Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

Who do you have moving on?

Stillers and Da Raidahs.

PIT & HOU

Thieves and thieves.

You guys are really picking the Raiders??

Steelers and Texans for me. Raiders look like dead men walking without a QB.

GannonFan wrote:Steelers and Texans for me. Raiders look like dead men walking without a QB.

I think home team wins all four games this weekend.

89Hen wrote:You guys are really picking the Raiders??

I could be completely off my rocker but I think the Raiders will be better with Cook having a week of preparation with the starters.

UNI88 wrote:

89Hen wrote:You guys are really picking the Raiders??

I could be completely off my rocker but I think the Raiders will be better with Cook having a week of preparation with the starters.

They can't be worse.

89Hen wrote:

GannonFan wrote:Steelers and Texans for me. Raiders look like dead men walking without a QB.

I think home team wins all four games this weekend.

The Giants are the, pardon the pun, wild card. They're fully capable of winning in GB and full capable of being blown out too. They're such a hit or miss team, but then again, that's a direct reflection of the QB.

89Hen wrote:

UNI88 wrote: I could be completely off my rocker but I think the Raiders will be better with Cook having a week of preparation with the starters.

They can't be worse.

True. My gut tells me that the team knew they were going to suck with McGloin going into to Denver and played like it. They'll be more comfortable with Cook and step up their game as a result. I could be totally wrong though.

I would take Oakland with Cook over Houston with Osweiler.

I'm taking Oakland over Houston no matter WHO is behind center...though I fully anticipate that it will be McGloin.

Steelers over Fish...fairly handily, too....

UNI88 wrote:

89Hen wrote: They can't be worse.

True. My gut tells me that the team knew they were going to suck with McGloin going into to Denver and played like it. They'll be more comfortable with Cook and step up their game as a result. I could be totally wrong though.

I guess I was wrong. Oops.

Vidav wrote:I would take Oakland with Cook over Houston with Osweiler.

I like Tomlin as a coach but I can't stand the Steelers. That was a vicious hit on Moore and I can't believe they let him back in the game. This one might get a little chippy.

kalm wrote:I like Tomlin as a coach but I can't stand the Steelers. That was a vicious hit on Moore and I can't believe they let him back in the game. This one might get a little chippy.

This one was chippy BEFORE that hit....refs are on the verge of losing control of this one.

SuperHornet wrote:I'm taking Oakland over Houston no matter WHO is behind center...though I fully anticipate that it will be McGloin.

Steelers over Fish...fairly handily, too....

Dolphins are getting fried who saw when Moore got BLASTED!!!!

The Steelers play like that every game. If you don't want to get hit, don't fuck around against the Steelers.

93henfan wrote:The Steelers play like that every game. If you don't want to get hit, don't fuck around against the Steelers.

Launching the crown of the helmet into the chin should have been a personal foul.

93henfan wrote:The Steelers play like that every game. If you don't want to get hit, don't **** around against the Steelers.

Why do they always whine about how Vontaze Burfict plays then?

89Hen wrote:

GannonFan wrote:Steelers and Texans for me. Raiders look like dead men walking without a QB.

I think home team wins all four games this weekend.

OK. I blew it. I didn't expect the loss of Donald Penn OR the secondary to play like cr@p. Clowney was hitting that edge all day long from what I hear, and I SHOULD have remembered that the OAK secondary has been cr@p all season long. Lester Hayes and Jack Tatum are no longer around, and they haven't had anyone of anywhere near their quality for quite some time. Perhaps that will change next year, but given how stupid Reggie McKenzie is, one wonders....

SuperHornet wrote:OK. I blew it. I didn't expect the loss of Donald Penn OR the secondary to play like cr@p. Clowney was hitting that edge all day long from what I hear, and I SHOULD have remembered that the OAK secondary has been cr@p all season long. Lester Hayes and Jack Tatum are no longer around, and they haven't had anyone of anywhere near their quality for quite some time. Perhaps that will change next year, but given how stupid Reggie McKenzie is, one wonders....

None of that really mattered, it mattered that Connor Cook was under center. That game was lost before the coin flip.

GannonFan wrote:

SuperHornet wrote:OK. I blew it. I didn't expect the loss of Donald Penn OR the secondary to play like cr@p. Clowney was hitting that edge all day long from what I hear, and I SHOULD have remembered that the OAK secondary has been cr@p all season long. Lester Hayes and Jack Tatum are no longer around, and they haven't had anyone of anywhere near their quality for quite some time. Perhaps that will change next year, but given how stupid Reggie McKenzie is, one wonders....

None of that really mattered, it mattered that Connor Cook was under center. That game was lost before the coin flip.

What?? Next you're going to tell us Knute Rockne is no longer Notre Dame's coach.