Political memes, Posters, Funny Pics, Etc.

[Ivytalk]

So brave...

She’ll be the honored guest at halftime of an EWU home game next year.

[Gil Dobie]

[kalm]

[Ibanez]

Whoa....I must've missed the China connection. I'm sure you have proof. Please provide. EVERY HUMINT asses in China was arrested and executed? That smells like....


Yes, i'm calling bullshit on you.


Aside from that, you'll see on here that me, 93, CID and others that have held (continue to hold) security clearances all agree that she violated her agreement to safeguard communications no matter the security level.

I refer you to Lisa Page's congressional testimony.

Also:

https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/08/15/bo ... elligence/

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/ ... g-service/

A lot of things aren't widely reported by the MSM for a variety of reasons -- mostly political. MSM didn't report on the ass-whipping the Russians got in Syria at the hands of the USMC. It might have made Trump look good vis-a-vis the Russians. The MSM sure as hell isn't going to report that Hillary got a bunch of our intel assets whacked, because, you know, Trump.

I’ll take a page from the Republican playbook- she’s a liar.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Col Hogan]

[Ibanez]

Whoa....I must've missed the China connection. I'm sure you have proof. Please provide. EVERY HUMINT asses in China was arrested and executed? That smells like.... :****:


Yes, i'm calling bullshit on you.


Aside from that, you'll see on here that me, 93, CID and others that have held (continue to hold) security clearances all agree that she violated her agreement to safeguard communications no matter the security level.

I’m going to have to go a little F. Lee Jelly on you here for a moment....

She did a little more than just violate her agreement - she violated the law in a very cut and dried way - a law that does not involve intent as an element

With that out of the way.... I never heard about HUMINT assets in China being whacked as a result- I think if that was substantiated we would have heard about it outside the realm of InfoWars

I know she violated the law. - that’s consequence of violating the NDA.


I still call BS in the HUMINT assets. People like BDK and Citgrad don’t trust the “MSM” because it doesn’t conform to their opinions and views. That doesn’t make CNN illegitimate. Surely there’s a bias and surely you can’t believe everything you read. They fail to understand or accept the fact that wherever they choose to get their news- they are also biased and will spin a story, embellish a story or just make up a story to support their ideals.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[HI54UNI]

[CitadelGrad]

I’m going to have to go a little F. Lee Jelly on you here for a moment....

She did a little more than just violate her agreement - she violated the law in a very cut and dried way - a law that does not involve intent as an element

With that out of the way.... I never heard about HUMINT assets in China being whacked as a result- I think if that was substantiated we would have heard about it outside the realm of InfoWars

I know she violated the law. - that’s consequence of violating the NDA.


I still call BS in the HUMINT assets. People like BDK and Citgrad don’t trust the “MSM” because it doesn’t conform to their opinions and views. That doesn’t make CNN illegitimate. Surely there’s a bias and surely you can’t believe everything you read. They fail to understand or accept the fact that wherever they choose to get their news- they are also biased and will spin a story, embellish a story or just make up a story to support their ideals.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

NYT reported on the rollup of HUMINT assets in China. Of course, they didn't attribute it to Hillary, but they did report it.

[Ibanez]

I know she violated the law. - that’s consequence of violating the NDA.


I still call BS in the HUMINT assets. People like BDK and Citgrad don’t trust the “MSM” because it doesn’t conform to their opinions and views. That doesn’t make CNN illegitimate. Surely there’s a bias and surely you can’t believe everything you read. They fail to understand or accept the fact that wherever they choose to get their news- they are also biased and will spin a story, embellish a story or just make up a story to support their ideals.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

NYT reported on the rollup of HUMINT assets in China. Of course, they didn't attribute it to Hillary, but they did report it.

Trump said the NYT was fake news. How can I trust it?!

[Chizzang]

NYT reported on the rollup of HUMINT assets in China. Of course, they didn't attribute it to Hillary, but they did report it.

Trump said the NYT was fake news. How can I trust it?!

All things that implicate Trump are fake news



all things that confirm my bias are real news


(DONE!)

[ALPHAGRIZ1]

Thanks for being there to correct all of us uneducated folk!

[Chizzang]

Thanks for being there to correct all of us uneducated folk!

It's my pleasure to be here supporting you

[ALPHAGRIZ1]

THANKS!

[CitadelGrad]

NYT reported on the rollup of HUMINT assets in China. Of course, they didn't attribute it to Hillary, but they did report it.

Trump said the NYT was fake news. How can I trust it?!

You wanted an MSM source. Here's your fvcking MSM source.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/20/worl ... onage.html

[mainejeff]

[Ibanez]

Trump said the NYT was fake news. How can I trust it?!

You wanted an MSM source. Here's your fvcking MSM source.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/20/worl ... onage.html

Trump said the NYT was fake news. How can I trust it?!

[CID1990]

Trump said the NYT was fake news. How can I trust it?!

You wanted an MSM source. Here's your fvcking MSM source.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/20/worl ... onage.html

The Chinese breach is well known and well documented

What is at issue here is that you tied it into Hillary’s security violations. As egregious as she was I haven’t seen any evidence that her intentional spillage of classified had anything to do with the disaster in China


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Ibanez]

You wanted an MSM source. Here's your fvcking MSM source.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/20/worl ... onage.html

The Chinese breach is well known and well documented

What is at issue here is that you tied it into Hillary’s security violations. As egregious as she was I haven’t seen any evidence that her intentional spillage of classified had anything to do with the disaster in China


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Preach, sister!

[CitadelGrad]

You wanted an MSM source. Here's your fvcking MSM source.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/20/worl ... onage.html

The Chinese breach is well known and well documented

What is at issue here is that you tied it into Hillary’s security violations. As egregious as she was I haven’t seen any evidence that her intentional spillage of classified had anything to do with the disaster in China


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I find it odd that CIA so casually revealed the disaster and took responsibility for it. This is an organization whose currency is anything but transparency. They are as afraid of bad publicity as the U.S. military is and are always in fear of the next Frank Church.

So who was actually held accountable? Nobody I'm aware of. CIA's admission was the equivalent of an, "Oops, my bad."

We know that CIA is very much a part of the deep state. Clapper, Brennan and many others had a vested interest in seeing Hillary win. CIA's casual acknowledgement seems like a cover for Hillary.

[CitadelGrad]

They don't need to be told what offends them. That's why Trump won the election.

[Chizzang]

They don't need to be told what offends them. That's why Trump won the election.

Trump won the Electoral College
He lost the election

[Ibanez]

The Chinese breach is well known and well documented

What is at issue here is that you tied it into Hillary’s security violations. As egregious as she was I haven’t seen any evidence that her intentional spillage of classified had anything to do with the disaster in China


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I find it odd that CIA so casually revealed the disaster and took responsibility for it. This is an organization whose currency is anything but transparency. They are as afraid of bad publicity as the U.S. military is and are always in fear of the next Frank Church.

So who was actually held accountable? Nobody I'm aware of. CIA's admission was the equivalent of an, "Oops, my bad."

We know that CIA is very much a part of the deep state. Clapper, Brennan and many others had a vested interest in seeing Hillary win. CIA's casual acknowledgement seems like a cover for Hillary.

So..you have no proof of your claim about China murdering HUMINT in relation to HRC.

[AZGrizFan]

Coming from a supporter of the party that is literally offended by EVERYTHING, that's fucking rich.

[dbackjon]

My male liberal SJW guilt prevents me from using a laughing emoji.

[AZGrizFan]

My male liberal SJW guilt prevents me from using a laughing emoji.

I bet it does. Not mine.