Apparently neither does Schiff.Skjellyfetti wrote:SDHornet wrote:Schiff is on the intel committee so he would have a good idea on "inside info" that is leaked to him...
"Leaked" to the chair of HPSCI...
I don't think that word means what you think it does.
Wanna bet?∞∞∞ wrote:Manafort will serve a total of 90 months in jail between the first sentencing and today's.
(7.5 years)
Even with the New York charges? He'll probably end up in prison for the rest of his life.ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:Wanna bet?∞∞∞ wrote:Manafort will serve a total of 90 months in jail between the first sentencing and today's.
(7.5 years)
I may be wrong, but I have a hunch the NY charges won’t be tried.∞∞∞ wrote:Even with the New York charges? He'll probably end up in prison for the rest of his life.ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:
Wanna bet?
Boy when all these dream teamers came on board it sure was a big dealSDHornet wrote:Weissmann leaving Mueller's super duper justice league team. Stepping down without a Trump Russian collusion charge...hhhmmmm...
https://www.npr.org/2019/03/14/70310807 ... -be-ending
Collusion isn’t a crime so there couldn’t be a charge for it. The media screwed up by using that word and not conspiracy.SDHornet wrote:Weissmann leaving Mueller's super duper justice league team. Stepping down without a Trump Russian collusion charge...hhhmmmm...
https://www.npr.org/2019/03/14/70310807 ... -be-ending
How about we use conspiracy then? I’ve said it like this right here on this here thread before (many times)Ibanez wrote:Collusion isn’t a crime so there couldn’t be a charge for it. The media screwed up by using that word and not conspiracy.SDHornet wrote:Weissmann leaving Mueller's super duper justice league team. Stepping down without a Trump Russian collusion charge...hhhmmmm...
https://www.npr.org/2019/03/14/70310807 ... -be-ending
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yeah Cid, that’s what I’ve been saying for two years. That’s what I said in my post that you quoted. Call it what it is- conspiracy. I’m not sure why your panties are in a bunch.CID1990 wrote:How about we use conspiracy then? I’ve said it like this right here on this here thread before (many times)Ibanez wrote: Collusion isn’t a crime so there couldn’t be a charge for it. The media screwed up by using that word and not conspiracy.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Conspiracy with Russians to throw the elections
Does that work?
PS- it didn’t happen
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Well, “collusion” is not the title of a crime, but it succinctly describes the element of the crime that is being alleged by those who are convinced it happened. “Collusion” is a tidy way to describe “conspiring with Russians to throw the election”Ibanez wrote:Yeah Cid, that’s what I’ve been saying for two years. That’s what I said in my post that you quoted. Call it what it is- conspiracy. I’m not sure why your panties are in a bunch.CID1990 wrote:
How about we use conspiracy then? I’ve said it like this right here on this here thread before (many times)
Conspiracy with Russians to throw the elections
Does that work?
PS- it didn’t happen
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Give it the name of the crime. And if there’s proof, deal with it. If not, let’s move on.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That’s a good summary. JSO- take a clueCID1990 wrote:Well, “collusion” is not the title of a crime, but it succinctly describes the element of the crime that is being alleged by those who are convinced it happened. “Collusion” is a tidy way to describe “conspiring with Russians to throw the election”Ibanez wrote: Yeah Cid, that’s what I’ve been saying for two years. That’s what I said in my post that you quoted. Call it what it is- conspiracy. I’m not sure why your panties are in a bunch.
Give it the name of the crime. And if there’s proof, deal with it. If not, let’s move on.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Takes less time to type, too
https://www.propublica.org/article/fede ... ssion=trueFederal Authorities Raided Trump Fundraiser’s Office in Money Laundering Probe
Federal authorities raided the office of Republican fundraiser Elliott Broidy last summer, seeking records related to his dealings with foreign officials and Trump administration associates, according to a sealed search warrant obtained by ProPublica.
Agents were authorized to use the megadonor’s hands and face to unlock any phones that required fingerprint or facial scans.
The Washington Post reported in August that the Justice Department was investigating Broidy. The sealed warrant offers new details of federal authorities’ investigation of allegations that Broidy had attempted to cash in on his Trump White House connections in dealings with foreign officials. It also shows that the government took a more aggressive approach with the Trump ally than was previously known, entering his office and removing records — just as it did with Trump’s personal lawyer Michael Cohen.
Broidy served as a major Trump campaign fundraiser and was the national deputy finance chair of the Republican National Committee until he resigned in April 2018, when it was revealed he had agreed to secretly pay off a former Playboy model in exchange for her silence about their affair.
The search warrant cites three potential crimes that authorities are investigating: conspiracy, money laundering and violations of the law barring covert lobbying on behalf of foreign officials. To obtain a search warrant, authorities have to convince a judge that there’s a probable cause they will find evidence of those specific crimes.
Whatever the conclusions, I hope it becomes public.Ibanez wrote:The report is in.
Now we play the waiting game
Yeah it’s hardly a revelation the Trump Inc. was knee deep in it with the ruskies. The only question is whether any of it was illegal.Ivytalk wrote:JellyBelly = The New Spandos
Not from the special counsel's office, but permanent prosecuting offices might not be done.Pwns wrote:No more indictments.
Yup. Sitting presidents don’t get indicted.Pwns wrote:No more indictments.
And if "Individual #1" is Trump, he's already been named as a non-indicted conspirator to Cohen and others.Ibanez wrote:Yup. Sitting presidents don’t get indicted.Pwns wrote:No more indictments.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You'd think of all people, CID would know that.93henfan wrote:This thing is faaaaaaaaaar from over. I wouldn't spike that football just yet.
