Page 1 of 1
Tiger vs Jack
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 9:03 am
by AZGrizFan
With all that's going on in Tiger's world, he seems to be a bit distracted. He's lost at least one major sponsor (Accenture) and another (Gillette) is phasing out his commercials. He's taking an unplanned hiatus from golf, for an unknown length of time, to get his life together and try to ostensibly "save" his marriage.
So, what impact will all this have on Tiger and his chasing of Jack's record # of major victories? Because he's already beaten Jack in # of mistresses...Does he come back more focused than ever? Or does this completely derail his golf career and cause him to fizzle out a few majors short of a load?
What say ye?
Re: Tiger vs Jack
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 9:07 am
by bandl
Some more questions might be....what other golfer will use Tiger's distractions to their advantage and beat him head-on (any/all titles won where Tiger is not in the field will automatically be scrutinized)? Because regardless of how Tiger reacts to all of this, he is still the best golf player in the world physically. Does he have what it takes to still be the best golf player in the world mentally?
Re: Tiger vs Jack
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 9:17 am
by andy7171
Even if his prenup gets torn up, he'll still have $500M. He doesn't have to do anything ever again. And he can have the hookers fedexed into his compound and released into the Gulf afterward.
Re: Tiger vs Jack
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 9:33 am
by AZGrizFan
andy7171 wrote:Even if his prenup gets torn up, he'll still have $500M. He doesn't have to do anything ever again. And he can have the hookers fedexed into his compound and released into the Gulf afterward.
Which is why I voted that he will now NOT catch Jack.

Re: Tiger vs Jack
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 9:43 am
by 93henfan
All the shit going on won't change his game one bit. When he decides to come back, he'll shake off the rust within a few months and be back to missing fairways, dropping F bombs, and pulling second shots out of his ass to win tournaments like always.
Re: Tiger vs Jack
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 11:01 am
by DJH
Tiger will destroy this record without question. He will win as many as he wants. Jack won a major at age 46, and is not in the type of physical shape that tiger is in. Tiger will be winning majors for another 20 years.
Re: Tiger vs Jack
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 11:19 am
by dbackjon
Tiger will beat the record
Re: Tiger vs Jack
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 11:57 am
by andy7171
I think he may have already broken Wilt's record.
Re: Tiger vs Jack
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 12:11 pm
by AZGrizFan
DJH wrote:Tiger will destroy this record without question. He will win as many as he wants. Jack won a major at age 46, and is not in the type of physical shape that tiger is in. Tiger will be winning majors for another 20 years.
That much sex will keep ANYBODY in tip-top shape.

Re: Tiger vs Jack
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 1:28 pm
by JayJ79
AZGrizFan wrote:Because he's already beaten Jack in # of mistresses...
how do you know that?
Re: Tiger vs Jack
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 2:01 pm
by SuperHornet
Who cares? I've ALWAYS held that Woods whomps, and that doesn't change with this adultery tr@sh, as wrong as it is. I'll watch old footage of Jack (if I watch golf at all) before I'll voluntarily watch a live tournament with Woods in it. Heck, I'll watch old footage of '80s golfer Jim Thorpe before I watch Woods live.
Re: Tiger vs Jack
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 2:28 pm
by AZGrizFan
JayJ79 wrote:AZGrizFan wrote:Because he's already beaten Jack in # of mistresses...
how do you know that?
Fine. The KNOWN # of Jack's mistresses....

Re: Tiger vs Jack
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 2:44 pm
by wideright82
SuperHornet wrote:Who cares? I've ALWAYS held that Woods whomps, and that doesn't change with this adultery tr@sh, as wrong as it is. I'll watch old footage of Jack (if I watch golf at all) before I'll voluntarily watch a live tournament with Woods in it. Heck, I'll watch old footage of '80s golfer Jim Thorpe before I watch Woods live.
Just about every opinion you have I disagree with and that makes me sooooo happy you thinl the Griz will win this weekend, because you are wrong a lot in my eyes.
I know you agree, Z. You guys are toast!!!

Re: Tiger vs Jack
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 2:47 pm
by Grizalltheway
wideright82 wrote:SuperHornet wrote:Who cares? I've ALWAYS held that Woods whomps, and that doesn't change with this adultery tr@sh, as wrong as it is. I'll watch old footage of Jack (if I watch golf at all) before I'll voluntarily watch a live tournament with Woods in it. Heck, I'll watch old footage of '80s golfer Jim Thorpe before I watch Woods live.
Just about every opinion you have I disagree with and that makes me sooooo happy you thinl the Griz will win this weekend, because you are wrong a lot in my eyes.
I know you agree, Z. You guys are toast!!!

According to him, we'd be playing Liberty (
LIBERTY) if they had gotten in.

Re: Tiger vs Jack
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 2:48 pm
by JMU DJ
Grizalltheway wrote:wideright82 wrote:
Just about every opinion you have I disagree with and that makes me sooooo happy you thinl the Griz will win this weekend, because you are wrong a lot in my eyes.
I know you agree, Z. You guys are toast!!!

According to him, we'd be playing Liberty (
LIBERTY) if they had gotten in.

... but he picked Selle to win the Heisman, so you can't totally disagree with the man right?
Re: Tiger vs Jack
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 2:53 pm
by Grizalltheway
JMU DJ wrote:Grizalltheway wrote:
According to him, we'd be playing Liberty (
LIBERTY) if they had gotten in.

... but he picked Selle to win the Heisman, so you can't totally disagree with the man right?
That is some solid logic right there.

Re: Tiger vs Jack
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 2:56 pm
by wideright82
Grizalltheway wrote:JMU DJ wrote:
... but he picked Selle to win the Heisman, so you can't totally disagree with the man right?
That is some solid logic right there.

He also prefers women's sports to men's. Just sayin.
Re: Tiger vs Jack
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 3:06 pm
by Grizalltheway
wideright82 wrote:Grizalltheway wrote:
That is some solid logic right there.

He also prefers women's sports to men's. Just sayin.
Whitney looks (and plays) like a chick. Just sayin.

Re: Tiger vs Jack
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 3:28 pm
by AZGrizFan
wideright82 wrote:SuperHornet wrote:Who cares? I've ALWAYS held that Woods whomps, and that doesn't change with this adultery tr@sh, as wrong as it is. I'll watch old footage of Jack (if I watch golf at all) before I'll voluntarily watch a live tournament with Woods in it. Heck, I'll watch old footage of '80s golfer Jim Thorpe before I watch Woods live.
Just about every opinion you have I disagree with and that makes me sooooo happy you thinl the Griz will win this weekend, because you are wrong a lot in my eyes.
I know you agree, Z. You guys are toast!!!

How many points are you giving?

Re: Tiger vs Jack
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 5:30 pm
by JMU DJ
AZGrizFan wrote:wideright82 wrote:
Just about every opinion you have I disagree with and that makes me sooooo happy you thinl the Griz will win this weekend, because you are wrong a lot in my eyes.
I know you agree, Z. You guys are toast!!!

How many points are you giving?

Villanova +10... take it to the bank, WR owes me one
Re: Tiger vs Jack
Posted: Tue Dec 15, 2009 9:56 am
by Gil Dobie
If Tiger returns within 5 years, he'll break Jacks record.
Re: Tiger vs Jack
Posted: Tue Dec 15, 2009 9:58 am
by Gil Dobie
DJH wrote:Tiger will destroy this record without question. He will win as many as he wants. Jack won a major at age 46, and is not in the type of physical shape that tiger is in. Tiger will be winning majors for another 20 years.
Nor was Tiger in the physical shape Tom Watson was in during the British Open.
Re: Tiger vs Jack
Posted: Tue Dec 15, 2009 8:28 pm
by BlueHen86
Grizalltheway wrote:wideright82 wrote:
Just about every opinion you have I disagree with and that makes me sooooo happy you thinl the Griz will win this weekend, because you are wrong a lot in my eyes.
I know you agree, Z. You guys are toast!!!

According to him, we'd be playing Liberty (
LIBERTY) if they had gotten in.

According to him, the Griz should be playing Boise in the Rose Bowl.

Re: Tiger vs Jack
Posted: Wed Dec 16, 2009 12:06 am
by SuperHornet
The Rose Bowl? That's not the only game being played in Pasadena in January....