April 2019 Presidential Preference Poll

Political discussions

Who would you vote for today?

Poll ended at Wed May 15, 2019 12:15 pm

Trump no matter what
13
35%
The Democrat no matter what
10
27%
Third Party/Independent/Write-in/Blank no matter what
7
19%
Trump, unless the donks nominate ___, which is unlikely
1
3%
The Democrat, unless the donks nominate ____, which is unlikely.
0
No votes
Third Party or Independent, unless the donks nominate ____, which is unlikely.
3
8%
Fvck dis Schit what's the point 2020
3
8%
 
Total votes: 37

Ursus A. Horribilis
Maroon Supporter
Maroon Supporter
Posts: 21613
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 12:17 pm
I am a fan of: Montana Grizzlies
A.K.A.: Bill Brasky

Re: April 2019 Presidential Preference Poll

Post by Ursus A. Horribilis »

AZGrizFan wrote:
89Hen wrote: Really? So telling folks to "have a spine" isn't telling folks that it's somehow brave to vote that way? Yeah, OK. :coffee:
I'm saying vote your conscience. Is that really that difficult to comprehend? Saying "I'm a third party guy but I don't want to waste my vote" is more damning than voting for a third party guy with (assumingly) no chance of winning.

Voting for one of the two major parties is literally throwing your vote away because there's NO difference other than semantics.

But hey, you do you bro.
I appreciate your ability to express this sentiment. I don't think I will be a third party guy this time but can't say for sure at this point.
Ursus A. Horribilis
Maroon Supporter
Maroon Supporter
Posts: 21613
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 12:17 pm
I am a fan of: Montana Grizzlies
A.K.A.: Bill Brasky

Re: April 2019 Presidential Preference Poll

Post by Ursus A. Horribilis »

kalm wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote:
I'm saying vote your conscience. Is that really that difficult to comprehend? Saying "I'm a third party guy but I don't want to waste my vote" is more damning than voting for a third party guy with (assumingly) no chance of winning.

Voting for one of the two major parties is literally throwing your vote away because there's NO difference other than semantics.

But hey, you do you bro.
:nod:

And nothing changes.

It’s like the old Yogi Berra line...if you don’t go to other people’s funerals they won’t go to yours.

(I’m actually not sure if the two concepts are alike at all but since I’m quoting Z it seemed like a good fit here :mrgreen: )
They are not and that is why it is a home run. :lol:
User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 59959
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Re: April 2019 Presidential Preference Poll

Post by AZGrizFan »

93henfan wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote:
Stack up the tax cut against the "pay freeze". See if you came out ahead.
A temporary win that increased the federal debt. That'll completely screw over our kids. Some day, the reckoning is coming to all of us for Trump's corporate and billionaire welfare program. :nod:

Pretty much every billionaire out there (Gates, Buffett, etc) will tell you that they should be paying more and not less taxes for the long term health of the country.
Then why don't they? They're free to send in a check any time they want...
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Image
User avatar
GannonFan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 18033
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
I am a fan of: Delaware
A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack

Re: April 2019 Presidential Preference Poll

Post by GannonFan »

mainejeff wrote:
GannonFan wrote:Well, I'm not voting Trump, so it's the Democrat unless they're crazy, but that could be likely, so I don't see the option clearly defined.
Possible crazies....Sanders, Beto, Warren. I'd vote for all of them over the insane Trump.

:coffee:
I'm not casting a vote for Beto (dumb as bricks) or for Warren (too old and really more of a Senator than President), and certainly not for Trump (buffoon). Sanders I'm up in the air on - I would've voted for him last time, and would probably do so again. Depends on the makeup of Congress, though. Voting for him last time wouldn't have been a problem, he'd never would've gotten any of his more crazy ideas through Congress. I don't think the Senate is going Democratic this time around, but it could be close, so now he's more of a risk. Besides, he's old, so when push comes to shove, I'm voting for a younger person.
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
User avatar
89Hen
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 39223
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: High Horses
A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter

Re: April 2019 Presidential Preference Poll

Post by 89Hen »

AZGrizFan wrote:
89Hen wrote: Really? So telling folks to "have a spine" isn't telling folks that it's somehow brave to vote that way? Yeah, OK. :coffee:
I'm saying vote your conscience. Is that really that difficult to comprehend? Saying "I'm a third party guy but I don't want to waste my vote" is more damning than voting for a third party guy with (assumingly) no chance of winning.

Voting for one of the two major parties is literally throwing your vote away because there's NO difference other than semantics.

But hey, you do you bro.
You're joking, right? Voting for either party is throwing away your vote, even though one of them will win? Whereas voting third party is not a waste, even though your vote will be going to somebody who will get maybe 5% of the vote in a good year?

And voting your conscience is only if they vote how you say they should vote? :lol:
Image
Ivytalk
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 26827
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:22 pm
I am a fan of: Salisbury University
Location: Republic of Western Sussex

Re: April 2019 Presidential Preference Poll

Post by Ivytalk »

GannonFan wrote:
mainejeff wrote:
Possible crazies....Sanders, Beto, Warren. I'd vote for all of them over the insane Trump.

:coffee:
I'm not casting a vote for Beto (dumb as bricks) or for Warren (too old and really more of a Senator than President), and certainly not for Trump (buffoon). Sanders I'm up in the air on - I would've voted for him last time, and would probably do so again. Depends on the makeup of Congress, though. Voting for him last time wouldn't have been a problem, he'd never would've gotten any of his more crazy ideas through Congress. I don't think the Senate is going Democratic this time around, but it could be close, so now he's more of a risk. Besides, he's old, so when push comes to shove, I'm voting for a younger person.
I thought you were more or less of a centrist. Your position makes no sense. You’d vote for Sanders only if you are convinced that none of his “more crazy ideas” would be enacted into law. Got it. Also, please let us know what his “less crazy ideas” are, beyond conventional Donk stuff.
“I’m tired and done.” — 89Hen 3/27/22.
User avatar
GannonFan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 18033
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
I am a fan of: Delaware
A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack

Re: April 2019 Presidential Preference Poll

Post by GannonFan »

Ivytalk wrote:
GannonFan wrote:
I'm not casting a vote for Beto (dumb as bricks) or for Warren (too old and really more of a Senator than President), and certainly not for Trump (buffoon). Sanders I'm up in the air on - I would've voted for him last time, and would probably do so again. Depends on the makeup of Congress, though. Voting for him last time wouldn't have been a problem, he'd never would've gotten any of his more crazy ideas through Congress. I don't think the Senate is going Democratic this time around, but it could be close, so now he's more of a risk. Besides, he's old, so when push comes to shove, I'm voting for a younger person.
I thought you were more or less of a centrist. Your position makes no sense. You’d vote for Sanders only if you are convinced that none of his “more crazy ideas” would be enacted into law. Got it. Also, please let us know what his “less crazy ideas” are, beyond conventional Donk stuff.
I am a centrist - that ties in fine with a President that would have to work with an opposing party in Congress to advance their ideas. Ideally, a more left-ward leaning President would be brought closer to the center by a right-wing based Congress that would also have to tack more towards the center and the net result of compromise would be something towards the middle. Worst case, gridlock, which for all of its faults doesn't really lean left or right - again, stuck in the middle. Makes perfect sense if you think on it. :coffee:
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
Ivytalk
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 26827
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:22 pm
I am a fan of: Salisbury University
Location: Republic of Western Sussex

Re: April 2019 Presidential Preference Poll

Post by Ivytalk »

GannonFan wrote:
Ivytalk wrote: I thought you were more or less of a centrist. Your position makes no sense. You’d vote for Sanders only if you are convinced that none of his “more crazy ideas” would be enacted into law. Got it. Also, please let us know what his “less crazy ideas” are, beyond conventional Donk stuff.
I am a centrist - that ties in fine with a President that would have to work with an opposing party in Congress to advance their ideas. Ideally, a more left-ward leaning President would be brought closer to the center by a right-wing based Congress that would also have to tack more towards the center and the net result of compromise would be something towards the middle. Worst case, gridlock, which for all of its faults doesn't really lean left or right - again, stuck in the middle. Makes perfect sense if you think on it. :coffee:
If you say so. :roll:
“I’m tired and done.” — 89Hen 3/27/22.
User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 59959
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Re: April 2019 Presidential Preference Poll

Post by AZGrizFan »

89Hen wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote:
I'm saying vote your conscience. Is that really that difficult to comprehend? Saying "I'm a third party guy but I don't want to waste my vote" is more damning than voting for a third party guy with (assumingly) no chance of winning.

Voting for one of the two major parties is literally throwing your vote away because there's NO difference other than semantics.

But hey, you do you bro.
You're joking, right? Voting for either party is throwing away your vote, even though one of them will win? Whereas voting third party is not a waste, even though your vote will be going to somebody who will get maybe 5% of the vote in a good year?

And voting your conscience is only if they vote how you say they should vote? :lol:
Jesus, you're being exceptionally dense today. :dunce: :dunce: :dunce:

It's throwing away your vote because in the long run it DOES. NOT. MATTER. If either of the major party candidates win, it's same ol' same ol'....wanting change and then voting for the same thing over and over again...the definition of insanity. Again, is that REALLY that difficult of a concept to grasp?
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Image
User avatar
dbackjon
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 45610
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
A.K.A.: He/Him
Location: Scottsdale

Re: April 2019 Presidential Preference Poll

Post by dbackjon »

AZGrizFan wrote:
89Hen wrote: You're joking, right? Voting for either party is throwing away your vote, even though one of them will win? Whereas voting third party is not a waste, even though your vote will be going to somebody who will get maybe 5% of the vote in a good year?

And voting your conscience is only if they vote how you say they should vote? :lol:
Jesus, you're being exceptionally dense today. :dunce: :dunce: :dunce:

It's throwing away your vote because in the long run it DOES. NOT. MATTER. If either of the major party candidates win, it's same ol' same ol'....wanting change and then voting for the same thing over and over again...the definition of insanity. Again, is that REALLY that difficult of a concept to grasp?

Jesus playing 2nd base for the Grizzlies this past weekend. The other Jesus played outfield, along with my Angels. Joseph was both the pitcher and the catcher. As for the Virgin Mary, no virgins on my team.
:thumb:
User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 59959
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Re: April 2019 Presidential Preference Poll

Post by AZGrizFan »

dbackjon wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote:
Jesus, you're being exceptionally dense today. :dunce: :dunce: :dunce:

It's throwing away your vote because in the long run it DOES. NOT. MATTER. If either of the major party candidates win, it's same ol' same ol'....wanting change and then voting for the same thing over and over again...the definition of insanity. Again, is that REALLY that difficult of a concept to grasp?

Jesus playing 2nd base for the Grizzlies this past weekend. The other Jesus played outfield, along with my Angels. Joseph was both the pitcher and the catcher. As for the Virgin Mary, no virgins on my team.
I bet he was. :ohno: :ohno:
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Image
User avatar
BDKJMU
Level5
Level5
Posts: 27895
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
I am a fan of: JMU
A.K.A.: BDKJMU
Location: Philly Burbs

Re: April 2019 Presidential Preference Poll

Post by BDKJMU »

AZGrizFan wrote:
89Hen wrote: Really? So telling folks to "have a spine" isn't telling folks that it's somehow brave to vote that way? Yeah, OK. :coffee:
I'm saying vote your conscience. Is that really that difficult to comprehend? Saying "I'm a third party guy but I don't want to waste my vote" is more damning than voting for a third party guy with (assumingly) no chance of winning.

Voting for one of the two major parties is literally throwing your vote away because there's NO difference other than semantics.

But hey, you do you bro.
Have to disagree with you there. I don’t think a Clinton admin would have done/be doing the same policy wise as the Trump admin. Sure, there’s some areas where the only difference is the rhetoric, but other areas where there is a HUGE difference.
..peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard..
..But you have to go home now. We have to have peace…
..I know how you feel, but go home, and go home in peace.
JMU Football: 2022 & 2023 Sun Belt East Champions.
User avatar
Winterborn
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 8812
Joined: Wed May 25, 2016 2:33 pm
I am a fan of: Beer and Diesel Pickups
Location: Wherever I hang my hat

Re: April 2019 Presidential Preference Poll

Post by Winterborn »

BDKJMU wrote: Have to disagree with you there. I don’t think a Clinton admin would have done/be doing the same policy wise as the Trump admin. Sure, there’s some areas where the only difference is the rhetoric, but other areas where there is a HUGE difference.
Only difference is in how long it is going to take before complete governmental control. D's will just get there quicker, but make no mistake the R's will wind up in the same spot. They are using the past voting record of the Republican name as a smoke screen. If you look at them in light of how they would compare to R's 15-20+ years ago, they would of been Democrats back then.

Sure there are a few that have held the course or have certain values that line up the same, but they are few and far between.
“The best of all things is to learn. Money can be lost or stolen, health and strength may fail, but what you have committed to your mind is yours forever.” – Louis L’Amour

“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.” - G. Michael Hopf

"I am neither especially clever nor especially gifted. I am only very, very curious.” – Albert Einstein
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 59295
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: April 2019 Presidential Preference Poll

Post by kalm »

Winterborn wrote:
BDKJMU wrote: Have to disagree with you there. I don’t think a Clinton admin would have done/be doing the same policy wise as the Trump admin. Sure, there’s some areas where the only difference is the rhetoric, but other areas where there is a HUGE difference.
Only difference is in how long it is going to take before complete governmental control. D's will just get there quicker, but make no mistake the R's will wind up in the same spot. They are using the past voting record of the Republican name as a smoke screen. If you look at them in light of how they would compare to R's 15-20+ years ago, they would of been Democrats back then.

Sure there are a few that have held the course or have certain values that line up the same, but they are few and far between.
Not economically. R’s 15 years ago were spending trillions on a war of choose, while cutting taxes, and enough of them getting ready to support Medicare Part D.
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Winterborn
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 8812
Joined: Wed May 25, 2016 2:33 pm
I am a fan of: Beer and Diesel Pickups
Location: Wherever I hang my hat

Re: April 2019 Presidential Preference Poll

Post by Winterborn »

kalm wrote:
Winterborn wrote:
Only difference is in how long it is going to take before complete governmental control. D's will just get there quicker, but make no mistake the R's will wind up in the same spot. They are using the past voting record of the Republican name as a smoke screen. If you look at them in light of how they would compare to R's 15-20+ years ago, they would of been Democrats back then.

Sure there are a few that have held the course or have certain values that line up the same, but they are few and far between.
Not economically. R’s 15 years ago were spending trillions on a war of choose, while cutting taxes, and enough of them getting ready to support Medicare Part D.
My bad, too early. They had already started to turn. :D
“The best of all things is to learn. Money can be lost or stolen, health and strength may fail, but what you have committed to your mind is yours forever.” – Louis L’Amour

“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.” - G. Michael Hopf

"I am neither especially clever nor especially gifted. I am only very, very curious.” – Albert Einstein
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 59295
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: April 2019 Presidential Preference Poll

Post by kalm »

Winterborn wrote:
kalm wrote:
Not economically. R’s 15 years ago were spending trillions on a war of choose, while cutting taxes, and enough of them getting ready to support Medicare Part D.
My bad, too early. They had already started to turn. :D
No worries. I was still voting most Democratic back then too. :oops:
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
UNI88
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 19949
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:30 am
I am a fan of: UNI
Location: the foggy, woggy banks Of the Limpopo River

Re: April 2019 Presidential Preference Poll

Post by UNI88 »

mainejeff wrote:
GannonFan wrote:Well, I'm not voting Trump, so it's the Democrat unless they're crazy, but that could be likely, so I don't see the option clearly defined.
Possible crazies....Sanders, Beto, Warren, Che, Stalin, Mao. I'd vote for all of them over the insane Trump.

:coffee:
FYP

To answer Jon's question, I would consider Buttigieg based on limited knowledge at this time but I'm not sure about D's that aren't running.
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm
User avatar
Gil Dobie
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 30939
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:45 pm
I am a fan of: Norse Dakota State
Location: Historic Leduc Estate

Re: April 2019 Presidential Preference Poll

Post by Gil Dobie »

I think it's perfect timing to put a woman in the White House, now that it won't be Hillary. Dems have a few good options at this point.
Image
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 59295
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: April 2019 Presidential Preference Poll

Post by kalm »

Gil Dobie wrote:I think it's perfect timing to put a woman in the White House, now that it won't be Hillary. Dems have a few good options at this point.
Maybe but I couldn’t care less about gender, skin color, sexual persuasion, etc. Since I’m in a safe space, I will say that women of the 2 or 3 generations currently in their political prime have overseen a massive feminization of America and not all of it is good.
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
Gil Dobie
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 30939
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:45 pm
I am a fan of: Norse Dakota State
Location: Historic Leduc Estate

Re: April 2019 Presidential Preference Poll

Post by Gil Dobie »

kalm wrote:
Gil Dobie wrote:I think it's perfect timing to put a woman in the White House, now that it won't be Hillary. Dems have a few good options at this point.
Maybe but I couldn’t care less about gender, skin color, sexual persuasion, etc. Since I’m in a safe space, I will say that women of the 2 or 3 generations currently in their political prime have overseen a massive feminization of America and not all of it is good.
..and the male domination has not exactly all been good either. There have been some great world leaders of the opposite sex.
Image
User avatar
Pwns
Level4
Level4
Posts: 7273
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 10:38 pm
I am a fan of: Georgia Friggin' Southern
A.K.A.: FCS_pwns_FBS (AGS)

Re: April 2019 Presidential Preference Poll

Post by Pwns »

My problems with the Democrats:

1. Racial resentment and identity politics. This stuff just makes it easier for the next Donald Trump to win, and leads to policies addressing non-existent problems like the alleged racial bias in police killings and school discipline.

2. I want a "too big to fail, too big to exist" policy for the mega banks. This should be a bipartisan issue. Granted Warren and Bernie have talked about this but I'm pretty sure Joe Biden's going to let them regulate themselves in exchange for a half-million dollar speech.

3. Environmental policy that has a minimal effect on the problems they're designed to solve that just make everyone's energy costs go up and causes other problems.

4. Immigration policy that works more for the Democrat party than for America. Not like it's not the same thing with the GOP, but the donks are much worse.

I'm not that afraid of the economic left at least right now, but with the current crop of donks it's very hard to not vote third party or independent.
Last edited by Pwns on Wed Apr 17, 2019 7:15 am, edited 2 times in total.
Celebrate Diversity.*
*of appearance only. Restrictions apply.
User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 59959
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Re: April 2019 Presidential Preference Poll

Post by AZGrizFan »

BDKJMU wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote:
I'm saying vote your conscience. Is that really that difficult to comprehend? Saying "I'm a third party guy but I don't want to waste my vote" is more damning than voting for a third party guy with (assumingly) no chance of winning.

Voting for one of the two major parties is literally throwing your vote away because there's NO difference other than semantics.

But hey, you do you bro.
Have to disagree with you there. I don’t think a Clinton admin would have done/be doing the same policy wise as the Trump admin. Sure, there’s some areas where the only difference is the rhetoric, but other areas where there is a HUGE difference.
Tomato tomahto. They both want to spend us into oblivion. They both spy on innocent Americans and don't call it spying. They both are only concerned about staying in power and not what's best for the country. Neither want to solve the political footballs because then they couldn't rile up the single issue mouthbreathers to come out and vote. Their proclaimed "differences" are merely a mirage. They're 90% the same and 10% different rhetoric.
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Image
User avatar
ALPHAGRIZ1
Level5
Level5
Posts: 16077
Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:26 am
I am a fan of: 1995 Montana Griz
A.K.A.: Fuck Off
Location: America: and having my rights violated on a daily basis

Re: RE: Re: April 2019 Presidential Preference Poll

Post by ALPHAGRIZ1 »

Gil Dobie wrote:
kalm wrote:
Maybe but I couldn’t care less about gender, skin color, sexual persuasion, etc. Since I’m in a safe space, I will say that women of the 2 or 3 generations currently in their political prime have overseen a massive feminization of America and not all of it is good.
..and the male domination has not exactly all been good either. There have been some great world leaders of the opposite sex.
Exactly one

(Thatcher)

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
Image

ALPHAGRIZ1 - Now available in internet black

The flat earth society has members all around the globe
User avatar
BDKJMU
Level5
Level5
Posts: 27895
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
I am a fan of: JMU
A.K.A.: BDKJMU
Location: Philly Burbs

Re: April 2019 Presidential Preference Poll

Post by BDKJMU »

AZGrizFan wrote:
BDKJMU wrote: Have to disagree with you there. I don’t think a Clinton admin would have done/be doing the same policy wise as the Trump admin. Sure, there’s some areas where the only difference is the rhetoric, but other areas where there is a HUGE difference.
Tomato tomahto. They both want to spend us into oblivion. They both spy on innocent Americans and don't call it spying. They both are only concerned about staying in power and not what's best for the country. Neither want to solve the political footballs because then they couldn't rile up the single issue mouthbreathers to come out and vote. Their proclaimed "differences" are merely a mirage. They're 90% the same and 10% different rhetoric.
You think with Clinton we would have had:
-2 SCOTUS nominations similar to Gorsuch and Kavanough + numerous conservative Circuit nominations
-Tax cuts
-Similar on Illegal Immigration
-Ending Obamacare mandate
-Similar on Deregulation
-Renegotiating NAFTA
-Similar on China.
-Nixing the terrible Iran Deal.
-Pulling out of the Paris Climate deal.
-Getting deadbeat NATO countries to pledge to pay more.
-Pulling out Syria
-Opening dialogue with North Korea

And those are just the differences off the top of my head. I don’t think with Clinton would have had the above. Big difference between the 2.
..peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard..
..But you have to go home now. We have to have peace…
..I know how you feel, but go home, and go home in peace.
JMU Football: 2022 & 2023 Sun Belt East Champions.
User avatar
Gil Dobie
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 30939
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:45 pm
I am a fan of: Norse Dakota State
Location: Historic Leduc Estate

Re: RE: Re: April 2019 Presidential Preference Poll

Post by Gil Dobie »

ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:
Gil Dobie wrote:
..and the male domination has not exactly all been good either. There have been some great world leaders of the opposite sex.
Exactly one

(Thatcher)

Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
Gandhi, Golda Meir, Cleopatra, Catherine the Great, Elizabeth I, Isabella I, etc
Image
Post Reply