To me it looks like the ball is behind the post meaning it went wide... Browns should have had a tie instead of a loss.
Re: Were The Browns Screwed?
Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 6:06 pm
by citdog
THAT KICK WAS NO GOOD
Re: Were The Browns Screwed?
Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 6:18 pm
by UNHWildCats
citdog wrote:THAT KICK WAS NO GOOD
we agree
Now because agreeing with you doesn't agree with me...
THE UNION ROCKS! CONFEDERACY SUCKS!
Re: Were The Browns Screwed?
Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 6:24 pm
by SuperHornet
Old fart Eagles fans paid for that call. They're STILL p!$$ed that Cleveland swept them in 1950 after the merger with the AAFC. The Browns blew Philly out in the first game, using what was widely decried as a "pass/trap" offense, and then won a closer game without throwing a single pass.
Re: Were The Browns Screwed?
Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 8:57 pm
by BlueHen86
SuperHornet wrote:Old fart Eagles fans paid for that call. They're STILL p!$$ed that Cleveland swept them in 1950 after the merger with the AAFC. The Browns blew Philly out in the first game, using what was widely decried as a "pass/trap" offense, and then won a closer game without throwing a single pass.
Let me guess, mushrooms right? Psilocybin mushrooms to be exact. Looks like you got a potent batch.
Re: Were The Browns Screwed?
Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 11:46 pm
by SuperHornet
BlueHen86 wrote:
SuperHornet wrote:Old fart Eagles fans paid for that call. They're STILL p!$$ed that Cleveland swept them in 1950 after the merger with the AAFC. The Browns blew Philly out in the first game, using what was widely decried as a "pass/trap" offense, and then won a closer game without throwing a single pass.
Let me guess, mushrooms right? Psilocybin mushrooms to be exact. Looks like you got a potent batch.
Look up your football history, dude. That really happened.
Re: Were The Browns Screwed?
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 6:33 am
by JMU DJ
SuperHornet wrote:
BlueHen86 wrote:
Let me guess, mushrooms right? Psilocybin mushrooms to be exact. Looks like you got a potent batch.
Look up your football history, dude. That really happened.
I don't think he's doubting you, I think it's more "What the F does this have to do with a game played 60 years later that has absolutely nothing to do with the Eagles?" Cuz yeah, I can come up with wacky conspiracy theories too... but I may need some of your mushrooms. Here's a website for you: http://tinfoilonmyhead.com/
Re: Were The Browns Screwed?
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 6:52 am
by BlueHen86
SuperHornet wrote:
BlueHen86 wrote:
Let me guess, mushrooms right? Psilocybin mushrooms to be exact. Looks like you got a potent batch.
Look up your football history, dude. That really happened.
So did Woodstock. But what does that have to do with a missed field goal? Did you just recently read about the events you described and decide to work them into a post?
Re: Were The Browns Screwed?
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 6:53 am
by BlueHen86
JMU DJ wrote:
SuperHornet wrote:
Look up your football history, dude. That really happened.
I don't think he's doubting you, I think it's more "What the F does this have to do with a game played 60 years later that has absolutely nothing to do with the Eagles?" Cuz yeah, I can come up with wacky conspiracy theories too... but I may need some of your mushrooms. Here's a website for you: http://tinfoilonmyhead.com/
Exactly.
Re: Were The Browns Screwed?
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 7:35 pm
by SuperHornet
BlueHen86 wrote:
SuperHornet wrote:
Look up your football history, dude. That really happened.
So did Woodstock. But what does that have to do with a missed field goal? Did you just recently read about the events you described and decide to work them into a post?
No, I just happen to read sports history on a regular basis. I've known about that since grade school. Sometimes, people are REALLY patient when it comes to revenge. Of course, I WAS being a bit facetious. But remember this idea: those who either don't know or choose to ignore history are doomed to repeat it.
Re: Were The Browns Screwed?
Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 9:41 pm
by BlueHen86
SuperHornet wrote:
BlueHen86 wrote:
So did Woodstock. But what does that have to do with a missed field goal? Did you just recently read about the events you described and decide to work them into a post?
No, I just happen to read sports history on a regular basis. I've known about that since grade school. Sometimes, people are REALLY patient when it comes to revenge. Of course, I WAS being a bit facetious. But remember this idea: those who either don't know or choose to ignore history are doomed to repeat it.
I like facetious.
I think it as a great revenge plan. Wait 59 years, so that most of the poeple who saw the games are dead, and then ruin the other teams season by making them 0 and 4 instead of 0 and 3 with a tie. Brilliant.