Angels Sign Pujols
Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2011 8:41 am
10 yr 250M reportedly.
As a NL guy I'm glad to see him go to the AL.
As a NL guy I'm glad to see him go to the AL.
FCS Football | Message Board | News
https://championshipsubdivision.com/forums/
https://championshipsubdivision.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=27842
bluehenbillk wrote: As a NL guy I'm glad to see him go to the AL.
Won't look like it for a couple years, but those last 3-4 years on that contract are gonna be BRUTAL.dbackjon wrote:Lotta money for him
That's the wrong way to look at it. That's $210M that the Cardinals can spend on players who will actually be able to play ten years from now. Albert's ankles are already shot and his number are clearly declining. Let the Angels try to win with that albatross of a contract hanging around their necks.bluehenbillk wrote:I look at it as one less team the Phils have to worry about.
Agreed. This contract might have made sense 4 years ago, but not now.CitadelGrad wrote:That's the wrong way to look at it. That's $210M that the Cardinals can spend on players who will actually be able to play ten years from now. Albert's ankles are already shot and his number are clearly declining. Let the Angels try to win with that albatross of a contract hanging around their necks.bluehenbillk wrote:I look at it as one less team the Phils have to worry about.
If he was in the NL, sure it would be a bad contract. In the AL, though, with him able to start full time DH'ing next year, it works. All he has to do is hit for the next 10 years and then sit on the bench for half that time while someone else is in the field. Perfect contract and team for him in that regard.AZGrizFan wrote:Agreed. This contract might have made sense 4 years ago, but not now.CitadelGrad wrote:
That's the wrong way to look at it. That's $210M that the Cardinals can spend on players who will actually be able to play ten years from now. Albert's ankles are already shot and his number are clearly declining. Let the Angels try to win with that albatross of a contract hanging around their necks.
Who's left to sign?CitadelGrad wrote:That's the wrong way to look at it. That's $210M that the Cardinals can spend on players who will actually be able to play ten years from now. Albert's ankles are already shot and his number are clearly declining. Let the Angels try to win with that albatross of a contract hanging around their necks.bluehenbillk wrote:I look at it as one less team the Phils have to worry about.
Alberts last 4 years:GannonFan wrote:If he was in the NL, sure it would be a bad contract. In the AL, though, with him able to start full time DH'ing next year, it works. All he has to do is hit for the next 10 years and then sit on the bench for half that time while someone else is in the field. Perfect contract and team for him in that regard.AZGrizFan wrote:
Agreed. This contract might have made sense 4 years ago, but not now.
He's a gamer, and I'd want him on my team. Just not by mortgaging the future of the organization.Seahawks08 wrote:Less feared? I was scared as shit every time he came up in the NLDS, even against Halladay. He may be declining slightly, but like other people have said, the DH will help him immensely. And the last 4 years of the contract being brutal is determined by who's point of view. For the Angels front office, I bet they can't wait for those last 4 years since he will be chasing the homerun record. The amount of money from attendance and fan gear will offset the contract at that point. From a production standpoint, it may get ugly. This is of course assuming he doesn't get injured where it ruins his career.
Do you really want to pay a DH $25.4 million a year to hit maybe .300 for three or four years and probably .260 to .280 for another six to seven years? Screw that.GannonFan wrote:If he was in the NL, sure it would be a bad contract. In the AL, though, with him able to start full time DH'ing next year, it works. All he has to do is hit for the next 10 years and then sit on the bench for half that time while someone else is in the field. Perfect contract and team for him in that regard.AZGrizFan wrote:
Agreed. This contract might have made sense 4 years ago, but not now.
Grizalltheway wrote:Great news for Mariners fans; now, we don't even need to get our hopes up about making the playoffs.
Hasn't worked out for the last few dream teams.Seahawks08 wrote:And I guess we can add this to the thread: CJ Wilson signed with the Angels for five years at $77.5 million.
http://twitter.com/#!/Buster_ESPN/statu ... 2052319232
So Angels 2012 = new dream team?
Even more puzzling is the reports by several outlets that the Marlins upped their offer to $275 million with no state income tax in Florida.. so he left 20-25 million in actual income on the table along with massive amounts he will pay in state taxes to sign with the Angels.CitadelGrad wrote:Do you really want to pay a DH $25.4 million a year to hit maybe .300 for three or four years and probably .260 to .280 for another six to seven years? Screw that.GannonFan wrote:
If he was in the NL, sure it would be a bad contract. In the AL, though, with him able to start full time DH'ing next year, it works. All he has to do is hit for the next 10 years and then sit on the bench for half that time while someone else is in the field. Perfect contract and team for him in that regard.
The joke is on Albert anyway. Given the difference in state taxes between Missouri and California, $22 million of taxable income in Missouri equates to $33 million in taxable income in California. Albert won't be making anywhere near $33 million a year under his new contract.