The Trump Whistleblower Extravaganza Thread

[Chizzang]

Ah...
"but Hilary"



I'm so glad we're still there two and a half years later

Isn't the juxtaposition ironic?

Well I do need to be careful
Last week or so I was rambling on and on about the Iraq war and "But Bush"

[GannonFan]

Easily accomplished, just give it to Hilary.

Ah...
"but Hilary"



I'm so glad we're still there two and a half years later

The "but Hillary" thing is entirely incorrect. Hillary gave money to other nations to get dirt on Trump (and maybe even Biden if the rumors are true). Trump just asked for it with the power of the office behind him. Both wrong and illegal, but different.

[89Hen]

Easily accomplished, just give it to Hilary.

Ah...
"but Hilary"



I'm so glad we're still there two and a half years later

You're really slipping lately. Have you seen a doctor? I'm worried. Not joking.

[Chizzang]

Ah...
"but Hilary"



I'm so glad we're still there two and a half years later

You're really slipping lately. Have you seen a doctor? I'm worried. Not joking.

I see the doctor every six months
it warms my charbroiled crusty old heart that you care

[Chizzang]

Ah...
"but Hilary"



I'm so glad we're still there two and a half years later

The "but Hillary" thing is entirely incorrect. Hillary gave money to other nations to get dirt on Trump (and maybe even Biden if the rumors are true). Trump just asked for it with the power of the office behind him. Both wrong and illegal, but different.

What office does Hillary hold presently..?
Or since 2013..?

[kalm]

The "but Hillary" thing is entirely incorrect. Hillary gave money to other nations to get dirt on Trump (and maybe even Biden if the rumors are true). Trump just asked for it with the power of the office behind him. Both wrong and illegal, but different.

What office does Hillary hold presently..?
Or since 2013..?

Her office occupies a corner window in many heads.

[AZGrizFan]

The "but Hillary" thing is entirely incorrect. Hillary gave money to other nations to get dirt on Trump (and maybe even Biden if the rumors are true). Trump just asked for it with the power of the office behind him. Both wrong and illegal, but different.

What office does Hillary hold presently..?
Or since 2013..?

She's the president of the left.

[AZGrizFan]

Adam Schiff making up a conversation when he has the transcript! Head of the committee no less.

Fail.

It's a memo; not a transcript. The transcript hasn't been released, and is likely on lockdown, been moved to a different server, or completely destroyed despite all the promises to release it.

Of course the whistle blower had concerns about that too:



Wonder what Trump and company are covering up...

He'll release it when Hillary releases those 33,000 emails she destroyed. Deal?

[Chizzang]

What office does Hillary hold presently..?
Or since 2013..?

She's the president of the left.

Mmmm... I see

[CAA Flagship]

What office does Hillary hold presently..?
Or since 2013..?

Her office occupies a corner window in many heads.

Good one, klammy.

[Chizzang]

It's a memo; not a transcript. The transcript hasn't been released, and is likely on lockdown, been moved to a different server, or completely destroyed despite all the promises to release it.

Of course the whistle blower had concerns about that too:



Wonder what Trump and company are covering up...

He'll release it when Hillary releases those 33,000 emails she destroyed. Deal?

I've got news for you AZ
and this isn't exactly a secret - emails cannot be "destroyed"

any junior IT tech could find them
especially 33,000



Every email sent and received comes with 'communications data'
"metadata" -- little fragments of information that carries the recipient and the sender's address, and routing data such as the IP addresses of the sender and the servers or data center that it's passed through.

Extracting this metadata is not a mystery or difficult, in fact anyone can do it

[BDKJMU]

It's a memo; not a transcript. The transcript hasn't been released, and is likely on lockdown, been moved to a different server, or completely destroyed despite all the promises to release it.

Of course the whistle blower had concerns about that too:



Wonder what Trump and company are covering up...

I get that you are saying the transcript is not the entire conversation, but it is still a transcript.

And why would they move it to a secure server? How many private conversations of Obama's were released? I can now think of three phone calls of Trump with other leaders now having been released.

Those releasing this information I hope are caught and prosecuted. It is not their job to dictate policy. We already have people who's job it is to listen in on the President's calls.

Yeah after 2017 I bet every conversation with a foreign leader was moved to a secure server with all the liberal leakers in the WH..

Trumps only mistake was having a non private conversation with president of Ukraine.

[SeattleGriz]

Just a guess, but Michael Barry Is the name being floated as the whistleblower.

https://thehill.com/policy/national-sec ... cil-report

[Skjellyfetti]

Great. I can't wait for the part of the story where the guy gets trashed by Red Hats.

[AZGrizFan]

Great. I can't wait for the part of the story where the guy gets trashed by Red Hats.

Is he 16? Y’all would know a lot about that wouldnt you?

[kalm]

I get that you are saying the transcript is not the entire conversation, but it is still a transcript.

And why would they move it to a secure server? How many private conversations of Obama's were released? I can now think of three phone calls of Trump with other leaders now having been released.

Those releasing this information I hope are caught and prosecuted. It is not their job to dictate policy. We already have people who's job it is to listen in on the President's calls.

Yeah after 2017 I bet every conversation with a foreign leader was moved to a secure server with all the liberal leakers in the WH..

Trumps only mistake was having a non private conversation with president of Ukraine.

Cynically, that might happen and probably needs to. But are you ok with President Warren privately negotiating deals on your behalf?

[BDKJMU]

Yeah after 2017 I bet every conversation with a foreign leader was moved to a secure server with all the liberal leakers in the WH..

Trumps only mistake was having a non private conversation with president of Ukraine.

Cynically, that might happen and probably needs to. But are you ok with President Warren privately negotiating deals on your behalf?

Should a POTUS be able to have a private conversation with a foreign leader? I would lean towards yes.
And if a conversation is being recorded/has a transcript, its not private.

[SeattleGriz]

Yeah after 2017 I bet every conversation with a foreign leader was moved to a secure server with all the liberal leakers in the WH..

Trumps only mistake was having a non private conversation with president of Ukraine.

Cynically, that might happen and probably needs to. But are you ok with President Warren privately negotiating deals on your behalf?

If I expect it for Trump, I have to expect it for her. I will also assume this is where the "deep state" gets to bring the car back on the road if it's in the ditch.

[JohnStOnge]

Ah...
"but Hilary"



I'm so glad we're still there two and a half years later

The "but Hillary" thing is entirely incorrect. Hillary gave money to other nations to get dirt on Trump (and maybe even Biden if the rumors are true). Trump just asked for it with the power of the office behind him. Both wrong and illegal, but different.

Hillary did not give money to other nations to get dirt on Trump or anybody else. Assuming it's what you are talking about, the Democrat Party paying a private entity (Fusion GPS) for opposition research is not paying a foreign country for opposition research. Fusion GPS had a former British intelligence professional working for it. That former British intelligence professional talked to people from various nations while gathering information. But that does not mean the Democrat Party in general or Hillary in particular paid other nations to get dirt on Trump.

Also, note that the Clinton campaign did not use any of the information in the Steele Dossier.

This crap of acting like Hillary, the Democrats, or anybody else has done crap like Trump and his people have done or are doing is nonsense.

[Ibanez]

I get that you are saying the transcript is not the entire conversation, but it is still a transcript.

And why would they move it to a secure server? How many private conversations of Obama's were released? I can now think of three phone calls of Trump with other leaders now having been released.

Those releasing this information I hope are caught and prosecuted. It is not their job to dictate policy. We already have people who's job it is to listen in on the President's calls.

Yeah after 2017 I bet every conversation with a foreign leader was moved to a secure server with all the liberal leakers in the WH..

Trumps only mistake was having a non private conversation with president of Ukraine.

Wait - are you saying that anyone who follows the law is a “liberal?”

Believe it or not but it is possible for a Republican to speak up when they see something wrong. It doesn’t make them a traitor.

You’ve gotta turn off Fox News and Rush. Reuter’s has had some really good, unbiased coverage.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Ibanez]

Cynically, that might happen and probably needs to. But are you ok with President Warren privately negotiating deals on your behalf?

Should a POTUS be able to have a private conversation with a foreign leader? I would lean towards yes.
And if a conversation is being recorded/has a transcript, its not private.

A POTUS should have those conversations.


He should not use his position for personal gain.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[HI54UNI]

So anyone want to comment on the Chairman of the Committee making quotes up for his opening statement and then calling it "parody" when he got called out on it?

[JohnStOnge]

Cynically, that might happen and probably needs to. But are you ok with President Warren privately negotiating deals on your behalf?

Should a POTUS be able to have a private conversation with a foreign leader? I would lean towards yes.
And if a conversation is being recorded/has a transcript, its not private.

There should be a record of every conversation a President has in their official capacity. I can't believe anyone would argue otherwise.

[BDKJMU]

The donks have gone full retard. I just listened to Schiff’s testimony about what was in the transcript. He was allegedly reading what Trump said, but what Schiff was saying wasn’t even remotely close to what Trump said . Schiff was clearly just making shit up to try to make Trump look as bad as possible. I wouln’t have believed it if I hadn’t heard it. I haven’t seem anything so out of a Congressman’s mouth sknce the “whole island might tip over’ comments.

I hope the donks do hold an impeachment vote. as they are clearly just making shit up about what Trump said.

[BDKJMU]

Should a POTUS be able to have a private conversation with a foreign leader? I would lean towards yes.
And if a conversation is being recorded/has a transcript, its not private.

There should be a record of every conversation a President has in their official capacity. I can't believe anyone would argue otherwise.

Ok, so you say a POTUS shouldn’t be able to have a private conversation (in their official capacity).