Wrong, Trump grovels before Putin's feet.css75 wrote:houndawg wrote:
Bullshit. Trump is the Republican party.
But it is an American Republican Party not a Russian one. Your girl pantsuit Hilly is the losing party.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
I'll have more flexibility after the election.houndawg wrote:Wrong, Trump grovels before Putin's feet.css75 wrote:
But it is an American Republican Party not a Russian one. Your girl pantsuit Hilly is the losing party.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Probably sucked him off in Helsinki.
More flexibility to lead from behind. Obama was feckless.AZGrizFan wrote:I'll have more flexibility after the election.houndawg wrote:
Wrong, Trump grovels before Putin's feet.
Probably sucked him off in Helsinki.
AZGrizFan wrote:I'll have more flexibility after the election.houndawg wrote:
Wrong, Trump grovels before Putin's feet.
Probably sucked him off in Helsinki.
And SCOTUS overturns the 9th Circuit 7-2, saying the asylum ban could go into effect..BDKJMU wrote:Partial win for Tump on barring asylum seekers in the U.S. if they first passed through another nation without seeking protection:
“A federal appeals court on Friday handed the Trump administration a partial victory in its quest for an asylum ban, appearing to clear the way for imposing it along the border in New Mexico and Texas, at least temporarily.
While the three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit upheld a lower court's decision to block the ban, it narrowed the nationwide injunction to the 9th Circuit, which encompasses district courts in the border states of Arizona and California....”
https://www.politico.com/amp/story/2019 ... p-1667003P
Good. A single circuit judge shouldn’t be able to issue a nationwide injunction- the injunction should be limited to his/her circuit. A say single 9th Circuit Judge shouldn’t be able to issue an injunction that rules on what can happen in say the 5th Circuit, without a single 5th Circuit nudge having the opportunity to overturn the injunction applying in the 5th Circuit.
..peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard..
Sotomayor's dissent is full of emotion and "this is not how it's done" SJW language but curiously free of actual legal opinionBDKJMU wrote:And SCOTUS overturns the 9th Circuit 7-2, saying the asylum ban could go into effect..BDKJMU wrote:Partial win for Tump on barring asylum seekers in the U.S. if they first passed through another nation without seeking protection:
“A federal appeals court on Friday handed the Trump administration a partial victory in its quest for an asylum ban, appearing to clear the way for imposing it along the border in New Mexico and Texas, at least temporarily.
While the three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit upheld a lower court's decision to block the ban, it narrowed the nationwide injunction to the 9th Circuit, which encompasses district courts in the border states of Arizona and California....”
https://www.politico.com/amp/story/2019 ... p-1667003P
Good. A single circuit judge shouldn’t be able to issue a nationwide injunction- the injunction should be limited to his/her circuit. A say single 9th Circuit Judge shouldn’t be able to issue an injunction that rules on what can happen in say the 5th Circuit, without a single 5th Circuit nudge having the opportunity to overturn the injunction applying in the 5th Circuit.
https://reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKCN1VW2U4
What do you expect from the Wise Latina?CID1990 wrote:Sotomayor's dissent is full of emotion and "this is not how it's done" SJW language but curiously free of actual legal opinionBDKJMU wrote: And SCOTUS overturns the 9th Circuit 7-2, saying the asylum ban could go into effect..
https://reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKCN1VW2U4
SeattleGriz wrote:More flexibility to lead from behind. Obama was feckless.AZGrizFan wrote:
I'll have more flexibility after the election.
I'll go with just feckless. Could care less about him being black. If you were to ask me what item I most disliked about Obama? He didn't appear to like America much.houndawg wrote:SeattleGriz wrote:
More flexibility to lead from behind. Obama was feckless.
Feckless and Black....and not a day goes by when you don't think about it
You're out of step with your ilk.SeattleGriz wrote:I'll go with just feckless. Could care less about him being black. If you were to ask me what item I most disliked about Obama? He didn't appear to like America much.houndawg wrote:
Feckless and Black....and not a day goes by when you don't think about it
I liked Obama outside of the fact he was a total douche.houndawg wrote:You're out of step with your ilk.SeattleGriz wrote:
I'll go with just feckless. Could care less about him being black. If you were to ask me what item I most disliked about Obama? He didn't appear to like America much.
It was the tan suit.
houndawg wrote:You're out of step with your ilk.SeattleGriz wrote:
I'll go with just feckless. Could care less about him being black. If you were to ask me what item I most disliked about Obama? He didn't appear to like America much.
It was the tan suit.
I actually liked the tan suit.
I disagree with his philosophy of government. But he is a FAR more honorable man than Trump is.css75 wrote:I liked Obama outside of the fact he was a total douche.houndawg wrote:
You're out of step with your ilk.
It was the tan suit.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Right now today he still draws bigger crowds than Trump can hire.JohnStOnge wrote:I disagree with his philosophy of government. But he is a FAR more honorable man than Trump is.css75 wrote:
I liked Obama outside of the fact he was a total douche.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Yeah, but you see Obama's a douche 'cause he's a well-educated, well-spoken, family-oriented man.houndawg wrote:Right now today he still draws bigger crowds than Trump can hire.JohnStOnge wrote:
I disagree with his philosophy of government. But he is a FAR more honorable man than Trump is.
Obama was just one big ass disappointment. All the nice talk and optics mean nothing if your policies don't benefit the average American...∞∞∞ wrote:Yeah, but you see Obama's a douche 'cause he's a well-educated, well-spoken, family-oriented man.houndawg wrote:
Right now today he still draws bigger crowds than Trump can hire.
Can't have people like that as President.
Agree. GOP should be doing nothing but touting the economy and how POC's have greatly benefited from it. Nobody cares about debt aside from politicos grandstanding on that issue.Skjellyfetti wrote:
Yeah, but you see Obama's a douche 'cause he's a well-educated, well-spoken, family-oriented man.∞∞∞ wrote:houndawg wrote:
Right now today he still draws bigger crowds than Trump can hire.
css75 wrote:Yeah, but you see Obama's a douche 'cause he's a well-educated, well-spoken, family-oriented man.∞∞∞ wrote:
Can't have people like that as President.[/quot
.Such an honorable man
“If you like your doctor you can keep your doctor.”
“If I had a son, he would be like Treyvon Martin.”
When Kris Kyle died he never acknowledged it
When Whitney Houston died he ordered flags at half mast.
More if you want them.
He could have healed racial tension, instead he made it the worst since the 60s.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
I was watching some guy ripping Trump on MSNBC last week on this. He pointed to the comment that was made by the Admin that the cars would be less safe. He said, "I don't even know what that means", while laughing.Pwns wrote:https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics ... ar-AAHrjFQ
Seeing some people on the right complain about this, but the alternative is that California basically gets to set the standards for the whole country, in which case why even have federal agencies to oversee this?
See what happened with California's goofy gas cans that you need 3 hands to use.
That's typical politics right there. It's not hard to understand that the weight of the vehicle and fuel mileage are tied to each other. And that lighter cars are less safe. 
It's cute how you still think Trump is capable of doing something not entirely neurotic and myopic...CID1990 wrote:Well well
https://thehill.com/policy/internationa ... -sanctions
So Iran has a temper tantrum, pirating ships, shooting down drones, and even attacking Saudi Arabia.... because they were counting on France, Germany, and the UK to continue to support the original “deal”.
Then after the attack on the Saudi oil facilities, France Germany and the UK issue statements that Iran was responsible
Suddenly Iran is singing a different tune. They grossly miscalculated and vaulted themselves right back into pariah status overnight
Trump should demand they enter into treaty negotiations and make it clear that sanctions relief is dependent on the signing of a nuclear nonproliferation treaty. Doubtful that he will, because he’ll want a quick “win”, and of course he likes “deals” too.... but if Lindsey has any juice at all with Trump he should be pushing this
I agree that Trump is neurotic, myopic and a number of other things but where would we likely be with Hillary or someone else as POTUS? My guess is either capitulating in hopes of convincing Iran to settle down or raising the alarm and sending in the __th Fleet and racheting up the tensions and likelihood of an actual conflict. I'll take Trump's lack of follow through over either of those and I don't care if his business interests are what drives his administration in the right direction.Chizzang wrote:It's cute how you still think Trump is capable of doing something not entirely neurotic and myopic...CID1990 wrote:Well well
https://thehill.com/policy/internationa ... -sanctions
So Iran has a temper tantrum, pirating ships, shooting down drones, and even attacking Saudi Arabia.... because they were counting on France, Germany, and the UK to continue to support the original “deal”.
Then after the attack on the Saudi oil facilities, France Germany and the UK issue statements that Iran was responsible
Suddenly Iran is singing a different tune. They grossly miscalculated and vaulted themselves right back into pariah status overnight
Trump should demand they enter into treaty negotiations and make it clear that sanctions relief is dependent on the signing of a nuclear nonproliferation treaty. Doubtful that he will, because he’ll want a quick “win”, and of course he likes “deals” too.... but if Lindsey has any juice at all with Trump he should be pushing this
meanwhile:
Trumps headed to a rally in the midwest where he can talk about himself
