FCS Football | Message Board | News
https://championshipsubdivision.com/forums/
https://championshipsubdivision.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=37754
They better bring their A game vs New Zealand or this time it really will be curtains for them!!!93henfan wrote:Apologies if this was already posted, but it's awesome. Apparently this USA goal over Panama put Mexico in the World Cup and they express their thanks.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cVZji7ywMUY[/youtube]
They can show up and play on their knees and beat the Kiwis. Mexico's ticket is as good as punched for the WC.dal4018 wrote:They better bring their A game vs New Zealand or this time it really will be curtains for them!!!93henfan wrote:Apologies if this was already posted, but it's awesome. Apparently this USA goal over Panama put Mexico in the World Cup and they express their thanks.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cVZji7ywMUY[/youtube]
Soccer plays with a running clock unlike other sports. One of the officials calculates the time of delays with dead balls and adds that to the time of the game. Usually somewhere between 2-5 minutes a half.CAA Flagship wrote:Stoppage Time
Pretty simple concept, even your pea brain should be able to grasp it.CAA Flagship wrote:Stoppage Time
I made it :51 seconds. Seems like I say that a lot at home too.93henfan wrote:Another classic CS thread pattern. Sheesh. Did anyone actually watch the video and just enjoy the announcers' joyous spontaneity, you ADD fucks?
Kiwis beat Italy in the last World Cup. The Me-hee-cans will be watching this one from home, like they deserve.SDHornet wrote:They can show up and play on their knees and beat the Kiwis. Mexico's ticket is as good as punched for the WC.dal4018 wrote:They better bring their A game vs New Zealand or this time it really will be curtains for them!!!
That's all you needed to see. I thought it was cool to hear the announcer go from Spanish to, "we love you, we love you forever and ever, God bless America!"ASUG8 wrote:I made it :51 seconds. Seems like I say that a lot at home too.93henfan wrote:Another classic CS thread pattern. Sheesh. Did anyone actually watch the video and just enjoy the announcers' joyous spontaneity, you ADD fucks?
I hope so. I’m still scratching my head as to why we didn’t purposely lose to Panama in that final game.Grizalltheway wrote:Kiwis beat Italy in the last World Cup. The Me-hee-cans will be watching this one from home, like they deserve.SDHornet wrote: They can show up and play on their knees and beat the Kiwis. Mexico's ticket is as good as punched for the WC.
That's not ethical, even when tanking to get the #1 draft pick....SDHornet wrote:I hope so. I’m still scratching my head as to why we didn’t purposely lose to Panama in that final game.Grizalltheway wrote:
Kiwis beat Italy in the last World Cup. The Me-hee-cans will be watching this one from home, like they deserve.
Don't sell New Zealand short just yet I'am quite sure they have WC aspirations as well.SDHornet wrote:They can show up and play on their knees and beat the Kiwis. Mexico's ticket is as good as punched for the WC.dal4018 wrote:They better bring their A game vs New Zealand or this time it really will be curtains for them!!!
Thank you Griz as stated before don't sell them short.Grizalltheway wrote:Kiwis beat Italy in the last World Cup. The Me-hee-cans will be watching this one from home, like they deserve.SDHornet wrote: They can show up and play on their knees and beat the Kiwis. Mexico's ticket is as good as punched for the WC.
USA was playing their B and C team. Wouldn't that be considered unethical?SuperHornet wrote:That's not ethical, even when tanking to get the #1 draft pick....SDHornet wrote: I hope so. I’m still scratching my head as to why we didn’t purposely lose to Panama in that final game.
Your saying that Uncle Sam took Panama lightly by playing their B&C squads???SDHornet wrote:USA was playing their B and C team. Wouldn't that be considered unethical?SuperHornet wrote:
That's not ethical, even when tanking to get the #1 draft pick....
No I'm saying Uncle Sam had nothing to play for since they already locked up the top qualifying spot from CONCAF.dal4018 wrote:Your saying that Uncle Sam took Panama lightly by playing their B&C squads???SDHornet wrote: USA was playing their B and C team. Wouldn't that be considered unethical?
SDHornet wrote:No I'm saying Uncle Sam had nothing to play for since they already locked up the top qualifying spot from CONCAF.dal4018 wrote:Your saying that Uncle Sam took Panama lightly by playing their B&C squads???
I like Pink Lady apples more than Red Delicious apples.93henfan wrote:Another classic CS thread pattern. Sheesh. Did anyone actually watch the video and just enjoy the announcers' joyous spontaneity, you ADD fucks?
I know that, but given the hatred between the two teams (USA & MX) it would have been nice to see MX miss the WC. US had that opportunity and didn't act on it.dbackjon wrote:SDHornet wrote: No I'm saying Uncle Sam had nothing to play for since they already locked up the top qualifying spot from CONCAF.
There is a difference in playing second string to avoid injuries to your stars and to give the back-ups experience and tanking.
Even though we had B and C players, those players were still trying their hardest to win and impress the coaches.
I don't have an Uncle Sam. I had an Uncle Rudy that worked for Lance crackers and would give us free crackers. Crackers as in the treat, not white people. He wasn't giving us white people.dal4018 wrote:Your saying that Uncle Sam took Panama lightly by playing their B&C squads???SDHornet wrote: USA was playing their B and C team. Wouldn't that be considered unethical?
Uncle Sam as in United States quite sure you know it's a moniker.Ibanez wrote:I don't have an Uncle Sam. I had an Uncle Rudy that worked for Lance crackers and would give us free crackers. Crackers as in the treat, not white people. He wasn't giving us white people.dal4018 wrote:Your saying that Uncle Sam took Panama lightly by playing their B&C squads???
That sounds a bit racist. Is this an urban term?dal4018 wrote:Uncle Sam as in United States quite sure you know it's a moniker.Ibanez wrote:
I don't have an Uncle Sam. I had an Uncle Rudy that worked for Lance crackers and would give us free crackers. Crackers as in the treat, not white people. He wasn't giving us white people.
Is this Uncle Sam?dal4018 wrote:Uncle Sam as in United States quite sure you know it's a moniker.Ibanez wrote:
I don't have an Uncle Sam. I had an Uncle Rudy that worked for Lance crackers and would give us free crackers. Crackers as in the treat, not white people. He wasn't giving us white people.
