WTF Cincinnati..?
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2016 12:18 am
Holy Nuclear Meltdown Bat Man...


FCS Football | Message Board | News
https://championshipsubdivision.com/forums/
https://championshipsubdivision.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=44888

http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/14540 ... ti-bengals" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;CINCINNATI -- A quote from Cincinnati Bengals founder and former coach Paul Brown scrolled all this week on monitors in the Bengals' locker room.
"The key to winning," it read, "is poise under stress."
kalm wrote:That was an extremely entertaining game.![]()
Burfict is a criminal.
I felt bad for Pac Man as you're hoping for him to remain a bit of a redemption story. Did they ever show what he said or did to get the second 15 yarder? If so, I missed it but it must of been a doozy to get a ref to make that call in that situation. In one of the replays it looked like the ref was throwing the flag at Joey Porter but Jones must have done something before that.
I tend to not have strong feelings of dislike for entire teams but I do hate nearly everything about the Steelers...except Mike Tomlin. That is one intensely cool motherfucker.![]()
http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/14540 ... ti-bengals" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;CINCINNATI -- A quote from Cincinnati Bengals founder and former coach Paul Brown scrolled all this week on monitors in the Bengals' locker room.
"The key to winning," it read, "is poise under stress."

Ironically enough that hit by Burfict reminded me of a James Harrison hit.kalm wrote:That was an extremely entertaining game.![]()
Burfict is a criminal.
I felt bad for Pac Man as you're hoping for him to remain a bit of a redemption story. Did they ever show what he said or did to get the second 15 yarder? If so, I missed it but it must of been a doozy to get a ref to make that call in that situation. In one of the replays it looked like the ref was throwing the flag at Joey Porter but Jones must have done something before that.
I tend to not have strong feelings of dislike for entire teams but I do hate nearly everything about the Steelers...except Mike Tomlin. That is one intensely cool motherfucker.![]()
According to the NFL:bluehenbillk wrote:Burfict, I don't even have words for that guy - what a bad player.
The NFL though was the real loser in this game - coaches all over the field - from both teams. What's Joey Porter doing 3/4 across the field talking shit?
Time to pay for full-time refs.
Wrong as usual. Porter will be fined by the NFL. Porter is a D coach. Brown is not one of his players. Porter did not go to help Brown at any time.Chizzang wrote:According to the NFL:bluehenbillk wrote:Burfict, I don't even have words for that guy - what a bad player.
The NFL though was the real loser in this game - coaches all over the field - from both teams. What's Joey Porter doing 3/4 across the field talking shit?
Time to pay for full-time refs.
coach Porter (as they called him) was allowed to be on the field to assist his downed player (Antonio Brown) when play is stopped and a player is down coaches can come to the downed players assistance...
1) Vontez Burfict is one of the most commonly fined players in the league
2) Pac Man Jones is right behind him on the list of highly fined players
Nobody on the Cincinnati coaching staff
seemed even remotely surprised by the on field behavior of their team
I'd have to see a replay of that. Collinsworth was commenting on how none of the O-line had taken off right after the play.dbackjon wrote:Wrong as usual. Porter will be fined by the NFL. Porter is a D coach. Brown is not one of his players. Porter did not go to help Brown at any time.Chizzang wrote:
According to the NFL:
coach Porter (as they called him) was allowed to be on the field to assist his downed player (Antonio Brown) when play is stopped and a player is down coaches can come to the downed players assistance...
1) Vontez Burfict is one of the most commonly fined players in the league
2) Pac Man Jones is right behind him on the list of highly fined players
Nobody on the Cincinnati coaching staff
seemed even remotely surprised by the on field behavior of their team
https://twitter.com/adamschefter/status ... 7383875584" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
If the NFL officials had correctly called the penalty on Shazier for spearing, then this may not have gotten out of control.
The Stealers, like the Cheatriots and Seahags, get the benefit of many, many questionable calls.
Like Wilson's "miracle play" to Lockett - there were TWO lineman downfield. The play was illegal, and for any other team, would have come back.
Collingsworth? Not sure if he knows anything.kalm wrote:I'd have to see a replay of that. Collinsworth was commenting on how none of the O-line had taken off right after the play.dbackjon wrote:
Wrong as usual. Porter will be fined by the NFL. Porter is a D coach. Brown is not one of his players. Porter did not go to help Brown at any time.
https://twitter.com/adamschefter/status ... 7383875584" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
If the NFL officials had correctly called the penalty on Shazier for spearing, then this may not have gotten out of control.
The Stealers, like the Cheatriots and Seahags, get the benefit of many, many questionable calls.
Like Wilson's "miracle play" to Lockett - there were TWO lineman downfield. The play was illegal, and for any other team, would have come back.
Lol at the rest of the hate.
Agree for the most part but you've got nuthin'.dbackjon wrote:Collingsworth? Not sure if he knows anything.kalm wrote:
I'd have to see a replay of that. Collinsworth was commenting on how none of the O-line had taken off right after the play.
Lol at the rest of the hate.
Firstly:dbackjon wrote:Wrong as usual. Porter will be fined by the NFL. Porter is a D coach. Brown is not one of his players. Porter did not go to help Brown at any time.Chizzang wrote:
According to the NFL:
coach Porter (as they called him) was allowed to be on the field to assist his downed player (Antonio Brown) when play is stopped and a player is down coaches can come to the downed players assistance...
1) Vontez Burfict is one of the most commonly fined players in the league
2) Pac Man Jones is right behind him on the list of highly fined players
Nobody on the Cincinnati coaching staff
seemed even remotely surprised by the on field behavior of their team
https://twitter.com/adamschefter/status ... 7383875584" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
If the NFL officials had correctly called the penalty on Shazier for spearing, then this may not have gotten out of control.
The Stealers, like the Cheatriots and Seahags, get the benefit of many, many questionable calls.
Like Wilson's "miracle play" to Lockett - there were TWO lineman downfield. The play was illegal, and for any other team, would have come back.
The refs blew it not because they let Porter on the field but because if Porter was on the field to tend to Brown then that is what he should have been doing. As soon as he started jawing at Bengals players that excuse for him being on the field evaporated and he should have been flagged.Chizzang wrote:Firstly:
The guy you're quoting even says that Burfect and Jones stupidity cost them the game
Secondly:
I'm just responding with the initial NFL feedback
I don't think the on-field officials know who's a defensive coach and who's not
FACT:
When a player is down coaches can come on-to-the field
Absolutely "After the fact" the NFL might fine the coaches - but during the game
expecting the officials to know what coaches to NOT LET ON THE FIELD when play is stopped due to injury
THAT John - is a ridiculous expectation
That was a legal hit according to the former VP of NFL officiating:UNI88 wrote:The refs blew it not because they let Porter on the field but because if Porter was on the field to tend to Brown then that is what he should have been doing. As soon as he started jawing at Bengals players that excuse for him being on the field evaporated and he should have been flagged.Chizzang wrote:Firstly:
The guy you're quoting even says that Burfect and Jones stupidity cost them the game
Secondly:
I'm just responding with the initial NFL feedback
I don't think the on-field officials know who's a defensive coach and who's not
FACT:
When a player is down coaches can come on-to-the field
Absolutely "After the fact" the NFL might fine the coaches - but during the game
expecting the officials to know what coaches to NOT LET ON THE FIELD when play is stopped due to injury
THAT John - is a ridiculous expectation
And to reiterate, Burfict's hit was so reminiscent of many James Harrison hits (who Porter played with and defended) that Porter's and any Steeler fan's anger is hypocritical.
And Jon is dead on about the spearing. That should have been called. And Shazier celebrating and dancing while a player was down was beyond tasteless. The NFL absolutely needs to stop players from leading with the crown of their helmet. It is stupid and actually more dangerous to the hitter than the target.
Sorry to go all JSO on you but this is from a Steelers fan site and even it doesn’t do a good job of justifying the no-call so it doesn’t really convince me. It seems to me as if Pereira disagrees with the rule and his interpretation demonstrates a bias against applying the rule as written.BDKJMU wrote:That was a legal hit according to the former VP of NFL officiating:UNI88 wrote:
The refs blew it not because they let Porter on the field but because if Porter was on the field to tend to Brown then that is what he should have been doing. As soon as he started jawing at Bengals players that excuse for him being on the field evaporated and he should have been flagged.
And to reiterate, Burfict's hit was so reminiscent of many James Harrison hits (who Porter played with and defended) that Porter's and any Steeler fan's anger is hypocritical.
And Jon is dead on about the spearing. That should have been called. And Shazier celebrating and dancing while a player was down was beyond tasteless. The NFL absolutely needs to stop players from leading with the crown of their helmet. It is stupid and actually more dangerous to the hitter than the target.
http://www.steelersdepot.com/2016/01/sh ... -analysts/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
First, Pereira argues that Bernard wasn't defenseless based on a subjective interpretation of the rules focusing on him establishing himself as a runner. From the rulebook:First, Bernard had the ball long enough to become a runner. As a runner, he wasn’t defenseless. Since he wasn’t defenseless, he could be hit in the head or neck area, and with Shazier’s helmet.
...
Second, the ban against use of the crown of the helmet doesn’t apply in a bang-bang situation. It requires the person delivering the blow with the crown of the helmet to “line up” the target. While close, that’s not what happened between Bernard and Shazier.
...
“This is the crown of the helmet rule that was brought in 2013 and I was against the rule when it was brought in because it was really designed for when two players are lined up against each other like two rams with their heads down,” said Pereira. “It was for that type of direct contact. It wasn’t for when a player went sideways and in this case he turned around, spun around after making the catch and was clearly a runner. The issue was that this rule is going to be so hard to officiate and that’s why when they brought in the rule there was two called in 2013. There were none called in 2014 and there have been one called in 2015. And I just don’t see it as the classic lineup, two guys face-up on each other and one guy lowering the head and making contact with the crown of the helmet.”
The more Pereira talked about the hit, however, the more confusing his interpretation of the rule is and he admits that this is something the competition committee will need to look at again during the offseason.
I will admit that this is subjective on my part but I would argue that Bernard did not have time to protect himself or avoid or ward off impending contact and was thus still defenseless.Rule 12, Section 2, Article 7 – A receiver attempting to catch a pass; or who has completed a catch and has not had time to protect himself or has not clearly become a runner. If the player is capable of avoiding or warding off the impending contact of an opponent, he is no longer a defenseless player.
http://operations.nfl.com/the-rules/2015-nfl-rulebook/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;Rule 12, Section 2, Article 8. INITIATING CONTACT WITH THE CROWN OF THE HELMET. It is a foul if a runner or tackler initiates forcible contact by delivering a blow with the top/crown of his helmet against an opponent when both players are clearly outside the tackle box.