Suck It Again Brady
Suck It Again Brady
US 2nd Circuit Appeals Court reinstates 4-game suspension.
Will Brady take it to SCOTUS and would they hear it?
Will Brady take it to SCOTUS and would they hear it?
Delaware Football: 1889-2012; 2022-
- DSUrocks07
- Supporter

- Posts: 5339
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 7:32 pm
- I am a fan of: Delaware State
- A.K.A.: phillywild305
- Location: The 9th Circle of Hellaware
Re: RE: Suck It Again Brady
SCOTUS cases usually result in a fundamental change in how business is done going forward.93henfan wrote:US 2nd Circuit Appeals Court reinstates 4-game suspension.
Will Brady take it to SCOTUS and would they hear it?
My question is, how would a ruling in either direction affect CBA negotiations going forward?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk
Re: RE: Suck It Again Brady
Going forward we're not really sure. But we'll surely find out how things are going to work out going forward.DSUrocks07 wrote:SCOTUS cases usually result in a fundamental change in how business is done going forward.93henfan wrote:US 2nd Circuit Appeals Court reinstates 4-game suspension.
Will Brady take it to SCOTUS and would they hear it?
My question is, how would a ruling in either direction affect CBA negotiations going forward?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk
- Chizzang
- Level5

- Posts: 19274
- Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:36 am
- I am a fan of: Deflate Gate
- A.K.A.: The Quasar Kid
- Location: Palermo Italy
Re: Suck It Again Brady
from NFL.com
Do the judges think Brady deflated the footballs?
Nope! They don't even care about the whole Deflategate thing, in fact. The judges only care about the process involved with the way the NFL and the NFLPA negotiated the discipline process. Roger Goodell is judge, jury and executioner, which is totally ridiculous, but it's the way things are set up in the CBA.
The judges even called Goodell's power "unorthodox" but also called it "mutually satisfactory" because it was negotiated by the two parties.
Do the judges think Brady deflated the footballs?
Nope! They don't even care about the whole Deflategate thing, in fact. The judges only care about the process involved with the way the NFL and the NFLPA negotiated the discipline process. Roger Goodell is judge, jury and executioner, which is totally ridiculous, but it's the way things are set up in the CBA.
The judges even called Goodell's power "unorthodox" but also called it "mutually satisfactory" because it was negotiated by the two parties.
Q: Name something that offends Republicans?
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
- DSUrocks07
- Supporter

- Posts: 5339
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 7:32 pm
- I am a fan of: Delaware State
- A.K.A.: phillywild305
- Location: The 9th Circle of Hellaware
Re: RE: Re: RE: Suck It Again Brady
But going forward, going forward is always the right decision. Especially when going forward is the only option available going forward.bandl wrote:Going forward we're not really sure. But we'll surely find out how things are going to work out going forward.DSUrocks07 wrote: SCOTUS cases usually result in a fundamental change in how business is done going forward.
My question is, how would a ruling in either direction affect CBA negotiations going forward?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk
-
Ivytalk
- Supporter

- Posts: 26827
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:22 pm
- I am a fan of: Salisbury University
- Location: Republic of Western Sussex
Re: Suck It Again Brady
But will the SCOTUS take this sorry-assed case with a 4-4 split? 
“I’m tired and done.” — 89Hen 3/27/22.
Re: RE: Suck It Again Brady
Going forward, i'm going to need to you shut your dirty mouth.bandl wrote:Going forward we're not really sure. But we'll surely find out how things are going to work out going forward.DSUrocks07 wrote: SCOTUS cases usually result in a fundamental change in how business is done going forward.
My question is, how would a ruling in either direction affect CBA negotiations going forward?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
Re: Suck It Again Brady
Personally, I think this is ridiculous. Brady should take the punishment like a man.Ivytalk wrote:But will the SCOTUS take this sorry-assed case with a 4-4 split?
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
-
tribe_pride
- Level2

- Posts: 1626
- Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 8:53 am
- I am a fan of: W&M
Re: Suck It Again Brady
93henfan wrote:US 2nd Circuit Appeals Court reinstates 4-game suspension.
Will Brady take it to SCOTUS and would they hear it?
Was just a 3 judge panel and not the full court so he could appeal to the full 2nd Circuit instead of the Supreme Court.
- dbackjon
- Moderator Team

- Posts: 45623
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
- I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
- A.K.A.: He/Him
- Location: Scottsdale
Re: RE: Suck It Again Brady
Ibanez wrote:Going forward, i'm going to need to you shut your dirty whore mouth.bandl wrote: Going forward we're not really sure. But we'll surely find out how things are going to work out going forward.
FTFY
Re: Suck It Again Brady
It's also dirty. He doesn't brush, floss or rinse. Nasty muthatrucka.dbackjon wrote:Ibanez wrote: Going forward, i'm going to need to you shut your dirty whore mouth.
FTFY
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
-
CAA Flagship
- 4th&29

- Posts: 38528
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:01 pm
- I am a fan of: Old Dominion
- A.K.A.: He/His/Him/Himself
- Location: Pizza Hell
Re: RE: Re: RE: Suck It Again Brady
If you are facing a mirror, which way is forward?DSUrocks07 wrote:But going forward, going forward is always the right decision. Especially when going forward is the only option available going forward.bandl wrote: Going forward we're not really sure. But we'll surely find out how things are going to work out going forward.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk
- DSUrocks07
- Supporter

- Posts: 5339
- Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 7:32 pm
- I am a fan of: Delaware State
- A.K.A.: phillywild305
- Location: The 9th Circle of Hellaware
Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Suck It Again Brady
That's a tricky one. If you're sitting down, it's hard to tell if your coming forward or going forward.CAA Flagship wrote:If you are facing a mirror, which way is forward?DSUrocks07 wrote: But going forward, going forward is always the right decision. Especially when going forward is the only option available going forward.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Tapatalk
-
Ivytalk
- Supporter

- Posts: 26827
- Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:22 pm
- I am a fan of: Salisbury University
- Location: Republic of Western Sussex
Re: Suck It Again Brady
Brady: "Thank you, sir, may I have another?"Ibanez wrote:Personally, I think this is ridiculous. Brady should take the punishment like a man.Ivytalk wrote:But will the SCOTUS take this sorry-assed case with a 4-4 split?
“I’m tired and done.” — 89Hen 3/27/22.
- Chizzang
- Level5

- Posts: 19274
- Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:36 am
- I am a fan of: Deflate Gate
- A.K.A.: The Quasar Kid
- Location: Palermo Italy
Re: Suck It Again Brady
I smell a petition certiorari coming down the chute... submitted to whatever the next level court isIvytalk wrote:Brady: "Thank you, sir, may I have another?"Ibanez wrote: Personally, I think this is ridiculous. Brady should take the punishment like a man.
Q: Name something that offends Republicans?
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
