Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

...is one of the dirtiest players in the history of football. What he did to that Packers OL last year was horrible. What he did to Matt Schaub today was worse. It's time for this guy to get a lifetime ban. I'm getting sick of his crazy play, and so are a LOT of people. You hear that, Commish? Kick Suh out NOW!!!

SuperHornet wrote:...is one of the dirtiest players in the history of football. What he did to that Packers OL last year was horrible. What he did to Matt Schaub today was worse. It's time for this guy to get a lifetime ban. I'm getting sick of his crazy play, and so are a LOT of people. You hear that, Commish? Kick Suh out NOW!!!

I for one was surprised he wasn't given a flag for that incident with Schaub!!!!! Maybe the favor should be returned to him by a fellow employee?!?!?!?!

Too bad there aren't about 100 more players like him. The NFL would be a helluva lot more fun to watch.

93henfan wrote:Too bad there aren't about 100 more players like him. The NFL would be a helluva lot more fun to watch.

NOW, Commissioner, NOW!!!!

What is so fun about this guy after he kicked an opposing player in the genitals easy for you to support this guy from a distance?????

I'd take Suh in a heartbeat on my team - dude is one of the best DT's in the game hands down.

dal4018 wrote:What is so fun about this guy after he kicked an opposing player in the genitals easy for you to support this guy from a distance?????

If you really think he kicked the Texan's QB in the nuts purposely you need treatment. He was falling down. He didn't do a damn thing wrong. If it was anyone else it would have been a non-issue. Grow up.

grizzaholic wrote:

dal4018 wrote:What is so fun about this guy after he kicked an opposing player in the genitals easy for you to support this guy from a distance?????

If you really think he kicked the Texan's QB in the nuts purposely you need treatment. He was falling down. He didn't do a damn thing wrong. If it was anyone else it would have been a non-issue. Grow up.

If it was anyone else, I might have believed it wan't intentional.

89Hen wrote:

grizzaholic wrote:
If you really think he kicked the Texan's QB in the nuts purposely you need treatment. He was falling down. He didn't do a damn thing wrong. If it was anyone else it would have been a non-issue. Grow up.

If it was anyone else, I might have believed it wan't intentional.

SuperHornet wrote: You hear that, Commish? Kick Suh out NOW!!!

If you shoo Suh, Suh will sue. This will not do. The owner will boo. You must try something new. Something true. Like doing to Suh what he did with his shoe.

grizzaholic wrote:

89Hen wrote: If it was anyone else, I might have believed it wan't intentional.

When you're falling like that you have a pretty good idea of where the other players are based on where they were when you started to tumble. You have 3 choices:
1) just roll with it
2) try and roll in a direction that avoids a collision
3) try and roll in a direction and flail your legs and feet about in hopes of getting a shot in

Suh's reputation is such that most people will believe it was #3 and while there is no way of proving it that is what it looked like to me.

bluehenbillk wrote:I'd take Suh in a heartbeat on my team - dude is one of the best DT's in the game hands down.

He has 20 tackles (16 solo 4 assist) and 4 sacks this year, no forced fumbles, no fumble recoveries, only 1 pass deflection, and 5 "stuffs" (what ever that is according to ESPN)


His numbers are going down every single year after his rookie season...66 tackles to 36 tackles, to just 20 so far this year, 10 sacks to 4 sacks and 4 sacks again this year.

20 tackles puts him in a TIE FOR 93RD FOR JUST DEFENSIVE LINEMAN and his 4.5 sacks ties him for 44TH among all defenders.


He's been nothing except mediocre since his rookie season, and it wasn't for him playing dirty he wouldn't be in the mind of anyone because he simply doesn't make that much of an impact on each game. I listened to the NFL Network guys talk about him the last could weeks and they've said the same thing. Warren Sapp (who knows good DT play) called him one of the most overrated DT's in the game, and would take Fairley over him in a heartbeat....Hell, Fairley has better numbers than Suh this year across the board, and according to Sapp (as well as most on the NFL network) Fairley causes problems through the entire game with how hard he plays...Suh only plays hard when he gets a free shot at the QB.



You can have him...he isn't as good as you want to think.

CAA Flagship wrote:

SuperHornet wrote: You hear that, Commish? Kick Suh out NOW!!!

If you shoo Suh, Suh will sue. This will not do. The owner will boo. You must try something new. Something true. Like doing to Suh what he did with his shoe.

I can't let this genius go unnoticed.

If the NFL kicks out Suh, UND can hire Suh to be their mascot

Or he could play in the next Star Wars movie.

grizzaholic wrote:

89Hen wrote: If it was anyone else, I might have believed it wan't intentional.

You are in denial.

grizzaholic wrote:

dal4018 wrote:What is so fun about this guy after he kicked an opposing player in the genitals easy for you to support this guy from a distance?????

If you really think he kicked the Texan's QB in the nuts purposely you need treatment. He was falling down. He didn't do a damn thing wrong. If it was anyone else it would have been a non-issue. Grow up.

Well Schaub didn't think it was legit he was asked, if he would want Suh as a teammate of course he said hell no.I will happily sign up for treatment!!!!

clenz wrote:IHell, Fairley has better numbers than Suh this year across the board, and according to Sapp (as well as most on the NFL network) Fairley causes problems through the entire game with how hard he plays...Suh only plays hard when he gets a free shot at the QB.

You can have him...he isn't as good as you want to think.

You made my point right there. Why is Fairley having success? Watch a Lions game. Suh get doubled or draws extra attention all the time from opponents - leaving lesser guys like Fairley singled up all game.

89Hen wrote:

grizzaholic wrote:

You are in denial.

I don't have a dog in this fight, being a Bengal fan. He didn't do anything wrong. He was falling and is getting slammed for past actions.

grizzaholic wrote:

89Hen wrote: You are in denial.

I don't have a dog in this fight, being a Bengal fan. He didn't do anything wrong. He was falling and is getting slammed for past actions.

What dog do I have in this fight?

89Hen wrote:

grizzaholic wrote:
I don't have a dog in this fight, being a Bengal fan. He didn't do anything wrong. He was falling and is getting slammed for past actions.

What dog do I have in this fight?

You use your EC(b) title to suit your needs. You get a

bluehenbillk wrote:

clenz wrote:IHell, Fairley has better numbers than Suh this year across the board, and according to Sapp (as well as most on the NFL network) Fairley causes problems through the entire game with how hard he plays...Suh only plays hard when he gets a free shot at the QB.

You can have him...he isn't as good as you want to think.

You made my point right there. Why is Fairley having success? Watch a Lions game. Suh get doubled or draws extra attention all the time from opponents - leaving lesser guys like Fairley singled up all game.

Double teams don't explain that big of a drop in stats. It shows a lack of effort on his part to not fight off of shit unless he gets s free ruin at the qb to take a cheap shot.

With that defensive line, it's impossible for him to be doubled every play....


His effort isn't there

Sent from the nexus of the universe

grizzaholic wrote:

89Hen wrote: What dog do I have in this fight?

You use your EC(b) title to suit your needs. You get a

Huh?

93henfan wrote:Too bad there aren't about 100 more players like him. The NFL would be a helluva lot more fun to watch.

Well he is about to shell out $30,000 for being a fun player to watch.