A swing and a miss. But nice try.Chizzang wrote:YOU... are a fraudSeattleGriz wrote:Yep. It's from NOAA. As soon as I get home, I can post the graph.
You identified the source you wanted to use
now you're suggesting it's the wrong source
I pointed out that NOAA very rarely uses the data from their own USCRN (US Climate Reference Network), and when they do, it really messes with their published story of continually rising temperatures. If you read the information under the Time Series description, it states:
In addition, the GAO concluded:National USHCN monthly temperature updates have been discontinued. The official CONUS temperature record is now based upon nClimDiv. USHCN data for January 1895 to August 2014 will remain available for historical comparison.
So NOAA uses stations that are substandard to feed the "warmest year ever" narrative, while suppressing the actual network that was designed to not have those problems.According to GAO’s survey of weather forecast offices, about 42 percent of the active stations in 2010 did not meet one or more of the siting standards. With regard to management requirements, GAO found that the weather forecast offices had generally but not always met the requirements to conduct annual station inspections and to update station records. NOAA officials told GAO that it is important to annually visit stations and keep records up to date, including siting conditions, so that NOAA and other users of the data know the conditions under which they were recorded. NOAA officials identified a variety of challenges that contribute to some stations not adhering to siting standards and management requirements, including the use of temperature measuring equipment that is connected by a cable to an indoor readout device— which can require installing equipment closer to buildings than specified in the siting standards.
NOAA does not centrally track whether USHCN stations adhere to siting standards and the requirement to update station records, and it does not have an agency wide policy regarding stations that do not meet its siting standards. Performance management guidelines call for using performance information to assess program results. NOAA’s information systems, however, are not designed to centrally track whether stations in the USHCN meet its siting standards or the requirement to update station records. Without centrally available information, NOAA cannot easily measure the performance of the USHCN in meeting siting standards and management requirements.
Hmmm. Seems to me as if I nailed this one.
There are three data sets available. I simply used the most accurate dataset to debunk your claim.
