Very Early Big Sky predictions
- Wildcat Ryan
- Level3
- Posts: 2798
- Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 6:59 pm
- I am a fan of: WEBER STATE
- A.K.A.: WILDCAT, WILDCATFAN
Re: Very Early Big Sky predictions
Thanks to EWU, UND and Sac my preseason predictions are off to a great start
- SDHornet
- Supporter
- Posts: 19443
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:50 pm
- I am a fan of: Sacramento State Hornets
Re: Very Early Big Sky predictions
Thank Sears...maybe we leave him there when we lose on the 17th, you mofos can have him back.Wildcat Ryan wrote:Thanks to EWU, UND and Sac my preseason predictions are off to a great start
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Wed May 22, 2013 4:27 pm
Re: Very Early Big Sky predictions
That what you get for doubting EWU.Wildcat Ryan wrote:Thanks to EWU, UND and Sac my preseason predictions are off to a great start
- Wildcat Ryan
- Level3
- Posts: 2798
- Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 6:59 pm
- I am a fan of: WEBER STATE
- A.K.A.: WILDCAT, WILDCATFAN
Re: Very Early Big Sky predictions
SDHornet wrote:Thank Sears...maybe we leave him there when we lose on the 17th, you mofos can have him back.Wildcat Ryan wrote:Thanks to EWU, UND and Sac my preseason predictions are off to a great start
No thank you
- Wildcat Ryan
- Level3
- Posts: 2798
- Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 6:59 pm
- I am a fan of: WEBER STATE
- A.K.A.: WILDCAT, WILDCATFAN
Re: Very Early Big Sky predictions
Color me humbled, but there is still much football to be playedewueagle2010 wrote:That what you get for doubting EWU.Wildcat Ryan wrote:Thanks to EWU, UND and Sac my preseason predictions are off to a great start
-
- Level5
- Posts: 12088
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:48 am
- I am a fan of: Fleecing the Stupid
- A.K.A.: Delaware Homie
Re: RE: Re: Very Early Big Sky predictions
Stony Brook a tough team?Bisonfanatical wrote:Stony brook is such a tough team .. hard to say ... what a strong Defensive game that turned out to beAZGrizFan wrote:Wonder if UND was counting Stony Brook in the "win" column as they marched towards that 8-3 record?
I see that MSU could have won their game if they had not got 17 points behind in the 1st qtr
Gregor ik's defense gelled for the next 3 qtrs .. do you think that Stitt will regret letting him go to brand X before this year is over?
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
STONY BROOK?
Bwahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Holy crap...that is hilarious.
These signatures have a 500 character limit?
What if I have more personalities than that?
What if I have more personalities than that?
-
- Level5
- Posts: 13707
- Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 2:44 pm
- I am a fan of: Montana
Re: RE: Re: Very Early Big Sky predictions
Cluck U wrote:Stony Brook a tough team?Bisonfanatical wrote: Stony brook is such a tough team .. hard to say ... what a strong Defensive game that turned out to be
I see that MSU could have won their game if they had not got 17 points behind in the 1st qtr
Gregor ik's defense gelled for the next 3 qtrs .. do you think that Stitt will regret letting him go to brand X before this year is over?
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
STONY BROOK?
Bwahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Holy crap...that is hilarious.
They did have one of the best defenses in the nation last year.
They've also been in the playoffs in the last 5 years, unlike another school further down the Atlantic.
-
- Supporter
- Posts: 59462
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: RE: Re: Very Early Big Sky predictions
I SB can play a little O that might not end up being such a bad road loss.Mvemjsunpx wrote:Cluck U wrote:
Stony Brook a tough team?
STONY BROOK?
Bwahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!
Holy crap...that is hilarious.
They did have one of the best defenses in the nation last year.
They've also been in the playoffs in the last 5 years, unlike another school further down the Atlantic.
Re: Very Early Big Sky predictions
I really don't expect that you can grasp this ... but I will try
For several years running, Stony Brook had a nationally ranked defense (tough word?). Last year for instance
Total Defense (nationally)
3. Stony Brook
5. Bison
14. UNI
34. UND (Chicken hawks)
39. GRIZZZ
80. Cal Poly
95. E Wash (wow)
114. MSU
Defensively they are tough
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
For several years running, Stony Brook had a nationally ranked defense (tough word?). Last year for instance
Total Defense (nationally)
3. Stony Brook
5. Bison
14. UNI
34. UND (Chicken hawks)
39. GRIZZZ
80. Cal Poly
95. E Wash (wow)
114. MSU
Defensively they are tough
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
- Bisonfanatical
- Level1
- Posts: 379
- Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2016 9:54 am
Re: Very Early Big Sky predictions
I really don't expect that you can grasp this ... but I will try
For several years running, Stony Brook had a nationally ranked defense (tough word?). Last year for instance
Total Defense (nationally)
3. Stony Brook
5. Bison
14. UNI
34. UND (Chicken hawks)
39. GRIZZZ
80. Cal Poly
95. E Wash (wow)
114. MSU
Defensively they are tough
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
For several years running, Stony Brook had a nationally ranked defense (tough word?). Last year for instance
Total Defense (nationally)
3. Stony Brook
5. Bison
14. UNI
34. UND (Chicken hawks)
39. GRIZZZ
80. Cal Poly
95. E Wash (wow)
114. MSU
Defensively they are tough
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
- Bisonfanatical
- Level1
- Posts: 379
- Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2016 9:54 am
Re: Very Early Big Sky predictions
P.s. I wouldn't be surprised to see MSU and UM flip spots in the next couple years?
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
- Bisonfanatical
- Level1
- Posts: 379
- Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2016 9:54 am
Re: Very Early Big Sky predictions
FWIW ... my post started as being attached to "cluck u", not sure what happened
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
- 89Hen
- Supporter
- Posts: 39224
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
- I am a fan of: High Horses
- A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter
Re: Very Early Big Sky predictions
Anything compared to the Big Sky looks good defensively.
- catbooster
- Level2
- Posts: 607
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 10:37 am
- I am a fan of: Montana State
Re: Very Early Big Sky predictions
It remains to be seen what happens with the Griz D - better, worse or about the same. But I think MSU's D is going to be noticeably better this year and is headed in the right direction.Bisonfanatical wrote:P.s. I wouldn't be surprised to see MSU and UM flip spots in the next couple years?
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
I'm interested to see our game this weekend. We play Bryant, who beat StFU last year by two at StFU. If we win big, I'll try to convince you that the transitive property works over two different seasons
- Bisonfanatical
- Level1
- Posts: 379
- Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2016 9:54 am
Re: RE: Re: Very Early Big Sky predictions
I saw an improvement already with the cats defense, bad 1st qtr and then things came together, held them to a field goal the second qtr, held them scoreless the entire 2nd half.catbooster wrote:It remains to be seen what happens with the Griz D - better, worse or about the same. But I think MSU's D is going to be noticeably better this year and is headed in the right direction.Bisonfanatical wrote:P.s. I wouldn't be surprised to see MSU and UM flip spots in the next couple years?
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
I'm interested to see our game this weekend. We play Bryant, who beat StFU last year by two at StFU. If we win big, I'll try to convince you that the transitive property works over two different seasons
I think coach stitt should not have scuttled those kids on scholarships, expecially the montana kids. .. if they go to MSU from now on what a loss for the Griz ... he should not have tossed aside his D coordinator to the point that he wen to the rival school?
Bison have great talent from other states BUT we value our instate kids and can't make it with our them also.
Just my thoughts .. we will see?
catbooster wrote:It remains to be seen what happens with the Griz D - better, worse or about the same. But I think MSU's D is going to be noticeably better this year and is headed in the right direction.Bisonfanatical wrote:P.s. I wouldn't be surprised to see MSU and UM flip spots in the next couple years?
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
I'm interested to see our game this weekend. We play Bryant, who beat StFU last year by two at StFU. If we win big, I'll try to convince you that the transitive property works over two different seasons
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
- Grizalltheway
- Supporter
- Posts: 35688
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
- A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
- Location: BSC
Re: RE: Re: Very Early Big Sky predictions
That's oversimplifying the Gregorak situation to say the least.Bisonfanatical wrote:I saw an improvement already with the cats defense, bad 1st qtr and then things came together, held them to a field goal the second qtr, held them scoreless the entire 2nd half.catbooster wrote: It remains to be seen what happens with the Griz D - better, worse or about the same. But I think MSU's D is going to be noticeably better this year and is headed in the right direction.
I'm interested to see our game this weekend. We play Bryant, who beat StFU last year by two at StFU. If we win big, I'll try to convince you that the transitive property works over two different seasons
I think coach stitt should not have scuttled those kids on scholarships, expecially the montana kids. .. if they go to MSU from now on what a loss for the Griz ... he should not have tossed aside his D coordinator to the point that he wen to the rival school?
Bison have great talent from other states BUT we value our instate kids and can't make it with our them also.
Just my thoughts .. we will see?catbooster wrote: It remains to be seen what happens with the Griz D - better, worse or about the same. But I think MSU's D is going to be noticeably better this year and is headed in the right direction.
I'm interested to see our game this weekend. We play Bryant, who beat StFU last year by two at StFU. If we win big, I'll try to convince you that the transitive property works over two different seasons
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
As for Dalton Daum, he's a prima dona who will fit in perfectly over there...
- Wildcat Ryan
- Level3
- Posts: 2798
- Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 6:59 pm
- I am a fan of: WEBER STATE
- A.K.A.: WILDCAT, WILDCATFAN
Re: Very Early Big Sky predictions
Wildcat Ryan wrote:Cal Poly- 6-5. 5-3
@ Nevada-L
San Diego-W
@ South Dakota State-L
Montana-W
@ North Dakota-L
@ Portland State-L
UC Davis-W
@ Sac State-W
Eastern Washington-W
@ Weber State-L
Northern Colorado-W
Eastern Washington- 4-7, 4-4
@ Washington St-L
@ North Dakota St-L
Northern Iowa-L
@ Northern Arizona-L
UC Davis-W
Northern Colorado-W
@ Montana State-L
Montana-W
@ Cal Poly-L
Idaho State-W
@ Portland State-L
Idaho State- 2-9, 1-7
Simon Fraser-W
@ Colorado-L
@ Oregon State-L
Sac State-W
@ Portland State-L
@ Northern Arizona-L
North Dakota-L
Southern Utah-L
@ Montana-L
@ Eastern Washington-L
Weber State-L
Montana- 7-4, 5-3
St. Francis-W
@ Northern Iowa-L
@ Cal Poly-L
Southern Utah-W
Miss Valley St-W
Sac State-W
@ Northern Arizona-L
@ Eastern Washington-L
Idaho State-W
@ Northern Colorado-W
Montana State-W
Montana State- 6-5, 4-4
@ Idaho-L
Bryant-W
Western Oregon-W
North Dakota-W
@ Sac State- W
Northern Arizona-L
@ Weber State-L
Eastern Washington-W
@ Southern Utah-L
UC Davis-W
@ Montana-L
North Dakota- 9-2, 7-1
@ Stony Brook-W
@ Bowling Green-L
South Dakota-W
@ Montana State-L
Cal Poly-W
@ Sac State- W
Southern Utah-W
@ Idaho State-W
Weber State-W
@ Northern Colorado-W
Northern Arizona-W
Northern Arizona- 9-2, 7-1
@ Arizona State- L
@ Western Illinois-W
New Mexico HL-W
Eastern Washington-W
@ Northern Colorado-W
@ Montana State-W
Idaho State-W
Montana-W
@ Weber State-W
@ North Dakota-L
Southern Utah-W
Northern Colorado- 2-9, 1-7
Rocky Mountain-W
@ Abilene Christian-L
@ Colorado State-L
Northern Arizona-L
@ Eastern Washington-L
@ UC Davis-L
Sac State-W
@ Portland State-L
North Dakota-L
Montana-L
@ Cal Poly-L
Portland State- 8-3, 7-1
Central Washington-W
@ San Jose State-L
@ Washington-L
@ Southern Utah-W
Idaho State-W
@ Weber State-L
Cal Poly-W
Northern Colorado-W
@ UC Davis-W
@ Sac State-W
Eastern Washington-W
Southern Utah- 4-7, 3-5
@ Utah-L
SE Louisiana-W
Portland State-L
@ Montana-L
UC Davis-W
@ North Dakota-L
Weber State-L
@ Idaho State-W
Montana State-W
@ BYU-L
@ Northern Arizona-L
Sacramento State- 1-10, 0-8
Western Oregon-W
@ Fresno State-L
@ Weber State-L
@ Idaho State-L
Montana State-L
North Dakota-L
@ Montana-L
@ Northern Colorado-L
Cal Poly-L
Portland State-L
@UC Davis-L
UC Davis- 3-8, 2-6
@ Oregon-L
Southern Oregon-W
@ Wyoming-L
Weber State-L
@ Eastern Washington-L
@ Southern Utah-L
Northern Colorado-W
@ Cal Poly-L
Portland State-L
@ Montana State-L
Sacramento State-W
Weber State- 7-4, 6-2
@ Utah State-L
@ South Dakota-L
Sacramento State-W
@ UC Davis-W
Portland State-W
Montana State-W
@ Southern Utah-W
@ North Dakota-L
Northern Arizona-L
Cal Poly-W
@ Idaho State-W
Final 2016 Big Sky standings
1. North Dakota (Co-BSC Champs, autobid, playoffs)
2. Northern Arizona (Co-BSC champs, playoffs)
3. Portland State (Playoffs)
4. Weber State (Playoffs)
5. Montana (Playoffs/Outside looking in)
6.Cal Poly
7. Montana State
8. Eastern Washington
9. Southern Utah
10. UC Davis
11. Idaho State
11b/12. Northern Colorado
13. Sacramento State
Discuss , hate on , agree with , analyze , belittle , rant about , etc below.
What are your predictions?
Gonna look at these again after this weekend to see how I'm doing at the "half way mark"
- 89Hen
- Supporter
- Posts: 39224
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
- I am a fan of: High Horses
- A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter
Re: Very Early Big Sky predictions
Not too well.Wildcat Ryan wrote:Gonna look at these again after this weekend to see how I'm doing at the "half way mark"Wildcat Ryan wrote:Eastern Washington- 4-7, 4-4
@ Washington St-L
@ North Dakota St-L
Northern Iowa-L
@ Northern Arizona-L
Montana- 7-4, 5-3
St. Francis-W
@ Northern Iowa-L
@ Cal Poly-L
- Wildcat Ryan
- Level3
- Posts: 2798
- Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 6:59 pm
- I am a fan of: WEBER STATE
- A.K.A.: WILDCAT, WILDCATFAN
Re: Very Early Big Sky predictions
89Hen wrote:Not too well.Wildcat Ryan wrote: Gonna look at these again after this weekend to see how I'm doing at the "half way mark"
- Screamin_Eagle174
- Supporter
- Posts: 16619
- Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 12:33 pm
- I am a fan of: Peaches
- A.K.A.: SE174
- Location: Spokanistan
Re: RE: Re: Very Early Big Sky predictions
Nope, we don't. We have a Gage Gubrud, but he's pretty decent... I'm certain.AZGrizFan wrote:What's certain is MSU doesn't have a Travis Lulay and EWU doesn't have a Vernon Adams. Thus, UM rises to the top again and resumes its rightful place as Big Sky champion.Wildcat Ryan wrote:
Like I said before, it's a 50/50 game, one that Montana can win just as easliy as lose, Home field helps in a lot of ways, Montana fans should know this more than most. And yes, I can say that I watched part of the game, until it got incredibly lopsided and I turned to a different game.
I watched UM beat NDSU, then turn around and lose to Cal Poly, Watched Montana escape Pocatello with a win thanks to a botched ISU snap then the following week watched them curbstomp EWU. I watched Weber get curbstomped by Southern Utah only to win in Missoula the next week. I also watched a bad Northern Colorado almost beat EWU in Greeley.
What I guess Im saying is nothing is certain anymore.
http://www.fcs.football/cfb/players.asp ... 5&team=113
Sent from my SM-G930R4 using Tapatalk
Re: Very Early Big Sky predictions
Interesting that in only 6 games played, Gubrud already own the single game record for offensive yards, and 5 out of 10 best single game performances. That's ridiculous.
- AZGrizFan
- Supporter
- Posts: 59959
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
- I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
- Location: Just to the right of center
Re: RE: Re: Very Early Big Sky predictions
Guess we shall see what happens when an irresistible force meets an immovable object.Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:Nope, we don't. We have a Gage Gubrud, but he's pretty decent... I'm certain.AZGrizFan wrote:
What's certain is MSU doesn't have a Travis Lulay and EWU doesn't have a Vernon Adams. Thus, UM rises to the top again and resumes its rightful place as Big Sky champion.
http://www.fcs.football/cfb/players.asp ... 5&team=113
Sent from my SM-G930R4 using Tapatalk
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
- Grizalltheway
- Supporter
- Posts: 35688
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
- A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
- Location: BSC
Re: RE: Re: Very Early Big Sky predictions
Griz are scoring 46 per game and allowing 21. Looks like we have both.AZGrizFan wrote:Guess we shall see what happens when an irresistible force meets an immovable object.Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:
Nope, we don't. We have a Gage Gubrud, but he's pretty decent... I'm certain.
http://www.fcs.football/cfb/players.asp ... 5&team=113
Sent from my SM-G930R4 using Tapatalk
-
- Moderator Team
- Posts: 10767
- Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 2:42 pm
- I am a fan of: Montana
- A.K.A.: The Russian
- Location: Missoula, MT
Re: RE: Re: Very Early Big Sky predictions
Physics show that if an immovable object is hit by an unstoppable force they would just go through each other without affecting each other in anyway.AZGrizFan wrote:Guess we shall see what happens when an irresistible force meets an immovable object.Screamin_Eagle174 wrote:
Nope, we don't. We have a Gage Gubrud, but he's pretty decent... I'm certain.
http://www.fcs.football/cfb/players.asp ... 5&team=113
Sent from my SM-G930R4 using Tapatalk
-
- Supporter
- Posts: 59462
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: RE: Re: Very Early Big Sky predictions
Griz are tearing it up but perhaps someone should pull up the offensive rankings of their opponents.Grizalltheway wrote:Griz are scoring 46 per game and allowing 21. Looks like we have both.AZGrizFan wrote:
Guess we shall see what happens when an irresistible force meets an immovable object.