Page 1 of 1
2012 NLCS
Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2012 8:39 pm
by SDHornet
Holy crap, the Cards are shitting down their legs and let a commanding 3-1 series lead go to waste. Game 7 should be a good one.

Re: 2012 NLCS
Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2012 8:44 pm
by SuperHornet
My Giants fan friends are really letting me have it right about now.
Ugh!
Re: 2012 NLCS
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 5:35 am
by AshevilleApp
Go Exhaustion!! Both teams worry me, so I'll just sit back and enjoy an (hopefully) grueling extra inning game.
Go TIgers!!
Re: 2012 NLCS
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 6:38 am
by 89Hen
Baseball? Who gives a crap about baseball?

Re: 2012 NLCS
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 7:25 am
by Gil Dobie
Tempted to find a flight to SFO and join my wife on Tuesday if the Giants win. Doubt there is room on her flight. Then try and score some tickets.
Re: 2012 NLCS
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 7:30 am
by GannonFan
This thing is still going on? Don't they know that Detroit has already had their World Series parade?
Re: 2012 NLCS
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 8:33 am
by Grizalltheway
GannonFan wrote:This thing is still going on? Don't they know that Detroit has already had their World Series parade?
No, no, you're thinking of the Phillies.

Re: 2012 NLCS
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 9:42 am
by Seahawks08
No, no, you're thinking of the Phillies.
That was last year! Get with the times!

Re: 2012 NLCS
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 9:52 am
by Grizalltheway
Seahawks08 wrote:No, no, you're thinking of the Phillies.
That was last year! Get with the times!

Sorry, I'm a Mariners fan. As far as baseball is concerned, it's still 2001.

Re: 2012 NLCS
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 9:34 pm
by Seahawks08
Comeback complete. Nice choke job by the Cards! Now who wants to guess how many people will watch the WS between Detroit and SF?
10? 100? 6.93?
- Spoiler: show
- I still don't know what 6.93 is but w/e

Re: 2012 NLCS
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 9:35 pm
by SDHornet
It was a curb stomping. Epic collapse by the Cards. The Giants got hot and it will be interesting to see how they fair against the Tigers rotation.
Re: 2012 NLCS
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 9:44 pm
by SuperHornet
Verlander will be tough, SD. Very tough. But I think Detroit's misplaying this. The traditional way to schedule the Series is to put your ace, ESPECIALLY one as good as Verlander is, in Games 1, 4, and 7. The Tigers, at least as of right now, are putting a mediocre #4 starter in that spot. I think that's going to cost them against SF.
Re: 2012 NLCS
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 9:48 pm
by SDHornet
Who knows, so long as the Tigers don't kick the ball around as bad as the Cards did the past 3 games they won't come even close to getting as embarrassed as what we just saw the past 2 nights in SF.
Re: 2012 NLCS
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 10:38 pm
by SuperHornet
SDHornet wrote:Who knows, so long as the Tigers don't kick the ball around as bad as the Cards did the past 3 games they won't come even close to getting as embarrassed as what we just saw the past 2 nights in SF.
There is always that....
Re: 2012 NLCS
Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2012 7:27 am
by Gil Dobie
SuperHornet wrote:Verlander will be tough, SD. Very tough. But I think Detroit's misplaying this. The traditional way to schedule the Series is to put your ace, ESPECIALLY one as good as Verlander is, in Games 1, 4, and 7. The Tigers, at least as of right now, are putting a mediocre #4 starter in that spot. I think that's going to cost them against SF.
Why do you think Scherzer is mediocre, he was 16-7 and 2nd to Verlander in K's in the American League.
Mickey Lolich pitched games 2, 5, 7 in the 1968 Series and won 3 games. This way they get a rested Verlander for 2 games and a short rest if needed in game 7.
Re: 2012 NLCS
Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2012 7:29 am
by Gil Dobie
Seahawks08 wrote:Comeback complete. Nice choke job by the Cards! Now who wants to guess how many people will watch the WS between Detroit and SF?
10? 100? 6.93?
- Spoiler: show
- I still don't know what 6.93 is but w/e

More that watched the Phillies win their title.

Re: 2012 NLCS
Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2012 7:32 am
by Seahawks08
More that watched the Phillies win their title.
