Page 2 of 2

Re: RE: Re: Aaron Rogers is 0-38 (updated)

Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2018 8:11 am
by clenz
Gil Dobie wrote:
Mvemjsunpx wrote:Aaron Rodgers is a very good quarterback, but he's not the Jesus-like figure that Packers fans & some national analysts like to claim he is. I find it comical how twitter erupts with "GOAT GOAT #GOAT" every time Rodgers completes a somewhat difficult pass.
I'm a Packer fan, but I've never said he was the greatest of all time. As we've seen over his career, as Rodgers goes, so do the Packers. That's not true about every QB, every team.
All we heard last year was how the Packers we're only bad because A a ron was out

Well


This year it's another excuse


Green Bay has been blessed with 28ish years if two of the top 10-15 QBs of all time and they have a massive two titles to show for it.

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk

Re: RE: Re: Aaron Rogers is 0-38 (updated)

Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2018 8:29 am
by Gil Dobie
clenz wrote:
Gil Dobie wrote:
I'm a Packer fan, but I've never said he was the greatest of all time. As we've seen over his career, as Rodgers goes, so do the Packers. That's not true about every QB, every team.
All we heard last year was how the Packers we're only bad because A a ron was out

Well


This year it's another excuse


Green Bay has been blessed with 28ish years if two of the top 10-15 QBs of all time and they have a massive two titles to show for it.

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk
They were not as good with Rodgers out. Do you not think that is legit reasoning? Remember the Vikings had 13 years of one of the best QB's in the game, and didn't win a single title. Miami had Marino and never won a title. That's the way things go.

Re: Aaron Rogers is 0-38 (updated)

Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2018 8:48 am
by Chizzang
It's all about next season right now...
The Green Bay Packers are in a good position to get any coach they want

I don't see them stinking this bad for long

Re: RE: Re: Aaron Rogers is 0-38 (updated)

Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2018 8:52 am
by kalm
Gil Dobie wrote:
clenz wrote:All we heard last year was how the Packers we're only bad because A a ron was out

Well


This year it's another excuse


Green Bay has been blessed with 28ish years if two of the top 10-15 QBs of all time and they have a massive two titles to show for it.

Sent from my Pixel 3 using Tapatalk
They were not as good with Rodgers out. Do you not think that is legit reasoning? Remember the Vikings had 13 years of one of the best QB's in the game, and didn't win a single title. Miami had Marino and never won a title. That's the way things go.
This guy?

phpBB [video]

Re: RE: Re: Aaron Rogers is 0-38 (updated)

Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2018 9:11 am
by Gil Dobie
kalm wrote:
Gil Dobie wrote:
They were not as good with Rodgers out. Do you not think that is legit reasoning? Remember the Vikings had 13 years of one of the best QB's in the game, and didn't win a single title. Miami had Marino and never won a title. That's the way things go.

This guy?

Video Blocked by the NFL
Yes that guy was good.

Re: RE: Re: Aaron Rogers is 0-38 (updated)

Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2018 9:17 am
by kalm
Gil Dobie wrote:
kalm wrote:
Yes that guy was good.
:nod: It's fun watching his old clips.

I was a Rams fan as a kid but Fran was one of my favorites. Eric Meyer, VA, and Russel Wilson remind me of him with their scrambling ability.

Re: RE: Re: Aaron Rogers is 0-38 (updated)

Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2018 9:29 am
by Grizalltheway
kalm wrote:
Gil Dobie wrote:
Yes that guy was good.
:nod: It's fun watching his old clips.

I was a Rams fan as a kid but Fran was one of my favorites. Eric Meyer, VA, and Russel Wilson remind me of him with their scrambling ability.
Who?