Greta Meme

[kalm]

"Hide behind her"? Is that like Trump hiding out on Twitter disparaging a 16 year old for receiving the same honor that he received 3 years earlier?

I'd say that YOU and your buddies hide behind Trump....in fact, the entire GOP does.

If you don’t defend the Climate Strike manifesto and just whine about the Cheeto twitting about her then you are hiding behind her

I’ll wait


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I googled Climate Strike Manifesto and couldn’t even find it after a short search. Just some articles from right wing sites, and a Guardian piece.

Please post it for my review.

Thanks.

[CID1990]

If you don’t defend the Climate Strike manifesto and just whine about the Cheeto twitting about her then you are hiding behind her

I’ll wait


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I googled Climate Strike Manifesto and couldn’t even find it after a short search. Just some articles from right wing sites, and a Guardian piece.

Please post it for my review.

Thanks.

Well klam

Let me help you

Google “climate strike”

Then click on their actual website (that wasnt so hard, was it?)

Now remember, these are hardcore “democratic” socialists who are still at least pretending to want to do this democratically

so their demands sound sugary sweet. You’re predisposed to being easily fooled so I’ll warn you ahead of time that the devil is in the details


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[SeattleGriz]

I googled Climate Strike Manifesto and couldn’t even find it after a short search. Just some articles from right wing sites, and a Guardian piece.

Please post it for my review.

Thanks.

Well klam

Let me help you

Google “climate strike”

Then click on their actual website (that wasnt so hard, was it?)

Now remember, these are hardcore “democratic” socialists who are still at least pretending to want to do this democratically

so their demands sound sugary sweet. You’re predisposed to being easily fooled so I’ll warn you ahead of time that the devil is in the details


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Found it! Super easy.

[kalm]

I googled Climate Strike Manifesto and couldn’t even find it after a short search. Just some articles from right wing sites, and a Guardian piece.

Please post it for my review.

Thanks.

Well klam

Let me help you

Google “climate strike”

Then click on their actual website (that wasnt so hard, was it?)

Now remember, these are hardcore “democratic” socialists who are still at least pretending to want to do this democratically

so their demands sound sugary sweet. You’re predisposed to being easily fooled so I’ll warn you ahead of time that the devil is in the details


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Ah...so I shouldn't have used manifesto like you called it.

I'll check out, but if it's anything like what UNI88 posted, those teenagers sound terrifying to be honest.

[CID1990]

Well klam

Let me help you

Google “climate strike”

Then click on their actual website (that wasnt so hard, was it?)

Now remember, these are hardcore “democratic” socialists who are still at least pretending to want to do this democratically

so their demands sound sugary sweet. You’re predisposed to being easily fooled so I’ll warn you ahead of time that the devil is in the details


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Ah...so I shouldn't have used manifesto like you called it.

I'll check out, but if it's anything like what UNI88 posted, those teenagers sound terrifying to be honest.

That’s because like most leftists, you rarely ask yourself what it would take to implement them or what the consequences would be

But you are skirting on the edges of being correct - their demands will never be realized democratically so they really aren’t very scary

The key is to keep them from becoming scary. Ridicule will do for now


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[kalm]

Ah...so I shouldn't have used manifesto like you called it.

I'll check out, but if it's anything like what UNI88 posted, those teenagers sound terrifying to be honest.

That’s because like most leftists, you rarely ask yourself what it would take to implement them or what the consequences would be

But you are skirting on the edges of being correct - their demands will never be realized democratically so they really aren’t very scary

The key is to keep them from becoming scary. Ridicule will do for now


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I don’t skirt the edges. I send it right down the middle. If the sides want any they’ve gotta jump in.

[houndawg]

When a PR stunt goes horribly wrong:

Yeah lol. And why is she not twittering in her native language?

Because she feels like twittering in a different language?

[UNI88]

Ah...so I shouldn't have used manifesto like you called it.

I'll check out, but if it's anything like what UNI88 posted, those teenagers sound terrifying to be honest.

That’s because like most leftists, you rarely ask yourself what it would take to implement them or what the consequences would be

But you are skirting on the edges of being correct - their demands will never be realized democratically so they really aren’t very scary

The key is to keep them from becoming scary. Ridicule will do for now

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The conflicts between many of the "demands" are laughably naive.

Transforming our economy to 100% clean, renewable energy by 2030, banning resource extraction, protecting lands and oceans, welcoming immigrants and moving to sustainable agriculture are noble goals but:

• Are they feasible without increased use of nuclear power?
• Will these changes cost significantly more jobs than they create especially in the short-run?
• Will they increase poverty, hunger and stress on existing programs and infrastructure?
• Why don't they address overpopulation in developing countries?

[AZGrizFan]

That’s because like most leftists, you rarely ask yourself what it would take to implement them or what the consequences would be

But you are skirting on the edges of being correct - their demands will never be realized democratically so they really aren’t very scary

The key is to keep them from becoming scary. Ridicule will do for now

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The conflicts between many of the "demands" are laughably naive.

Transforming our economy to 100% clean, renewable energy by 2030, banning resource extraction, protecting lands and oceans, welcoming immigrants and moving to sustainable agriculture are noble goals but:

• Are they feasible without increased use of nuclear power?
• Will these changes cost significantly more jobs than they create especially in the short-run?
• Will they increase poverty, hunger and stress on existing programs and infrastructure?
• Why don't they address overpopulation in developing countries?

How do you convert to nuclear without first extracting the uranium?
How do you convert to wind without first extracting the steel, copper, etc., that make up the vast majority of the wind turbines?
Etc., etc., etc.,...their stupidity is mindboggling.

[Chizzang]

The conflicts between many of the "demands" are laughably naive.

Transforming our economy to 100% clean, renewable energy by 2030, banning resource extraction, protecting lands and oceans, welcoming immigrants and moving to sustainable agriculture are noble goals but:

• Are they feasible without increased use of nuclear power?
• Will these changes cost significantly more jobs than they create especially in the short-run?
• Will they increase poverty, hunger and stress on existing programs and infrastructure?
• Why don't they address overpopulation in developing countries?

How do you convert to nuclear without first extracting the uranium?
How do you convert to wind without first extracting the steel, copper, etc., that make up the vast majority of the wind turbines?
Etc., etc., etc.,...their stupidity is mindboggling.

Mindboggling..?

It's like watching you lick Trumps balls for the past 2 years
in fact, it's exactly that mindboggling



She means to do the right thing in the worst way possible, Just like Trump
mirror images of each other - and - they are hero's to throngs of idiots

She nicely represents everything that is wrong with the Left
and Trump represents everything that is wrong with the Right
of course they hate each other and their adoring followers hate each other

[CID1990]

Hey - if we get some kind of Green New Deal or Climate Strike's wishes come true, we won't be lambasted for not calling 3rd world countries "developing"

No wonder they want full on open borders... why would anyone want to live in The Congo if they knew for sure it would never be able to industrialize and lift itself out of the iron age?

[kalm]

The conflicts between many of the "demands" are laughably naive.

Transforming our economy to 100% clean, renewable energy by 2030, banning resource extraction, protecting lands and oceans, welcoming immigrants and moving to sustainable agriculture are noble goals but:

• Are they feasible without increased use of nuclear power?
• Will these changes cost significantly more jobs than they create especially in the short-run?
• Will they increase poverty, hunger and stress on existing programs and infrastructure?
• Why don't they address overpopulation in developing countries?

How do you convert to nuclear without first extracting the uranium?
How do you convert to wind without first extracting the steel, copper, etc., that make up the vast majority of the wind turbines?
Etc., etc., etc.,...their stupidity is mindboggling.

But they also plant trees and sing for the planet. Its right there on their homepage!

I can now see why you guys are taking these kids so seriously. They're on to your ways!

[kalm]

Breaking news!

Trump was gonna be POY but turned it down

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/11 ... xcaM5vOcGc

[Ibanez]

How do you convert to nuclear without first extracting the uranium?
How do you convert to wind without first extracting the steel, copper, etc., that make up the vast majority of the wind turbines?
Etc., etc., etc.,...their stupidity is mindboggling.

But they also plant trees and sing for the planet. Its right there on their homepage!

I can now see why you guys are taking these kids so seriously. They're on to your ways!

What else would you expect from Michigan's Man of the Year?

[AZGrizFan]

How do you convert to nuclear without first extracting the uranium?
How do you convert to wind without first extracting the steel, copper, etc., that make up the vast majority of the wind turbines?
Etc., etc., etc.,...their stupidity is mindboggling.

Mindboggling..?

It's like watching you lick Trumps balls for the past 2 years
in fact, it's exactly that mindboggling



She means to do the right thing in the worst way possible, Just like Trump
mirror images of each other - and - they are hero's to throngs of idiots

She nicely represents everything that is wrong with the Left
and Trump represents everything that is wrong with the Right
of course they hate each other and their adoring followers hate each other

You should learn to read deeper.

[89Hen]

Consider yourself one of the folks I mentioned.

I did...and it's still funny. It's ok if you don't understand why.

I understand what you think is why, and it's not funny or accurate.

[kalm]

I did...and it's still funny. It's ok if you don't understand why.

I understand what you think is why, and it's not funny or accurate.

It’s ok, Hen. Both sides are hypocritical.

[89Hen]

I understand what you think is why, and it's not funny or accurate.

It’s ok, Hen. Both sides are hypocritical.

They are, but that's a non sequitur here.

[Chizzang]

I understand what you think is why, and it's not funny or accurate.

It’s ok, Hen. Both sides are hypocritical.

Was it Hitchens that said:
"a key element required to be Christian is a complete lack of understanding of hypocrisy"

[89Hen]

Holy moving targets. What do you want to talk about next, my favorite color?

[kalm]

It’s ok, Hen. Both sides are hypocritical.

Was it Hitchens that said:
"a key element required to be Christian is a complete lack of understanding of hypocrisy"

[kalm]

It’s ok, Hen. Both sides are hypocritical.

They are, but that's a non sequitur here.

[89Hen]

They are, but that's a non sequitur here.

It's ok if you don't understand why.

[kalm]

It's ok if you don't understand why.

Explain how it's a non-sequitur.

[89Hen]

It's ok if you don't understand why.

Explain how it's a non-sequitur.

I find the irony and whiff of this comment delicious.