Page 1 of 1
NFL field width may become equal with the CFL's
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2013 5:48 am
by bonarae
This widening of the field is intended to promote players' safety, but will it cause more problems for college players in transitioning to the NFL? (Considering the successes of former FCS players in the CFL...)
http://www.examiner.com/article/nfl-fie ... yer-safety
Re: NFL field width may become equal with the CFL's
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2013 7:53 am
by bluehenbillk
Well, not this year anyway, it's not even on the agenda listed for the NFL Competition Committee.
Re: NFL field width may become equal with the CFL's
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2013 8:46 am
by ASUG8
It's the artificial turf lobbyists trying to turn a buck.
Re: NFL field width may become equal with the CFL's
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2013 8:49 am
by grizzaholic
Dumb idea. If they keep on changing the rules more and more, pretty soon football as we know it will become soccer.
Re: NFL field width may become equal with the CFL's
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2013 8:58 am
by CAA Flagship
grizzaholic wrote:Dumb idea. If they keep on changing the rules more and more, pretty soon football as we know it will become soccer.
You mean football with become futbol.

Re: NFL field width may become equal with the CFL's
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2013 8:58 am
by Grizalltheway
grizzaholic wrote:Dumb idea. If they keep on changing the rules more and more, pretty soon football as we know it will become soccer.
The rules of soccer rarely, if ever, change.

Re: NFL field width may become equal with the CFL's
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2013 9:06 am
by grizzaholic
Grizalltheway wrote:grizzaholic wrote:Dumb idea. If they keep on changing the rules more and more, pretty soon football as we know it will become soccer.
The rules of soccer rarely, if ever, change.

exactly. Football will go and go and change and change until it finally becomes soccer.
Re: NFL field width may become equal with the CFL's
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2013 9:42 am
by andy7171
Grizalltheway wrote:grizzaholic wrote:Dumb idea. If they keep on changing the rules more and more, pretty soon football as we know it will become soccer.
The rules of soccer rarely, if ever, change.

Yeah. No hands. Don't kick each other in the nuts. Not hard to follow. Also, only pussies can play.
Re: NFL field width may become equal with the CFL's
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2013 10:13 am
by Grizalltheway
andy7171 wrote:Grizalltheway wrote:
The rules of soccer rarely, if ever, change.

Yeah. No hands. Don't kick each other in the nuts. Not hard to follow. Also, only pussies can play.
Thanks for the insight, Andy Rooney.
Re: NFL field width may become equal with the CFL's
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2013 10:14 am
by grizzaholic
Grizalltheway wrote:andy7171 wrote:
Yeah. No hands. Don't kick each other in the nuts. Not hard to follow. Also, only pussies can play.
Thanks for the insight, Andy Rooney.
He would be the go to for this type of information IMO. He has 3 or 4, maybe 6 who really knows, daughters that play soccer. He would know all about the rules and regulations of that game.
- Spoiler: show
- I say game because it is not a sport. Nothing that boring could possibly be considered a sport.
Re: NFL field width may become equal with the CFL's
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2013 10:41 am
by 89Hen
Re: NFL field width may become equal with the CFL's
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2013 11:26 am
by ASUG8
It's the one time having a little extra space on the sides (i.e. a track) might pay off.
Re: NFL field width may become equal with the CFL's
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2013 11:32 am
by 89Hen
ASUG8 wrote:It's the one time having a little extra space on the sides (i.e. a track) might pay off.
Not happening. You think the NFL will tell Lambeau they need to remove 4000 seats so they can widen the field?
Re: NFL field width may become equal with the CFL's
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2013 1:24 pm
by CAA Flagship
89Hen wrote:ASUG8 wrote:It's the one time having a little extra space on the sides (i.e. a track) might pay off.
Not happening. You think the NFL will tell Lambeau they need to remove 4000 seats so they can widen the field?
Now. Now.
Let's not exaggerate.
They need about 17.5 feet on each side. That thick white border around the field looks to be around 10 feet. Factor in another 7.5 and all you may have to do is carve out a notch in each corner and lose maybe 50 seats total. Done.
But they won't do it.
Re: NFL field width may become equal with the CFL's
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2013 1:53 pm
by Rob Iola
CAA Flagship wrote:89Hen wrote:
Not happening. You think the NFL will tell Lambeau they need to remove 4000 seats so they can widen the field?
Now. Now.
Let's not exaggerate.
They need about 17.5 feet on each side. That thick white border around the field looks to be around 10 feet. Factor in another 7.5 and all you may have to do is carve out a notch in each corner and lose maybe 50 seats total. Done.
But they won't do it.
What about making the endzones 20 yards long, putting the goal posts in play, and adding the "rouge"?
Re: NFL field width may become equal with the CFL's
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2013 7:26 pm
by SuperHornet
What do you mean by "in play," Rob? Putting them back on the goal line? The Redskins once lost an NFL Championship game because of that. Any pass from the end zone that hit the goal post was considered a safety. Sammy Baugh and his taped up ribs had a guy wide open down the left sideline for a TD, but hit the cross bar. After Bob Waterfield's missed PAT, the Rams won by one point. Of course, the NFL caved to pressure from the Redskins' owner to eliminate the safety rule the next season (too late to do anything about a game already in the books), but if you have too many bombs screwed up by the goal posts, fans will DEFINITELY whine about that.
That said, CFL-length end zones and the rouge would be a GREAT idea. Of course, if you have CFL-length end zones, you'll probably have to have a rule requiring KOs and punts to be returned out of the end zone. Are you prepared to accept a "touchback" that costs you a point?
Re: NFL field width may become equal with the CFL's
Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 7:09 am
by dal4018
grizzaholic wrote:Grizalltheway wrote:
Thanks for the insight, Andy Rooney.
He would be the go to for this type of information IMO. He has 3 or 4, maybe 6 who really knows, daughters that play soccer. He would know all about the rules and regulations of that game.
- Spoiler: show
- I say game because it is not a sport. Nothing that boring could possibly be considered a sport.
Well if Soccer is boring then ppl who watch the World Cup loved being bored to death three yrs ago in South Africa.
Re: NFL field width may become equal with the CFL's
Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 7:34 am
by 89Hen
CAA Flagship wrote:89Hen wrote:
Not happening. You think the NFL will tell Lambeau they need to remove 4000 seats so they can widen the field?
Now. Now.
Let's not exaggerate.
They need about 17.5 feet on each side. That thick white border around the field looks to be around 10 feet. Factor in another 7.5 and all you may have to do is carve out a notch in each corner and lose maybe 50 seats total. Done.
But they won't do it.
You're not spacially gifted.

Re: NFL field width may become equal with the CFL's
Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 9:02 am
by grizzaholic
dal4018 wrote:grizzaholic wrote:
He would be the go to for this type of information IMO. He has 3 or 4, maybe 6 who really knows, daughters that play soccer. He would know all about the rules and regulations of that game.
- Spoiler: show
- I say game because it is not a sport. Nothing that boring could possibly be considered a sport.
Well if Soccer is boring then ppl who watch the World Cup loved being bored to death three yrs ago in South Africa.
Why are you posting something that is common sense.
Re: NFL field width may become equal with the CFL's
Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 11:18 am
by BlueHen86
I like the idea, just like I like the idea to widen NHL surfaces.
But, as has been pointed out already, it won't happen beacuse no owner is going to get rid of seats in order to make this happen.
Re: NFL field width may become equal with the CFL's
Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 12:15 pm
by CID1990
If they add land mines I'm in.