Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

AZGrizFan wrote:Shocking.

My money's on Rio.

MarkCCU wrote:The murder capital of the USA was not chosen? Shocking! I guess a city where corruption and hate flow freely is not what the committee is looking for.

wideright82 wrote:

MarkCCU wrote:The murder capital of the USA was not chosen? Shocking! I guess a city where corruption and hate flow freely is not what the committee is looking for.

Oh yeah, and Rio is just a shining example of peace

MarkCCU wrote:

wideright82 wrote:

Oh yeah, and Rio is just a shining example of peace

Never said it was.


My response was humor, i'm not surprised that Chicago wasn't chosen.

wideright82 wrote:

MarkCCU wrote:

Never said it was.


My response was humor, i'm not surprised that Chicago wasn't chosen.

No neither am I. I just don't think crime was the reason is all. If it were, you'd have to include Rio

MarkCCU wrote:The murder capital of the USA was not chosen? Shocking! I guess a city where corruption and hate flow freely is not what the committee is looking for.

MarkCCU wrote:

wideright82 wrote:

No neither am I. I just don't think crime was the reason is all. If it were, you'd have to include Rio

I hear Chicago sucks...If O'hare is any indication of the city, I would agree. That's one of the worst airports I have ever been in.

danefan wrote:BTW - how did this become an indictment of Obama?

Check out Drudgereport.com

I find that interesting.

JMU DJ wrote:

MarkCCU wrote:The murder capital of the USA was not chosen? Shocking! I guess a city where corruption and hate flow freely is not what the committee is looking for.

I always thought that was RVA... aka Richmond, VA. Citdogs murder cap city???

dbackjon wrote:Shame on all the treasonous people on here cheering against America

...
On Sept. 24, Obama ostentatiously presided over the Security Council. With 14 heads of state (or government) at the table, with an American president at the chair for the first time ever, with every news camera in the world trained on the meeting, it would garner unprecedented worldwide attention.

Unknown to the world, Obama had in his pocket explosive revelations about an illegal uranium enrichment facility that the Iranians had been hiding near Qom. The French and the British were urging him to use this most dramatic of settings to stun the world with the revelation and to call for immediate action.

Obama refused. Not only did he say nothing about it, but, reports the Wall Street Journal (citing Le Monde), Sarkozy was forced to scrap the Qom section of his speech. Obama held the news until a day later -- in Pittsburgh. I've got nothing against Pittsburgh (site of the G-20 summit), but a stacked-with-world-leaders Security Council chamber it is not.

Why forgo the opportunity? Because Obama wanted the Security Council meeting to be about his own dream of a nuclear-free world. The president, reports the New York Times citing "White House officials," did not want to "dilute" his disarmament resolution "by diverting to Iran."

Diversion? It's the most serious security issue in the world. A diversion from what? From a worthless U.N. disarmament resolution?

Yes. And from Obama's star turn as planetary visionary: "The administration told the French," reports the Wall Street Journal, "that it didn't want to 'spoil the image of success' for Mr. Obama's debut at the U.N."

Image? Success? Sarkozy could hardly contain himself. At the council table, with Obama at the chair, he reminded Obama that "we live in a real world, not a virtual world."

He explained: "President Obama has even said, 'I dream of a world without [nuclear weapons].' Yet before our very eyes, two countries are currently doing the exact opposite."

Sarkozy's unspoken words? "And yet, sacré bleu, he's sitting on Qom!"
...

dbackjon wrote:Shame on all the treasonous people on here cheering against America