Vote for Your Contemporary Hall of Famers - Mattingly's Chance
- Gil Dobie
- Supporter
- Posts: 31253
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:45 pm
- I am a fan of: Norse Dakota State
- Location: Historic Leduc Estate
Vote for Your Contemporary Hall of Famers - Mattingly's Chance
The committee votes on 3, so let's do the same.

- SuperHornet
- SuperHornet
- Posts: 20686
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:24 pm
- I am a fan of: Sac State
- Location: Twentynine Palms, CA
Re: Vote for Your Contemporary Hall of Famers - Mattingly's Chance
Based on that list, I'd have to turn in a blank ballot....

SuperHornet's Athletics Hall of Fame includes Jacksonville State kicker Ashley Martin, the first girl to score in a Division I football game. She kicked 3 PATs in a 2001 game for J-State.
- GannonFan
- Level5
- Posts: 18559
- Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
- I am a fan of: Delaware
- A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack
Re: Vote for Your Contemporary Hall of Famers - Mattingly's Chance
Schilling should be a mortal lock assuming it's about baseball. The regular voters got caught up in his after baseball comments, but this committee will keep it to baseball and he's a lock. I like Albert Belle and I like Mattingly. Both are clean from the steroid label and both are solid players. I don't think they are as deserving as Schilling, but good enough to get in on this ballot.
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
- Gil Dobie
- Supporter
- Posts: 31253
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:45 pm
- I am a fan of: Norse Dakota State
- Location: Historic Leduc Estate
Re: Vote for Your Contemporary Hall of Famers - Mattingly's Chance
So far, cs has 3 new hall of famers voted in. 3 of 4 ballots at this time.

- dbackjon
- Moderator Team
- Posts: 45614
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
- I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
- A.K.A.: He/Him
- Location: Scottsdale
Re: Vote for Your Contemporary Hall of Famers - Mattingly's Chance
i am going with Albert Belle and two unpopular choices - Bonds and Clemens. Both were HOF before the steriods took over.

- dbackjon
- Moderator Team
- Posts: 45614
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
- I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
- A.K.A.: He/Him
- Location: Scottsdale
Re: Vote for Your Contemporary Hall of Famers - Mattingly's Chance
Part two - for each of the listed, what cap would they wear?
My choices:
Bonds - Pirates
Clemens - Red Sox
Palmeiro - Rangers
Murphy - Braves (no brainer)
Belle - Indians
Schilling - tough one - spent longest time in Philly, WS MVP and greatest season in Arizona, bloody sox and WS win in Boston.
Mattingly - Yankees, no doubt
McGriff - one of the tougher ones - probably Braves
My choices:
Bonds - Pirates
Clemens - Red Sox
Palmeiro - Rangers
Murphy - Braves (no brainer)
Belle - Indians
Schilling - tough one - spent longest time in Philly, WS MVP and greatest season in Arizona, bloody sox and WS win in Boston.
Mattingly - Yankees, no doubt
McGriff - one of the tougher ones - probably Braves

- Gil Dobie
- Supporter
- Posts: 31253
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:45 pm
- I am a fan of: Norse Dakota State
- Location: Historic Leduc Estate
- GannonFan
- Level5
- Posts: 18559
- Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
- I am a fan of: Delaware
- A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack
Re: Vote for Your Contemporary Hall of Famers - Mattingly's Chance
You think Bonds would pick Pittsburgh over San Fran? Granted, he was steroid-free in Pittsburgh, but those San Fran fans stayed loyal to him even knowing full well he was juicing big time.dbackjon wrote: ↑Wed Nov 16, 2022 5:50 pm Part two - for each of the listed, what cap would they wear?
My choices:
Bonds - Pirates
Clemens - Red Sox
Palmeiro - Rangers
Murphy - Braves (no brainer)
Belle - Indians
Schilling - tough one - spent longest time in Philly, WS MVP and greatest season in Arizona, bloody sox and WS win in Boston.
Mattingly - Yankees, no doubt
McGriff - one of the tougher ones - probably Braves
I honestly forgot McGriff played for teams other than the Braves.
Schilling is certainly the hardest. I think he burned bridges more in Boston so it would be Arizona or Philly. He was lionized in Philly so maybe that. Not sure how Arizona feels about him.
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
- GannonFan
- Level5
- Posts: 18559
- Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
- I am a fan of: Delaware
- A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack
Re: Vote for Your Contemporary Hall of Famers - Mattingly's Chance
All three over Schilling? Two were out and out cheaters, and Bonds isn't really sad about it. No one has ever argued that they didn't need steroids to be HOF'ers. Kinda like how Pete Rose didn't need the money but surely bet for and against the team he was managing, and how Shoeless Joe probably didn't take any money and didn't underperform in the 1919 World Series (actually Shoeless Joe doesn't belong in the category of those three, he didn't cheat or dishonor the game). At least Schillings misdeeds happened after his career was over and didn't involve baseball.
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
- dbackjon
- Moderator Team
- Posts: 45614
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
- I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
- A.K.A.: He/Him
- Location: Scottsdale
Re: Vote for Your Contemporary Hall of Famers - Mattingly's Chance
IIRC, it is not the player's choice. That was done away with. The HOF picks the cap. Bonds had HOF credentials in Pittsburgh. This allows the hall to sidestep the steriod era.GannonFan wrote: ↑Wed Nov 16, 2022 10:58 pmYou think Bonds would pick Pittsburgh over San Fran? Granted, he was steroid-free in Pittsburgh, but those San Fran fans stayed loyal to him even knowing full well he was juicing big time.dbackjon wrote: ↑Wed Nov 16, 2022 5:50 pm Part two - for each of the listed, what cap would they wear?
My choices:
Bonds - Pirates
Clemens - Red Sox
Palmeiro - Rangers
Murphy - Braves (no brainer)
Belle - Indians
Schilling - tough one - spent longest time in Philly, WS MVP and greatest season in Arizona, bloody sox and WS win in Boston.
Mattingly - Yankees, no doubt
McGriff - one of the tougher ones - probably Braves
I honestly forgot McGriff played for teams other than the Braves.
Schilling is certainly the hardest. I think he burned bridges more in Boston so it would be Arizona or Philly. He was lionized in Philly so maybe that. Not sure how Arizona feels about him.
Arizona - it's a mixed reaction. He is local, going to school through Community College in Arizona. His politics are polarizing, of course, but more people in Arizona would agree with him than in Boston. Plus the symmetry of both 2001 WS Co-MVP's being in under the same cap is appealing.

- dbackjon
- Moderator Team
- Posts: 45614
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
- I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
- A.K.A.: He/Him
- Location: Scottsdale
Re: Vote for Your Contemporary Hall of Famers - Mattingly's Chance
You can certainly make the case for all four. Gil's rules were to pick threeGannonFan wrote: ↑Wed Nov 16, 2022 11:02 pmAll three over Schilling? Two were out and out cheaters, and Bonds isn't really sad about it. No one has ever argued that they didn't need steroids to be HOF'ers. Kinda like how Pete Rose didn't need the money but surely bet for and against the team he was managing, and how Shoeless Joe probably didn't take any money and didn't underperform in the 1919 World Series (actually Shoeless Joe doesn't belong in the category of those three, he didn't cheat or dishonor the game). At least Schillings misdeeds happened after his career was over and didn't involve baseball.


- Gil Dobie
- Supporter
- Posts: 31253
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:45 pm
- I am a fan of: Norse Dakota State
- Location: Historic Leduc Estate
Re: Vote for Your Contemporary Hall of Famers - Mattingly's Chance
I was using the Hall of Fame rules for this selection.dbackjon wrote: ↑Thu Nov 17, 2022 8:37 amYou can certainly make the case for all four. Gil's rules were to pick threeGannonFan wrote: ↑Wed Nov 16, 2022 11:02 pm
All three over Schilling? Two were out and out cheaters, and Bonds isn't really sad about it. No one has ever argued that they didn't need steroids to be HOF'ers. Kinda like how Pete Rose didn't need the money but surely bet for and against the team he was managing, and how Shoeless Joe probably didn't take any money and didn't underperform in the 1919 World Series (actually Shoeless Joe doesn't belong in the category of those three, he didn't cheat or dishonor the game). At least Schillings misdeeds happened after his career was over and didn't involve baseball.![]()

- TheDancinMonarch
- Supporter
- Posts: 4779
- Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2009 10:23 pm
- I am a fan of: Old Dominion
- Location: Norfolk VA
- SuperHornet
- SuperHornet
- Posts: 20686
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:24 pm
- I am a fan of: Sac State
- Location: Twentynine Palms, CA
Re: Vote for Your Contemporary Hall of Famers - Mattingly's Chance
Outside of Mays, I would NEVER vote for a guy who had a significant chunk of his career with the Giants....

SuperHornet's Athletics Hall of Fame includes Jacksonville State kicker Ashley Martin, the first girl to score in a Division I football game. She kicked 3 PATs in a 2001 game for J-State.
- dbackjon
- Moderator Team
- Posts: 45614
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
- I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
- A.K.A.: He/Him
- Location: Scottsdale
- Gil Dobie
- Supporter
- Posts: 31253
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:45 pm
- I am a fan of: Norse Dakota State
- Location: Historic Leduc Estate
- Gil Dobie
- Supporter
- Posts: 31253
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:45 pm
- I am a fan of: Norse Dakota State
- Location: Historic Leduc Estate
Re: Vote for Your Contemporary Hall of Famers - Mattingly's Chance
PLAYER VOTES (PCT)
Fred McGriff 16 votes, (100%)
Don Mattingly 8 votes, (50%)
Curt Schilling 7 votes (43.8%)
Dale Murphy 6 votes (37.5%)
Albert Belle Less than 4 votes
Barry Bonds Less than 4 votes
Roger Clemens Less than 4 votes
Rafael Palmeiro Less than 4 votes
Fred McGriff 16 votes, (100%)
Don Mattingly 8 votes, (50%)
Curt Schilling 7 votes (43.8%)
Dale Murphy 6 votes (37.5%)
Albert Belle Less than 4 votes
Barry Bonds Less than 4 votes
Roger Clemens Less than 4 votes
Rafael Palmeiro Less than 4 votes
