Page 1 of 1

buck shOwalter

Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2010 9:28 am
by 89Hen
It might just be the opposition or a fluke, but the Orioles are 7-1 under Buck Showalter so far. If he finished the season with a winning record (his tenure) he should get consideration for manager of the decade. The O's were easily the worst team in baseball when he took over.

Can a manager really make this much of a difference?

Re: buck shOwalter

Posted: Wed Aug 11, 2010 9:39 am
by AZGrizFan
89Hen wrote:It might just be the opposition or a fluke, but the Orioles are 7-1 under Buck Showalter so far. If he finished the season with a winning record (his tenure) he should get consideration for manager of the decade. The O's were easily the worst team in baseball when he took over.

Can a manager really make this much of a difference?
You'd obviously not seen the Diamondbacks under AJ Hinch.

Re: buck shOwalter

Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2010 6:23 am
by bandl
8-1 now....starting pitcher threw a CG 2-hitter last night...

This won't last and they still suck in general, but at least they stand a chance to get out of the 'worst record in baseball' cellar for 2010...

Re: buck shOwalter

Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2010 7:05 am
by 89Hen
bandl wrote:8-1 now....starting pitcher threw a CG 2-hitter last night...

This won't last and they still suck in general, but at least they stand a chance to get out of the 'worst record in baseball' cellar for 2010...
I think they've already caught Pittsburgh with this run. :thumb:

Re: buck shOwalter

Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2010 9:09 am
by AZGrizFan
89Hen wrote:
bandl wrote:8-1 now....starting pitcher threw a CG 2-hitter last night...

This won't last and they still suck in general, but at least they stand a chance to get out of the 'worst record in baseball' cellar for 2010...
I think they've already caught Pittsburgh with this run. :thumb:
How about my D-Backs going back-back-back-back last night against the Brewers!!!! :notworthy: :notworthy: :notworthy:

Only the 7th time in baseball history.... :thumb: :thumb:

Re: buck shOwalter

Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2010 9:11 am
by 89Hen
AZGrizFan wrote:How about my D-Backs going back-back-back-back last night against the Brewers!!!!
Somehow I missed the DBacks/Brewers game last night. Was it on TV? :roll:







:twisted: ;)

Re: buck shOwalter

Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2010 9:12 am
by AZGrizFan
89Hen wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote:How about my D-Backs going back-back-back-back last night against the Brewers!!!!
Somehow I missed the DBacks/Brewers game last night. Was it on TV? :roll:

:twisted: ;)
So, you don't get ESPN in your area? :roll: :kisswink: :dunce: :tothehand:

Re: buck shOwalter

Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2010 9:15 am
by 89Hen
AZGrizFan wrote:So, you don't get ESPN in your area? :roll: :kisswink: :dunce: :tothehand:
THAT game was on ESPN? :shock: What, no arena football or poker being played? Teams are a combined 33.5 out. :x

Re: buck shOwalter

Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2010 10:20 am
by AZGrizFan
89Hen wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote:So, you don't get ESPN in your area? :roll: :kisswink: :dunce: :tothehand:
THAT game was on ESPN? :shock: What, no arena football or poker being played? Teams are a combined 33.5 out. :x
No....that game was NOT on ESPN...much like no Orioles games are on ESPN....but I'm pretty sure the HIGHLIGHT of back-to-back-to-back-to-back HR's was.... :ohno: :ohno: :ohno:

Re: buck shOwalter

Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2010 10:37 am
by andy7171
It also helps Brian Roberts is back. I am actually thinking about going to a game when I get back fromt he beach.

Re: buck shOwalter

Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2010 10:38 am
by 89Hen
andy7171 wrote:It also helps Brian Roberts is back. I am actually thinking about going to a game when I get back fromt he beach.
Heck, they could be ahead of the Pirates and DBacks by then! :thumb:

Re: buck shOwalter

Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2010 10:40 am
by AZGrizFan
89Hen wrote:
andy7171 wrote:It also helps Brian Roberts is back. I am actually thinking about going to a game when I get back fromt he beach.
Heck, they could be ahead of the Pirates and DBacks by then! :thumb:
D-Backs? Uh.....NO.

We're 8-3 in our last 11 since the trade deadline came and went and we got rid of the clubhouse cancers. :thumb: :thumb: :thumb:

Re: buck shOwalter

Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2010 11:57 am
by 93henfan
andy7171 wrote:It also helps Brian Roberts is back. I am actually thinking about going to a game when I get back fromt he beach.
30 1/2 games out
48 games to play

So you're saying there's a chance!

Image

Re: buck shOwalter

Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2010 1:23 pm
by AZGrizFan
93henfan wrote:
andy7171 wrote:It also helps Brian Roberts is back. I am actually thinking about going to a game when I get back fromt he beach.
30 1/2 games out
48 games to play

So you're saying there's a chance!

Image
well, hell. If THAT'S the case, the D-Backs have the Padres right where we want 'em!!

17 1/2 out with 48 to play!

Re: buck shOwalter

Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2010 1:37 pm
by 89Hen
AZGrizFan wrote:D-Backs? Uh.....NO.

We're 8-3 in our last 11 since the trade deadline came and went and we got rid of the clubhouse cancers. :thumb: :thumb: :thumb:
O's are only 5.5 back of the DB's and are 8-2 in last 11. ;)

Only problem is they have to play the Yankees, Rays and Sox 21 more times this year. :x

Re: buck shOwalter

Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2010 3:48 pm
by bandl
89Hen wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote:D-Backs? Uh.....NO.

We're 8-3 in our last 11 since the trade deadline came and went and we got rid of the clubhouse cancers. :thumb: :thumb: :thumb:
O's are only 5.5 back of the DB's and are 8-2 in last 11. ;)

Only problem is they have to play the Yankees, Rays and Sox 21 more times this year. :x
huh?

Re: buck shOwalter

Posted: Thu Aug 12, 2010 3:49 pm
by 89Hen
bandl wrote:
89Hen wrote: O's are only 5.5 back of the DB's and are 8-2 in last 11. ;)

Only problem is they have to play the Yankees, Rays and Sox 21 more times this year. :x
huh?
LIke the left pinkie more than the right one I guess. :oops:

Re: buck shOwalter

Posted: Wed Sep 22, 2010 7:06 pm
by 89Hen
AZGrizFan wrote:
89Hen wrote:Heck, they could be ahead of the Pirates and DBacks by then! :thumb:
D-Backs? Uh.....NO.

We're 8-3 in our last 11 since the trade deadline came and went and we got rid of the clubhouse cancers. :thumb: :thumb: :thumb:
How you like me know?

Re: buck shOwalter

Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2010 10:58 am
by bandl
89Hen wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote:
D-Backs? Uh.....NO.

We're 8-3 in our last 11 since the trade deadline came and went and we got rid of the clubhouse cancers. :thumb: :thumb: :thumb:
How you like me know?
bump

:lol: :lol:

Re: buck shOwalter

Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:01 am
by andy7171
The O's were on pace to lose 116 games when Showalter arrived. I'm pretty impressed.

Re: buck shOwalter

Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:03 am
by bandl
andy7171 wrote:The O's were on pace to lose 116 games when Showalter arrived. I'm pretty impressed.
20 game improvement from that point? Yeah, damn impressive.

Re: buck shOwalter

Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:16 am
by JoltinJoe
Showalter is going to bring winning back to Baltimore. For all the credit Torre gets for the Yankees, keep in mind he stepped into something that Showalter was instrumental in building. If you listen to guys like Paul O'Neill and Bernie Williams, you'll appreciate just how important Showalter was in teaching the Yankees how to win and building the confidence of young players. For example, much to Mel Hall's disbelief, Showalter put his foot down and told the Yankees to let him go after the '92 season because he was razzing a young Bernie Williams and wouldn't stop despite being told to knock it off. Showalter thought Williams was going to amount a great big-league player and believed that Hall, despite his productivity, was damaging his confidence.

Re: buck shOwalter

Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:38 am
by 93henfan
JoltinJoe wrote:For example, much to Mel Hall's disbelief, Showalter put his foot down and told the Yankees to let him go after the '92 season because he was razzing a young Bernie Williams and wouldn't stop despite being told to knock it off. Showalter thought Williams was going to amount a great big-league player and believed that Hall, despite his productivity, was damaging his confidence.
Meanwhile, Mel Hall is eligible for parole in 22 years. Apparently the state of Texas does not take kindly to men who rape 12 year old girls.

Re: buck shOwalter

Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:40 am
by bandl
93henfan wrote:
JoltinJoe wrote:For example, much to Mel Hall's disbelief, Showalter put his foot down and told the Yankees to let him go after the '92 season because he was razzing a young Bernie Williams and wouldn't stop despite being told to knock it off. Showalter thought Williams was going to amount a great big-league player and believed that Hall, despite his productivity, was damaging his confidence.
Meanwhile, Mel Hall is eligible for parole in 22 years. Apparently the state of Texas does not take kindly to men who rape 12 year old girls.
If he doesn't like prison, then he shoulda thought about becoming a priest instead of a baseball player. :ohno:

EDIT: Oh wait...you said GIRLS. Nevermind. :oops:

Re: buck shOwalter

Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2010 12:10 pm
by 89Hen
AZGrizFan wrote:
89Hen wrote:Heck, they could be ahead of the Pirates and DBacks by then! :thumb:
D-Backs? Uh.....NO.

We're 8-3 in our last 11 since the trade deadline came and went and we got rid of the clubhouse cancers. :thumb: :thumb: :thumb:
Baltimore 66-96
Arizona 65-97
Pittsburgh 57-105

You sure are taking your lumps lately. ;)