The Trump Whistleblower Extravaganza Thread

[houndawg]

I'm sorry you weren't included - here why don't you tell us a story about your successful classmates, Ivytwat.

Only if you tell us stories about your time in NorCal hanging out with the transvestite hooker who you thought was Nancy Pelosi.



Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk

I never thought she was Nancy P - hell, she was 6'1"

[UNI88]

Only if you tell us stories about your time in NorCal hanging out with the transvestite hooker who you thought was Nancy Pelosi.



Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk

What do you do in Iowa during the long winter?

Slow and no sense of humor?

I give Houndy lots of crap but he knows how to take it and dish it back.

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk

[CAA Flagship]

I give Houndy lots of crap but he knows how to take it and dish it back.

[Ivytalk]

I'm sorry you weren't included - here why don't you tell us a story about your successful classmates, Ivytwat.

Burn!

That’s all he’s got: low-information, one-line soundbites from the stupidest part of the most corrupt state in the nation.

[kalm]

Burn!

That’s all he’s got: low-information, one-line soundbites from the stupidest part of the most corrupt state in the nation.

Wait...Houndy is from SE Texas?

[Ivytalk]

That’s all he’s got: low-information, one-line soundbites from the stupidest part of the most corrupt state in the nation.

Wait...Houndy is from SE Texas?

Texas is the Vatican compared to Illinois

[CID1990]

Burn!

That’s all he’s got: low-information, one-line soundbites from the stupidest part of the most corrupt state in the nation.

I flew over Illinois prior to landing in Chicago this weekend.

I took a picture and I'll post it later. I wanted to ask HD which silo was his

[houndawg]

Burn!

That’s all he’s got: low-information, one-line soundbites from the stupidest part of the most corrupt state in the nation.

Is somebody experiencing that not-so-fresh feeling....?

[houndawg]

That’s all he’s got: low-information, one-line soundbites from the stupidest part of the most corrupt state in the nation.

Wait...Houndy is from SE Texas?

[kalm]

This Doug Collins from Georgia is an impressive orator.

[kalm]

It’s also fun seeing Mr. Johnson from Guam er I mean Georgia in the roll calls votes.

[kalm]

Ooops! Nunes didn't like this question. Why was he chummy with Paranas?

I know it's a shocker, but they are all crooked. Bidens probably too.

https://theintercept.com/2019/12/08/nrc ... ev-parnas/

[Ivytalk]

Ooops! Nunes didn't like this question. Why was he chummy with Paranas?

I know it's a shocker, but they are all crooked. Bidens probably too.

https://theintercept.com/2019/12/08/nrc ... ev-parnas/

Nobody likes piranhas.

[Skjellyfetti]

Hoodwinked by Fraud Guarantee...

[Col Hogan]

Rep. Jeff Van Drew, one of two House Democrats who do not support articles of impeachment against President Trump, is likely to switch parties.

“Several high-level sources with ties to Van Drew” said his chief of staff has notified the lawmaker’s campaign and congressional staffs that he’s switching to the GOP, the New Jersey Globe reported Saturday.

A representative for Van Drew has not yet returned a request for comment from the Washington Examiner.

Van Drew was elected in 2018 to fill the seat held for more than two decades by Republican Frank LoBiondo, who retired.

Van Drew was facing a difficult reelection bid. His seat was rated “toss-up” by many election analysts, and in addition, liberal Democrats were threatening to challenge him in a primary due to his opposition to impeachment.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news ... ch-parties

[Ibanez]

So he’s switching to retain his seat. What a man of principle.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[kalm]

Rep. Jeff Van Drew, one of two House Democrats who do not support articles of impeachment against President Trump, is likely to switch parties.

“Several high-level sources with ties to Van Drew” said his chief of staff has notified the lawmaker’s campaign and congressional staffs that he’s switching to the GOP, the New Jersey Globe reported Saturday.

A representative for Van Drew has not yet returned a request for comment from the Washington Examiner.

Van Drew was elected in 2018 to fill the seat held for more than two decades by Republican Frank LoBiondo, who retired.

Van Drew was facing a difficult reelection bid. His seat was rated “toss-up” by many election analysts, and in addition, liberal Democrats were threatening to challenge him in a primary due to his opposition to impeachment.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news ... ch-parties

There's a battle brewing in the Democratic Party between the Republocrats and progressives. The establishment is relying on corporate money but the insurgents seem to be organizing. It will be interesting to see what if anything comes of it and whether there are more defections.

[CAA Flagship]

Yeah, I don't know what to think about this. A person gets voted in to represent the local views and/or follow the party lines. It seems switching parties is a bit extreme. Going independent seems to be a more practical approach so that you can truly sort through the legislative decisions that best suit the people that put you there. As an incumbent, you can let your voting record speak for itself when it comes to re-election. But if you need the financial backing of a major party, make the full conversion at the next election.

[HI54UNI]

If you want to switch parties I think you should do what Phil Gramm did. Immediately resign and run for re-election as the candidate of your new party.

[WWII]

Yeah, I don't know what to think about this. A person gets voted in to represent the local views and/or follow the party lines. It seems switching parties is a bit extreme. Going independent seems to be a more practical approach so that you can truly sort through the legislative decisions that best suit the people that put you there. As an incumbent, you can let your voting record speak for itself when it comes to re-election. But if you need the financial backing of a major party, make the full conversion at the next election.

It seems lately the Democratic party is leaving many of the voters. I just can't believe that a large contingent of democrats can be happy with the lurch to the left that the party has taken.

[kalm]

Yeah, I don't know what to think about this. A person gets voted in to represent the local views and/or follow the party lines. It seems switching parties is a bit extreme. Going independent seems to be a more practical approach so that you can truly sort through the legislative decisions that best suit the people that put you there. As an incumbent, you can let your voting record speak for itself when it comes to re-election. But if you need the financial backing of a major party, make the full conversion at the next election.

It seems lately the Democratic party is leaving many of the voters. I just can't believe that a large contingent of democrats can be happy with the lurch to the left that the party has taken.

The party needs to go further left regarding money in politics and economics.

[UNI88]

It seems lately the Democratic party is leaving many of the voters. I just can't believe that a large contingent of democrats can be happy with the lurch to the left that the party has taken.

The party needs to go further left regarding money in politics and economics.

A true progressive would be against insidious influence not just money.

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk

[kalm]

The party needs to go further left regarding money in politics and economics.

A true progressive would be against insidious influence not just money.

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk

I’m a kalmunist...but go ahead....insidious influence?

[UNI88]

A true progressive would be against insidious influence not just money.

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk

I’m a kalmunist...but go ahead....insidious influence?

The influence of public sector unions is just as insidious as corporate money.

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk

[kalm]

I’m a kalmunist...but go ahead....insidious influence?

The influence of public sector unions is just as insidious as corporate money.

Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk

I've always agreed with this, but I'm guessing the amount ($'s) is less considering 7% of non public workers are represented now. But you'll find that the progressives in the party are in favor of getting all money including union money out of politics.