Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

Many times, logo changes are stupid. This is not one of those. Looks MUCH better....

EPJr wrote:

Why?

Looks pretty much the same. This falls somewhere between the Lions and Broncos logo changes on the "what's the point" scale.

This should be the adjustment that gets them to the Super Bowl.

CID1990 wrote:This should be the adjustment that gets them to the Super Bowl.

This and Tebow.

The new one is AWFUL. Like playing fetch with a 3-legged dog.

93henfan wrote:

EPJr wrote:

Why?

Looks pretty much the same. This falls somewhere between the Lions and Broncos logo changes on the "what's the point" scale.

Don't forget the Cardinals too

Sent from my VM670 using Tapatalk 2

93henfan wrote:

EPJr wrote:

Why?

Looks pretty much the same. This falls somewhere between the Lions and Broncos logo changes on the "what's the point" scale.

You can change the logo all you want unless the product on the field changes it will not matter.

EPJr wrote:

Well, looking at this purely from a logo perspective (I don't think anyone believes this change will help on-the-field production) it is an improvement. Supposedly, there is at least one team that will be getting a Seahawks-esque uniform makeover and most think it will be the Jags. If those reports are true, it makes sense to update the logo.

I thought the new Jags logo would have an "L.A." on it.

I like the new one, but not a fan of the teal.

93henfan wrote:Looks pretty much the same. This falls somewhere between the Lions and Broncos logo changes on the "what's the point" scale.

I think there's a pretty big difference.

I like the new one.

89Hen wrote:

93henfan wrote:Looks pretty much the same. This falls somewhere between the Lions and Broncos logo changes on the "what's the point" scale.

I think there's a pretty big difference.

Yes. One is a cartoon of the right side quarter profile of a growling jaguar, while the other is a cartoon of the right side quarter profile of a growling jaguar. Yay.

Is it the blue eye in the new cartoon that made all the difference or the slight bit more definition to the cartoon? The longer tongue perhaps? I'll bet you liked Gene Simmons over Paul Stanley too, huh?

93henfan wrote:

89Hen wrote: I think there's a pretty big difference.

Yes. One is a cartoon of the right side quarter profile of a growling jaguar, while the other is a cartoon of the right side quarter profile of a growling jaguar. Yay.

Is it the blue eye in the new cartoon that made all the difference or the slight bit more definition to the cartoon? The longer tongue perhaps? I'll bet you liked Gene Simmons over Paul Stanley too, huh?

The old is more abstract. If you didn't know what the left one was, there is no way you get it, while the new one is easy. JMHO.

89Hen wrote:

93henfan wrote:
Yes. One is a cartoon of the right side quarter profile of a growling jaguar, while the other is a cartoon of the right side quarter profile of a growling jaguar. Yay.

Is it the blue eye in the new cartoon that made all the difference or the slight bit more definition to the cartoon? The longer tongue perhaps? I'll bet you liked Gene Simmons over Paul Stanley too, huh?

The old is more abstract. If you didn't know what the left one was, there is no way you get it, while the new one is easy. JMHO.

You're probably right, but I refuse to give in.

93henfan wrote:

CID1990 wrote:This should be the adjustment that gets them to the Super Bowl.

This and Tebow.

The new GM has no interest in Tebow period.

89Hen wrote:

93henfan wrote:
Yes. One is a cartoon of the right side quarter profile of a growling jaguar, while the other is a cartoon of the right side quarter profile of a growling jaguar. Yay.

Is it the blue eye in the new cartoon that made all the difference or the slight bit more definition to the cartoon? The longer tongue perhaps? I'll bet you liked Gene Simmons over Paul Stanley too, huh?

The old is more abstract. If you didn't know what the left one was, there is no way you get it, while the new one is easy. JMHO.

Yup. It's definitely an upgrade.

It's like they made some improvements to this logo:

ASUG8 wrote:I thought the new Jags logo would have an "L.A." on it.

93henfan wrote:

89Hen wrote: I think there's a pretty big difference.

Yes. One is a cartoon of the right side quarter profile of a growling jaguar, while the other is a cartoon of the right side quarter profile of a growling jaguar. Yay.

Is it the blue eye in the new cartoon that made all the difference or the slight bit more definition to the cartoon? The longer tongue perhaps? I'll bet you liked Gene Simmons over Paul Stanley too, huh?

The old one is swallowing a "V" while the new one is swallowing a "U". That is an upgrade of 3.846% (1/26th) since U is only one rung higher than V. I feel like, at a minimum, Q was attainable.

CAA Flagship wrote:

93henfan wrote:
Yes. One is a cartoon of the right side quarter profile of a growling jaguar, while the other is a cartoon of the right side quarter profile of a growling jaguar. Yay.

Is it the blue eye in the new cartoon that made all the difference or the slight bit more definition to the cartoon? The longer tongue perhaps? I'll bet you liked Gene Simmons over Paul Stanley too, huh?

The old one is swallowing a "V" while the new one is swallowing a "U". That is an upgrade of 3.846% (1/26th) since U is only one rung higher than V. I feel like, at a minimum, Q was attainable.

You got that shit right.