Paul, MN
Re: What Ever Idiot Vho Voted Miguel Cabrera Over Joe Mauer
Mariners writer apparently.
North Dakota State University Bison 2011 and 2012 National Champions
-
dbackjon
- Moderator Team
- Posts: 45623
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
- I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
- A.K.A.: He/Him
- Location: Scottsdale
Re: What Ever Idiot Vho Voted Miguel Cabrera Over Joe Mauer
Welcome backTwinTownBisonFan wrote:Mariners writer apparently.
Re: What Ever Idiot Vho Voted Miguel Cabrera Over Joe Mauer
Congratulations to the Yankees' next catcher. 
-
Gil Dobie
- Supporter
- Posts: 31511
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:45 pm
- I am a fan of: Norse Dakota State
- Location: Historic Leduc Estate
Re: What Ever Idiot Vho Voted Miguel Cabrera Over Joe Mauer
Somehow, Yogi Mauer just doesn't sound right.JoltinJoe wrote:Congratulations to the Yankees' next catcher.
-
Gil Dobie
- Supporter
- Posts: 31511
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:45 pm
- I am a fan of: Norse Dakota State
- Location: Historic Leduc Estate
Re: What Ever Idiot Vho Voted Miguel Cabrera Over Joe Mauer
Via my Twins connection, Mauer is going to sign for $20 million a year for 10 years. $10 extra to be spent per season by the Twins to build and keep a contender. Yankees has purposed $30 per year, but not for 10 years. Sorry Mickey, Sorry Yogi, Sorry JoeJoltinJoe wrote:Congratulations to the Yankees' next catcher.
-
UNHWildCats
- Level4
- Posts: 6984
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:47 pm
- I am a fan of: New Hampshire
- A.K.A.: UNHWildCats
Re: What Ever Idiot Vho Voted Miguel Cabrera Over Joe Mauer
I really hope the Yankees proposed that figure to him, and I hope it it was it can be provved cause the Yankees would be in a bit of trouble.Gil Dobie wrote:Via my Twins connection, Mauer is going to sign for $20 million a year for 10 years. $10 extra to be spent per season by the Twins to build and keep a contender. Yankees has purposed $30 per year, but not for 10 years. Sorry Mickey, Sorry Yogi, Sorry JoeJoltinJoe wrote:Congratulations to the Yankees' next catcher.
Re: What Ever Idiot Vho Voted Miguel Cabrera Over Joe Mauer
All kidding aside, I think it would be great for the Twins and for baseball if the cheap misers who own the Twins actually invested some of their massive horded wealth in the Twins, and the best place to start would be by keeping Mauer (actually, it would have been better if they had started by keeping Santana, and Hunter, and etc., but hey, too late crying over spilled milk).Gil Dobie wrote:Via my Twins connection, Mauer is going to sign for $20 million a year for 10 years. $10 extra to be spent per season by the Twins to build and keep a contender. Yankees has purposed $30 per year, but not for 10 years. Sorry Mickey, Sorry Yogi, Sorry JoeJoltinJoe wrote:Congratulations to the Yankees' next catcher.
If the Twins actually became serious about investing in their success, and then saw that this investment paid off through increased fan interest, attendance, marketing (meaning increasing revenues), maybe other teams would catch on too -- that you can make a lot of money in baseball by investing in your team).
Right now, only the Yankees, the Red Sox, and a handful of other teams get it. And if other teams don't get it soon, the haves will continue to grow their revenues exponetially, leaving the have nots farther and farther behind.