The Official "Making America Great Again" Thread

[BDKJMU]

Oh, do you think I approve of that? What does Trump gain from revoking awards? It’s petty. But we already knew Trump is a petty ****. He should stick to domestic policy.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I would say dealing with supposed war crimes is waaaaaay more under the purview of the president than a burglary in Boston.

Or of a homicide of some random teen in Sanford, FL, or some thug in Ferguson, MO.

[∞∞∞]

Yup. If the're wrong about Israel, they'd be happy to directly demonstrate how they're wrong.

Banning them makes it clear the women are spot-on in their criticisms.

I hope the next administration completely re-evaluates our relationship with Israel.

Please explain why they should allow them in? They've made their position on Israel very clear.

They don't have to, but If Israel bans legislative members (co-equals to the executive), they shouldn't receive aid or support from our country. Otherwise Israel doesn't have to like them or agree, but they have to acknowledge they're leaders in our representative democracy.

These aren't two random Americans they're banning.

[AZGrizFan]

Please explain why they should allow them in? They've made their position on Israel very clear.

They don't have to, but If Israel bans legislative members (co-equals to the executive), they shouldn't receive aid or support from our country. Otherwise Israel doesn't have to like them or agree, but they have to acknowledge they're leaders in our representative democracy.

These aren't two random Americans they're banning.

No, they're not. They're two "Americans" who openly support terrorist organizations who are hell-bent on destroying Israel. Go figure that Israel doesn't want them trapsing around for photo ops.

[∞∞∞]

They don't have to, but If Israel bans legislative members (co-equals to the executive), they shouldn't receive aid or support from our country. Otherwise Israel doesn't have to like them or agree, but they have to acknowledge they're leaders in our representative democracy.

These aren't two random Americans they're banning.

No, they're not. They're two "Americans" who openly support terrorist organizations who are hell-bent on destroying Israel. Go figure that Israel doesn't want them trapsing around for photo ops.

Did you know it's possible to criticize the government of a country and not the people residing in it?

[AZGrizFan]

No, they're not. They're two "Americans" who openly support terrorist organizations who are hell-bent on destroying Israel. Go figure that Israel doesn't want them trapsing around for photo ops.

Did you know it's possible to criticize the government of a country and not the people residing in it?

They support terrorist organizations. Are those organizations only trying to eliminate the government? They don't hate just the government. They hate JEWS. Period. They want to see them eradicated from the area.

[UNI88]

No, they're not. They're two "Americans" who openly support terrorist organizations who are hell-bent on destroying Israel. Go figure that Israel doesn't want them trapsing around for photo ops.

Did you know it's possible to criticize the government of a country and not the people residing in it?

They're two-faced hypocrites. They support Maduro but criticize Israel. They criticize the Venezuelan resistance but give Hamas a pass. Who is firing rockets at civilian targets from the cover of schools and who is marching in the streets to protest? It's laughable how transparent their bias is.

Israel has some share of responsibility for the Palestinians but it is no where near 100% and is close to equal to the PLO/Hamas' share. Arab and western nations also share some of the blame.

[Chizzang]

Did you know it's possible to criticize the government of a country and not the people residing in it?

They're two-faced hypocrites. They support Maduro but criticize Israel. They criticize the Venezuelan resistance but give Hamas a pass. Who is firing rockets at civilian targets from the cover of schools and who is marching in the streets to protest? It's laughable how transparent their bias is.

Israel has some share of responsibility for the Palestinians but it is no where near 100% and is close to equal to the PLO/Hamas' share. Arab and western nations also share some of the blame.

Not to mention even so much as a peep from them about the atrocities in Saudi Arabia... The mother land

[ALPHAGRIZ1]

Please explain why they should allow them in? They've made their position on Israel very clear.

They don't have to, but If Israel bans legislative members (co-equals to the executive), they shouldn't receive aid or support from our country. Otherwise Israel doesn't have to like them or agree, but they have to acknowledge they're leaders in our representative democracy.

These aren't two random Americans they're banning.

They are not even Americans so you are right

[css75]

https://www.cnn.com/2019/08/15/politics ... index.html



What a thin-skinned punk.

Yup. If the're wrong about Israel, they'd be happy to directly demonstrate how they're wrong.

Banning them makes it clear the women are spot-on in their criticisms.

I hope the next administration completely re-evaluates our relationship with Israel.

They said many negative things about Israel, including a boycott, what do those 2 dimwits expect? Good for Israel.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[Ibanez]

Yup. If the're wrong about Israel, they'd be happy to directly demonstrate how they're wrong.

Banning them makes it clear the women are spot-on in their criticisms.

I hope the next administration completely re-evaluates our relationship with Israel.

They wouldn't admit they were wrong about Israel (or anything for that matter) if you hit them in the face with the evidence.

Please explain why Isreal should allow them in? They've made their position on Israel very clear.

Why shouldn't they? Neither are criminals. They don't represent a hostile governments (sorta) or terroists organizations. They are representatives of an ally. I guess freedom of speech and free association is on a case by base basis.

I don't care for them but this is the petty bullshit that Trump can easily avoid if he wasn't so thin-skinned and a petulant child.

[Ibanez]

I would say dealing with supposed war crimes is waaaaaay more under the purview of the president than a burglary in Boston.

Or of a homicide of some random teen in Sanford, FL, or some thug in Ferguson, MO.

You don't see why the first black President was wading into a domestic conversation around race?


Surely you're not this naive. Or biased.

[Ibanez]

Did you know it's possible to criticize the government of a country and not the people residing in it?

They support terrorist organizations. Are those organizations only trying to eliminate the government? They don't hate just the government. They hate JEWS. Period. They want to see them eradicated from the area.

They said that!? Where can I read/watch this stunning revelation?!


It could've been BDK, but someone here that when Trump says stupid or hateful shit that words don't matter only actions.

So...

[AZGrizFan]

Or of a homicide of some random teen in Sanford, FL, or some thug in Ferguson, MO.

You don't see why the first black President was wading into a domestic conversation around race?


Surely you're not this naive. Or biased.

No, I don't. But if he insisted, it would have been great if he hadn't chosen to pour gasoline on a fucking fire while he was at it.

[AZGrizFan]

They support terrorist organizations. Are those organizations only trying to eliminate the government? They don't hate just the government. They hate JEWS. Period. They want to see them eradicated from the area.

They said that!? Where can I read/watch this stunning revelation?!


It could've been BDK, but someone here that when Trump says stupid or hateful shit that words don't matter only actions.

So...

It's in their DNA.

[AZGrizFan]

They wouldn't admit they were wrong about Israel (or anything for that matter) if you hit them in the face with the evidence.

Please explain why Isreal should allow them in? They've made their position on Israel very clear.

Why shouldn't they? Neither are criminals. They don't represent a hostile governments (sorta) or terroists organizations. They are representatives of an ally. I guess freedom of speech and free association is on a case by base basis.

I don't care for them but this is the petty bullshit that Trump can easily avoid if he wasn't so thin-skinned and a petulant child.

Does Israel have freedom of speech laws?

And they sure as fuck do represent terrorist organizations. Represent them. Support them. Champion their causes.

[ALPHAGRIZ1]

They wouldn't admit they were wrong about Israel (or anything for that matter) if you hit them in the face with the evidence.

Please explain why Isreal should allow them in? They've made their position on Israel very clear.

Why shouldn't they? Neither are criminals. They don't represent a hostile governments (sorta) or terroists organizations. They are representatives of an ally. I guess freedom of speech and free association is on a case by base basis.

I don't care for them but this is the petty bullshit that Trump can easily avoid if he wasn't so thin-skinned and a petulant child.

It's nothing the left doesnt do, they have free speech but they also have to deal with the consequences of their hate speak.

Good for Trump

Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk

[Ibanez]

Why shouldn't they? Neither are criminals. They don't represent a hostile governments (sorta) or terroists organizations. They are representatives of an ally. I guess freedom of speech and free association is on a case by base basis.

I don't care for them but this is the petty bullshit that Trump can easily avoid if he wasn't so thin-skinned and a petulant child.

Does Israel have freedom of speech laws?

And they sure as fuck do represent terrorist organizations. Represent them. Support them. Champion their causes.

I must’ve missed that part of their CVs. Which terrorist orgs?

America has Free Speech and because they oppose Trump, He is using his influence to make things difficult for him.


FWIW - I don’t like those two. I think they’re ridiculous and am happy that they’re only reps and not senators.





Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Ibanez]

Why shouldn't they? Neither are criminals. They don't represent a hostile governments (sorta) or terroists organizations. They are representatives of an ally. I guess freedom of speech and free association is on a case by base basis.

I don't care for them but this is the petty bullshit that Trump can easily avoid if he wasn't so thin-skinned and a petulant child.

It's nothing the left doesnt do, they have free speech but they also have to deal with the consequences of their hate speak.

Good for Trump

Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk

Oh. So does that go for Trump? He spouts hateful shit on the regular. I’m sure there’s no hypocrisy there


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[LeadBolt]

I made a trip to Israel and the Palestinian Authority last fall. There seemed to be out right overt discrimination against Christians and Jews in the Authority, but not against Muslims and Christians in Israel. The stated objective of the PLO and Hamas is outright destroying of Israel, while that of Israel is co-existence. That these two nunchucks supporting Israel ‘s destruction are banned only seems logical. I’m sure if they tempered their hate speech they would be allowed in.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[BDKJMU]

Or of a homicide of some random teen in Sanford, FL, or some thug in Ferguson, MO.

You don't see why the first black President was wading into a domestic conversation around race?


Surely you're not this naive. Or biased.

He had no business with the “Police acted stupidly”, “if I had a son he would look like Trayvon” and siding with a “hands up, don’t
shoot” narrative based on a total lie.

Surely you’re not this naive. Or biased.

[BDKJMU]

It's nothing the left doesnt do, they have free speech but they also have to deal with the consequences of their hate speak.

Good for Trump

Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk

Oh. So does that go for Trump? He spouts hateful **** on the regular. I’m sure there’s no hypocrisy there


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

No he doesn’t..You’re starting to sound like you have TDS.

[Chizzang]

Debt to GDP Ratio



https://thehill.com/opinion/national-se ... ity-threat

[ALPHAGRIZ1]

It's nothing the left doesnt do, they have free speech but they also have to deal with the consequences of their hate speak.

Good for Trump

Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk

Oh. So does that go for Trump? He spouts hateful shit on the regular. I’m sure there’s no hypocrisy there


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Please post the hateful comments all he does is propose unity and bringing the country together.

I will wait....................but I wont hold my breath

[Ibanez]

You don't see why the first black President was wading into a domestic conversation around race?


Surely you're not this naive. Or biased.

He had no business with the “Police acted stupidly”, “if I had a son he would look like Trayvon” and siding with a “hands up, don’t
shoot” narrative based on a total lie.

Surely you’re not this naive. Or biased.

I think he had every right to speak about something happening. Just as Trump does.

Doesn't mean I agree with what he said. That's the beauty of free speech that people like you tend to forget or ignore.

[Ibanez]

Oh. So does that go for Trump? He spouts hateful shit on the regular. I’m sure there’s no hypocrisy there


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Please post the hateful comments all he does is propose unity and bringing the country together.

I will wait....................but I wont hold my breath

Your troll job is obvious. You can't be this delusional.



Maybe, but I doubt it.